Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 11/2016

01-11-2016 | Retinal Disorders

Pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy alone

Authors: Rivka Kessner, Adiel Barak

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 11/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the outcomes of combined vitrectomy + scleral buckle (SB) and vitrectomy alone for pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Methods

Cases included 65 eyes of 63 patients with primary non-complex pseudophakic RRD. The first group underwent combined vitrectomy + SB between January 2010 and August 2012, and the second group was treated with vitrectomy alone between September 2012 and October 2013. The medical records of the patients were reviewed for preoperative examinations, follow-up examinations (including final visual acuity [VA]), appearance of redetachment and complications. The main outcomes were recurrent retinal detachment, complications, and VA improvement.

Results

The rate of single-surgery anatomic success was non-significantly lower in the combined vitrectomy + SB group compared with the vitrectomy alone group — 75.8 % versus 84.4 % respectively (P = 0.683). Complications were significantly more frequent in the former compared to the latter (P = 0.014). The final VAs were 0.580 (logMAR) and 0.486, respectively (P = 0.258). VA improvement of ≥3 lines was achieved in 48.5 % and in 50 % of the eyes respectively (P = 0.769).

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in single-surgery anatomic success rates and VA improvement between combined vitrectomy + SB and vitrectomy alone for pseudophakic RRD. Significantly more complications occurred in the combination group.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clark A, Morlet N, Ng JQ et al (2012) Risk for retinal detachment after phacoemulsification: a whole-population study of cataract surgery outcomes. Arch Ophthalmol 130:882–888CrossRefPubMed Clark A, Morlet N, Ng JQ et al (2012) Risk for retinal detachment after phacoemulsification: a whole-population study of cataract surgery outcomes. Arch Ophthalmol 130:882–888CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bjerrum SS, Mikkelsen KL, La Cour M (2013) Risk of pseudophakic retinal detachment in 202,226 patients using the fellow nonoperated eye as reference. Ophthalmology 120:2573–2579CrossRefPubMed Bjerrum SS, Mikkelsen KL, La Cour M (2013) Risk of pseudophakic retinal detachment in 202,226 patients using the fellow nonoperated eye as reference. Ophthalmology 120:2573–2579CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Ducournau D, for the European Vitreo-Retinal Society (EVRS) Retinal Detachment Study Group (2013) Strategy for the management of uncomplicated retinal detachments: the European Vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report 1. Ophthalmology 120:1804–1808CrossRefPubMed Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Ducournau D, for the European Vitreo-Retinal Society (EVRS) Retinal Detachment Study Group (2013) Strategy for the management of uncomplicated retinal detachments: the European Vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report 1. Ophthalmology 120:1804–1808CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lehpamer BP, Carvounis PE (2014) Vitrectomy with and without scleral buckling for retinal detachment repair in pseudophakic patients. Int Ophthalmol Clin 54:79–90CrossRefPubMed Lehpamer BP, Carvounis PE (2014) Vitrectomy with and without scleral buckling for retinal detachment repair in pseudophakic patients. Int Ophthalmol Clin 54:79–90CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N, Scleral Buckling versus Primary Vitrectomy in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment (SPR) Study Group et al (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment — a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 114:2142–2154CrossRefPubMed Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N, Scleral Buckling versus Primary Vitrectomy in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment (SPR) Study Group et al (2007) Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment — a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 114:2142–2154CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sun Q, Sun T, Xu Y et al (2012) Primary vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Curr Eye Res 37:492–499CrossRefPubMed Sun Q, Sun T, Xu Y et al (2012) Primary vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Curr Eye Res 37:492–499CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sharma YR, Karunanithi S, Azad RV et al (2005) Functional and anatomic outcome of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:293–297CrossRefPubMed Sharma YR, Karunanithi S, Azad RV et al (2005) Functional and anatomic outcome of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 83:293–297CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Brazitikos PD, Androudi S, Christen WG, Stangos NT (2005) Primary pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle surgery for the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment — a randomized clinical trial. Retina 25:957–964CrossRefPubMed Brazitikos PD, Androudi S, Christen WG, Stangos NT (2005) Primary pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle surgery for the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment — a randomized clinical trial. Retina 25:957–964CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Campo RV, Sipperley JO, Sneed SR et al (1999) Pars plana vitrectomy without scleral buckle for pseudophakic retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 106:1811–1816CrossRefPubMed Campo RV, Sipperley JO, Sneed SR et al (1999) Pars plana vitrectomy without scleral buckle for pseudophakic retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 106:1811–1816CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mendrinos E, Dang-Burgener NP, Stangos AN et al (2008) Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 145:1063–1070CrossRefPubMed Mendrinos E, Dang-Burgener NP, Stangos AN et al (2008) Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 145:1063–1070CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Speicher MA, Fu AD, Martin JP, von Fricken MA (2000) Primary vitrectomy alone for repair of retinal detachments following cataract surgery. Retina 20:459–464CrossRefPubMed Speicher MA, Fu AD, Martin JP, von Fricken MA (2000) Primary vitrectomy alone for repair of retinal detachments following cataract surgery. Retina 20:459–464CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Schneider EW, Geraets RL, Johnson MW (2012) Pars plana vitrectomy without adjuvant procedures for repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 32:213–219CrossRefPubMed Schneider EW, Geraets RL, Johnson MW (2012) Pars plana vitrectomy without adjuvant procedures for repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 32:213–219CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kinori M, Moisseiev E, Shoshany N et al (2011) Comparison of pars plana vitrectomy with and without scleral buckle for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 152:291–297CrossRefPubMed Kinori M, Moisseiev E, Shoshany N et al (2011) Comparison of pars plana vitrectomy with and without scleral buckle for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 152:291–297CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mehta S, Blinder KJ, Shah GK, Grand MG (2011) Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle for primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Can J Ophthalmol 46:237–241CrossRefPubMed Mehta S, Blinder KJ, Shah GK, Grand MG (2011) Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle for primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Can J Ophthalmol 46:237–241CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Orlin A, Hewing NJ, Nissen M et al (2014) Pars plana vitrectomy compared with pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle in the primary management of noncomplex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 34:1069–1075CrossRefPubMed Orlin A, Hewing NJ, Nissen M et al (2014) Pars plana vitrectomy compared with pars plana vitrectomy combined with scleral buckle in the primary management of noncomplex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 34:1069–1075CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Ghoraba HH, El Sayed SH, Said KG et al (2013) Evaluation of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treatment by pars plana vitrectomy alone versus pars plana vitrectomy with a scleral buckle. Menoufia Med J 26:122–126CrossRef Ghoraba HH, El Sayed SH, Said KG et al (2013) Evaluation of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treatment by pars plana vitrectomy alone versus pars plana vitrectomy with a scleral buckle. Menoufia Med J 26:122–126CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pournaras CJ, Kapetanios AD (2003) Primary vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment: a prospective non-randomized study. Eur J Ophthalmol 13:298–306PubMed Pournaras CJ, Kapetanios AD (2003) Primary vitrectomy for pseudophakic retinal detachment: a prospective non-randomized study. Eur J Ophthalmol 13:298–306PubMed
18.
go back to reference Stangos AN, Petropoulos IK, Brozou CG et al (2004) Pars-plana vitrectomy alone vs vitrectomy with scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous pseudophakic retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 138:952–958CrossRefPubMed Stangos AN, Petropoulos IK, Brozou CG et al (2004) Pars-plana vitrectomy alone vs vitrectomy with scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous pseudophakic retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 138:952–958CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Weichel ED, Martidis A, Fineman MS et al (2006) Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy–scleral buckle for primary repair of pseudophakic retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 113:2033–2040CrossRefPubMed Weichel ED, Martidis A, Fineman MS et al (2006) Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy–scleral buckle for primary repair of pseudophakic retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 113:2033–2040CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Brazitikos PD (2000) The expanding role of primary pars plana vitrectomy in the treatment of rhegmatogenous noncomplicated retinal detachment. Semin Ophthalmol 15:65–77CrossRefPubMed Brazitikos PD (2000) The expanding role of primary pars plana vitrectomy in the treatment of rhegmatogenous noncomplicated retinal detachment. Semin Ophthalmol 15:65–77CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Koh HJ, Cheng L, Kosobucki B et al (2007) Prophylactic intraoperative 360 degrees laser retinopexy for prevention of retinal detachment. Retina 27:744–749CrossRefPubMed Koh HJ, Cheng L, Kosobucki B et al (2007) Prophylactic intraoperative 360 degrees laser retinopexy for prevention of retinal detachment. Retina 27:744–749CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Iwase T, Jo YJ, Oveson BC (2013) Effect of prophylactic 360 laser treatment for prevention of retinal detachment after phacovitrectomy: prophylactic 360 laser treatment for prevention of retinal detachment. BMC Ophthalmol 13:77CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Iwase T, Jo YJ, Oveson BC (2013) Effect of prophylactic 360 laser treatment for prevention of retinal detachment after phacovitrectomy: prophylactic 360 laser treatment for prevention of retinal detachment. BMC Ophthalmol 13:77CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle versus pars plana vitrectomy alone
Authors
Rivka Kessner
Adiel Barak
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3381-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2016

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 11/2016 Go to the issue