Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy 4/2019

01-12-2019 | Psychotherapy | Editorial

“The Nominees for Best Article …”: Awards for the Most Valuable Papers on Psychotherapy in 2018

Author: James C. Overholser

Published in: Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Each year, many important articles are published that make valuable contributions to the field of psychotherapy. It is helpful to remain informed about recent developments in the field, and respect the useful refinements that are being proposed in various journal articles. Unfortunately, with so many journals in the field, it can be challenging to find the best articles, and some important papers may be overlooked. In recent years, the situation has become even worse with the expansion of many new and often predatory journals, publishing inferior papers. The Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy awards program has two main goals. First, the review of the recent literature helps to highlight the useful papers published during the previous year. Second, the awards program helps to praise the best and inspire the rest, aiming to motivate the field to publish high quality papers. The awards selection process involved a review of numerous academic articles published during 2018 in 60 different professional journals. Then, a panel of judges reviewed 52 finalists for ten possible awards. Adequate agreement was found to provide awards for nine different categories of research studies or review articles. Each winning paper is reviewed, and most authors provide a behind-the-scenes look at the work involved in their valuable contribution to the field of psychotherapy.
Literature
go back to reference Brady, J. P., Davison, G., Dewald, P., Egan, G., Fadiman, J., Frank, J. D., et al. (1980). Some views on effective principles of psychotherapy. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 4, 271–306.CrossRef Brady, J. P., Davison, G., Dewald, P., Egan, G., Fadiman, J., Frank, J. D., et al. (1980). Some views on effective principles of psychotherapy. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 4, 271–306.CrossRef
go back to reference Cornelius-White, J., Kanamori, Y., Murphy, D., & Tickle, E. (2018). Mutuality in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 28(4), 489–504.CrossRef Cornelius-White, J., Kanamori, Y., Murphy, D., & Tickle, E. (2018). Mutuality in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 28(4), 489–504.CrossRef
go back to reference Farber, B., Suzuki, J., & Lynch, D. (2018). Positive regard and psychotherapy outcome: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 411–423.CrossRef Farber, B., Suzuki, J., & Lynch, D. (2018). Positive regard and psychotherapy outcome: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 411–423.CrossRef
go back to reference Fluckiger, C., DelRe, A., Wampold, B., & Horvath, A. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 316–340.CrossRef Fluckiger, C., DelRe, A., Wampold, B., & Horvath, A. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 316–340.CrossRef
go back to reference Jennissen, S., Huber, J., Ehrenthal, J., Schauenberg, H., & Dinger, U. (2018). Association between insight and outcome of psychotherapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 175(10), 961–969.CrossRef Jennissen, S., Huber, J., Ehrenthal, J., Schauenberg, H., & Dinger, U. (2018). Association between insight and outcome of psychotherapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 175(10), 961–969.CrossRef
go back to reference Kolden, G., Wang, C., Austin, S., Chang, Y., & Klein, M. (2018). Congruence/genuineness: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 424–433.CrossRef Kolden, G., Wang, C., Austin, S., Chang, Y., & Klein, M. (2018). Congruence/genuineness: A meta-analysis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 424–433.CrossRef
go back to reference Overholser, J. C. (2007). The Boulder model in academia: Struggling to integrate the science and practice of psychology. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 37, 205–211.CrossRef Overholser, J. C. (2007). The Boulder model in academia: Struggling to integrate the science and practice of psychology. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 37, 205–211.CrossRef
go back to reference Overholser, J. C. (2010). Ten criteria to qualify as a scientist-practitioner in clinical psychology: An immodest proposal for objective standards. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40, 51–59.CrossRef Overholser, J. C. (2010). Ten criteria to qualify as a scientist-practitioner in clinical psychology: An immodest proposal for objective standards. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 40, 51–59.CrossRef
go back to reference Shedler, J. (2018). Where is the evidence for “Evidence-Based” Therapy? Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 41, 319–329.CrossRef Shedler, J. (2018). Where is the evidence for “Evidence-Based” Therapy? Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 41, 319–329.CrossRef
go back to reference Wright, S., Breier, J., Depner, R., Grant, P., & Lodi-Smith, J. (2018). Wisdom at the end of life: Hospice patients’ reflections on the meaning of life and death. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 31(2), 162–185.CrossRef Wright, S., Breier, J., Depner, R., Grant, P., & Lodi-Smith, J. (2018). Wisdom at the end of life: Hospice patients’ reflections on the meaning of life and death. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 31(2), 162–185.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
“The Nominees for Best Article …”: Awards for the Most Valuable Papers on Psychotherapy in 2018
Author
James C. Overholser
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Psychotherapy
Published in
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0022-0116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3564
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-019-09433-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy 4/2019 Go to the issue