Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 24-04-2024 | Prostate Cancer | Invited Review

Biparametric MRI in prostate cancer during active surveillance: is it safe?

Authors: Iztok Caglic, Nikita Sushentsev, Tom Syer, Kang-Lung Lee, Tristan Barrett

Published in: European Radiology

Login to get access

Abstract

Active surveillance (AS) is the preferred option for patients presenting with low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer. MRI now plays a crucial role for baseline assessment and ongoing monitoring of AS. The Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) recommendations aid radiological assessment of progression; however, current guidelines do not advise on MRI protocols nor on frequency. Biparametric (bp) imaging without contrast administration offers advantages such as reduced costs and increased throughput, with similar outcomes to multiparametric (mp) MRI shown in the biopsy naïve setting. In AS follow-up, the paradigm shifts from MRI lesion detection to assessment of progression, and patients have the further safety net of continuing clinical surveillance. As such, bpMRI may be appropriate in clinically stable patients on routine AS follow-up pathways; however, there is currently limited published evidence for this approach. It should be noted that mpMRI may be mandated in certain patients and potentially offers additional advantages, including improving image quality, new lesion detection, and staging accuracy. Recently developed AI solutions have enabled higher quality and faster scanning protocols, which may help mitigate against disadvantages of bpMRI. In this article, we explore the current role of MRI in AS and address the need for contrast-enhanced sequences.

Clinical relevance statement

Active surveillance is the preferred plan for patients with lower-risk prostate cancer, and MRI plays a crucial role in patient selection and monitoring; however, current guidelines do not currently recommend how or when to perform MRI in follow-up.

Key Points

  • Noncontrast biparametric MRI has reduced costs and increased throughput and may be appropriate for monitoring stable patients.
  • Multiparametric MRI may be mandated in certain patients, and contrast potentially offers additional advantages.
  • AI solutions enable higher quality, faster scanning protocols, and could mitigate the disadvantages of biparametric imaging.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E et al (2021) EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer—2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with urative intent. Eur Urol 79:243–262PubMedCrossRef Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E et al (2021) EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer—2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with urative intent. Eur Urol 79:243–262PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ et al (2017) Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 377:132–142PubMedCrossRef Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ et al (2017) Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 377:132–142PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA et al (2023) Fifteen-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 388:1547–1558 Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA et al (2023) Fifteen-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 388:1547–1558
4.
go back to reference Rajwa P, Sprenkle PC, Leapman MS (2021) When and how should active surveillance for prostate cancer be de-escalated? Eur Urol Focus 7:297–300PubMedCrossRef Rajwa P, Sprenkle PC, Leapman MS (2021) When and how should active surveillance for prostate cancer be de-escalated? Eur Urol Focus 7:297–300PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Prostate cancer diagnosis and management: NICE guideline (NG131). 2019 Prostate cancer diagnosis and management: NICE guideline (NG131). 2019
6.
go back to reference Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline. 2022 Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline. 2022
7.
go back to reference Moore CM, King LE, Withington J et al (2023) Best current practice and research priorities in active surveillance for prostate cancer-a report of a Movember International Consensus Meeting. Eur Urol Oncol 6:160–182PubMedCrossRef Moore CM, King LE, Withington J et al (2023) Best current practice and research priorities in active surveillance for prostate cancer-a report of a Movember International Consensus Meeting. Eur Urol Oncol 6:160–182PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Klotz L, Pond G, Loblaw A et al (2020) Randomized study of systematic biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging and targeted and systematic biopsy in men on active surveillance (ASIST): 2-year postbiopsy follow-up. Eur Urol 77:311–317PubMedCrossRef Klotz L, Pond G, Loblaw A et al (2020) Randomized study of systematic biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging and targeted and systematic biopsy in men on active surveillance (ASIST): 2-year postbiopsy follow-up. Eur Urol 77:311–317PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gallagher KM, Christopher E, Cameron AJ et al (2019) Four-year outcomes from a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based active surveillance programme: PSA dynamics and serial MRI scans allow omission of protocol biopsies. BJU Int 123:429–438PubMedCrossRef Gallagher KM, Christopher E, Cameron AJ et al (2019) Four-year outcomes from a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based active surveillance programme: PSA dynamics and serial MRI scans allow omission of protocol biopsies. BJU Int 123:429–438PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Westphalen AC, McCulloch CE, Anaokar JM et al (2020) Variability of the positive predictive value of PI-RADS for prostate MRI across 26 centers: experience of the society of abdominal radiology prostate cancer disease-focused panel. Radiology 296:76–84PubMedCrossRef Westphalen AC, McCulloch CE, Anaokar JM et al (2020) Variability of the positive predictive value of PI-RADS for prostate MRI across 26 centers: experience of the society of abdominal radiology prostate cancer disease-focused panel. Radiology 296:76–84PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rajwa P, Pradere B, Quhal F et al (2021) Reliability of serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect prostate cancer progression during active surveillance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 80:549–563PubMedCrossRef Rajwa P, Pradere B, Quhal F et al (2021) Reliability of serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect prostate cancer progression during active surveillance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 80:549–563PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hettiarachchi D, Geraghty R, Rice P et al (2021) Can the use of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging during active surveillance of prostate cancer avoid the need for prostate biopsies?-A systematic diagnostic test accuracy review. Eur Urol Oncol 4:426–436PubMedCrossRef Hettiarachchi D, Geraghty R, Rice P et al (2021) Can the use of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging during active surveillance of prostate cancer avoid the need for prostate biopsies?-A systematic diagnostic test accuracy review. Eur Urol Oncol 4:426–436PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sushentsev N, Abrego L, Colarieti A et al (2023) Using a recurrent neural network to inform the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density for dynamic monitoring of the risk of prostate cancer progression on active surveillance. Eur Urol Open Sci 52:36–39PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sushentsev N, Abrego L, Colarieti A et al (2023) Using a recurrent neural network to inform the use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density for dynamic monitoring of the risk of prostate cancer progression on active surveillance. Eur Urol Open Sci 52:36–39PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA et al(2019) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol 76:340–351PubMedCrossRef Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA et al(2019) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol 76:340–351PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference McDonald JS, Hunt CH, Kolbe AB et al (2019) Acute adverse events following gadolinium-based contrast agent administration: a single-center retrospective study of 281 945 injections. Radiology 292:620–627PubMedCrossRef McDonald JS, Hunt CH, Kolbe AB et al (2019) Acute adverse events following gadolinium-based contrast agent administration: a single-center retrospective study of 281 945 injections. Radiology 292:620–627PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF et al (2015) Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 275:772–782PubMedCrossRef McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF et al (2015) Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 275:772–782PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kanda T, Fukusato T, Matsuda M et al (2015) Gadolinium-based contrast agent accumulates in the brain even in subjects without severe renal dysfunction: evaluation of autopsy brain specimens with inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. Radiology 276:228–232PubMedCrossRef Kanda T, Fukusato T, Matsuda M et al (2015) Gadolinium-based contrast agent accumulates in the brain even in subjects without severe renal dysfunction: evaluation of autopsy brain specimens with inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. Radiology 276:228–232PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Gulani V, Calamante F, Shellock FG, Kanal E, Reeder SB (2017) Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations. Lancet Neurol 16:564–570PubMedCrossRef Gulani V, Calamante F, Shellock FG, Kanal E, Reeder SB (2017) Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations. Lancet Neurol 16:564–570PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Murata N, Gonzalez-Cuyar LF, Murata K et al (2016) Macrocyclic and other non-group 1 gadolinium contrast agents deposit low levels of gadolinium in brain and bone tissue: preliminary results from 9 patients with normal renal function. Invest Radiol 51:447–453PubMedCrossRef Murata N, Gonzalez-Cuyar LF, Murata K et al (2016) Macrocyclic and other non-group 1 gadolinium contrast agents deposit low levels of gadolinium in brain and bone tissue: preliminary results from 9 patients with normal renal function. Invest Radiol 51:447–453PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ponrartana S, Moore MM, Chan SS, Victoria T, Dillman JR, Chavhan GB (2021) Safety issues related to intravenous contrast agent use in magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol 51:736–747PubMedCrossRef Ponrartana S, Moore MM, Chan SS, Victoria T, Dillman JR, Chavhan GB (2021) Safety issues related to intravenous contrast agent use in magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol 51:736–747PubMedCrossRef
21.
22.
go back to reference Rouvière O (2023) Contrast-medium administration for prostate MRI can be abandoned: no(t so simple)! Eur Radiol 33:8415–8416PubMedCrossRef Rouvière O (2023) Contrast-medium administration for prostate MRI can be abandoned: no(t so simple)! Eur Radiol 33:8415–8416PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schoots IG, Barentsz JO, Bittencourt LK et al (2020) PI-RADS committee position on MRI without contrast medium in biopsy-naive men with suspected prostate cancer: narrative review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 216:3–19PubMedCrossRef Schoots IG, Barentsz JO, Bittencourt LK et al (2020) PI-RADS committee position on MRI without contrast medium in biopsy-naive men with suspected prostate cancer: narrative review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 216:3–19PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Porter KK, King A, Galgano SJ, Sherrer RL, Gordetsky JB, Rais-Bahrami S (2020) Financial implications of biparametric prostate MRI. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 23:88–93PubMedCrossRef Porter KK, King A, Galgano SJ, Sherrer RL, Gordetsky JB, Rais-Bahrami S (2020) Financial implications of biparametric prostate MRI. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 23:88–93PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Barrett T, Ghafoor S, Gupta RT et al (2022) Prostate MRI qualification: AJR expert panel narrative review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 219:691–702PubMedCrossRef Barrett T, Ghafoor S, Gupta RT et al (2022) Prostate MRI qualification: AJR expert panel narrative review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 219:691–702PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Davies C, Castle JT, Stalbow K, Haslam PJ (2019) Prostate mpMRI in the UK: the state of the nation. Clin Radiol 74:894.e11–894.e18PubMedCrossRef Davies C, Castle JT, Stalbow K, Haslam PJ (2019) Prostate mpMRI in the UK: the state of the nation. Clin Radiol 74:894.e11–894.e18PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bass EJ, Pantovic A, Connor M et al (2021) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric prostate MRI for prostate cancer in men at risk. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 24:596–611PubMedCrossRef Bass EJ, Pantovic A, Connor M et al (2021) A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of biparametric prostate MRI for prostate cancer in men at risk. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 24:596–611PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Belue MJ, Yilmaz EC, Daryanani A, Turkbey B (2022) Current status of biparametric MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: literature analysis. Life (Basel) 12:804PubMed Belue MJ, Yilmaz EC, Daryanani A, Turkbey B (2022) Current status of biparametric MRI in prostate cancer diagnosis: literature analysis. Life (Basel) 12:804PubMed
29.
go back to reference Russo F, Mazzetti S, Regge D et al (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of single-plane biparametric and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: a randomized noninferiority trial in biopsy-naïve men. Eur Urol Oncol 4:855–862PubMedCrossRef Russo F, Mazzetti S, Regge D et al (2021) Diagnostic accuracy of single-plane biparametric and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: a randomized noninferiority trial in biopsy-naïve men. Eur Urol Oncol 4:855–862PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Asif A, Nathan A, Ng A et al (2023) Comparing biparametric to multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (PRIME): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol. BMJ Open 13:e070280PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Asif A, Nathan A, Ng A et al (2023) Comparing biparametric to multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men (PRIME): a prospective, international, multicentre, non-inferiority within-patient, diagnostic yield trial protocol. BMJ Open 13:e070280PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Thurtle D, Barrett T, Thankappan-Nair V et al (2018) Progression and treatment rates using an active surveillance protocol incorporating image-guided baseline biopsies and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging monitoring for men with favourable-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int 122:59–65PubMedCrossRef Thurtle D, Barrett T, Thankappan-Nair V et al (2018) Progression and treatment rates using an active surveillance protocol incorporating image-guided baseline biopsies and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging monitoring for men with favourable-risk prostate cancer. BJU Int 122:59–65PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Stavrinides V, Giganti F, Trock B et al (2020) Five-ryear outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging-based Active Surveillance for prostate cancer: large cohort study. Eur Urol 78:443–451PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Stavrinides V, Giganti F, Trock B et al (2020) Five-ryear outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging-based Active Surveillance for prostate cancer: large cohort study. Eur Urol 78:443–451PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Light A, Lophatananon A, Keates A et al (2022) Development and external validation of the STRATified CANcer surveillance (STRATCANS) multivariable model for predicting progression in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer starting active surveillance. J Clin Med 12:216PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Light A, Lophatananon A, Keates A et al (2022) Development and external validation of the STRATified CANcer surveillance (STRATCANS) multivariable model for predicting progression in men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer starting active surveillance. J Clin Med 12:216PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Moore CM, Giganti F, Albertsen P et al (2017) Reporting magnetic resonance imaging in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: the PRECISE recommendations—a report of a European School of Oncology Task Force. Eur Urol 71:648–655PubMedCrossRef Moore CM, Giganti F, Albertsen P et al (2017) Reporting magnetic resonance imaging in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: the PRECISE recommendations—a report of a European School of Oncology Task Force. Eur Urol 71:648–655PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Sanmugalingam N, Sushentsev N, Lee KL et al (2023) The PRECISE recommendations for prostate MRI in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer: a critical review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 221:649–660PubMedCrossRef Sanmugalingam N, Sushentsev N, Lee KL et al (2023) The PRECISE recommendations for prostate MRI in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer: a critical review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 221:649–660PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Sushentsev N, Caglic I, Sala E et al (2020) The effect of capped biparametric magnetic resonance imaging slots on weekly prostate cancer imaging workload. Br J Radiol 93:20190929PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sushentsev N, Caglic I, Sala E et al (2020) The effect of capped biparametric magnetic resonance imaging slots on weekly prostate cancer imaging workload. Br J Radiol 93:20190929PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Cooperberg MR, Meeks W, Fang R, Gaylis FD, Catalona WJ, Makarov DV (2023) Time trends and variation in the use of active surveillance for management of low-risk prostate cancer in the US. JAMA Netw Open 6:E231439PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Cooperberg MR, Meeks W, Fang R, Gaylis FD, Catalona WJ, Makarov DV (2023) Time trends and variation in the use of active surveillance for management of low-risk prostate cancer in the US. JAMA Netw Open 6:E231439PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
go back to reference de Vos II, Luiting HB, Roobol MJ (2023) Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Past, Current, and Future Trends. J Pers Med 13:629 de Vos II, Luiting HB, Roobol MJ (2023) Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: Past, Current, and Future Trends. J Pers Med 13:629
40.
go back to reference Biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: a preliminary collaboration between the UK and France Part of the Cities partnership Programme Biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: a preliminary collaboration between the UK and France Part of the Cities partnership Programme
41.
go back to reference Kortenbach KC, Boesen L, Løgager V, Thomsen HS (2021) For men enrolled in active surveillance, pre-biopsy biparametric magnetic resonance imaging significantly reduces the risk of reclassification and disease progression after 1 year. Scand J Urol 55:215–220PubMedCrossRef Kortenbach KC, Boesen L, Løgager V, Thomsen HS (2021) For men enrolled in active surveillance, pre-biopsy biparametric magnetic resonance imaging significantly reduces the risk of reclassification and disease progression after 1 year. Scand J Urol 55:215–220PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Thestrup KCD, Løgager V, Boesen L, Thomsen HS (2019) Comparison of bi- and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to select men for active surveillance. Acta Radiol Open 8:2058460119866352PubMedPubMedCentral Thestrup KCD, Løgager V, Boesen L, Thomsen HS (2019) Comparison of bi- and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to select men for active surveillance. Acta Radiol Open 8:2058460119866352PubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Caglic I, Sushentsev N, Gnanapragasam VJ et al (2021) MRI-derived PRECISE scores for predicting pathologically-confirmed radiological progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. Eur Radiol 31:2696–2705PubMedCrossRef Caglic I, Sushentsev N, Gnanapragasam VJ et al (2021) MRI-derived PRECISE scores for predicting pathologically-confirmed radiological progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance. Eur Radiol 31:2696–2705PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Gatti M, Faletti R, Calleris G et al (2019) Prostate cancer detection with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) by readers with different experience: performance and comparison with multiparametric (mpMRI). Abdom Radiol (NY) 44:1883–1893PubMedCrossRef Gatti M, Faletti R, Calleris G et al (2019) Prostate cancer detection with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) by readers with different experience: performance and comparison with multiparametric (mpMRI). Abdom Radiol (NY) 44:1883–1893PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Di Campli E, Delli Pizzi A, Seccia B et al (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience. Eur J Radiol 101:17–23PubMedCrossRef Di Campli E, Delli Pizzi A, Seccia B et al (2018) Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience. Eur J Radiol 101:17–23PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Zawaideh JP, Sala E, Shaida N et al (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 30:4039–4049PubMedCrossRef Zawaideh JP, Sala E, Shaida N et al (2020) Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 30:4039–4049PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Van Hemelrijck M, Ji X, Helleman J et al (2019) Reasons for discontinuing active surveillance: assessment of 21 centres in 12 countries in the Movember GAP3 Consortium. Eur Urol 75:523–531PubMedCrossRef Van Hemelrijck M, Ji X, Helleman J et al (2019) Reasons for discontinuing active surveillance: assessment of 21 centres in 12 countries in the Movember GAP3 Consortium. Eur Urol 75:523–531PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Kinsella N, Helleman J, Bruinsma S et al (2018) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of contemporary worldwide practices. Transl Androl Urol 7:83–97PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kinsella N, Helleman J, Bruinsma S et al (2018) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a systematic review of contemporary worldwide practices. Transl Androl Urol 7:83–97PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Kinsella N, Stattin P, Cahill D et al (2018) Factors influencing men’s choice of and adherence to active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: a mixed-method systematic review. Eur Urol 74:261–280PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kinsella N, Stattin P, Cahill D et al (2018) Factors influencing men’s choice of and adherence to active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: a mixed-method systematic review. Eur Urol 74:261–280PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Eldred-Evans D, Tam H, Sokhi H, Padhani AR, Winkler M, Ahmed HU (2020) Rethinking prostate cancer screening: could MRI be an alternative screening test? Nat Rev Urol 17:526–539PubMedCrossRef Eldred-Evans D, Tam H, Sokhi H, Padhani AR, Winkler M, Ahmed HU (2020) Rethinking prostate cancer screening: could MRI be an alternative screening test? Nat Rev Urol 17:526–539PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Ghavimi S, Abdi H, Waterhouse J et al (2018) Natural history of prostatic lesions on serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Can Urol Assoc J 12:270–275PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ghavimi S, Abdi H, Waterhouse J et al (2018) Natural history of prostatic lesions on serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Can Urol Assoc J 12:270–275PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Barrett T, de Rooij M, Giganti F, Allen C, Barentsz JO, Padhani AR (2023) Quality checkpoints in the MRI-directed prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Nat Rev Urol 20:9–22PubMedCrossRef Barrett T, de Rooij M, Giganti F, Allen C, Barentsz JO, Padhani AR (2023) Quality checkpoints in the MRI-directed prostate cancer diagnostic pathway. Nat Rev Urol 20:9–22PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Wassberg C, Akin O, Vargas HA, Shukla-Dave A, Zhang J, Hricak H (2012) The incremental value of contrast-enhanced MRI in the detection of biopsy-proven local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: effect of reader experience. AJR. Am J Roentgenol 199:360–366CrossRef Wassberg C, Akin O, Vargas HA, Shukla-Dave A, Zhang J, Hricak H (2012) The incremental value of contrast-enhanced MRI in the detection of biopsy-proven local recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: effect of reader experience. AJR. Am J Roentgenol 199:360–366CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Caglic I, Sushentsev N, Shah N, Warren AY, Lamb BW, Barrett T (2021) Comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in biopsy naïve patients. Eur J Radiol 141:109804PubMedCrossRef Caglic I, Sushentsev N, Shah N, Warren AY, Lamb BW, Barrett T (2021) Comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI for the detection of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in biopsy naïve patients. Eur J Radiol 141:109804PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Junker D, Steinkohl F, Fritz V et al (2019) Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric MRI of the prostate: are gadolinium-based contrast agents needed for routine examinations? World J Urol 37:691–699PubMedCrossRef Junker D, Steinkohl F, Fritz V et al (2019) Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric MRI of the prostate: are gadolinium-based contrast agents needed for routine examinations? World J Urol 37:691–699PubMedCrossRef
56.
go back to reference Bao J, Zhi R, Hou Y et al (2021) Optimized MRI assessment for clinically significant prostate cancer: a STARD-compliant two-center study. J Magn Reson Imaging 53:1210–1219PubMedCrossRef Bao J, Zhi R, Hou Y et al (2021) Optimized MRI assessment for clinically significant prostate cancer: a STARD-compliant two-center study. J Magn Reson Imaging 53:1210–1219PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Giganti F, Pecoraro M, Stavrinides V et al (2020) Interobserver reproducibility of the PRECISE scoring system for prostate MRI on active surveillance: results from a two-centre pilot study. Eur Radiol 30:2082–2090PubMedCrossRef Giganti F, Pecoraro M, Stavrinides V et al (2020) Interobserver reproducibility of the PRECISE scoring system for prostate MRI on active surveillance: results from a two-centre pilot study. Eur Radiol 30:2082–2090PubMedCrossRef
58.
go back to reference Lee KL, Kessler DA, Dezonie S, et al (2023). Assessment of deep learning-based reconstruction on T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted prostate MRI image quality. Eur J Radiol 166:111017 Lee KL, Kessler DA, Dezonie S, et al (2023). Assessment of deep learning-based reconstruction on T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted prostate MRI image quality. Eur J Radiol 166:111017
59.
go back to reference Giganti F, Allen C, Emberton M, Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, PRECISION study group (2020) Prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL): a new quality control scoring system for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate from the PRECISION trial. Eur Urol Oncol 3:615–619PubMedCrossRef Giganti F, Allen C, Emberton M, Moore CM, Kasivisvanathan V, PRECISION study group (2020) Prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL): a new quality control scoring system for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate from the PRECISION trial. Eur Urol Oncol 3:615–619PubMedCrossRef
60.
go back to reference Karanasios E, Caglic I, Zawaideh JP, Barrett T (2022) Prostate MRI quality: clinical impact of the PI-QUAL score in prostate cancer diagnostic work-up. Br J Radiol 95:20211372PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Karanasios E, Caglic I, Zawaideh JP, Barrett T (2022) Prostate MRI quality: clinical impact of the PI-QUAL score in prostate cancer diagnostic work-up. Br J Radiol 95:20211372PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Englman C, Maffei D, Allen C, et al (2024) PRECISE Version 2: Updated recommendations for reporting prostate magnetic resonance imaging in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 30:S0302–2838 Englman C, Maffei D, Allen C, et al (2024) PRECISE Version 2: Updated recommendations for reporting prostate magnetic resonance imaging in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer. Eur Urol 30:S0302–2838
62.
go back to reference Sushentsev N, Rundo L, Blyuss O, Gnanapragasam VJ, Sala E, Barrett T(2021) MRI-derived radiomics model for baseline prediction of prostate cancer progression on active surveillance Sci Rep 11:12917PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sushentsev N, Rundo L, Blyuss O, Gnanapragasam VJ, Sala E, Barrett T(2021) MRI-derived radiomics model for baseline prediction of prostate cancer progression on active surveillance Sci Rep 11:12917PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Sushentsev N, Rundo L, Blyuss O et al (2021) Comparative performance of MRI-derived PRECISE scores and delta-radiomics models for the prediction of prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance Eur Radiol 32:680–689 Sushentsev N, Rundo L, Blyuss O et al (2021) Comparative performance of MRI-derived PRECISE scores and delta-radiomics models for the prediction of prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance Eur Radiol 32:680–689
64.
go back to reference Sushentsev N, Rundo L, Abrego L et al (2023) Time series radiomics for the prediction of prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance. Eur Radiol 33:3792–3800 Sushentsev N, Rundo L, Abrego L et al (2023) Time series radiomics for the prediction of prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance. Eur Radiol 33:3792–3800
65.
go back to reference Roest C, Kwee TC, Saha A, Fütterer JJ, Yakar D, Huisman H (2023) AI-assisted biparametric MRI surveillance of prostate cancer: feasibility study. Eur Radiol 33:89–96PubMedCrossRef Roest C, Kwee TC, Saha A, Fütterer JJ, Yakar D, Huisman H (2023) AI-assisted biparametric MRI surveillance of prostate cancer: feasibility study. Eur Radiol 33:89–96PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Rajwa P, Pradere B, Quhal F et al (2021) Reliability of serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect prostate cancer progression during active surveillance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 80:549–563 Rajwa P, Pradere B, Quhal F et al (2021) Reliability of serial prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect prostate cancer progression during active surveillance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 80:549–563
67.
go back to reference Sushentsev N, Caglic I, Rundo L et al (2022) Serial changes in tumour measurements and apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance with and without histopathological progression. Br J Radiol 95:20210842PubMedCrossRef Sushentsev N, Caglic I, Rundo L et al (2022) Serial changes in tumour measurements and apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance with and without histopathological progression. Br J Radiol 95:20210842PubMedCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Giganti F, Allen C, Stavrinides V et al (2021) Tumour growth rates of prostate cancer during active surveillance: is there a difference between MRI-visible low and intermediate-risk disease? Br J Radiol 95:20210321 Giganti F, Allen C, Stavrinides V et al (2021) Tumour growth rates of prostate cancer during active surveillance: is there a difference between MRI-visible low and intermediate-risk disease? Br J Radiol 95:20210321
Metadata
Title
Biparametric MRI in prostate cancer during active surveillance: is it safe?
Authors
Iztok Caglic
Nikita Sushentsev
Tom Syer
Kang-Lung Lee
Tristan Barrett
Publication date
24-04-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10770-z