Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Systematic Reviews 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Protocol

Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on the associations between shift work and sickness absence

Authors: Erlend Sunde, Anette Harris, Morten Birkeland Nielsen, Bjørn Bjorvatn, Stein Atle Lie, Øystein Holmelid, Øystein Vedaa, Siri Waage, Ståle Pallesen

Published in: Systematic Reviews | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Shift work, i.e., non-standard work hours, has been associated with both short- and long-term sickness absence. However, findings are inconsistent and inconclusive. Thus far, no comprehensive meta-analytic synthesis on the relationship between shift work and sickness absence has been published. The aims of the planned systematic review and meta-analysis are (1) to establish whether shift work is associated with sickness absence, (2) to determine if specific shift work characteristics relate to sickness absence (e.g., length and frequency of spells), and (3) to identify moderating factors affecting the relationship between shift work and sickness absence.

Methods

Eligible studies will be identified using a predefined search strategy in several electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsychInfo, EMBASE, and ProQuest) and comprise peer-reviewed papers reporting original empirical findings on the association between shift work and sickness absence. Mainly observational studies with cross-sectional, prospective, or retrospective research design and case-control studies will be included. Risk of bias will be assessed using an adapted checklist previously employed to evaluate studies on sickness absence. To carry out the meta-analytic synthesis, a random effects meta-analysis will be conducted using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software. The review and meta-analysis will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Heterogeneity will be evaluated by Cochran’s Q test and the I2 statistics.

Discussion

The review and meta-analysis will be the first to conduct a meta-analytic synthesis of the evidence on the association between exposure to shift work and sickness absence, as well as identify relevant moderators affecting the relationship between shift work and sickness absence. Aggregation of the existing evidence will improve the knowledge on the association between shift work and sickness absence. Such knowledge can be used to guide scheduling of shift work to promote work schedules that are less detrimental to health and contribute to reduced sickness absence and higher work- and leisure-time productivity.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42022301200
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Eurofound. Sixth European working conditions survey: overview report (2017 update). Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union; 2017. Eurofound. Sixth European working conditions survey: overview report (2017 update). Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union; 2017.
17.
go back to reference OECD. Sickness, disability and work: keeping track in the economic downturn. Stockholm: OECD; 2009. OECD. Sickness, disability and work: keeping track in the economic downturn. Stockholm: OECD; 2009.
19.
go back to reference International Agency for Research on Cancer. Night shift work. IARC Monogr Identif Carcinog Hazards Hum. 2020;124:1–371. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Night shift work. IARC Monogr Identif Carcinog Hazards Hum. 2020;124:1–371.
34.
go back to reference Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley; 2021.CrossRef Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley; 2021.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Boutron I, Page MJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Lundh A, Hróbjartsson A. Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [internet]: Cochrane; 2021. Available from: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Boutron I, Page MJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Lundh A, Hróbjartsson A. Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies. In: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions [internet]: Cochrane; 2021. Available from: www.​training.​cochrane.​org/​handbook.
Metadata
Title
Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis on the associations between shift work and sickness absence
Authors
Erlend Sunde
Anette Harris
Morten Birkeland Nielsen
Bjørn Bjorvatn
Stein Atle Lie
Øystein Holmelid
Øystein Vedaa
Siri Waage
Ståle Pallesen
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Systematic Reviews / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 2046-4053
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02020-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Systematic Reviews 1/2022 Go to the issue