Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 11/2022

15-09-2022 | Prostate Cancer | Editorial Comment

Should we combine systematic with MRI-targeted biopsy? Implications for the management of patients with prostate cancer

Authors: Giorgio Gandaglia, Gianluca Giannarini, Armando Stabile, Francesco Montorsi, Alberto Briganti

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 11/2022

Login to get access

Excerpt

In the current issue of European Radiology, Deniffel and colleagues analysed a large cohort of men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent combined MRI-targeted plus systematic biopsy performed by seven experienced radiologists at a high-volume tertiary referral centre [1]. The authors demonstrated that the addition of systematic biopsy in men with elevated PSA levels and at least one PI-RADS score 3 to 5 lesion on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) allowed for the identification of only 6% additional clinically significant PCa (csPCa) cases, defined as International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group ≥ 2. In this small proportion of patients, the diagnosis of csPCa would have been missed by MRI-targeted biopsy alone. …
Literature
2.
go back to reference Rouvière O, Puech P, Renard-Penna R et al (2019) Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 20:100–109CrossRef Rouvière O, Puech P, Renard-Penna R et al (2019) Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 20:100–109CrossRef
3.
go back to reference van der Leest M, Cornel E, Israël B et al (2019) Head-to-head comparison of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus multiparametric prostate resonance imaging with subsequent magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: a large prospective multicenter clinical study. Eur Urol 75:570–578CrossRef van der Leest M, Cornel E, Israël B et al (2019) Head-to-head comparison of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus multiparametric prostate resonance imaging with subsequent magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: a large prospective multicenter clinical study. Eur Urol 75:570–578CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D et al (2019) Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4(4):CD012663 Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D et al (2019) Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4(4):CD012663
5.
go back to reference Stabile A, Dell’Oglio P, De Cobelli F et al (2018) Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score for the index lesion and multifocal, clinically significant prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 1:29–36CrossRef Stabile A, Dell’Oglio P, De Cobelli F et al (2018) Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score for the index lesion and multifocal, clinically significant prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 1:29–36CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dell’Oglio P, Stabile A, Soligo M et al (2020) There is no way to avoid systematic prostate biopsies in addition to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsies. Eur Urol Oncol 3:112–118CrossRef Dell’Oglio P, Stabile A, Soligo M et al (2020) There is no way to avoid systematic prostate biopsies in addition to multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsies. Eur Urol Oncol 3:112–118CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bates AS, Ayers J, Kostakopoulos N et al (2021) A systematic review of focal ablative therapy for clinically localised prostate cancer in comparison with standard management options: limitations of the available evidence and recommendations for clinical practice and further research. Eur Urol Oncol 4:405–423CrossRef Bates AS, Ayers J, Kostakopoulos N et al (2021) A systematic review of focal ablative therapy for clinically localised prostate cancer in comparison with standard management options: limitations of the available evidence and recommendations for clinical practice and further research. Eur Urol Oncol 4:405–423CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Moris L, Gandaglia G, Vilaseca A et al (2021) Evaluation of Oncological outcomes and data quality in studies assessing nerve-sparing versus non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy in nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol Focus:S2405-4569(21)00161-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.009 Moris L, Gandaglia G, Vilaseca A et al (2021) Evaluation of Oncological outcomes and data quality in studies assessing nerve-sparing versus non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy in nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol Focus:S2405-4569(21)00161-9. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​euf.​2021.​05.​009
9.
go back to reference Gandaglia G, Ploussard G, Valerio M et al (2020) The key combined value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging–targeted and concomitant systematic biopsies for the prediction of adverse pathological features in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 77:733–741CrossRef Gandaglia G, Ploussard G, Valerio M et al (2020) The key combined value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance imaging–targeted and concomitant systematic biopsies for the prediction of adverse pathological features in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 77:733–741CrossRef
10.
go back to reference de Rooij M, Hamoen EHJ, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM (2016) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Urol 70:233–245CrossRef de Rooij M, Hamoen EHJ, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM (2016) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Urol 70:233–245CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Diamand R, Ploussard G, Roumiguié M et al (2021) External validation of a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram for the prediction of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 79:180–185CrossRef Diamand R, Ploussard G, Roumiguié M et al (2021) External validation of a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based nomogram for the prediction of extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 79:180–185CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gandaglia G, Ploussard G, Valerio M et al (2019) A novel nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsies. Eur Urol 75:506–514CrossRef Gandaglia G, Ploussard G, Valerio M et al (2019) A novel nomogram to identify candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection among patients with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging-targeted and systematic biopsies. Eur Urol 75:506–514CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gandaglia G, Ploussard G, Valerio M et al (2020) Prognostic implications of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and concomitant systematic biopsy in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy. Eur Urol Oncol 3:739–747CrossRef Gandaglia G, Ploussard G, Valerio M et al (2020) Prognostic implications of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and concomitant systematic biopsy in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy. Eur Urol Oncol 3:739–747CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rai BP, Mayerhofer C, Somani BK et al (2021) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided transperineal versus magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided transrectal prostate biopsy-a systematic review. Eur Urol Oncol 4:904–913CrossRef Rai BP, Mayerhofer C, Somani BK et al (2021) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided transperineal versus magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion-guided transrectal prostate biopsy-a systematic review. Eur Urol Oncol 4:904–913CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Should we combine systematic with MRI-targeted biopsy? Implications for the management of patients with prostate cancer
Authors
Giorgio Gandaglia
Gianluca Giannarini
Armando Stabile
Francesco Montorsi
Alberto Briganti
Publication date
15-09-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 11/2022
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09096-5

Other articles of this Issue 11/2022

European Radiology 11/2022 Go to the issue