Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Urology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Prostate Cancer | Research

Expanding the role of PSMA PET in active surveillance

Authors: Anika Jain, Anthony-Joe Nassour, Thomas Dean, Imogen Patterson, Lisa Tarlinton, Lawrence Kim, Henry Woo

Published in: BMC Urology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Accurate grading at the time of diagnosis is fundamental to risk stratification and treatment decision making, particularly for men being considered for Active Surveillance (AS). With the introduction of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) there has been considerable improvement in sensitivity and specificity for the detection and staging of clinically significant prostate cancer. Our study aims to determine the role of PSMA PET/CT in men with newly diagnosed low or favourable intermediate risk prostate cancer to better select men for AS.

Method

This is a retrospective single centre study performed from January 2019 and October 2022. This study includes men identified from electronic medical record system who had undergone a PSMA PET/CT following newly diagnosed low or favourable-intermediate risk prostate cancer. Primary outcome was to assess the change in management for men being considered for AS following PSMA PET/CT results on the basis of PSMA PET characteristics.

Results

In total, there were 11 of 30 men (36.67%) who were assigned management by AS and 19 of 30 men (63.33%) who had definitive treatment. 15 of the 19 men that needed treatment had concerning features on PSMA PET/CT results. Of the 15 men with concerning features on PSMA PET, 9 (60%) men were found to have adverse pathological features on final prostatectomy features.

