Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire—short form in cancer patients: a Bayesian structural equation modeling approach

Authors: Ted C. T. Fong, Adrian H. Y. Wan, Venus P. Y. Wong, Rainbow T. H. Ho

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Mindfulness has emerged as an important correlate of well-being in various clinical populations. The present study evaluated the psychometric properties of the 20-item short form of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-SF) in the Chinese context.

Methods

The study sample was 127 Chinese colorectal cancer patients who completed the FFMQ-SF and validated physical and mental health measures. Factorial validity of the FFMQ-SF was assessed using Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM) via informative priors on cross-loadings and residual covariances. Linear regression analysis examined its convergent validity with the health measures on imputed datasets.

Results

The five-factor BSEM model with approximate zero cross-loadings and one residual covariance provided an adequate model fit (PPP = 0.07, RMSEA = 0.06, CFI = 0.95). Satisfactory reliability (ω = 0.77–0.85) was found in four of the five facets (except nonjudging). Acting with awareness predicted lower levels of perceived stress, negative affect, anxiety, depression, and illness symptoms (β = − 0.37 to − 0.42) and better quality of life (β = 0.29–0.32). Observing, nonjudging, and nonreacting did not show any significant associations (p > .05) with health measures. Acting with awareness was not significantly correlated (r < 0.15) with the other four facets.

