Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2007

01-09-2007

Psychometric Evaluation of Health-Related Work Outcome Measures For Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review

Authors: Renee M. Williams, Gloria Schmuck, Shannon Allwood, Matthew Sanchez, Ryan Shea, Glenn Wark

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 3/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction: This systematic review evaluated the quality of psychometric properties of self-report health-related work outcome measures for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Methods: Electronic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) between 1980 and December 2006 were conducted for peer-reviewed studies that evaluated self-report work outcome measures for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. The eligibility criteria for the papers included in the review were articles that: (1) discussed the psychometric evaluation of a self-reported health-related work outcome measure, (2) were conducted with patients who were diagnosed with musculoskeletal disorders, (3) were written as peer-reviewed full published reports, and (4) were published in English. Three pairs of reviewers used a modified rating form and evaluated the quality of the psychometric properties of the instruments described in the retrieved articles. Results: Of the 740 articles that were identified, six instruments in eight studies met the inclusion criteria. None of the instruments demonstrated satisfactory results for all properties. Overall, the highest quality ratings were given to the Functional Abilities Confidence Scale and the Occupational Role Questionnaire. Conclusions: Although validation studies of self-report health-related work outcome measures for patients with musculoskeletal disorders exist, they appear to be limited in the quality of their psychometric properties. There is a need to continue to validate health-related work outcome measures and to make them more meaningful for patients and clinicians.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Butler, R. J., Johnson, W. G., & Baldwin, M. L. (1995). Managing work disability: Why first return to work is not a measure of success. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 48, 453–469.CrossRef Butler, R. J., Johnson, W. G., & Baldwin, M. L. (1995). Managing work disability: Why first return to work is not a measure of success. Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 48, 453–469.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Brouwer, W. B. F., Koopmanschap, M. A., & Rutten, F. F. H. (1999). Productivity losses without absence: Measurement validation and empirical evidence. Health Policy, 48, 13–27.PubMedCrossRef Brouwer, W. B. F., Koopmanschap, M. A., & Rutten, F. F. H. (1999). Productivity losses without absence: Measurement validation and empirical evidence. Health Policy, 48, 13–27.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stewart, W. F., Ricci, J. A., & Leotta, C. (2004). Health-related lost productive time (LPT): Recall interval and bias in LPT estimates. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46(6 suppl), S12–S22.PubMedCrossRef Stewart, W. F., Ricci, J. A., & Leotta, C. (2004). Health-related lost productive time (LPT): Recall interval and bias in LPT estimates. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46(6 suppl), S12–S22.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Boden, L. I., Biddle, E. A., & Spieler, E. A. (2001). Social and economic impacts of workplace illness and injury: Current and future directions for research. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 40, 398–402.PubMedCrossRef Boden, L. I., Biddle, E. A., & Spieler, E. A. (2001). Social and economic impacts of workplace illness and injury: Current and future directions for research. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 40, 398–402.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Burton, W. N., Pransky, G., Conti, D. J., Chen, C.-Y., & Edingon, D. W. (2004). The association of medical conditions and presenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46(6), S38–S45.PubMedCrossRef Burton, W. N., Pransky, G., Conti, D. J., Chen, C.-Y., & Edingon, D. W. (2004). The association of medical conditions and presenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46(6), S38–S45.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kessler, R. C., Greenberg, P. E., Mickelson, K. D., Meneades, L. M., & Wang, P. S. (2001). The effects of chronic medical conditions on work loss and work cutbacks. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 43(3), 218–225.PubMedCrossRef Kessler, R. C., Greenberg, P. E., Mickelson, K. D., Meneades, L. M., & Wang, P. S. (2001). The effects of chronic medical conditions on work loss and work cutbacks. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 43(3), 218–225.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lerner, D. J., Amick, B. C., Malspeis, S., & Rogers, W. H. (2000). A national survey of health-related work limitations among employed persons in the United States. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22, 225–232.PubMedCrossRef Lerner, D. J., Amick, B. C., Malspeis, S., & Rogers, W. H. (2000). A national survey of health-related work limitations among employed persons in the United States. Disability and Rehabilitation, 22, 225–232.