Conclusion

This retrospective study suggests that PSMA PET/CT has potential to influence the management of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer that would otherwise be appropriate for active surveillance.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17–48.CrossRefPubMed Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17–48.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bruinsma SM, Roobol MJ, Carroll PR, Klotz L, Pickles T, Moore CM, et al. Expert consensus document: semantics in active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer - results of a modified Delphi consensus procedure. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14(5):312–22.CrossRefPubMed Bruinsma SM, Roobol MJ, Carroll PR, Klotz L, Pickles T, Moore CM, et al. Expert consensus document: semantics in active surveillance for men with localized prostate cancer - results of a modified Delphi consensus procedure. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14(5):312–22.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M, Williams M, Udovicich C, Vela I, et al. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced prostate Cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane Antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;77(4):403–17.CrossRefPubMed Perera M, Papa N, Roberts M, Williams M, Udovicich C, Vela I, et al. Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Advanced prostate Cancer-updated diagnostic utility, sensitivity, specificity, and distribution of prostate-specific membrane Antigen-avid lesions: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;77(4):403–17.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1208–16.CrossRefPubMed Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. Lancet. 2020;395(10231):1208–16.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Emmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, Moon D, Thompson J, Roberts MJ, et al. The Additive Diagnostic Value of prostate-specific membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging triage in the diagnosis of prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): a prospective Multicentre Study. Eur Urol. 2021;80(6):682–9.CrossRefPubMed Emmett L, Buteau J, Papa N, Moon D, Thompson J, Roberts MJ, et al. The Additive Diagnostic Value of prostate-specific membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography to Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging triage in the diagnosis of prostate Cancer (PRIMARY): a prospective Multicentre Study. Eur Urol. 2021;80(6):682–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Zhou C, Tang Y, Deng Z, Yang J, Zhou M, Wang L, et al. Comparison of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for the detection of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2022;12(1):10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhou C, Tang Y, Deng Z, Yang J, Zhou M, Wang L, et al. Comparison of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for the detection of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2022;12(1):10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Uprimny C, Kroiss AS, Decristoforo C, Fritz J, von Guggenberg E, Kendler D, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer: PSA and Gleason score predict the intensity of tracer accumulation in the primary tumour. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(6):941–9.CrossRefPubMed Uprimny C, Kroiss AS, Decristoforo C, Fritz J, von Guggenberg E, Kendler D, et al. (68)Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in primary staging of prostate cancer: PSA and Gleason score predict the intensity of tracer accumulation in the primary tumour. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(6):941–9.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Thomsen FB, Brasso K, Klotz LH, Røder MA, Berg KD, Iversen P. Active surveillance for clinically localized prostate cancer–a systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2014;109(8):830–5.CrossRefPubMed Thomsen FB, Brasso K, Klotz LH, Røder MA, Berg KD, Iversen P. Active surveillance for clinically localized prostate cancer–a systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2014;109(8):830–5.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Tosoian JJ, Mamawala M, Epstein JI, Landis P, Wolf S, Trock BJ, et al. Intermediate and longer-term outcomes from a prospective active-surveillance program for favorable-risk prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(30):3379–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tosoian JJ, Mamawala M, Epstein JI, Landis P, Wolf S, Trock BJ, et al. Intermediate and longer-term outcomes from a prospective active-surveillance program for favorable-risk prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(30):3379–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Tosoian JJ, Mamawala M, Epstein JI, Landis P, Macura KJ, Simopoulos DN, et al. Active surveillance of Grade Group 1 prostate Cancer: long-term outcomes from a large prospective cohort. Eur Urol. 2020;77(6):675–82.CrossRefPubMed Tosoian JJ, Mamawala M, Epstein JI, Landis P, Macura KJ, Simopoulos DN, et al. Active surveillance of Grade Group 1 prostate Cancer: long-term outcomes from a large prospective cohort. Eur Urol. 2020;77(6):675–82.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference van As NJ, Norman AR, Thomas K, Khoo VS, Thompson A, Huddart RA, et al. Predicting the probability of deferred radical treatment for localised prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. Eur Urol. 2008;54(6):1297–305.CrossRefPubMed van As NJ, Norman AR, Thomas K, Khoo VS, Thompson A, Huddart RA, et al. Predicting the probability of deferred radical treatment for localised prostate cancer managed by active surveillance. Eur Urol. 2008;54(6):1297–305.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Carlsson S, Benfante N, Alvim R, Sjoberg DD, Vickers A, Reuter VE, et al. Long-term outcomes of active surveillance for prostate Cancer: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Experience. J Urol. 2020;203(6):1122–7.CrossRefPubMed Carlsson S, Benfante N, Alvim R, Sjoberg DD, Vickers A, Reuter VE, et al. Long-term outcomes of active surveillance for prostate Cancer: the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Experience. J Urol. 2020;203(6):1122–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Komisarenko M, Martin LJ, Finelli A. Active surveillance review: contemporary selection criteria, follow-up, compliance and outcomes. Transl Androl Urol. 2018;7(2):243–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Komisarenko M, Martin LJ, Finelli A. Active surveillance review: contemporary selection criteria, follow-up, compliance and outcomes. Transl Androl Urol. 2018;7(2):243–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Preisser F, Cooperberg MR, Crook J, Feng F, Graefen M, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Intermediate-risk prostate Cancer: stratification and management. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020;3(3):270–80.CrossRefPubMed Preisser F, Cooperberg MR, Crook J, Feng F, Graefen M, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Intermediate-risk prostate Cancer: stratification and management. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020;3(3):270–80.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Stolzenbach LF, Rosiello G, Pecoraro A, Palumbo C, Luzzago S, Deuker M, et al. Prostate Cancer Grade and Stage Misclassification in active surveillance candidates: black Versus White Patients. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18(11):1492–9.CrossRefPubMed Stolzenbach LF, Rosiello G, Pecoraro A, Palumbo C, Luzzago S, Deuker M, et al. Prostate Cancer Grade and Stage Misclassification in active surveillance candidates: black Versus White Patients. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020;18(11):1492–9.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mufarrij P, Sankin A, Godoy G, Lepor H. Pathologic outcomes of candidates for active surveillance undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2010;76(3):689–92.CrossRefPubMed Mufarrij P, Sankin A, Godoy G, Lepor H. Pathologic outcomes of candidates for active surveillance undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2010;76(3):689–92.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Barkovich EJ, Shankar PR, Westphalen AC. Literature and Subset Meta-Analysis of PI-RADSv2 Categories Stratified by Gleason Scores. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(4):847–54. A Systematic Review of the Existing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2. Barkovich EJ, Shankar PR, Westphalen AC. Literature and Subset Meta-Analysis of PI-RADSv2 Categories Stratified by Gleason Scores. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(4):847–54. A Systematic Review of the Existing Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 (PI-RADSv2.
18.
go back to reference Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, et al. MRI-Targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-Cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(19):1767–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse LA, Vaarala MH, et al. MRI-Targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-Cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(19):1767–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Aus G, Abbou CC, Bolla M, Heidenreich A, Schmid HP, van Poppel H, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2005;48(4):546–51.CrossRefPubMed Aus G, Abbou CC, Bolla M, Heidenreich A, Schmid HP, van Poppel H, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2005;48(4):546–51.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Carter HB, Albertsen PC, Barry MJ, Etzioni R, Freedland SJ, Greene KL, et al. Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline. J Urol. 2013;190(2):419–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Carter HB, Albertsen PC, Barry MJ, Etzioni R, Freedland SJ, Greene KL, et al. Early detection of prostate cancer: AUA Guideline. J Urol. 2013;190(2):419–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Privé BM, Israël B, Schilham MGM, Muselaers CHJ, Zámecnik P, Mulders PFA, et al. Evaluating F-18-PSMA-1007-PET in primary prostate cancer and comparing it to multi-parametric MRI and histopathology. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021;24(2):423–30.CrossRefPubMed Privé BM, Israël B, Schilham MGM, Muselaers CHJ, Zámecnik P, Mulders PFA, et al. Evaluating F-18-PSMA-1007-PET in primary prostate cancer and comparing it to multi-parametric MRI and histopathology. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021;24(2):423–30.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Raveenthiran S, Yaxley WJ, Franklin T, Coughlin G, Roberts M, Gianduzzo T, et al. Findings in 1,123 men with preoperative (68)Ga-Prostate-specific membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography and Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging compared to totally embedded radical prostatectomy histopathology: implications for the diagnosis and management of prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2022;207(3):573–80.CrossRefPubMed Raveenthiran S, Yaxley WJ, Franklin T, Coughlin G, Roberts M, Gianduzzo T, et al. Findings in 1,123 men with preoperative (68)Ga-Prostate-specific membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography and Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging compared to totally embedded radical prostatectomy histopathology: implications for the diagnosis and management of prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2022;207(3):573–80.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Amin A, Blazevski A, Thompson J, Scheltema MJ, Hofman MS, Murphy D, et al. Protocol for the PRIMARY clinical trial, a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study of the additive diagnostic value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic setting for men being investigated for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2020;125(4):515–24.CrossRefPubMed Amin A, Blazevski A, Thompson J, Scheltema MJ, Hofman MS, Murphy D, et al. Protocol for the PRIMARY clinical trial, a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study of the additive diagnostic value of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic setting for men being investigated for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2020;125(4):515–24.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Expanding the role of PSMA PET in active surveillance
Authors
Anika Jain
Anthony-Joe Nassour
Thomas Dean
Imogen Patterson
Lisa Tarlinton
Lawrence Kim
Henry Woo
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Urology / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2490
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01219-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Urology 1/2023 Go to the issue