Conclusion

The present findings provide partial support for the psychometric properties of the FFMQ-SF in colorectal cancer patients. The nonjudging facet showed questionable validity and reliability in the present sample. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to elucidate the viability of FFMQ-SF as a measure of mindfulness facets in cancer patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Zhang B, Xie S-H, Yu IT-S. Differential incidence trends of colon and rectal cancers in Hong Kong: an age-period-cohort analysis. Cancer Commun. 2018;38:42.CrossRef Zhang B, Xie S-H, Yu IT-S. Differential incidence trends of colon and rectal cancers in Hong Kong: an age-period-cohort analysis. Cancer Commun. 2018;38:42.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Carlson LE. Mindfulness-based interventions for coping with cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1373:5–12.PubMedCrossRef Carlson LE. Mindfulness-based interventions for coping with cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1373:5–12.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2003;10:144–56.CrossRef Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2003;10:144–56.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Khoury B, Lecomte T, Fortin G, Masse M, Therien P, Bouchard V, Chapleau M-A, Paquin K, Hofmann SG. Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33:763–71.PubMedCrossRef Khoury B, Lecomte T, Fortin G, Masse M, Therien P, Bouchard V, Chapleau M-A, Paquin K, Hofmann SG. Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33:763–71.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ledesma D, Kumano H. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and cancer: a meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncology. 2009;18:571–9.PubMedCrossRef Ledesma D, Kumano H. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and cancer: a meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncology. 2009;18:571–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Johns SA, Von Ah D, Brown LF, Beck-Coon K, Talib TL, Alyea JM, Monahan PO, Tong Y, Wilhelm L, Giesler RB. Randomized controlled pilot trial of mindfulness-based stress reduction for breast and colorectal cancer survivors: effects on cancer-related cognitive impairment. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10:437–48.PubMedCrossRef Johns SA, Von Ah D, Brown LF, Beck-Coon K, Talib TL, Alyea JM, Monahan PO, Tong Y, Wilhelm L, Giesler RB. Randomized controlled pilot trial of mindfulness-based stress reduction for breast and colorectal cancer survivors: effects on cancer-related cognitive impairment. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10:437–48.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Carlson LE, Beattie TL, Giese-Davis J, Faris P, Tamagawa R, Fick LJ, Degelman ES, Speca M. Mindfulness-based cancer recovery and supportive-expressive therapy maintain telomere length relative to controls in distressed breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2015;121:476–84.PubMedCrossRef Carlson LE, Beattie TL, Giese-Davis J, Faris P, Tamagawa R, Fick LJ, Degelman ES, Speca M. Mindfulness-based cancer recovery and supportive-expressive therapy maintain telomere length relative to controls in distressed breast cancer survivors. Cancer. 2015;121:476–84.PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Bergomi C, Tschacher W, Kupper Z. The assessment of mindfulness with self-report measures: existing scales and open issues. Mindfulness. 2013;4:191–202. CrossRef Bergomi C, Tschacher W, Kupper Z. The assessment of mindfulness with self-report measures: existing scales and open issues. Mindfulness. 2013;4:191–202. CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Baer RA, Smith GT, Allen KB. Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment. 2004;11:191–206.PubMedCrossRef Baer RA, Smith GT, Allen KB. Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment. 2004;11:191–206.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Carlson LE, Brown KW. Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in a cancer population. J Psychosom Res. 2005;58:29–33.PubMedCrossRef Carlson LE, Brown KW. Validation of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in a cancer population. J Psychosom Res. 2005;58:29–33.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Walach H, Buchheld N, Buttenmüller V, Kleinknecht N, Schmidt S. Measuring mindfulness—the Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI). Personal Individ Differ. 2006;40:1543–55.CrossRef Walach H, Buchheld N, Buttenmüller V, Kleinknecht N, Schmidt S. Measuring mindfulness—the Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI). Personal Individ Differ. 2006;40:1543–55.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Feldman G, Hayes A, Kumar S, Greeson J, Laurenceau J-P. Mindfulness and emotion regulation: the development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2007;29:177.CrossRef Feldman G, Hayes A, Kumar S, Greeson J, Laurenceau J-P. Mindfulness and emotion regulation: the development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2007;29:177.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chadwick P, Hember M, Symes J, Peters E, Kuipers E, Dagnan D. Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ). Br J Clin Psychol. 2008;47:451–5.PubMedCrossRef Chadwick P, Hember M, Symes J, Peters E, Kuipers E, Dagnan D. Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ). Br J Clin Psychol. 2008;47:451–5.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment. 2006;13:27–45.PubMedCrossRef Baer RA, Smith GT, Hopkins J, Krietemeyer J, Toney L. Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment. 2006;13:27–45.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Park T, Reilly-Spong M, Gross CR. Mindfulness: a systematic review of instruments to measure an emergent patient-reported outcome (PRO). Qual Life Res. 2013;22:2639–59.PubMedCrossRef Park T, Reilly-Spong M, Gross CR. Mindfulness: a systematic review of instruments to measure an emergent patient-reported outcome (PRO). Qual Life Res. 2013;22:2639–59.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hou J, Wong SY-S, Lo HH-M, Mak WW-S, Ma HS-W. Validation of a Chinese version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Hong Kong and development of a short form. Assessment. 2014;21:363–71.PubMedCrossRef Hou J, Wong SY-S, Lo HH-M, Mak WW-S, Ma HS-W. Validation of a Chinese version of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Hong Kong and development of a short form. Assessment. 2014;21:363–71.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bohlmeijer E, Ten Klooster PM, Fledderus M, Veehof M, Baer RA. Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment. 2011;18:308–20.PubMedCrossRef Bohlmeijer E, Ten Klooster PM, Fledderus M, Veehof M, Baer RA. Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form. Assessment. 2011;18:308–20.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Williams MJ, Dalgleish T, Karl A, Kuyken W. Examining the factor structures of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire and the self-compassion scale. Psychol Assess. 2014;26:407–18.PubMedCrossRef Williams MJ, Dalgleish T, Karl A, Kuyken W. Examining the factor structures of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire and the self-compassion scale. Psychol Assess. 2014;26:407–18.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Baer RA, Smith GT, Lykins E, Button D, Krietemeyer J, Sauer S, Walsh E, Duggan D, Williams JMG. Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment. 2008;15:329–42.CrossRefPubMed Baer RA, Smith GT, Lykins E, Button D, Krietemeyer J, Sauer S, Walsh E, Duggan D, Williams JMG. Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment. 2008;15:329–42.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Deng Y-Q, Liu X-H, Rodriguez MA, Xia C-Y. The five facet mindfulness questionnaire: psychometric properties of the Chinese version. Mindfulness. 2011;2:123–8.CrossRef Deng Y-Q, Liu X-H, Rodriguez MA, Xia C-Y. The five facet mindfulness questionnaire: psychometric properties of the Chinese version. Mindfulness. 2011;2:123–8.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Asensio-Martínez Á, Masluk B, Montero-Marin J, Olivan-Blázquez B, Navarro-Gil MT, García-Campayo J, Magallón-Botaya R. Validation of Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire—short form, in Spanish, general health care services patients sample: prediction of depression through mindfulness scale. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0214503.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Asensio-Martínez Á, Masluk B, Montero-Marin J, Olivan-Blázquez B, Navarro-Gil MT, García-Campayo J, Magallón-Botaya R. Validation of Five Facets Mindfulness Questionnaire—short form, in Spanish, general health care services patients sample: prediction of depression through mindfulness scale. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0214503.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Oñate L, Calvete E. Adaptation of the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form to Spanish family caregivers of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Ann Psychol. 2018;34:305–13. Oñate L, Calvete E. Adaptation of the Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire-Short Form to Spanish family caregivers of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Ann Psychol. 2018;34:305–13.
26.
go back to reference Medvedev ON, Titkova EA, Siegert RJ, Hwang Y-S, Krägeloh CU. Evaluating short versions of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. Mindfulness. 2018;9:1411–22.CrossRef Medvedev ON, Titkova EA, Siegert RJ, Hwang Y-S, Krägeloh CU. Evaluating short versions of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire using Rasch analysis. Mindfulness. 2018;9:1411–22.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Laurie K, Hyde MK, Lepore SJ, Chambers SK. Validation of the factor structure of the Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire in men diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2018;27:1061–4.PubMedCrossRef Laurie K, Hyde MK, Lepore SJ, Chambers SK. Validation of the factor structure of the Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire in men diagnosed with advanced prostate cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2018;27:1061–4.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Lilja JL, Falkenström F, Zelleroth C, Jacobson E, Risberg S, Nissling L, Weineland S. Psychometric properties and validation of the Swedish Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in a clinical and non-clinical sample among meditators and non-meditators. Scand J Psychol. 2020;61:369–79.PubMedCrossRef Lilja JL, Falkenström F, Zelleroth C, Jacobson E, Risberg S, Nissling L, Weineland S. Psychometric properties and validation of the Swedish Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in a clinical and non-clinical sample among meditators and non-meditators. Scand J Psychol. 2020;61:369–79.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Aguado J, Luciano JV, Cebolla A, Serrano-Blanco A, Soler J, García-Campayo J. Bifactor analysis and construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ) in non-clinical Spanish samples. Front Psychol. 2015;6:404.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Aguado J, Luciano JV, Cebolla A, Serrano-Blanco A, Soler J, García-Campayo J. Bifactor analysis and construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ) in non-clinical Spanish samples. Front Psychol. 2015;6:404.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Muthén B, Asparouhov T. Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychol Methods. 2012;17:313–35.PubMedCrossRef Muthén B, Asparouhov T. Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory. Psychol Methods. 2012;17:313–35.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Asparouhov T, Muthén B, Morin AJS. Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances: comments on Stromeyer et al. J Manag. 2015;41:1561–77. Asparouhov T, Muthén B, Morin AJS. Bayesian structural equation modeling with cross-loadings and residual covariances: comments on Stromeyer et al. J Manag. 2015;41:1561–77.
32.
go back to reference Asparouhov T, Muthen BO. Bayesian analysis of latent variable models using Mplus (technical report). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen; 2010. Asparouhov T, Muthen BO. Bayesian analysis of latent variable models using Mplus (technical report). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen; 2010.
33.
go back to reference Ng S-m. Validation of the 10-item Chinese perceived stress scale in elderly service workers: one-factor versus two-factor structure. BMC Psychol. 2013;1:9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ng S-m. Validation of the 10-item Chinese perceived stress scale in elderly service workers: one-factor versus two-factor structure. BMC Psychol. 2013;1:9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:385–96.PubMedCrossRef Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:385–96.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Huang L, Yang T, Li Z. Applicability of the positive and negative affect scale in Chinese. Chin Ment Health J. 2003;17:54–6. Huang L, Yang T, Li Z. Applicability of the positive and negative affect scale in Chinese. Chin Ment Health J. 2003;17:54–6.
36.
