Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 1/2017

01-01-2017 | Original Article

Proximity of uterosacral ligament suspension sutures and S3 sacral nerve to pelvic landmarks

Authors: Pedro A. Maldonado, Mallory A. Stuparich, Donald D. McIntire, Clifford Y. Wai

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

To describe the relationships between pelvic bony landmarks to points along the third sacral nerve and to uterosacral ligament suspension sutures.

Methods

Three transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension sutures were placed bilaterally in unembalmed female human cadavers. The third sacral nerve was marked at the foramen (S3a) and at two additional points at 1-cm intervals along its course caudally (S3b, S3c). Three bony pelvic landmarks were identified and marked, including the ischial spine, pubic symphysis, and coccyx. Distances from each landmark to each suture and nerve point were measured. The distance from each landmark to each S3 nerve point was extended radially, encompassing an arbitrary zone in which sutures may be placed and thus where nerve injury may occur. Zones of potential nerve injury included: zone A (closest to the sacral nerve root), zone B, and zone C (closest to the landmark). Descriptive statistics were used and comparisons were made using Student’s t test and ANOVA.

Results

Ten cadaver specimens were dissected. For the ischial spine, the distances to points S3a, S3b, and S3c were 6.3, 5.4, and 4.6 cm respectively. Approximately two thirds of the sutures were noted beyond zone C, indicating a potentially increased risk of nerve injury with suture placement in zones farthest from the ischial spine given their proximity to the sacral nerve.

Conclusions

Using the ischial spine as a landmark, increased sacral nerve injury could result from suture placement beyond the mean distance of 4.6 cm from the ischial spine. The use of bony landmarks in avoiding sacral nerve injury may be as important as suture depth and angle of suture placement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ (2000) A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1365–1374. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.110910 CrossRefPubMed Shull BL, Bachofen C, Coates KW, Kuehl TJ (2000) A transvaginal approach to repair of apical and other associated sites of pelvic organ prolapse with uterosacral ligaments. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1365–1374. doi:10.​1067/​mob.​2000.​110910 CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Karram M, Goldwasser S, Kleeman S, Steele A, Vassallo B, Walsh P (2001) High uterosacral vaginal vault suspension with fascial reconstruction for vaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1339–1343. doi:10.1067/mob.2001.119077 CrossRefPubMed Karram M, Goldwasser S, Kleeman S, Steele A, Vassallo B, Walsh P (2001) High uterosacral vaginal vault suspension with fascial reconstruction for vaginal repair of enterocele and vaginal vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:1339–1343. doi:10.​1067/​mob.​2001.​119077 CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Barber MD, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL, Bump RC (2000) Bilateral uterosacral ligament suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1402–1411. doi:10.1067/mob.2000.110910 CrossRefPubMed Barber MD, Visco AG, Weidner AC, Amundsen CL, Bump RC (2000) Bilateral uterosacral ligament suspension with site-specific endopelvic fascia defect repair for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1402–1411. doi:10.​1067/​mob.​2000.​110910 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL et al (2013) Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse. JAMA 311:1023–1034. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.1719 CrossRef Barber MD, Brubaker L, Burgio KL et al (2013) Comparison of 2 transvaginal surgical approaches and perioperative behavioral therapy for apical vaginal prolapse. JAMA 311:1023–1034. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​2014.​1719 CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Unger CA, Walters MD, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Paraiso MF (2015) Incidence of adverse events after uterosacral colpopexy for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212:603.e1–603.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.034 CrossRef Unger CA, Walters MD, Ridgeway B, Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Paraiso MF (2015) Incidence of adverse events after uterosacral colpopexy for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 212:603.e1–603.e7. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajog.​2014.​11.​034 CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Montoya TI, Luebbehusen HI, Schaffer JI, Wai CY, Rahn DD, Corton MM (2012) Sensory neuropathy following suspension of the vaginal apex to the proximal uterosacral ligaments. Int Urogynecol J 23:1735–1740. doi:10.1007/s00192-012-1810-3 CrossRefPubMed Montoya TI, Luebbehusen HI, Schaffer JI, Wai CY, Rahn DD, Corton MM (2012) Sensory neuropathy following suspension of the vaginal apex to the proximal uterosacral ligaments. Int Urogynecol J 23:1735–1740. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-012-1810-3 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Buller JL, Thompson JR, Cundiff GQ, Krueger Sullivan L, Schon Ybarra MA, Bent AE (2001) Uterosacral ligament: description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety. Obstet Gynecol 97:873–879PubMed Buller JL, Thompson JR, Cundiff GQ, Krueger Sullivan L, Schon Ybarra MA, Bent AE (2001) Uterosacral ligament: description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety. Obstet Gynecol 97:873–879PubMed
10.
go back to reference Siddique SA, Gutman RE, Schon Ybarra MA, Rojas F, Handa VL (2006) Relationship of the uterosacral ligament to the sacral plexus and to the pudendal nerve. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:642–645. doi:10.1007/s00192-006-0088-8 CrossRefPubMed Siddique SA, Gutman RE, Schon Ybarra MA, Rojas F, Handa VL (2006) Relationship of the uterosacral ligament to the sacral plexus and to the pudendal nerve. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17:642–645. doi:10.​1007/​s00192-006-0088-8 CrossRefPubMed
11.
14.
go back to reference Montoya TI, Dillon SJ, Balgobin S, Wai CY (2013) Functional and anatomic comparison of 2 versus 3 suture placement for uterosacral ligament suspension: a cadaver study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 209:486e1–486.e5. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.010 Montoya TI, Dillon SJ, Balgobin S, Wai CY (2013) Functional and anatomic comparison of 2 versus 3 suture placement for uterosacral ligament suspension: a cadaver study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 209:486e1–486.e5. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ajog.​2013.​06.​010
16.
Metadata
Title
Proximity of uterosacral ligament suspension sutures and S3 sacral nerve to pelvic landmarks
Authors
Pedro A. Maldonado
Mallory A. Stuparich
Donald D. McIntire
Clifford Y. Wai
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3039-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 1/2017 Go to the issue