Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

Standardisation of prostate multiparametric MRI across a hospital network: a London experience

Authors: Marianthi-Vasiliki Papoutsaki, Clare Allen, Francesco Giganti, David Atkinson, Louise Dickinson, Jacob Goodman, Helen Saunders, Tristan Barrett, Shonit Punwani

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

National guidelines recommend prostate multiparametric (mp) MRI in men with suspected prostate cancer before biopsy. In this study, we explore prostate mpMRI protocols across 14 London hospitals and determine whether standardisation improves diagnostic quality.

Methods

An MRI physicist facilitated mpMRI set-up across several regional hospitals, working together with experienced uroradiologists who judged diagnostic quality. Radiologists from the 14 hospitals participated in the assessment and optimisation of prostate mpMRI image quality, assessed according to both PiRADSv2 recommendations and on the ability to “rule in” and/or “rule out” prostate cancer. Image quality and sequence parameters of representative mpMRI scans were evaluated across 23 MR scanners. Optimisation visits were performed to improve image quality, and 2 radiologists scored the image quality pre- and post-optimisation.

Results

20/23 mpMRI protocols, consisting of 111 sequences, were optimised by modifying their sequence parameters. Pre-optimisation, only 15% of T2W images were non-diagnostic, whereas 40% of ADC maps, 50% of high b-value DWI and 41% of DCE-MRI were considered non-diagnostic. Post-optimisation, the scores were increased with 80% of ADC maps, 74% of high b-value DWI and 88% of DCE-MRI to be partially or fully diagnostic. T2W sequences were not optimised, due to their higher baseline quality scores.

Conclusions

Targeted intervention at a regional level can improve the diagnostic quality of prostate mpMRI protocols, with implications for improving prostate cancer detection rates and targeted biopsies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Culp MBB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA et al (2020) Recent global patterns in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol 77:38–52CrossRef Culp MBB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA et al (2020) Recent global patterns in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol 77:38–52CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389:815–822CrossRef Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389:815–822CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Simmons LAM, Kanthabalan A, Arya M et al (2017) The PICTURE study: diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men requiring a repeat prostate biopsy. Br J Cancer 116:1159–1165CrossRef Simmons LAM, Kanthabalan A, Arya M et al (2017) The PICTURE study: diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI in men requiring a repeat prostate biopsy. Br J Cancer 116:1159–1165CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M et al (2018) MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med 378:1767–1777CrossRef Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko AS, Borghi M et al (2018) MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med 378:1767–1777CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Brizmohun Appayya M, Adshead J, Ahmed HU et al (2018) National implementation of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection—recommendations from a UK consensus meeting. BJU Int 122:13–25CrossRef Brizmohun Appayya M, Adshead J, Ahmed HU et al (2018) National implementation of multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer detection—recommendations from a UK consensus meeting. BJU Int 122:13–25CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Esses SJ, Taneja SS, Rosenkrantz AB (2018) Imaging facilities’ adherence to PI-RADS v2 minimum technical standards for the performance of prostate MRI. Acad Radiol 25:188–195CrossRef Esses SJ, Taneja SS, Rosenkrantz AB (2018) Imaging facilities’ adherence to PI-RADS v2 minimum technical standards for the performance of prostate MRI. Acad Radiol 25:188–195CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sackett J, Shih JH, Reese SE et al (2020) Quality of prostate MRI: is the PI-RADS standard sufficient? Acad Radiol 28:199–207CrossRef Sackett J, Shih JH, Reese SE et al (2020) Quality of prostate MRI: is the PI-RADS standard sufficient? Acad Radiol 28:199–207CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Burn PR, Freeman SJ, Andreou A et al (2019) A multicentre assessment of prostate MRI quality and compliance with UK and international standards. Clin Radiol 74:894.e19-894.e25CrossRef Burn PR, Freeman SJ, Andreou A et al (2019) A multicentre assessment of prostate MRI quality and compliance with UK and international standards. Clin Radiol 74:894.e19-894.e25CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL et al (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging-reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40CrossRef Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL et al (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging-reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69:16–40CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA et al (2019) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol 76:340–351CrossRef Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA et al (2019) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol 76:340–351CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kirkham APS, Haslam P, Keanie JY et al (2013) Prostate MRI: who, when, and how? Report from a UK consensus meeting. Clin Radiol 68:1016–1023CrossRef Kirkham APS, Haslam P, Keanie JY et al (2013) Prostate MRI: who, when, and how? Report from a UK consensus meeting. Clin Radiol 68:1016–1023CrossRef
13.
go back to reference de Rooij M, Israël B, Tummers M et al (2020) ESUR/ESUI consensus statements on multi-parametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: quality requirements for image acquisition, interpretation and radiologists’ training. Eur Radiol 30:5404–5416CrossRef de Rooij M, Israël B, Tummers M et al (2020) ESUR/ESUI consensus statements on multi-parametric MRI for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: quality requirements for image acquisition, interpretation and radiologists’ training. Eur Radiol 30:5404–5416CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Giganti F, Allen C, Emberton M et al (2020) Prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL): a new quality control scoring system for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate from the PRECISION trial. Eur Urol Oncol 3:615–619CrossRef Giganti F, Allen C, Emberton M et al (2020) Prostate imaging quality (PI-QUAL): a new quality control scoring system for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate from the PRECISION trial. Eur Urol Oncol 3:615–619CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cuocolo R, Stanzione A, Ponsiglione A et al (2019) Prostate MRI technical parameters standardization: a systematic review on adherence to PI-RADSv2 acquisition protocol. Eur J Radiol 120:108662CrossRef Cuocolo R, Stanzione A, Ponsiglione A et al (2019) Prostate MRI technical parameters standardization: a systematic review on adherence to PI-RADSv2 acquisition protocol. Eur J Radiol 120:108662CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Abreu-Gomez J, Shabana W, McInnes MD, O’Sullivan JP, Morash CSN (2019) Regional standardization of prostate multiparametric MRI performance and reporting: is there a role for a director of prostate imaging? AJR Am J Roentgenol 213:844–850CrossRef Abreu-Gomez J, Shabana W, McInnes MD, O’Sullivan JP, Morash CSN (2019) Regional standardization of prostate multiparametric MRI performance and reporting: is there a role for a director of prostate imaging? AJR Am J Roentgenol 213:844–850CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Caglic I, Barrett T (2019) Optimising prostate mpMRI: prepare for success. Clin Radiol 74:831–840CrossRef Caglic I, Barrett T (2019) Optimising prostate mpMRI: prepare for success. Clin Radiol 74:831–840CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Caglic I, Hansen NL, Slough RA et al (2017) Evaluating the effect of rectal distension on prostate multiparametric MRI image quality. Eur J Radiol 90:174–180CrossRef Caglic I, Hansen NL, Slough RA et al (2017) Evaluating the effect of rectal distension on prostate multiparametric MRI image quality. Eur J Radiol 90:174–180CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Standardisation of prostate multiparametric MRI across a hospital network: a London experience
Authors
Marianthi-Vasiliki Papoutsaki
Clare Allen
Francesco Giganti
David Atkinson
Louise Dickinson
Jacob Goodman
Helen Saunders
Tristan Barrett
Shonit Punwani
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-021-00990-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Insights into Imaging 1/2021 Go to the issue