go back to reference Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063–70.PubMedCrossRef Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063–70.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Fong TCT, Ho RTH. Testing gender invariance of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale using the classical approach and Bayesian approach. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:1421–6.PubMedCrossRef Fong TCT, Ho RTH. Testing gender invariance of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale using the classical approach and Bayesian approach. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:1421–6.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.PubMedCrossRef Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Cheng KK, Wong EM, Ling W, Chan CW, Thompson DR. Measuring the symptom experience of Chinese cancer patients: a validation of the Chinese version of the memorial symptom assessment scale. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2009;37:44–57.CrossRef Cheng KK, Wong EM, Ling W, Chan CW, Thompson DR. Measuring the symptom experience of Chinese cancer patients: a validation of the Chinese version of the memorial symptom assessment scale. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2009;37:44–57.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Kornblith AB, Lepore JM, Friedlanderklar H, Kiyasu E, Sobel K, Coyle N, Kemeny N, Norton L, Scher H. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A:1326–36.PubMedCrossRef Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Kornblith AB, Lepore JM, Friedlanderklar H, Kiyasu E, Sobel K, Coyle N, Kemeny N, Norton L, Scher H. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A:1326–36.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Lam ETP, Lam CLK, Fong DYT, Huang WW. Is the SF-12 version 2 Health Survey a valid and equivalent substitute for the SF-36 version 2 Health Survey for the Chinese? J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19:200–8.PubMedCrossRef Lam ETP, Lam CLK, Fong DYT, Huang WW. Is the SF-12 version 2 Health Survey a valid and equivalent substitute for the SF-36 version 2 Health Survey for the Chinese? J Eval Clin Pract. 2013;19:200–8.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey—construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.PubMedCrossRef Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey—construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Lam CL, Eileen Y, Gandek B. Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population? Qual Life Res. 2005;14:539–47.PubMedCrossRef Lam CL, Eileen Y, Gandek B. Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population? Qual Life Res. 2005;14:539–47.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Lee SY, Song XY. Evaluation of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood approaches in analyzing structural equation models with small sample sizes. Multivar Behav Res. 2004;39:653–86.CrossRef Lee SY, Song XY. Evaluation of the Bayesian and maximum likelihood approaches in analyzing structural equation models with small sample sizes. Multivar Behav Res. 2004;39:653–86.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Muthén B, Asparouhov T. Rejoinder to MacCallum, Edwards, and Cai (2012) and Rindskopf (2012): mastering a new method. Psychol Methods. 2012;17:346–53.CrossRef Muthén B, Asparouhov T. Rejoinder to MacCallum, Edwards, and Cai (2012) and Rindskopf (2012): mastering a new method. Psychol Methods. 2012;17:346–53.CrossRef
46.
go back to reference Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB. Bayesian data analysis. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall; 2014. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB. Bayesian data analysis. 3rd ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall; 2014.
47.
48.
49.
go back to reference Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley; 2014. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley; 2014.
50.
go back to reference Segal ZV, Williams M, Teasdale J. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. New York: Guilford Publications; 2018. Segal ZV, Williams M, Teasdale J. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression. New York: Guilford Publications; 2018.
51.
go back to reference Grossman P. On measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research. J Psychosom Res. 2008;64:405–8.PubMedCrossRef Grossman P. On measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research. J Psychosom Res. 2008;64:405–8.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Van Dam NT, Earleywine M, Danoff-Burg S. Differential item function across meditators and non-meditators on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Personal Individ Differ. 2009;47:516–21.CrossRef Van Dam NT, Earleywine M, Danoff-Burg S. Differential item function across meditators and non-meditators on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. Personal Individ Differ. 2009;47:516–21.CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Goldberg SB, Wielgosz J, Dahl C, Schuyler B, MacCoon DS, Rosenkranz M, Lutz A, Sebranek CA, Davidson RJ. Does the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire measure what we think it does? Construct validity evidence from an active controlled randomized clinical trial. Psychol Assess. 2016;28:1009–14.PubMedCrossRef Goldberg SB, Wielgosz J, Dahl C, Schuyler B, MacCoon DS, Rosenkranz M, Lutz A, Sebranek CA, Davidson RJ. Does the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire measure what we think it does? Construct validity evidence from an active controlled randomized clinical trial. Psychol Assess. 2016;28:1009–14.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Rudkin E, Medvedev ON, Siegert RJ. The Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: why the observing subscale does not predict psychological symptoms. Mindfulness. 2018;9:230–42.CrossRef Rudkin E, Medvedev ON, Siegert RJ. The Five-Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire: why the observing subscale does not predict psychological symptoms. Mindfulness. 2018;9:230–42.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Kakoo E, Ouakinin S, Costa L. Is cancer emotions-free? A study of psychological factors on colorectal cancer patients. Psychother Psychosom. 2013;82:50. Kakoo E, Ouakinin S, Costa L. Is cancer emotions-free? A study of psychological factors on colorectal cancer patients. Psychother Psychosom. 2013;82:50.
56.
go back to reference Tang Y-Y, Hölzel BK, Posner MI. Traits and states in mindfulness meditation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;17:59.PubMedCrossRef Tang Y-Y, Hölzel BK, Posner MI. Traits and states in mindfulness meditation. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2016;17:59.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Hall GC, Hong JJ, Zane NW, Meyer OL. Culturally competent treatments for Asian Americans: the relevance of mindfulness and acceptance-based psychotherapies. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2011;18:215–31.CrossRef Hall GC, Hong JJ, Zane NW, Meyer OL. Culturally competent treatments for Asian Americans: the relevance of mindfulness and acceptance-based psychotherapies. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2011;18:215–31.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Raphiphatthana B, Jose PE, Chobthamkit P. The association between mindfulness and grit: an east vs. west cross-cultural comparison. Mindfulness. 2019;10:146–58.CrossRef Raphiphatthana B, Jose PE, Chobthamkit P. The association between mindfulness and grit: an east vs. west cross-cultural comparison. Mindfulness. 2019;10:146–58.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire—short form in cancer patients: a Bayesian structural equation modeling approach
Authors
Ted C. T. Fong
Adrian H. Y. Wan
Venus P. Y. Wong
Rainbow T. H. Ho
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01692-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2021 Go to the issue