Top

Trials

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Study protocol

Protecting Adolescents in Low- And Middle-Income Countries from Interpersonal Violence (PRO YOUTH TRIAL): Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of the Strengthening Families Programme 10-14 (“Familias Fuertes”) in Panama

Authors: Anilena Mejia, Richard Emsley, Eleonora Fichera, Wadih Maalouf, Jeremy Segrott, Rachel Calam

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2018

Abstract

Background

Interpersonal violence can significantly reduce adolescents’ opportunities for becoming happy and healthy adults. Central America is the most violent region in the world and it is estimated that adolescents are involved in 82% of all homicides in this region. Family skills training programmes have been designed to prevent interpersonal violence in adolescents. Several studies in high-income countries suggest they are effective. However, there are no published trials assessing effectiveness of these programmes in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). The aim of this study is to test the effectiveness of the Strengthening Families Programme 10–14 (SFP 10–14 or “Familias Fuertes”) in Panama, a LMIC in Central America. An embedded process evaluation will examine the extent to which the intervention is delivered as intended, variation across trial sites, influences on implementation and intervention-context interactions. Cost-effectiveness will also be assessed.

Methods

This is a cluster randomised controlled trial. The 28 townships with the highest homicide rates in Panama will be randomly allocated to implementation of SFP 10–14 alongside services-as-usual or to services-as-usual only. Approximately 30 families will be recruited in each township, a total sample of 840 families. Families will be assessed at baseline, approximately eight weeks after baseline (i.e. post intervention), six months and 12 months after. The primary outcome measure will be the parent reported externalising subscale of the Child Behaviour Checklist at T3 (i.e., which is approximately 12 months after baseline). For the process evaluation, recruitment, attendance, fidelity and receipt will be measured. Qualitative interviews with facilitators, trainers, parents and adolescents will explore barriers/facilitators to implementation and intervention receipt. For the cost-effectiveness analysis, service use information will be gathered from parents and adolescents with a three-month recall period. Costs and consequences associated with implementation of the intervention will be identified.

Discussion

This trial will be the first to evaluate SFP 10–14 in a LMIC. Results have the potential to guide public policies for the prevention of interpersonal violence in Central America and beyond.

Trial registration

ISRCTN Registry, 14023111. Registered on 13 July 2017.

Available only for authorised users

Jaitman L, Soares R, Olavarría-Gambi M, Guerrero Compeán R. Los costos del crimen y la violencia en el bienestar en América Latina y el Caribe. 2015. https://doi.org/10.18235/0000170.

World Bank. Main report (No. 56781): The World Bank; 2001. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/882501468242386224/Main-report. Accessed 6 Sept 2017

World Health Organization. Health for the World’s Adolescents: A second chance in the second decade. Geneva: WHO; 2014. http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/second-decade/en/. Accessed 6 Sept 2017

Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, Zwi AB. The world report on violence and health. Lancet. 2002;360(9339):1083–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736 (02)11133-0CrossRefPubMed

World Health Organization. Violence Prevention: The Evidence. Geneva: WHO; 2010. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/4th_milestones_meeting/evidence_briefings_all.pdf. Accessed 6 Sept 2017

World Health Organization. INSPIRE: Seven Strategies for Ending Violence Against Children. Geneva: WHO; 2016. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/207717/1/9789241565356-eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 6 Sept 2017

White KS, Bruce SE, Farrell AD, Kliewer W. Impact of exposure to community violence on anxiety: a longitudinal study of family social support as a protective factor for urban children. J Child Fam Stud. 1998;7(2):187–203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022943216319.

Sullivan TN, Kung EM, Farrell AD. Relation between witnessing violence and drug use initiation among rural adolescents: parental monitoring and family support as protective factors. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2010;33(3):488–98.CrossRef

Kliewer W, Cunningham JN, Diehl R, Parrish KA, Walker JM, Atiyeh C, et al. Violence exposure and adjustment in inner-city youth: child and caregiver emotion regulation skill, caregiver-child relationship quality, and neighborhood cohesion as protective factor. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2004;33(3):477–87.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Klein K, Forehand R, Armistead L, Long P. Delinquency during the transition to early adulthood: family and parenting predictors from early adolescence. Adolescence. 1997;32(125):61–80.PubMed

11.

Piquero AR, Jennings WG, Diamond B, Farrington DP, Tremblay RE, Welsh BC, et al. A meta-analysis update on the effects of early family/parent training programs on antisocial behavior and delinquency. J Exp Criminol. 2016;12(2):229–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-016-9256-0CrossRef

12.

Spoth RL, Redmond C, Shin C. Reducing adolescents’ aggressive and hostile behaviors: randomized trial effects of a brief family intervention 4 years past baseline. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154(12):1248–57.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Kumpfer KL, Trunnell EP, Whiteside WH. The bio-psychosocial model: application to the addictions field. In: Engs RC, editor. Controversies in the addiction field. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt Publishing; 1985. p. 55–68.

14.

Kumpfer KL. Factors and processes contributing to resilience. In: Glantz MD, Johnson JL, editors. Resilience and development. Boston: Springer; 2002. p. 179–224. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/0-306-47167-1_9.

15.

Mihalic SF, Elliott DS. Evidence-based programs registry: blueprints for healthy youth development. Eval Program Plann. 2015;48:124–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.08.004CrossRefPubMed

16.

Bröning S, Sack P-M, Thomsen M, Stolle M, Wendell A, Stappenbeck J, et al. Implementing and evaluating the German adaptation of the “strengthening families program 10 – 14”– a randomized-controlled multicentre study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:83. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-83CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

17.

