Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2022

01-04-2022 | Prostate Cancer | Original Research: Qualitative Research

Discontinuing Cancer Screening for Older Adults: a Comparison of Clinician Decision-Making for Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Screenings

Authors: Justine P. Enns, BSc, Craig E. Pollack, MD, MHS, Cynthia M. Boyd, MD, MPH, Jacqueline Massare, BS, Nancy L. Schoenborn, MD, MHS

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 5/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

While guidelines recommend against routine screening for breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers in older adults (65+ years) with <10-year life expectancy, many of these patients continue to be screened. How clinicians consider screening cessation across multiple cancer screening types is unknown.

Objective

To compare and contrast clinicians’ perspectives on discontinuing breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer screenings in older adults.

Design

Qualitative, semi-structured interviews.

Participants

Primary care clinicians in Maryland (N=30)

Approach

We conducted semi-structured interviews with individual clinicians. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using standard techniques of qualitative content analysis to identify major themes.

Key Results

Participants were mostly physicians (24/30) and women (16/30). Four major themes highlighted differences in decision-making across cancer screenings: (1) Clinicians reported more often screening beyond guideline-recommended ages for breast and prostate cancers than colorectal cancer; (2) clinicians had different priorities when considering the benefits/harms of each screening; for example, some prioritized continuing colorectal cancer screening due to the test’s high efficacy while others prioritized stopping colorectal cancer screening due to high procedural risk; some prioritized continuing prostate cancer screening due to poor outcomes from advanced prostate cancer while others prioritized stopping prostate cancer screening due to high false positive test rates and harms from downstream tests; (3) clinicians discussed harms of prostate and colorectal cancer screening more readily than for breast cancer screening; (4) clinicians perceived more involvement with gastroenterologists in colonoscopy decisions and less involvement from specialists for prostate and breast cancer screening.

Conclusions

Our results highlight the need for more explicit guidance on how to weigh competing considerations in cancer screening (such as test accuracy versus ease of cancer treatment after detection). Recognizing the complexity of the benefit/harms analysis as clinicians consider multiple cancer screenings, future decision support tools, and clinician education materials can specifically address the competing considerations.
Literature
22.
go back to reference Qaseem A, Lin JS, Mustafa RA, Horwitch CA, Wilt TJ, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Screening for Breast Cancer in Average-Risk Women: A Guidance Statement From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(8):547-560. doi:https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-2147CrossRefPubMed Qaseem A, Lin JS, Mustafa RA, Horwitch CA, Wilt TJ, Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians. Screening for Breast Cancer in Average-Risk Women: A Guidance Statement From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(8):547-560. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​7326/​M18-2147CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Schoenborn NL, Massare J, Park R, Pollack CE, Choi Y, Boyd CM. Clinician Perspectives on Overscreening for Cancer in Older Adults With Limited Life Expectancy. J Am Geriatr Soc. Published online March 31, 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16415 Schoenborn NL, Massare J, Park R, Pollack CE, Choi Y, Boyd CM. Clinician Perspectives on Overscreening for Cancer in Older Adults With Limited Life Expectancy. J Am Geriatr Soc. Published online March 31, 2020. doi:https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​jgs.​16415
33.
go back to reference Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing Qualitative Research. Second. SAGE; 1999. Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing Qualitative Research. Second. SAGE; 1999.
37.
go back to reference Heflin MT, Pollak KI, Kuchibhatla MN, Branch LG, Oddone EZ. The impact of health status on physicians' intentions to offer cancer screening to older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(8):844-50.CrossRef Heflin MT, Pollak KI, Kuchibhatla MN, Branch LG, Oddone EZ. The impact of health status on physicians' intentions to offer cancer screening to older women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(8):844-50.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Dalton AF, Golin CE, Esserman D, Pignone MP, Pathman DE, Lewis CL. Relationship between physicians' uncertainty about clinical assessments and patient-centered recommendations for colorectal cancer screening in the elderly. Med Decis Making. 2015;35(4):458-66.CrossRef Dalton AF, Golin CE, Esserman D, Pignone MP, Pathman DE, Lewis CL. Relationship between physicians' uncertainty about clinical assessments and patient-centered recommendations for colorectal cancer screening in the elderly. Med Decis Making. 2015;35(4):458-66.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Smith J, Dodd RH, Hersch J, et al. Psychosocial and clinical predictors of continued cancer screening in older adults. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;S0738-3991(21)00292-5. Smith J, Dodd RH, Hersch J, et al. Psychosocial and clinical predictors of continued cancer screening in older adults. Patient Educ Couns. 2021;S0738-3991(21)00292-5.
43.
go back to reference Scherer LD, Valentine KD, Patel N, Baker SG, Fagerlin A. A bias for action in cancer screening? J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019;25(2):149-161.CrossRef Scherer LD, Valentine KD, Patel N, Baker SG, Fagerlin A. A bias for action in cancer screening? J Exp Psychol Appl. 2019;25(2):149-161.CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Kullgren JT, Fagerlin A, Klamerus ML, Bernstein SJ, Kerr EA. Perceived barriers to implementing individual Choosing Wisely recommendations in two national surveys of primary care providers. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(2):210-217.CrossRef Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Kullgren JT, Fagerlin A, Klamerus ML, Bernstein SJ, Kerr EA. Perceived barriers to implementing individual Choosing Wisely recommendations in two national surveys of primary care providers. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(2):210-217.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Haggerty J, Tudiver F, Brown JB, Herbert C, Ciampi A, Guibert R. Patients’ anxiety and expectations: how they influence family physicians’ decisions to order cancer screening tests. Can Fam Physician. 2005;51(12):1658-9.PubMed Haggerty J, Tudiver F, Brown JB, Herbert C, Ciampi A, Guibert R. Patients’ anxiety and expectations: how they influence family physicians’ decisions to order cancer screening tests. Can Fam Physician. 2005;51(12):1658-9.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Discontinuing Cancer Screening for Older Adults: a Comparison of Clinician Decision-Making for Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Screenings
Authors
Justine P. Enns, BSc
Craig E. Pollack, MD, MHS
Cynthia M. Boyd, MD, MPH
Jacqueline Massare, BS
Nancy L. Schoenborn, MD, MHS
Publication date
01-04-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 5/2022
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07121-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2022

Journal of General Internal Medicine 5/2022 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine