Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 3/2007

01-06-2007 | Original Paper

Proximal femoral nail – an analysis of 100 cases of proximal femoral fractures with an average follow up of 1 year

Authors: W. M. Gadegone, Y. S. Salphale

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 3/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

Numerous variations of intramedullary nails have been devised to achieve a stable fixation and early mobilisation of pertrochanteric fracture, among which is the proximal femoral nail (PFN). We report here the results of a prospective study carried out at our institute on 100 consecutive patients who had suffered a pertrochanteric, intertrochanteric or high subtrochanteric fracture, or a combination of fractures, between December 2002 and December 2005 and were subsequently treated with a PFN. Close to anatomical reduction of the fracture fragments was achieved in 12 patients, while limited open reduction was required in 14 patients. During the follow-up period of 1 year complications occurred in 12 patients. Our results indicate the necessity of a careful surgical technique and modifications that are specific to the individual fracture pattern in order to reduce complications. Osteosynthesis with the PFN offers the advantages of high rotational stability of the head-neck fragment, an unreamed implantation technique and the possibility of static or dynamic distal locking.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ansari Moein CM, Verhofstad MHJ, Bleys RLAW, Werken C van der (2005) Soft tissue injury related to the choice of entry point in ante grade femoral nailing; pyriform fossa or greater trochanter tip. Injury 36:1337–1342CrossRef Ansari Moein CM, Verhofstad MHJ, Bleys RLAW, Werken C van der (2005) Soft tissue injury related to the choice of entry point in ante grade femoral nailing; pyriform fossa or greater trochanter tip. Injury 36:1337–1342CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Curtis MJ, Jinnh RH, Wilson V, Cunningham BW (1994) Proximal femoral fractures; a biomechanical study to compare extramedullary and intramedullary fixation. Injury 25:99–104PubMedCrossRef Curtis MJ, Jinnh RH, Wilson V, Cunningham BW (1994) Proximal femoral fractures; a biomechanical study to compare extramedullary and intramedullary fixation. Injury 25:99–104PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dean GL, David S, Jason HN (2004) Osteoporotic pertrochateric fractures; management and concurrent controversies. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 72-B:737–752 Dean GL, David S, Jason HN (2004) Osteoporotic pertrochateric fractures; management and concurrent controversies. J Bone Jt Surg (Am) 72-B:737–752
4.
go back to reference Dousa P, Bartonicek J, Jehlicka D, Skala-Rosenbaum J (2002) Osteosynthesis of trochanteric fracture using proximal femoral nail. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 69:22–30PubMed Dousa P, Bartonicek J, Jehlicka D, Skala-Rosenbaum J (2002) Osteosynthesis of trochanteric fracture using proximal femoral nail. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 69:22–30PubMed
5.
go back to reference Gulberg B, Duppe H, Nilsson B (1993) Incidence of Hip Fractures in Malmo, Sweden (1950–1991). Bone 14[Suppl 1]:23–29CrossRef Gulberg B, Duppe H, Nilsson B (1993) Incidence of Hip Fractures in Malmo, Sweden (1950–1991). Bone 14[Suppl 1]:23–29CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kannus P, Oarkkari J, Sievanen H et al (1996) Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone 18[Suppl]:57–63CrossRef Kannus P, Oarkkari J, Sievanen H et al (1996) Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone 18[Suppl]:57–63CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kim WY, Han CH, Park JI, Kim FJY (2001) Failure of intertrochanteric fracture fixation with a dynamic hip screw in relation to preoperative fracture stability and osteoporosis. Int Orthop 25:360–362 Kim WY, Han CH, Park JI, Kim FJY (2001) Failure of intertrochanteric fracture fixation with a dynamic hip screw in relation to preoperative fracture stability and osteoporosis. Int Orthop 25:360–362
8.
go back to reference Menezes DF, Gamulin A, Noesberger B (2005) Is the proximal femoral nail a suitable implant for treatment of all trochanteric fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res 439:221–227PubMedCrossRef Menezes DF, Gamulin A, Noesberger B (2005) Is the proximal femoral nail a suitable implant for treatment of all trochanteric fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res 439:221–227PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelsson O, Savolainen V, Hirvensalo E (1992) Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail .J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 74-B:352–357 Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelsson O, Savolainen V, Hirvensalo E (1992) Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail .J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 74-B:352–357
10.
go back to reference Pavelka T, Matejka J, Cervenkova H (2005) Complications of internal fixation by a short proximal femoral nail. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 72:344–354PubMed Pavelka T, Matejka J, Cervenkova H (2005) Complications of internal fixation by a short proximal femoral nail. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 72:344–354PubMed
11.
go back to reference Radford PJ, Needoff M, Webb JK (1993) A prospective randomized comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 75-B:789–793 Radford PJ, Needoff M, Webb JK (1993) A prospective randomized comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 75-B:789–793
12.
go back to reference Rosenblum SF, Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, Tam BS (1992) A biomechanical evaluation of Gamma Nail. J Bone Jt Surg 74:352–357 Rosenblum SF, Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, Tam BS (1992) A biomechanical evaluation of Gamma Nail. J Bone Jt Surg 74:352–357
13.
go back to reference Valverde JA, Alonso MG, Porro JG et al (1998) Use of Gamma nail in treatment of fractures of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop 350:56–61PubMed Valverde JA, Alonso MG, Porro JG et al (1998) Use of Gamma nail in treatment of fractures of the proximal femur. Clin Orthop 350:56–61PubMed
14.
go back to reference Windoff J, Hollander DA, Hakimi M, Linhart W (2005) Pitfalls and complications in the use of proximal femoral nail. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390(1):59–65, Feb Epub 2004 Apr 15CrossRef Windoff J, Hollander DA, Hakimi M, Linhart W (2005) Pitfalls and complications in the use of proximal femoral nail. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390(1):59–65, Feb Epub 2004 Apr 15CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Domingo LJ, Cecilia D, Herrera A, Resines C (2001) Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 25:298–301PubMedCrossRef Domingo LJ, Cecilia D, Herrera A, Resines C (2001) Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 25:298–301PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Proximal femoral nail – an analysis of 100 cases of proximal femoral fractures with an average follow up of 1 year
Authors
W. M. Gadegone
Y. S. Salphale
Publication date
01-06-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 3/2007
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0170-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2007

International Orthopaedics 3/2007 Go to the issue