Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 6/2022

Open Access 04-11-2021 | Psycho-oncology

Evaluation of an electronic psycho-oncological adaptive screening program (EPAS) with immediate patient feedback: findings from a German cluster intervention study

Authors: Peter Esser, Leon Sautier, Susanne Sarkar, Georgia Schilling, Carsten Bokemeyer, Uwe Koch, Matthias Rose, Michael Friedrich, Sandra Nolte, Otto Walter, Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 6/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Distress screening has become mandatory and essential in comprehensive cancer care. We evaluated an electronic psycho-oncological adaptive screening (EPAS) which assesses objective indicators of care needs and subjectively perceived care needs and subsequently provides patient feedback with individualized recommendations about psychosocial care services.

Methods

Patients were assessed within clusters, i.e., different oncological facilities of the competence network of the University Cancer Center Hamburg (UCCH). Patients in the intervention arm underwent the screening, controls received standard care. Patients were assessed at baseline (t0), 3-month (t1), and 6-month (t2) follow-up. Outcomes included information level and use of/access to nine psychosocial services at UCCH, well-being (GAD-7, PHQ-9, SF-8), and treatment satisfaction (SCCC). Conditional linear and logistic regressions were used to identify screening effects at t1 and t2.

Results

Of 1320 eligible patients across 11 clusters, 660 were included (50%). The average age was 60 years; 46% were female. The intervention was associated with increased information level for all psychosocial services at t1 and t2 (all p < .001), increased use in some of these services at t1 and t2, respectively (p ≤ .02), and better evaluation of access (e.g., more recommendations for services provided by physicians, p < .01). At t2, the intervention was associated with a lower level of satisfaction with disease-related information (p = .02).

Conclusions

EPAS may improve information about psychosocial services as well as utilization of and access to these services. The effect on information level seems not to be generalizable to other aspects of oncological care. Future studies should incorporate novel technologies and condense the procedure to its core factors.
Implications for Cancer Survivors: The screening may help to enhance self-management competencies among cancer survivors.

Trial registration

The trial was retrospectively registered (2/2021) at ClinicalTrials.gov (number: NCT04749056).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hartung TJ, Brähler E, Faller H, et al. The risk of being depressed is significantly higher in cancer patients than in the general population: prevalence and severity of depressive symptoms across major cancer types. Eur J Cancer. 2017;72:46–53.CrossRefPubMed Hartung TJ, Brähler E, Faller H, et al. The risk of being depressed is significantly higher in cancer patients than in the general population: prevalence and severity of depressive symptoms across major cancer types. Eur J Cancer. 2017;72:46–53.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kuba K, Esser P, Mehnert A, et al. Risk for depression and anxiety in long-term survivors of hematologic cancer. Health psychology: official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association. 2019;38:187–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000713.CrossRef Kuba K, Esser P, Mehnert A, et al. Risk for depression and anxiety in long-term survivors of hematologic cancer. Health psychology: official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association. 2019;38:187–95. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​hea0000713.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fallowfield, L, et al. Psychiatric morbidity and its recognition by doctors in patients with cancer. Fallowfield, L, et al. Psychiatric morbidity and its recognition by doctors in patients with cancer.
6.
go back to reference Faller H, Schuler M, Richard M, Heckl U, Weis J, Küffner R. Effects of psycho-oncologic interventions on emotional distress and quality of life in adult patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:782–93.CrossRefPubMed Faller H, Schuler M, Richard M, Heckl U, Weis J, Küffner R. Effects of psycho-oncologic interventions on emotional distress and quality of life in adult patients with cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:782–93.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Schepers SA, Sint Nicolaas SM, Maurice-Stam H, et al. First experience with electronic feedback of the psychosocial assessment tool in pediatric cancer care. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2017;25:3113–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3719-3.CrossRef Schepers SA, Sint Nicolaas SM, Maurice-Stam H, et al. First experience with electronic feedback of the psychosocial assessment tool in pediatric cancer care. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2017;25:3113–21. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00520-017-3719-3.CrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Mitchell AJ. Screening for cancer-related distress: when is implementation successful and when is it unsuccessful? Acta Oncol. 2013;52:216–24.CrossRefPubMed Mitchell AJ. Screening for cancer-related distress: when is implementation successful and when is it unsuccessful? Acta Oncol. 2013;52:216–24.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference McCarter K, Britton B, Baker AL, et al. Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for psychosocial distress: systematic review. BMJ open 2018 8. McCarter K, Britton B, Baker AL, et al. Interventions to improve screening and appropriate referral of patients with cancer for psychosocial distress: systematic review. BMJ open 2018 8.
17.
go back to reference Martin A, Rief W, Klaiberg A, Braehler E. Validity of the brief patient health questionnaire mood scale (PHQ-9) in the general population. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28:71–7.CrossRefPubMed Martin A, Rief W, Klaiberg A, Braehler E. Validity of the brief patient health questionnaire mood scale (PHQ-9) in the general population. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006;28:71–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Löwe B, Decker O, Müller S, et al. Validation and standardization of the generalized anxiety disorder screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Medical care 2008:266–74. Löwe B, Decker O, Müller S, et al. Validation and standardization of the generalized anxiety disorder screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Medical care 2008:266–74.
19.
20.
go back to reference Faller H, Weis J, Koch U, et al. Perceived need for psychosocial support depending on emotional distress and mental comorbidity in men and women with cancer. J Psychosom Res. 2016;81:24–30.CrossRefPubMed Faller H, Weis J, Koch U, et al. Perceived need for psychosocial support depending on emotional distress and mental comorbidity in men and women with cancer. J Psychosom Res. 2016;81:24–30.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Fliege H, Becker J, Walter OB, Rose M, Bjorner JB, Klapp BF. Evaluation of a computer-adaptive test for the assessment of depression (D-CAT) in clinical application. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009;18:23–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fliege H, Becker J, Walter OB, Rose M, Bjorner JB, Klapp BF. Evaluation of a computer-adaptive test for the assessment of depression (D-CAT) in clinical application. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2009;18:23–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Becker J, Fliege H, Kocalevent R-D, et al. Functioning and validity of A computerized adaptive test to measure anxiety (A-CAT). Depress Anxiety. 2008;25:E182–94.CrossRefPubMed Becker J, Fliege H, Kocalevent R-D, et al. Functioning and validity of A computerized adaptive test to measure anxiety (A-CAT). Depress Anxiety. 2008;25:E182–94.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kocalevent R-D, Rose M, Becker J, et al. An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:278–87.CrossRefPubMed Kocalevent R-D, Rose M, Becker J, et al. An evaluation of patient-reported outcomes found computerized adaptive testing was efficient in assessing stress perception. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:278–87.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ellert U, Lampert T, Ravens-Sieberer U. Messung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität mit dem SF-8. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz 2005 48:1330-7. Ellert U, Lampert T, Ravens-Sieberer U. Messung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität mit dem SF-8. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz 2005 48:1330-7.
27.
go back to reference Mehnert A, Müller D, Lehmann C, Koch U. Die deutsche version des NCCN distress-thermometers: empirische Prüfung eines screening-instruments zur erfassung psychosozialer belastung bei krebspatienten. Z Psychiatr Psychol Psychother. 2006;54:213–23. Mehnert A, Müller D, Lehmann C, Koch U. Die deutsche version des NCCN distress-thermometers: empirische Prüfung eines screening-instruments zur erfassung psychosozialer belastung bei krebspatienten. Z Psychiatr Psychol Psychother. 2006;54:213–23.
28.
go back to reference Andrade C. Understanding relative risk, odds ratio, and related terms: as simple as it can get. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76:857–61.CrossRef Andrade C. Understanding relative risk, odds ratio, and related terms: as simple as it can get. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76:857–61.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Fridriksdottir N, Gunnarsdottir S, Zoëga S, Ingadottir B, Hafsteinsdottir EJG. Effects of web-based interventions on cancer patients’ symptoms: review of randomized trials. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2018;26:337–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3882-6.CrossRef Fridriksdottir N, Gunnarsdottir S, Zoëga S, Ingadottir B, Hafsteinsdottir EJG. Effects of web-based interventions on cancer patients’ symptoms: review of randomized trials. Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2018;26:337–51. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00520-017-3882-6.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference van Ploos Amstel FK, Peters MEWJ, Donders R, et al. Does a regular nurse-led distress screening and discussion improve quality of life of breast cancer patients treated with curative intent? A randomized controlled trial Psycho-Oncology. 2020;29:719–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5324.CrossRef van Ploos Amstel FK, Peters MEWJ, Donders R, et al. Does a regular nurse-led distress screening and discussion improve quality of life of breast cancer patients treated with curative intent? A randomized controlled trial Psycho-Oncology. 2020;29:719–28. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​pon.​5324.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Hollingworth W, Metcalfe C, Mancero S, et al. Are needs assessments cost effective in reducing distress among patients with cancer? A randomized controlled trial using the distress thermometer and problem list. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2013;31:3631–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.48.3040.CrossRef Hollingworth W, Metcalfe C, Mancero S, et al. Are needs assessments cost effective in reducing distress among patients with cancer? A randomized controlled trial using the distress thermometer and problem list. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2013;31:3631–8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2012.​48.​3040.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Geerligs L, Shepherd HL, Butow P, et al. What factors influence organisational readiness for change? Implementation of the Australian clinical pathway for the screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients (ADAPT CP). Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05836-9.CrossRef Geerligs L, Shepherd HL, Butow P, et al. What factors influence organisational readiness for change? Implementation of the Australian clinical pathway for the screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adult cancer patients (ADAPT CP). Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer. 2020. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00520-020-05836-9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of an electronic psycho-oncological adaptive screening program (EPAS) with immediate patient feedback: findings from a German cluster intervention study
Authors
Peter Esser
Leon Sautier
Susanne Sarkar
Georgia Schilling
Carsten Bokemeyer
Uwe Koch
Matthias Rose
Michael Friedrich
Sandra Nolte
Otto Walter
Anja Mehnert-Theuerkauf
Publication date
04-11-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-021-01121-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 6/2022 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine