Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship 3/2013

01-09-2013

Provider perceptions and expectations of breast cancer posttreatment care: a University of California Athena Breast Health Network project

Authors: Erin E. Hahn, Patricia A. Ganz, Michelle E. Melisko, John P. Pierce, Marlene von Friederichs-Fitzwater, Karen T. Lane, Robert A. Hiatt

Published in: Journal of Cancer Survivorship | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The Athena Breast Health Network collaboration is a University of California system-wide project initiated with the intent to drive innovation in breast cancer prevention, screening, and treatment. This qualitative research examines provider perceptions and expectations of posttreatment breast cancer care across five network sites with the goal of better understanding provider behavior during the posttreatment phase of the cancer care trajectory.

Methods

Investigators at each site conducted semi-structured interviews with oncology specialists and primary care providers (PCPs). Interviews used case study examples and open- and closed-ended questions on the delivery of posttreatment breast cancer care. Informant responses were manually recorded by the interviewer, compiled in a database, then coded and analyzed using NVivo 9 software.

Results

There were 39 key informants across the sites: 14 medical oncologists, 7 radiation oncologists, 11 surgeons, 3 oncology nurses, and 4 PCPs. Care coordination was a major unprompted theme identified in the interviews. There was a perceived need for greater care coordination across institutions in order to improve delivery of posttreatment health care services and a need for greater care coordination within oncology, particularly to help avoid duplication of follow-up care and services. Participants expect frequent follow-up visits and to use biomarker tests and advanced imaging services as part of routine surveillance care. Implementing survivorship care programs was perceived as a way to improve care delivery.

Conclusions

These results identify a need for increased focus on care coordination during the posttreatment phase of breast cancer care within the University of California system and the potential for system and provider-level interventions that could help increase coordination of posttreatment care.

Implications for Cancer Survivors

Breast cancer survivors do not always receive evidence-based care. This research helps to better understand what motivates provider behavior during the posttreatment phase and lays a foundation for targeted interventions to increase adherence to evidence-based recommendations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, Smith T, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(4):220–41.PubMedCrossRef Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, Smith T, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(4):220–41.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference American Cancer Society Cancer Facts & Figures 2012. In. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2012. American Cancer Society Cancer Facts & Figures 2012. In. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2012.
3.
go back to reference Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington: National Academies Press; 2006. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington: National Academies Press; 2006.
4.
go back to reference Lafata J, Simpkins J, Schultz L, Chase G, Hohnson C, Yood M, et al. Routine surveillance care after cancer treatment with curative intent. Medical Care. 2005;43(6):592–9.CrossRef Lafata J, Simpkins J, Schultz L, Chase G, Hohnson C, Yood M, et al. Routine surveillance care after cancer treatment with curative intent. Medical Care. 2005;43(6):592–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cheung W, Pond G, Rother M, Krzyzanowska M, Swallow C, Brierley J, et al. Adherence to surveillance guidelines after curative resection for stage II/III colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2008;43(6):191–6.CrossRef Cheung W, Pond G, Rother M, Krzyzanowska M, Swallow C, Brierley J, et al. Adherence to surveillance guidelines after curative resection for stage II/III colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2008;43(6):191–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Keating N, Landrum M, Guadagnoli E, Winer E, Ayanian J. Surveillance testing among survivors of early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;25(9):1074–81.CrossRef Keating N, Landrum M, Guadagnoli E, Winer E, Ayanian J. Surveillance testing among survivors of early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;25(9):1074–81.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cooper G, Kou T, Reynolds H. Receipt of guideline-recommended follow-up in older colorectal cancer survivors. Cancer. 2008;113(8):2029–37.PubMedCrossRef Cooper G, Kou T, Reynolds H. Receipt of guideline-recommended follow-up in older colorectal cancer survivors. Cancer. 2008;113(8):2029–37.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Mandelblatt J, Lawrence W, Cullen J, Stanton A, Krupnick J, Kwan L, et al. Patterns of care in early stage breast cancer survivors in the first year after cessation of active treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(1):77–84.PubMedCrossRef Mandelblatt J, Lawrence W, Cullen J, Stanton A, Krupnick J, Kwan L, et al. Patterns of care in early stage breast cancer survivors in the first year after cessation of active treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(1):77–84.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Grunfeld E, Hodgson D, Del Giudice M, Moineddin R. Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors. Journal of Oncology Practice. 2010;6(4):174–81.PubMedCrossRef Grunfeld E, Hodgson D, Del Giudice M, Moineddin R. Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors. Journal of Oncology Practice. 2010;6(4):174–81.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ, Grunfeld E, Muss HB, Vogel VG, Halberg F, Somerfield MR, Davidson NE: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. In: J Clin Oncol. Volume 24, edn. United States; 2006: 5091–5097. Khatcheressian JL, Wolff AC, Smith TJ, Grunfeld E, Muss HB, Vogel VG, Halberg F, Somerfield MR, Davidson NE: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2006 update of the breast cancer follow-up and management guidelines in the adjuvant setting. In: J Clin Oncol. Volume 24, edn. United States; 2006: 5091–5097.
12.
go back to reference Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, Blayney DW, Ganz PA, Mulvey TM, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(14):1715–24.PubMedCrossRef Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, Blayney DW, Ganz PA, Mulvey TM, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(14):1715–24.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Good Stewardship Working G. The “top 5” lists in primary care: meeting the responsibility of professionalism. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1385–90.CrossRef Good Stewardship Working G. The “top 5” lists in primary care: meeting the responsibility of professionalism. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(15):1385–90.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Panageas K, Sima C, Liberman L, Schrag D. Use of high technology imaging for surveillance of early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131:663–70.PubMedCrossRef Panageas K, Sima C, Liberman L, Schrag D. Use of high technology imaging for surveillance of early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;131:663–70.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, Moschetti I, Coe L, Fossati R, Palli D, del Roselli TM, Liberati A: Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(1):CD001768. Rojas MP, Telaro E, Russo A, Moschetti I, Coe L, Fossati R, Palli D, del Roselli TM, Liberati A: Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(1):CD001768.
16.
go back to reference Bradley E, Curry L, Devers K. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Heal Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1758–72.CrossRef Bradley E, Curry L, Devers K. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Heal Serv Res. 2007;42(4):1758–72.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Caelli K, Ray L, Mill J. ‘Clear as mud’: toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2003;2(2):1–13. Caelli K, Ray L, Mill J. ‘Clear as mud’: toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2003;2(2):1–13.
18.
go back to reference Cooper S, Endacott R. Generic qualitative research: a design for qualitative research in emergency care? Emerg Med J. 2007;24(12):816–9.PubMedCrossRef Cooper S, Endacott R. Generic qualitative research: a design for qualitative research in emergency care? Emerg Med J. 2007;24(12):816–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Patton M. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage; 1990. Patton M. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage; 1990.
20.
go back to reference Glaser B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):436–45.CrossRef Glaser B. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):436–45.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Morse J, Field P. Qualitative research methods for health professionals. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995. Morse J, Field P. Qualitative research methods for health professionals. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995.
22.
go back to reference Freeman M. Constant comparative method. In: Mathison S, editor. Encyclopedia of evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005. Freeman M. Constant comparative method. In: Mathison S, editor. Encyclopedia of evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2005.
23.
go back to reference Floersch J, Longhofer J, Kranke D, Townsend L. Integrating thematic, grounded theory, and narrative analysis. Qual Soc Work. 2010;9(3):407–25.CrossRef Floersch J, Longhofer J, Kranke D, Townsend L. Integrating thematic, grounded theory, and narrative analysis. Qual Soc Work. 2010;9(3):407–25.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Grunfeld E. Optimizing follow-up after breast cancer treatment. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21(1):92–6.PubMedCrossRef Grunfeld E. Optimizing follow-up after breast cancer treatment. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2009;21(1):92–6.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Earle CC, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, Weeks JC. Quality of non-breast cancer health maintenance among elderly breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(8):1447–51.PubMedCrossRef Earle CC, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, Weeks JC. Quality of non-breast cancer health maintenance among elderly breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(8):1447–51.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Margenthaler JA, Allam E, Chen L, Virgo KS, Kulkarni UM, Patel AP, et al. Surveillance of patients with breast cancer after curative-intent primary. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8(2):79–83.PubMedCrossRef Margenthaler JA, Allam E, Chen L, Virgo KS, Kulkarni UM, Patel AP, et al. Surveillance of patients with breast cancer after curative-intent primary. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8(2):79–83.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sudsawad P: Knowledge translation: introduction to models, strategies, and measures. In. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research; 2007. Sudsawad P: Knowledge translation: introduction to models, strategies, and measures. In. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research; 2007.
28.
go back to reference Khoury MJ, Gwinn M, Ioannidis JP. The emergence of translational epidemiology: from scientific discovery to population health impact. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(5):517–24.PubMedCrossRef Khoury MJ, Gwinn M, Ioannidis JP. The emergence of translational epidemiology: from scientific discovery to population health impact. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(5):517–24.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Provider perceptions and expectations of breast cancer posttreatment care: a University of California Athena Breast Health Network project
Authors
Erin E. Hahn
Patricia A. Ganz
Michelle E. Melisko
John P. Pierce
Marlene von Friederichs-Fitzwater
Karen T. Lane
Robert A. Hiatt
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Survivorship / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 1932-2259
Electronic ISSN: 1932-2267
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-013-0269-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Journal of Cancer Survivorship 3/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine