Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 8/2020

01-08-2020 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

Transperineal prostate biopsy with cognitive magnetic resonance imaging/biplanar ultrasound fusion: description of technique and early results

Authors: Michael A. Gorin, Alexa R. Meyer, Michael Zimmerman, Rana Harb, Gregory A. Joice, Zeyad R. Schwen, Mohamad E. Allaf

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 8/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To describe our technique and early results performing transperineal prostate biopsy using cognitive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/biplanar ultrasound fusion. Key components of this technique include use of the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System (Perineologic, Cumberland, MD) and simultaneous transrectal ultrasound guidance in the axial and sagittal planes.

Patients and methods

In total, 95 patients (38 studied retrospectively and 57 studied prospectively) underwent a transperineal MRI-targeted prostate biopsy using the technique detailed in this manuscript. All biopsies were performed by a single urologist (MAG). Data were collected with respect to cancer detection rates, tolerability, and complications. The subset of patients who were studied prospectively was assessed for complications by telephone interviews performed at 4–6 days and 25–31 days following the prostate biopsy.

Results

Between February 2018 and June 2019, 95 men underwent a transperineal prostate biopsy using MRI/biplanar ultrasound fusion guidance. Patients had a total of 124 PI-RADS 3–5 lesions that were targeted for biopsy. In total, 108 (87.1%) lesions were found to harbor prostate cancer of any grade. Grade group ≥ 2 prostate cancer was found in 81 (65.3%) of targeted lesions. The detection rates for grade group ≥ 1 and grade group ≥ 2 prostate cancer rose with increasing PI-RADS score. In 65 (68.4%) cases, the patient’s highest grade prostate cancer was found within an MRI target. Additionally, 12 of 55 (21.8%) patients who were found to have no or grade group 1 prostate cancer on systematic biopsy were upgraded to grade group ≥ 2 prostate cancer with MRI targeting. Only 1 (1.1%) patient received periprocedural antibiotics and no patient experienced an infectious complication. Self-limited hematuria and hematospermia were commonly reported following the procedure (75.4% and 40.4%, respectively) and only 1 (1.1%) patient developed urinary retention.

Conclusions

We demonstrate the safety and feasibility of performing transperineal prostate biopsy using cognitive MRI/biplanar ultrasound fusion guidance. The described technique affords the safety benefits of the transperineal approach as well as obviates the need for a formal fusion platform. Additionally, this method can conveniently be performed under local anesthesia with acceptable tolerability.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ghabili K, Tosoian JJ, Schaeffer EM et al (2016) The history of prostate cancer from antiquity: review of paleopathological studies. Urology 97:8–12CrossRef Ghabili K, Tosoian JJ, Schaeffer EM et al (2016) The history of prostate cancer from antiquity: review of paleopathological studies. Urology 97:8–12CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Soloway MS, Obek C (2000) Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 163:172–173CrossRef Soloway MS, Obek C (2000) Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol 163:172–173CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Fracchia JA (2001) Periprostatic nerve blockade for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study. J Urol 166:894–897CrossRef Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Fracchia JA (2001) Periprostatic nerve blockade for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study. J Urol 166:894–897CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Liss MA, Ehdaie B, Loeb S et al (2017) An update of the american urological association white paper on the prevention and treatment of the more common complications related to prostate biopsy. J Urol 198:329–334CrossRef Liss MA, Ehdaie B, Loeb S et al (2017) An update of the american urological association white paper on the prevention and treatment of the more common complications related to prostate biopsy. J Urol 198:329–334CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Borghesi M, Ahmed H, Nam R et al (2017) Complications after systematic, random, and image-guided prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 71:353–365CrossRef Borghesi M, Ahmed H, Nam R et al (2017) Complications after systematic, random, and image-guided prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 71:353–365CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Roberts MJ, Bennett HY, Harris PN et al (2017) Prostate biopsy-related infection: a systematic review of risk factors, prevention strategies, and management approaches. Urology 104:11–21CrossRef Roberts MJ, Bennett HY, Harris PN et al (2017) Prostate biopsy-related infection: a systematic review of risk factors, prevention strategies, and management approaches. Urology 104:11–21CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Xiang J, Yan H, Li J, Wang X, Chen H, Zheng X (2019) Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 17:31CrossRef Xiang J, Yan H, Li J, Wang X, Chen H, Zheng X (2019) Transperineal versus transrectal prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 17:31CrossRef
8.
go back to reference McGrath S, Christidis D, Clarebrough E et al (2017) Transperineal prostate biopsy-tips for analgesia. BJU Int 120:164–167CrossRef McGrath S, Christidis D, Clarebrough E et al (2017) Transperineal prostate biopsy-tips for analgesia. BJU Int 120:164–167CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chang DT, Challacombe B, Lawrentschuk N (2013) Transperineal biopsy of the prostate–is this the future? Nat Rev Urol 10:690–702CrossRef Chang DT, Challacombe B, Lawrentschuk N (2013) Transperineal biopsy of the prostate–is this the future? Nat Rev Urol 10:690–702CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Meyer AR, Joice GA, Schwen ZR, Partin AW, Allaf ME, Gorin MA (2018) Initial experience performing in-office ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia using the precision point transperineal access system. Urology 115:8–13CrossRef Meyer AR, Joice GA, Schwen ZR, Partin AW, Allaf ME, Gorin MA (2018) Initial experience performing in-office ultrasound-guided transperineal prostate biopsy under local anesthesia using the precision point transperineal access system. Urology 115:8–13CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ristau BT, Allaway M, Cendo D et al (2018) Free-hand transperineal prostate biopsy provides acceptable cancer detection and minimizes risk of infection: evolving experience with a 10-sector template. Urol Oncol 36(528):e15–e20 Ristau BT, Allaway M, Cendo D et al (2018) Free-hand transperineal prostate biopsy provides acceptable cancer detection and minimizes risk of infection: evolving experience with a 10-sector template. Urol Oncol 36(528):e15–e20
13.
go back to reference Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389:815–822CrossRef Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389:815–822CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M et al (2018) MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med 378:1767–1777CrossRef Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M et al (2018) MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis. N Engl J Med 378:1767–1777CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rouviere O, Puech P, Renard-Penna R et al (2019) Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 20:100–109CrossRef Rouviere O, Puech P, Renard-Penna R et al (2019) Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 20:100–109CrossRef
16.
go back to reference van der Leest M, Cornel E, Israel B et al (2019) Head-to-head comparison of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus multiparametric prostate resonance imaging with subsequent magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in biopsy-naive men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: a large prospective multicenter clinical study. Eur Urol 75:570–578CrossRef van der Leest M, Cornel E, Israel B et al (2019) Head-to-head comparison of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus multiparametric prostate resonance imaging with subsequent magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in biopsy-naive men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: a large prospective multicenter clinical study. Eur Urol 75:570–578CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA et al (2019) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol 76:340–351CrossRef Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA et al (2019) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol 76:340–351CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VE, Humphrey PA (2017) Contemporary Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: an update with discussion on practical issues to implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 41:e1–e7CrossRef Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VE, Humphrey PA (2017) Contemporary Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: an update with discussion on practical issues to implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 41:e1–e7CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L (2010) A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics 126:e1168–e1198CrossRef Tomlinson D, von Baeyer CL, Stinson JN, Sung L (2010) A systematic review of faces scales for the self-report of pain intensity in children. Pediatrics 126:e1168–e1198CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Swan JS, Ying J, Stahl J et al (2010) Initial development of the Temporary Utilities Index: a multiattribute system for classifying the functional health impact of diagnostic testing. Qual Life Res 19:401–412CrossRef Swan JS, Ying J, Stahl J et al (2010) Initial development of the Temporary Utilities Index: a multiattribute system for classifying the functional health impact of diagnostic testing. Qual Life Res 19:401–412CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Swan JS, Hur C, Lee P, Motazedi T, Donelan K (2013) Responsiveness of the testing morbidities index in colonoscopy. Value Health 16:1046–1053CrossRef Swan JS, Hur C, Lee P, Motazedi T, Donelan K (2013) Responsiveness of the testing morbidities index in colonoscopy. Value Health 16:1046–1053CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Swan JS, Kong CY, Hur C et al (2015) Comparing morbidities of testing with a new index: screening colonoscopy versus core-needle breast biopsy. J Am Coll Radiol 12:295–301CrossRef Swan JS, Kong CY, Hur C et al (2015) Comparing morbidities of testing with a new index: screening colonoscopy versus core-needle breast biopsy. J Am Coll Radiol 12:295–301CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381CrossRef Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Liu W, Patil D, Howard DH et al (2018) Adoption of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging for men undergoing prostate biopsy in the United States. Urology 117:57–63CrossRef Liu W, Patil D, Howard DH et al (2018) Adoption of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging for men undergoing prostate biopsy in the United States. Urology 117:57–63CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wegelin O, van Melick HHE, Hooft L et al (2017) Comparing three different techniques for magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsies: a systematic review of in-bore versus magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion versus cognitive registration. Is there a preferred technique? Eur Urol 71:517–531CrossRef Wegelin O, van Melick HHE, Hooft L et al (2017) Comparing three different techniques for magnetic resonance imaging-targeted prostate biopsies: a systematic review of in-bore versus magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound fusion versus cognitive registration. Is there a preferred technique? Eur Urol 71:517–531CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Transperineal prostate biopsy with cognitive magnetic resonance imaging/biplanar ultrasound fusion: description of technique and early results
Authors
Michael A. Gorin
Alexa R. Meyer
Michael Zimmerman
Rana Harb
Gregory A. Joice
Zeyad R. Schwen
Mohamad E. Allaf
Publication date
01-08-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 8/2020
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02992-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2020

World Journal of Urology 8/2020 Go to the issue