Segrott J, Gillespie D, Holliday J, Humphreys I, Murphy S, Phillips C, et al. Preventing substance misuse: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of the strengthening families Programme 10–14 UK (SFP 10–14 UK). BMC Public Health. 2014;14:49. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Foxcroft DR, Callen H, Davies EL, Okulicz-Kozaryn K. Effectiveness of the strengthening families programme 10–14 in Poland: cluster randomized controlled trial. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27(3):494–500. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckw195PubMed

19.

Skärstrand E, Sundell K, Andréasson S. Evaluation of a Swedish version of the strengthening families Programme. Eur J Pub Health. 2014;24(4):578–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckt146CrossRef

20.

Maalouf W, Campello G. The influence of family skills programmes on violence indicators: experience from a multi-site project of the United Nations Office on drugs and crime in low and middle income countries. Aggress Violent Behav. 2014;19(6):616–24.CrossRef

21.

Mejia A, Ulph F, Calam R. An exploration of parents’ perceptions and beliefs about changes following participation in a family skill training program: a qualitative study in a developing country. Prev Sci. 2015;16(5):674–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-014-0530-yCrossRefPubMed

22.

Mejia A, Ulph F, Calam R. The strengthening families program 10-14 in Panama: parents’ perceptions of cultural fit. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 2016;47(1):56.CrossRef

23.

Achenbach TM. Manual for the child behavior checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont; 1991. https://books.google.com.pa/books/about/Manual_for_the_Child_Behavior_Checklist.html?id=I5btOwAACAAJ&redir_esc=y.

24.

Holahan CJ, Moos RH. Social support and adjustment: predictive benefits of social climate indices. Am J Community Psychol. 1982;10(4):403–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00893979CrossRefPubMed

25.

Arnold DS, O’Leary SG, Wolff LS, Acker MM. Parenting scale: a measure of dysfunctional parenting in discipline situations. Psychological Assessessment. 1993;5(2):137–44.CrossRef

26.

Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF, Psychology Foundation of Australia. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation of Australia; 1995. http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/30421447

27.

EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.CrossRef

28.

Gardner JM, Williams KR, Guerra NG, Walker I. The Jamaica youth survey: assessing core competencies and risk for aggression among Jamaican youth. Caribbean Quarterly. 2011;57(1):35–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00086495.2011.11672393CrossRef

29.

Elliott D. National Youth Survey [United States]: Wave VII, 1987: Version 3. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. 1996. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR06542.v3

30.

Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG. CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2004;328(7441):702–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7441.702CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012;345:e5661. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5661CrossRefPubMed

32.

Linnan L, Steckler A. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research: an overview. In: Steckler A, Linnan L, editors. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002. p. 1–23.

33.

Spoth RL, Trudeau LS, Guyll ME, Shin C. Benefits of universal intervention effects on a youth protective shield 10 years after baseline. J Adolesc Health. 2012;50(4):414–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.06.010CrossRefPubMed

34.

May C. Towards a general theory of implementation. Implementation Sci. 2013;8:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-8-18

35.

Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft G, editor. Measuring mental health needs. London: Gaskell; 2001. p. 200–24.

36.

O’Neill D. A cost-benefit analysis of early childhood intervention: evidence from a randomised evaluation of a parenting programme (IZA Discussion Papers No. 4518). Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA); 2009. https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp4518.html. Accessed 6 Sept 2017.

37.

Stevens K. The child health utility 9D (CHU9D): a new paediatric preference based measure of health related quality of life. PRO Newsletter. 2010;43. https://mapigroup.com/pro_newsletter/archive/.

38.

Heckman JJ, Moon SH, Pinto R, Savelyev PA, Yavitz A. The rate of return to the high/scope Perry preschool program. J Public Econ. 2010;94(1–2):114–28.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Woods B, Revill P, Sculpher M, Claxton K. Country-level cost-effectiveness thresholds: initial estimates and the need for further research. Value Health. 2016;19(8):929–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.017

40.

Knerr W, Gardner F, Cluver L. Improving positive parenting skills and reducing harsh and abuse parenting in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Prev Sci. 2013;14(4):352–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-012-0314-1CrossRefPubMed

41.

Mejia A, Calam R, Sanders MR. A review of parenting programs in developing countries: opportunities and challenges for preventing emotional and behavioral difficulties in children. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2012;15(2):163–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-012-0116-9CrossRefPubMed

Title: Protecting Adolescents in Low- And Middle-Income Countries from Interpersonal Violence (PRO YOUTH TRIAL): Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of the Strengthening Families Programme 10-14 (“Familias Fuertes”) in Panama
Authors: Anilena Mejia
Richard Emsley
Eleonora Fichera
Wadih Maalouf
Jeremy Segrott
Rachel Calam
Publication date: 01-12-2018
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Trials / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2698-0

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Protecting Adolescents in Low- And Middle-Income Countries from Interpersonal Violence (PRO YOUTH TRIAL): Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of the Strengthening Families Programme 10-14 (“Familias Fuertes”) in Panama

Abstract

Background

Methods

Discussion

Trial registration

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Discussion

Trial registration

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Cerebral microembolism in the critically ill with acute kidney injury (COMET-AKI trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial

Open-label, randomized multicentre phase II study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of sunitinib by dose administration regimen (dose modification or dose interruptions) in patients with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: study protocol of the SURF trial

Tranexamic Acid versus Placebo to Prevent Blood Transfusion during Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer (TACT): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Use of monomeric and oligomeric flavanols in the dietary management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and microalbuminuria (FLAVA trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Improving trial recruitment processes: how qualitative methodologies can be used to address the top 10 research priorities identified within the PRioRiTy study

BetaMe: impact of a comprehensive digital health programme on HbA1c and weight at 12 months for people with diabetes and pre-diabetes: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial