Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Prostate Cancer | Research article

Integrating germline and somatic variation information using genomic data for the discovery of biomarkers in prostate cancer

Authors: Tarun Karthik Kumar Mamidi, Jiande Wu, Chindo Hicks

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among men in the United States. High-throughput genotyping has enabled discovery of germline genetic susceptibility variants (herein referred to as germline mutations) associated with an increased risk of developing PCa. However, germline mutation information has not been leveraged and integrated with information on acquired somatic mutations to link genetic susceptibility to tumorigenesis. The objective of this exploratory study was to address this knowledge gap.

Methods

Germline mutations and associated gene information were derived from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) reports. Somatic mutation and gene expression data were derived from 495 tumors and 52 normal control samples obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We integrated germline and somatic mutation information using gene expression data. We performed enrichment analysis to discover molecular networks and biological pathways enriched for germline and somatic mutations.

Results

We discovered a signature of 124 genes containing both germline and somatic mutations. Enrichment analysis revealed molecular networks and biological pathways enriched for germline and somatic mutations, including, the PDGF, P53, MYC, IGF-1, PTEN and Androgen receptor signaling pathways.

Conclusion

Integrative genomic analysis links genetic susceptibility to tumorigenesis in PCa and establishes putative functional bridges between the germline and somatic variation, and the biological pathways they control.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference American cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2017 (Annual Report). American cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures 2017 (Annual Report).
2.
go back to reference Feigelson HS, Goddard KA, Hollombe C, Tingle SR, Gillanders EM, Mechanic LE, Nelson SA. Approaches to integrating germline and tumor genomic data in cancer research. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35(10):2157–63.CrossRef Feigelson HS, Goddard KA, Hollombe C, Tingle SR, Gillanders EM, Mechanic LE, Nelson SA. Approaches to integrating germline and tumor genomic data in cancer research. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35(10):2157–63.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hicks C, Miele L, Koganti T, Vijayakumar S. Comprehensive assessment and network analysis of the emerging genetic susceptibility landscape of prostate cancer. Cancer Inform. 2013;12:175–91.PubMedPubMedCentral Hicks C, Miele L, Koganti T, Vijayakumar S. Comprehensive assessment and network analysis of the emerging genetic susceptibility landscape of prostate cancer. Cancer Inform. 2013;12:175–91.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Hicks C, Koganti T, Giri S, Tekere M, Ramani R, Sitthi-Amorn J, Vijayakumar S. Integrative genomic analysis for the discovery of biomarkers in prostate cancer. Biomark Insights. 2014 Jun 29;9:39–51.CrossRef Hicks C, Koganti T, Giri S, Tekere M, Ramani R, Sitthi-Amorn J, Vijayakumar S. Integrative genomic analysis for the discovery of biomarkers in prostate cancer. Biomark Insights. 2014 Jun 29;9:39–51.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hicks C, Ramani R, Sartor O, Bhalla R, Miele L, Dlamini Z, Gumede N. An integrative genomics approach for associating genome-wide association studies information with localized and metastatic prostate Cancer phenotypes. Biomark Insights. 2017;12:1177271917695810.CrossRef Hicks C, Ramani R, Sartor O, Bhalla R, Miele L, Dlamini Z, Gumede N. An integrative genomics approach for associating genome-wide association studies information with localized and metastatic prostate Cancer phenotypes. Biomark Insights. 2017;12:1177271917695810.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Weinstein JN, Collisson EA, Mills GB, Shaw KR, Ozenberger BA, Ellrott K, Shmulevich I, Sander C, Stuart JM. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Nat Genet. 2013;45(10):1113–20.CrossRef Weinstein JN, Collisson EA, Mills GB, Shaw KR, Ozenberger BA, Ellrott K, Shmulevich I, Sander C, Stuart JM. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Nat Genet. 2013;45(10):1113–20.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference The International Cancer Genome Consortium. International network of cancer genome projects. Nature. 2010;464:993–8.CrossRef The International Cancer Genome Consortium. International network of cancer genome projects. Nature. 2010;464:993–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ioannidis JP, Boffetta P, Little J, et al. Assessment of cumulative evidence on genetic associations: interim guidelines. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:120–32.CrossRef Ioannidis JP, Boffetta P, Little J, et al. Assessment of cumulative evidence on genetic associations: interim guidelines. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:120–32.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Khoury MJ, Bertram I, Boffetta P, et al. Genome-wide association studies, field synopses, and the development of the knowledge base on genetic variation and human diseases. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170:269–79.CrossRef Khoury MJ, Bertram I, Boffetta P, et al. Genome-wide association studies, field synopses, and the development of the knowledge base on genetic variation and human diseases. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170:269–79.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sagoo GS, Little J, Higgins JP. Systematic reviews of genetic association studies. Human Genome Epidemiology Network. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e28.CrossRef Sagoo GS, Little J, Higgins JP. Systematic reviews of genetic association studies. Human Genome Epidemiology Network. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e28.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9.CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100.CrossRef Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000100.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, Smyth GK. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015;43(7):e47.CrossRef Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, Smyth GK. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015;43(7):e47.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Benjamini Y, Yosef H. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Society. 1995;57:289–300. Benjamini Y, Yosef H. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Royal Stat Society. 1995;57:289–300.
18.
go back to reference Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–9.CrossRef Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 2000;25:25–9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Zuk O, Schaffner SF, Samocha K, Do R, Hechter E, Kathiresan S, Daly MJ, Neale BM, Sunyaev SR, Lander ES. Searching for missing heritability: designing rare variant association studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(4):E455–64.CrossRef Zuk O, Schaffner SF, Samocha K, Do R, Hechter E, Kathiresan S, Daly MJ, Neale BM, Sunyaev SR, Lander ES. Searching for missing heritability: designing rare variant association studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(4):E455–64.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Xiao R, Boehnk M. Quantifying and correcting for the winner's curse in genetic association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2009;33(5):453–62.CrossRef Xiao R, Boehnk M. Quantifying and correcting for the winner's curse in genetic association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2009;33(5):453–62.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Palmer C, Pe’er I. Statistical correction of the Winner’s curse explains replication variability in quantitative trait genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 2017;13(7):e1006916.CrossRef Palmer C, Pe’er I. Statistical correction of the Winner’s curse explains replication variability in quantitative trait genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 2017;13(7):e1006916.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Carter H, Marty R, Hofree M, et al. Interaction landscape of inherited polymorphisms with somatic events in Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(4):410–23.CrossRef Carter H, Marty R, Hofree M, et al. Interaction landscape of inherited polymorphisms with somatic events in Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2017;7(4):410–23.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bonifaci N, Górski B, Masojć B, et al. Exploring the link between germline and somatic genetic alterations in breast carcinogenesis. PLoS One. 2010;5(11):e14078.CrossRef Bonifaci N, Górski B, Masojć B, et al. Exploring the link between germline and somatic genetic alterations in breast carcinogenesis. PLoS One. 2010;5(11):e14078.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Grünewald TG, Delattre O. Cooperation between somatic mutations and germline susceptibility variants in tumorigenesis - a dangerous liaison. Mol Cell Oncol. 2015;3(3):e1086853.CrossRef Grünewald TG, Delattre O. Cooperation between somatic mutations and germline susceptibility variants in tumorigenesis - a dangerous liaison. Mol Cell Oncol. 2015;3(3):e1086853.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Jia P, Zhao Z. Impacts of somatic mutations on gene expression: an association perspective. Brief Bioinform. 2017;18(3):413–25.PubMed Jia P, Zhao Z. Impacts of somatic mutations on gene expression: an association perspective. Brief Bioinform. 2017;18(3):413–25.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Fleck JL, Pavel AB, Cassandras CG. Integrating mutation and gene expression cross-sectional data to infer cancer progression. BMC Syst Biol. 2016;10:12.CrossRef Fleck JL, Pavel AB, Cassandras CG. Integrating mutation and gene expression cross-sectional data to infer cancer progression. BMC Syst Biol. 2016;10:12.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Integrating germline and somatic variation information using genomic data for the discovery of biomarkers in prostate cancer
Authors
Tarun Karthik Kumar Mamidi
Jiande Wu
Chindo Hicks
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-019-5440-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Cancer 1/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine