Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Public Health | Protocol

Public sector implementation strategies to approach the judicialization of health care: a systematic review protocol

Authors: Sueli Miyuki Yamauti, Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto, Silvio Barberato-Filho, Fernanda Lacerda da Silva Machado, Luciane Cruz Lopes

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The judicialization of health care can be understood as a societal response to pressing healthcare needs, which probably are not being adequately addressed by the current healthcare system. This phenomenon increases the strain on service resources, both in the health sector and in the judiciary system as well, demanding an institutional reorganization to manage judicial actions. It is believed that each institution has developed strategies for coping with the problem in isolation and with little public disclosure. The purpose of this review will be to identify institutional strategies implemented and to investigate their effects in approaching the judicialization of health care.

Methods

Electronic searches will be conducted up to December 2021 on 11 databases, supplemented with gray literature and references lists of secondary studies. The descriptor “judicialization of health” will be the basis for conducting the main research. Studies describing any strategy implemented by public institutions to approach the judicialization of health care will be included. Results related to the quality of services provided by the implemented strategy reported in the studies and those that report accessibility, usability, and potential adverse effects or harms caused by the implemented strategy will be investigated. In addition, it will be explored if there have been changes related to the value or characteristics of health litigation. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, abstract data, and full-text papers. The risk of bias in each study will be appraised using a tool suggested by Cochrane Effective Practice and Care Organization Group (EPOC). Subsequently, the reviewers will also extract the data of interest and classify the findings of these studies according to their performance at the institutional level. The results obtained will be described as a narrative synthesis.

Discussion

This review may provide evidence on the effects of the strategies implemented to approach the judicialization of health care. It will potentially benefit health care and legal professionals, decision-makers, and researchers by identifying the types and characteristics of strategies that have the potential to improve service delivery in the future.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42020160608
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Thesis Gelis-Filho A. Sistemas de saúde e constituição: análise da relação entre a presença de proteção constitucional do direito à saúde e mortalidade infantil em 112 países. Administração Hospitalar e Gestão de Sistemas de Saúde. São Paulo: Fundação Getúlio Vargas - Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo; 2005. https://gvsaude.fgv.br/sites/gvsaude.fgv.br/files/t1.pdf. Accessed 6 ago 2022. Thesis Gelis-Filho A. Sistemas de saúde e constituição: análise da relação entre a presença de proteção constitucional do direito à saúde e mortalidade infantil em 112 países. Administração Hospitalar e Gestão de Sistemas de Saúde. São Paulo: Fundação Getúlio Vargas - Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo; 2005. https://​gvsaude.​fgv.​br/​sites/​gvsaude.​fgv.​br/​files/​t1.​pdf. Accessed 6 ago 2022.
4.
go back to reference Panerai RB, Peña-Mohr J. Health technology assessment methodologies for developing countries. Washington: Pan-American Health Organization; 1989. Panerai RB, Peña-Mohr J. Health technology assessment methodologies for developing countries. Washington: Pan-American Health Organization; 1989.
16.
go back to reference Asensi FD, Pinheiro R. Judicialização da saúde no Brasil: dados e experiência. Brasília: Conselho Nacional Justiça; 2015. Asensi FD, Pinheiro R. Judicialização da saúde no Brasil: dados e experiência. Brasília: Conselho Nacional Justiça; 2015.
17.
go back to reference Yamauti SM. Estratégias implementadas em instituições públicas brasileiras para abordar a judicialização da saúde. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas. Sorocaba: Universidade de Sorocaba; 2020. Yamauti SM. Estratégias implementadas em instituições públicas brasileiras para abordar a judicialização da saúde. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas. Sorocaba: Universidade de Sorocaba; 2020.
18.
go back to reference Biehl J, Socal MP, Amon JJ. The judicialization of health and the quest for state accountability: evidence from 1,262 lawsuits for access to medicines in southern Brazil. Health Hum Rights. 2016;18(1):209–20.PubMedPubMedCentral Biehl J, Socal MP, Amon JJ. The judicialization of health and the quest for state accountability: evidence from 1,262 lawsuits for access to medicines in southern Brazil. Health Hum Rights. 2016;18(1):209–20.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Wildridge V, Bell L. How CLIP became ECLIPSE: a mnemonic to assist in searching for health policy/management information. Health Inform Lib J. 2002;19:113–5.CrossRef Wildridge V, Bell L. How CLIP became ECLIPSE: a mnemonic to assist in searching for health policy/management information. Health Inform Lib J. 2002;19:113–5.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kavanagh J, Oliver S, Lorenc T. Reflections on developing and using PROGRESS-Plus. Equity Update. 2008;2(1):1–3. Kavanagh J, Oliver S, Lorenc T. Reflections on developing and using PROGRESS-Plus. Equity Update. 2008;2(1):1–3.
26.
go back to reference Oliver S, Kavanagh J, Caird J, et al. Health promotion, inequalities and young people’s health: a systematic review of research. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2008. Oliver S, Kavanagh J, Caird J, et al. Health promotion, inequalities and young people’s health: a systematic review of research. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London; 2008.
27.
go back to reference Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information (BIREME). Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS/MeSH). 2021. http://decs.bvs.br/. Accessed 4 Nov 2021. Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PAHO/WHO), Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information (BIREME). Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS/MeSH). 2021. http://​decs.​bvs.​br/​. Accessed 4 Nov 2021.
30.
go back to reference Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ. 2020;368:l6890.CrossRef Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ. 2020;368:l6890.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. Swindon: ESRC Methods Programme; 2006. Popay J, Roberts H, Sowden A, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. Swindon: ESRC Methods Programme; 2006.
32.
go back to reference Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP). Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(Suppl 1):I1.CrossRef Lavis JN, Oxman AD, Lewin S, Fretheim A. SUPPORT tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (STP). Health Res Policy Syst. 2009;7(Suppl 1):I1.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Public sector implementation strategies to approach the judicialization of health care: a systematic review protocol
Authors
Sueli Miyuki Yamauti
Jorge Otávio Maia Barreto
Silvio Barberato-Filho
Fernanda Lacerda da Silva Machado
Luciane Cruz Lopes
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02043-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Systematic Reviews 1/2022 Go to the issue