Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 5/2021

Open Access 01-10-2021 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

Improvement in early continence after introduction of periurethral suspension stitch in robotic prostatectomy

Authors: Erling Aarsæther, Marius Roaldsen, Tore Knutsen, Hiten R. Patel, Bård Soltun

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Early urinary incontinence remains a major source of morbidity for patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy. The purpose of the study was to determine whether the introduction of a suspension stitch would improve early urinary continence rates in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer at our department. We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy with either suspension (n = 119) or figure-of-eight (n = 48) stitching of the dorsal venous complex. The patients submitted EPIC-26 questionnaires before surgery and after 3 and 18 months, respectively. Logistic regression analysis was run to determine the effect of the suspension stitch, nerve-sparing, posterior reconstruction, prostate volume, age and body mass index on early continence rate. The odds ratio of experiencing urinary leaks was 2.1 times higher (95% CI 1.0–4.3) in the figure-of-eight stitch group compared to the suspension stitch group 3 months after surgery (p < 0.05). The early urinary continence rate was 61.3% in the suspension stitch group compared to 35.4% in the figure-of-eight stitch group (p < 0.005). There were no differences between the groups 18 months post-prostatectomy (90.7% in the suspension stitch group versus 81.4% in the non-suspension stitch group, p = 0.1). Ordinal regression analysis identified the suspension stitch, bilateral nerve-sparing and body mass index as independent predictors of urinary continence at 3 months. The association between urinary continence and either unilateral nerve-sparing, posterior reconstruction, prostate volume or age did not reach statistical significance. Our results suggest that the suspension stitch improved early urinary continence following robotic prostatectomy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pearce SM, Pariser JJ, Karrison T et al (2016) Comparison of perioperative and early oncologic outcomes between open and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in a contemporary population based cohort. J Urol 196(1):76–81CrossRef Pearce SM, Pariser JJ, Karrison T et al (2016) Comparison of perioperative and early oncologic outcomes between open and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in a contemporary population based cohort. J Urol 196(1):76–81CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yaxley JW, Coughlin GD, Chambers SK et al (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet 388(10049):1057–1066CrossRef Yaxley JW, Coughlin GD, Chambers SK et al (2016) Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: early outcomes from a randomised controlled phase 3 study. Lancet 388(10049):1057–1066CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wilson T, Torrey R (2011) Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better? Curr Opin Urol 21(3):200–205CrossRef Wilson T, Torrey R (2011) Open versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: which is better? Curr Opin Urol 21(3):200–205CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Leow JJ, Chang SL, Meyer CP et al (2016) Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of an all-payer discharge database. Eur Urol 70(5):837–845CrossRef Leow JJ, Chang SL, Meyer CP et al (2016) Robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of an all-payer discharge database. Eur Urol 70(5):837–845CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):405–417CrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC et al (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):405–417CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hoyland K, Vasdev N, Abrof A et al (2014) Post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: etiology and prevention. Rev Urol 16(4):181–188PubMedPubMedCentral Hoyland K, Vasdev N, Abrof A et al (2014) Post-radical prostatectomy incontinence: etiology and prevention. Rev Urol 16(4):181–188PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Rocco B, Cozzi G, Spinelli MG et al (2012) Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 62(5):779–790CrossRef Rocco B, Cozzi G, Spinelli MG et al (2012) Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 62(5):779–790CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ et al (2009) Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 56(3):472–478CrossRef Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ et al (2009) Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 56(3):472–478CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lavery HJ, Samadi DB, Thaly R et al (2009) The advanced learning curve in robotic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional survey. J Robot Surg 3(3):165CrossRef Lavery HJ, Samadi DB, Thaly R et al (2009) The advanced learning curve in robotic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional survey. J Robot Surg 3(3):165CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Grasso AA, Mistretta FA, Sandri M et al (2016) Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: an updated systematic review and a meta-analysis. BJU Int 118(1):20–34CrossRef Grasso AA, Mistretta FA, Sandri M et al (2016) Posterior musculofascial reconstruction after radical prostatectomy: an updated systematic review and a meta-analysis. BJU Int 118(1):20–34CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Walsh PC (1998) Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 160(6 Pt 2):2418–2424PubMed Walsh PC (1998) Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 160(6 Pt 2):2418–2424PubMed
12.
go back to reference Carlson KV, Nitti VW (2001) Prevention and management of incontinence following radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 28(3):595–612CrossRef Carlson KV, Nitti VW (2001) Prevention and management of incontinence following radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 28(3):595–612CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lei Y, Alemozaffar M, Williams SB et al (2011) Athermal division and selective suture ligation of the dorsal vein complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 59(2):235–243CrossRef Lei Y, Alemozaffar M, Williams SB et al (2011) Athermal division and selective suture ligation of the dorsal vein complex during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 59(2):235–243CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Walz J, Epstein JI, Ganzer R et al (2016) A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy of the prostate related to optimisation of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy: an update. Eur Urol 70(2):301–311CrossRef Walz J, Epstein JI, Ganzer R et al (2016) A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy of the prostate related to optimisation of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy: an update. Eur Urol 70(2):301–311CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ganzer R, Blana A, Gaumann A et al (2008) Topographical anatomy of periprostatic and capsular nerves: quantification and computerised planimetry. Eur Urol 54(2):353–360CrossRef Ganzer R, Blana A, Gaumann A et al (2008) Topographical anatomy of periprostatic and capsular nerves: quantification and computerised planimetry. Eur Urol 54(2):353–360CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Improvement in early continence after introduction of periurethral suspension stitch in robotic prostatectomy
Authors
Erling Aarsæther
Marius Roaldsen
Tore Knutsen
Hiten R. Patel
Bård Soltun
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01156-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Journal of Robotic Surgery 5/2021 Go to the issue