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Loeppke, R., Hymel, P. A., Loftland, J. H., Pizzi, L., Konicki, D. L., Anstadt, G. W., et al. (2003). Health-related workplace productivity measurement: General and migraine-specific recommendations from the ACOEM expert panel. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45, 349–359.PubMedCrossRef Loeppke, R., Hymel, P. A., Loftland, J. H., Pizzi, L., Konicki, D. L., Anstadt, G. W., et al. (2003). Health-related workplace productivity measurement: General and migraine-specific recommendations from the ACOEM expert panel. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45, 349–359.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ilmarinen, J., & Rantanen, J. (1999). Promotion of work ability during ageing. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 38(Suppl 1), 21–23.CrossRef Ilmarinen, J., & Rantanen, J. (1999). Promotion of work ability during ageing. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 38(Suppl 1), 21–23.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference De Zwart, B. C. H., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., & van Duivenbooden, J. C. (2002). Test–retest of the Work Ability Index questionnaire. Occupational Medicine, 52(4), 177–181.PubMedCrossRef De Zwart, B. C. H., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., & van Duivenbooden, J. C. (2002). Test–retest of the Work Ability Index questionnaire. Occupational Medicine, 52(4), 177–181.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Amick, B. C., Lerner, D., Rogers, W. H., Rooney, T., & Katz, J. N. (2000). A review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses, and recommended measures. Spine, 25(24), 3152–3160.PubMedCrossRef Amick, B. C., Lerner, D., Rogers, W. H., Rooney, T., & Katz, J. N. (2000). A review of health-related work outcome measures and their uses, and recommended measures. Spine, 25(24), 3152–3160.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lotters, F., Meerding, W. J., & Burdorf, A. (2005). Reduced productivity after sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders and its relation to health outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, 31(5), 367–374. Lotters, F., Meerding, W. J., & Burdorf, A. (2005). Reduced productivity after sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders and its relation to health outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health, 31(5), 367–374.
14.
go back to reference Koopman, C., Pelletier, K. R., Murray, J. F., Sharda, C. E., Berger, M. L., Turpin, R. S., et al. (2002). Stanford Presenteeism Scale: Health status and employee productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 44, 14–20.PubMedCrossRef Koopman, C., Pelletier, K. R., Murray, J. F., Sharda, C. E., Berger, M. L., Turpin, R. S., et al. (2002). Stanford Presenteeism Scale: Health status and employee productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 44, 14–20.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Turpin, R. S., Ozminkowski, R. J., Sharda, C. E., Collins, J. J., Berger, M. L., Billot, G. M., et al. (2004). Reliability and validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46(11), 1123–1133.PubMedCrossRef Turpin, R. S., Ozminkowski, R. J., Sharda, C. E., Collins, J. J., Berger, M. L., Billot, G. M., et al. (2004). Reliability and validity of the Stanford Presenteeism Scale. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46(11), 1123–1133.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Feuerstein, M., Nicholas, R. A., Huang, G. D., Haufler, A. J., & Pransky, G. (2005). Workstyle: Development of a measure of response to work in those with upper extremity pain. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(2), 87–104.PubMedCrossRef Feuerstein, M., Nicholas, R. A., Huang, G. D., Haufler, A. J., & Pransky, G. (2005). Workstyle: Development of a measure of response to work in those with upper extremity pain. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 15(2), 87–104.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Feuerstein, M., & Nicholas, R. A. (2006). Development of a short form of the workstyle measure. Occupational Medicine, 56, 94–99.PubMedCrossRef Feuerstein, M., & Nicholas, R. A. (2006). Development of a short form of the workstyle measure. Occupational Medicine, 56, 94–99.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Prasad, M., Wahlqvist, P., Shikiar, R., & Shih, Y. (2004). A review of self-report instruments measuring health-related work productivity. A patient-reported outcomes perspective. Pharmacoeconomics, 22, 165–184.CrossRef Prasad, M., Wahlqvist, P., Shikiar, R., & Shih, Y. (2004). A review of self-report instruments measuring health-related work productivity. A patient-reported outcomes perspective. Pharmacoeconomics, 22, 165–184.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lofland, J. H., Pizzi, L., & Frick, K. D. (2004). A review of health-related workplace productivity loss instruments. Pharmacoeconomics, 22(3), 165–184.PubMedCrossRef Lofland, J. H., Pizzi, L., & Frick, K. D. (2004). A review of health-related workplace productivity loss instruments. Pharmacoeconomics, 22(3), 165–184.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Evans, C. J. (2004). Health and work productivity assessment: State of the art or state of flux? Journal of Environmental Medicine, 46(6 Supplement), 3–11. Evans, C. J. (2004). Health and work productivity assessment: State of the art or state of flux? Journal of Environmental Medicine, 46(6 Supplement), 3–11.
21.
go back to reference Lohr, K. N., Aaronson, N. K., Alonso, J., Burnam, M. A., Patrick, D. L., Perrin, E. B., et al. (1996). Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: Development of scientific review criteria. Clinical Therapeutics, 18(5), 979–992.PubMedCrossRef Lohr, K. N., Aaronson, N. K., Alonso, J., Burnam, M. A., Patrick, D. L., Perrin, E. B., et al. (1996). Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: Development of scientific review criteria. Clinical Therapeutics, 18(5), 979–992.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Guyatt, G. H., Feeny, D. H., & Patrick, D. L. (1993). Measuring health-related quality of life. Annals of Internal Medicine, 118, 622–629.PubMed Guyatt, G. H., Feeny, D. H., & Patrick, D. L. (1993). Measuring health-related quality of life. Annals of Internal Medicine, 118, 622–629.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Kirshner, B., & Guyatt, G. H. (1985). A methodological framework for assessing health indices. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 38, 27–36.PubMedCrossRef Kirshner, B., & Guyatt, G. H. (1985). A methodological framework for assessing health indices. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 38, 27–36.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1995). Health status measures. A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford Medical Publications. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (1995). Health status measures. A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford Medical Publications.
25.
go back to reference DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development theory and application. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development theory and application. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
26.
go back to reference Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
27.
go back to reference Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1996). Measurement error and correlation coefficients. BMJ, 313, 41–42.PubMed Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1996). Measurement error and correlation coefficients. BMJ, 313, 41–42.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Terwee, C. B., Dekker, F. W., Wiersinga, W. M., Prummel, M. F., & Bossy, P. M. M. (2003). On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments. Quality of Life Research, 12, 349–362.PubMedCrossRef Terwee, C. B., Dekker, F. W., Wiersinga, W. M., Prummel, M. F., & Bossy, P. M. M. (2003). On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments. Quality of Life Research, 12, 349–362.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Liang, M. H. (2000). Longitudinal construct validity. Establishment of clinical meaning in patient evaluative instruments. Medical Care, 38(9 suppl), II84–II90.PubMed Liang, M. H. (2000). Longitudinal construct validity. Establishment of clinical meaning in patient evaluative instruments. Medical Care, 38(9 suppl), II84–II90.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Bot, S. D. M., Terwee, C. B., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C.W. (2004). Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: A systematic review of the literature. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 63, 335–341.PubMedCrossRef Bot, S. D. M., Terwee, C. B., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C.W. (2004). Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: A systematic review of the literature. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 63, 335–341.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Williams, R. M., & Myers, A. M. (1998). Functional Abilities Confidence Scale: A clinical measure for injured workers with acute low back pain. Physical Therapy, 78, 624–634.PubMed Williams, R. M., & Myers, A. M. (1998). Functional Abilities Confidence Scale: A clinical measure for injured workers with acute low back pain. Physical Therapy, 78, 624–634.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Kopec, J. A., & Esdaile, J. M. (1998). Occupational role performance in persons with back pain. Disability & Rehabilitation, 20(10), 373–379.CrossRef Kopec, J. A., & Esdaile, J. M. (1998). Occupational role performance in persons with back pain. Disability & Rehabilitation, 20(10), 373–379.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Durand, M.-J., Vachon, B., Hong, Q. N., Imbeau, D., Amick, B. C., & Loisel, P. (2004). The cross-cultural adaptation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire in Canadian French. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 27(4), 261–268.PubMedCrossRef Durand, M.-J., Vachon, B., Hong, Q. N., Imbeau, D., Amick, B. C., & Loisel, P. (2004). The cross-cultural adaptation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire in Canadian French. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 27(4), 261–268.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lerner, D., Amick, B. C., Rogers, W. H., Malspeis, S., Bungay, K., & Cynn, D. (2001). The Work Limitations Questionnaire. Medical Care, 39(1), 72–85.PubMedCrossRef Lerner, D., Amick, B. C., Rogers, W. H., Malspeis, S., Bungay, K., & Cynn, D. (2001). The Work Limitations Questionnaire. Medical Care, 39(1), 72–85.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Lerner, D., Reed, J. I., Massarotti, E., Wester, L. M., & Burke, T. A. (2002). The work limitation’s validity and reliability among patients with osteoarthritis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55(2), 197–208.PubMedCrossRef Lerner, D., Reed, J. I., Massarotti, E., Wester, L. M., & Burke, T. A. (2002). The work limitation’s validity and reliability among patients with osteoarthritis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 55(2), 197–208.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Walker, N., Michaud, K., & Wolfe, F. (2005). Work limitations among persons with rheumatoid arthritis: results, reliability and validity of the Work Limitations Questionnaire in 836 patients. Journal of Rheumatology, 32(6), 1006–1012.PubMed Walker, N., Michaud, K., & Wolfe, F. (2005). Work limitations among persons with rheumatoid arthritis: results, reliability and validity of the Work Limitations Questionnaire in 836 patients. Journal of Rheumatology, 32(6), 1006–1012.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Beaton, D. E., & Kennedy, C. A. (2005). The Workplace upper extremity research group. Beyond return to work: testing a measure of at-work disability in workers with musculoskeletal pain. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1869–1879.PubMedCrossRef Beaton, D. E., & Kennedy, C. A. (2005). The Workplace upper extremity research group. Beyond return to work: testing a measure of at-work disability in workers with musculoskeletal pain. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1869–1879.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Gilworth, F., Chamberlain, M. A., Harvey, A., Woodhouse, A., Smith, J., Smyth, M. G., et al. (2003). Development of a Work Instability Scale for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 49(3), 349–354.PubMedCrossRef Gilworth, F., Chamberlain, M. A., Harvey, A., Woodhouse, A., Smith, J., Smyth, M. G., et al. (2003). Development of a Work Instability Scale for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 49(3), 349–354.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Williams, R. M., & Myers, A. M. (1998). A new approach to measuring recovery in injured workers with acute low back pain: Resumption of activities of daily living scale. Physical Therapy, 78, 613–623.PubMed Williams, R. M., & Myers, A. M. (1998). A new approach to measuring recovery in injured workers with acute low back pain: Resumption of activities of daily living scale. Physical Therapy, 78, 613–623.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Ryckman, R. M., Robbins, M. A., Thornton, B., Cantrell, P. (1982). Development and validation of a Physical Self-Efficacy Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 891–900.CrossRef Ryckman, R. M., Robbins, M. A., Thornton, B., Cantrell, P. (1982). Development and validation of a Physical Self-Efficacy Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 891–900.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Roland, M., & Morris, R. (1983). A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: The development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine, 8, 141–145.PubMedCrossRef Roland, M., & Morris, R. (1983). A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: The development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine, 8, 141–145.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., & Raczek, A. E. (1993). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31, 247–263.PubMedCrossRef McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., & Raczek, A. E. (1993). The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31, 247–263.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Bellamy, N., Kirwan, J., Boers, M., Brooks, P., Strand, V., Tugwell, P., et al. (1997). Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. Journal of Rheumatology, 24, 799–802.PubMed Bellamy, N., Kirwan, J., Boers, M., Brooks, P., Strand, V., Tugwell, P., et al. (1997). Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. Journal of Rheumatology, 24, 799–802.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Beaton, D. E., Katz, J. N., Fossel, A. H., Tarasuk, V., Wright, J. G., & Bombardier, C. (2001). Measuring the whole or the parts. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the DASH outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. Journal of Hand Therapy, 14, 128–146.PubMed Beaton, D. E., Katz, J. N., Fossel, A. H., Tarasuk, V., Wright, J. G., & Bombardier, C. (2001). Measuring the whole or the parts. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the DASH outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. Journal of Hand Therapy, 14, 128–146.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishing Co. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishing Co.
46.
go back to reference Kazis, L., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989). Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Medical Care, 27(Supplement), 178–189.CrossRef Kazis, L., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989). Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Medical Care, 27(Supplement), 178–189.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Wright, J. G., & Young, N. L. (1998). Comparison of different indices of responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 239–246.CrossRef Wright, J. G., & Young, N. L. (1998). Comparison of different indices of responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 239–246.CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Guyatt, G. H., & Rennie, D. (Eds.) (2002). Users’ guide to the medical literature. Essentials of evidence-based practice. Chicago, IL: AMA Press. Guyatt, G. H., & Rennie, D. (Eds.) (2002). Users’ guide to the medical literature. Essentials of evidence-based practice. Chicago, IL: AMA Press.
Metadata
Title
Psychometric Evaluation of Health-Related Work Outcome Measures For Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Systematic Review
Authors
Renee M. Williams
Gloria Schmuck
Shannon Allwood
Matthew Sanchez
Ryan Shea
Glenn Wark
Publication date
01-09-2007
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 3/2007
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-007-9093-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2007

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2007 Go to the issue