Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2017

01-12-2017 | Translational Research and Biomarkers

Proteomic Features of Colorectal Cancer Identify Tumor Subtypes Independent of Oncogenic Mutations and Independently Predict Relapse-Free Survival

Authors: Callisia N. Clarke, MD, Michael S. Lee, MD, Wei Wei, PhD, Ganiraju Manyam, PhD, Zhi-Qin Jiang, PhD, Yiling Lu, MD, Jeffrey Morris, PhD, Bradley Broom, PhD, David Menter, PhD, Eduardo Vilar-Sanchez, MD, PhD, Kanwal Raghav, MD, Cathy Eng, MD, George J. Chang, MD, Iris Simon, PhD, Rene Bernards, PhD, Michael Overman, MD, Gordon B. Mills, MD, PhD, Dipen Maru, MD, Scott Kopetz, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 13/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The directed study of the functional proteome in colorectal cancer (CRC) has identified critical protein markers and signaling pathways; however, the prognostic relevance of many of these proteins remains unclear.

Methods

We determined the prognostic implications of the functional proteome in 263 CRC tumor samples from patients treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) and 462 patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to identify patterns of protein expression that drive tumorigenesis. A total of 163 validated proteins were analyzed by reverse phase protein array (RPPA). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the tumor proteins from the MDACC cohort was performed, and clustering was validated using RPPA data from TCGA CRC. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of tumor recurrence.

Results

Clustering revealed dichotomization, with subtype A notable for a high epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) protein signature, while subtype B was notable for high Akt/TSC/mTOR pathway components. Survival data were only available for the MDACC cohort and were used to evaluate prognostic relevance of these protein signatures. Group B demonstrated worse relapse-free survival (hazard ratio 2.11, 95% confidence interval 1.04–4.27, p = 0.039), although there was no difference in known genomic drivers between the two proteomic groups. Proteomic grouping and stage were significant predictors of recurrence on multivariate analysis. Eight proteins were found to be significant predictors of tumor recurrence on multivariate analysis: Collagen VI, FOXO3a, INPP4B, LcK, phospho-PEA15, phospho-PRAS40, Rad51, phospho-S6.

Conclusion

CRC can be classified into distinct subtypes by proteomic features independent of common oncogenic driver mutations. Proteomic analysis has identified key biomarkers with prognostic importance, however these findings require further validation in an independent cohort.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference The Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 2012;487:330–7.CrossRefPubMedCentral The Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 2012;487:330–7.CrossRefPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Pounds S, Morris SW. Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1236–42.CrossRefPubMed Pounds S, Morris SW. Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values. Bioinformatics 2003;19:1236–42.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Segal E, Friedman N, Koller D, Regev A. A module map showing conditional activity of expression modules in cancer. Nat Genet. 2004;36:1090–8.CrossRefPubMed Segal E, Friedman N, Koller D, Regev A. A module map showing conditional activity of expression modules in cancer. Nat Genet. 2004;36:1090–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Margolin AA, Nemenman I, Basso K, et al. ARACNE: an algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinform. 2006;7(Suppl 1):S7.CrossRef Margolin AA, Nemenman I, Basso K, et al. ARACNE: an algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinform. 2006;7(Suppl 1):S7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Wang K, Saito M, Bisikirska BC, et al. Genome-wide identification of post-translational modulators of transcription factor activity in human B cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:829–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang K, Saito M, Bisikirska BC, et al. Genome-wide identification of post-translational modulators of transcription factor activity in human B cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27:829–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Miller TW, Rexer BN, Garrett JT, Arteaga CL. Mutations in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway: role in tumor progression and therapeutic implications in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:224.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Miller TW, Rexer BN, Garrett JT, Arteaga CL. Mutations in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway: role in tumor progression and therapeutic implications in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13:224.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Chen P, Cescon M, Bonaldo P. Collagen VI in cancer and its biological mechanisms. Trends Mol Med. 2013;19:410–7.CrossRefPubMed Chen P, Cescon M, Bonaldo P. Collagen VI in cancer and its biological mechanisms. Trends Mol Med. 2013;19:410–7.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Dennison JB, Shahmoradgoli M, Liu W, et al. High intratumoral stromal content defines reactive breast cancer as a low-risk breast cancer subtype. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:5068–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dennison JB, Shahmoradgoli M, Liu W, et al. High intratumoral stromal content defines reactive breast cancer as a low-risk breast cancer subtype. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:5068–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Dalerba P, Maccalli C, Casati C, et al. Immunology and immunotherapy of colorectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;46:33–57.CrossRefPubMed Dalerba P, Maccalli C, Casati C, et al. Immunology and immunotherapy of colorectal cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;46:33–57.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ropponen KM, Eskelinen MJ, Lipponen PK et al. Prognostic value of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 1997;182:318–24.CrossRefPubMed Ropponen KM, Eskelinen MJ, Lipponen PK et al. Prognostic value of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in colorectal cancer. J Pathol. 1997;182:318–24.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Tennstedt P, Fresow R, Simon R, et al. RAD51 overexpression is a negative prognostic marker for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer 2013;132:2118–26.CrossRefPubMed Tennstedt P, Fresow R, Simon R, et al. RAD51 overexpression is a negative prognostic marker for colorectal adenocarcinoma. Int J Cancer 2013;132:2118–26.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Proteomic Features of Colorectal Cancer Identify Tumor Subtypes Independent of Oncogenic Mutations and Independently Predict Relapse-Free Survival
Authors
Callisia N. Clarke, MD
Michael S. Lee, MD
Wei Wei, PhD
Ganiraju Manyam, PhD
Zhi-Qin Jiang, PhD
Yiling Lu, MD
Jeffrey Morris, PhD
Bradley Broom, PhD
David Menter, PhD
Eduardo Vilar-Sanchez, MD, PhD
Kanwal Raghav, MD
Cathy Eng, MD
George J. Chang, MD
Iris Simon, PhD
Rene Bernards, PhD
Michael Overman, MD
Gordon B. Mills, MD, PhD
Dipen Maru, MD
Scott Kopetz, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 13/2017
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6054-5

Other articles of this Issue 13/2017

Annals of Surgical Oncology 13/2017 Go to the issue