Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Urology 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Prostate Cancer | Research

Reliability of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1 for excluding clinically significant prostate cancer using a 1.5 tesla scanner

Authors: Abdallah Sharqawi, Naomi Drye, Abdul Shugaba, Alison O’reilly, Ahmed M. Kadry, A I El-Sakka

Published in: BMC Urology | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate gland is now the recommended initial investigation of choice for the detection of Prostate cancer (PCa). It effectively identifies patients who require prostate biopsies due to the risk of clinically significant PCa. It helps patients with clinically insignificant PCa avoid the invasive biopsies and possible accompanying complications. Large clinical trials have investigated the accuracy of mpMRI in detecting PCa. We performed a local review to examine the reliability of omitting tissue sampling in men with a negative (PIRADS 2 (P2) or less) mpMRI in the primary diagnostic setting.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of patients with clinical suspicion of PCa within a 2-year period. Patients had a mpMRI prior to having trans-perineal prostate gland biopsies. Clinically significant disease was defined as Gleason 7 and above. The descriptive data was analysed using contingency table methods. A p-value less than 0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

Out of 700 patients 90 had an mpMRI score of PIRADS 2. Seventy-seven (85.5%) of these patients had a negative biopsy, 9(10%) showed Gleason 6, 4 patients showed Gleason 7 or above. 78 patients with PIRADS 2 had a PSA density of < 0.15, none of which had a clinically significant biopsy result. The negative predictive value of mpMRI from this study is 95%.

Conclusion

Our results are in line with negative predictive values demonstrated in the current literature. This local study, likely applicable to other district general hospitals, shows that mpMRI is a safe and reliable initial investigation to aid decisions on which patients require biopsies.
Literature
1.
3.
go back to reference NICE Guidance -. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management: ! NICE (2019) prostate cancer: diagnosis and management. BJU Int. 2019 Jul;124(1):9e26. NICE Guidance -. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management: ! NICE (2019) prostate cancer: diagnosis and management. BJU Int. 2019 Jul;124(1):9e26.
4.
go back to reference Abraham NE, Mendhiratta N, Taneja SS. Patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in contemporary clinical practice. J Urol., Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389:815 – 22. Abraham NE, Mendhiratta N, Taneja SS. Patterns of repeat prostate biopsy in contemporary clinical practice. J Urol., Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389:815 – 22.
5.
6.
go back to reference Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389:815–22.CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet. 2017;389:815–22.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Turkbey B, Pinto PA, Mani H, Bernardo M, Pang Y, McKinney YL, et al. Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection–histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 2010;255:89–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Turkbey B, Pinto PA, Mani H, Bernardo M, Pang Y, McKinney YL, et al. Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection–histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 2010;255:89–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Harris RD, Schned AR, Heaney JA. Staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: lessons from a learning curve. Radiographics. 1995;15:813–29.CrossRefPubMed Harris RD, Schned AR, Heaney JA. Staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: lessons from a learning curve. Radiographics. 1995;15:813–29.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sonnad SS, Langlotz CP, Schwartz JS. Accuracy of MR imaging for staging prostate cancer: a meta-analysis to examine the effect of technologic change. Acad Radiol. 2001;8:149–57.CrossRefPubMed Sonnad SS, Langlotz CP, Schwartz JS. Accuracy of MR imaging for staging prostate cancer: a meta-analysis to examine the effect of technologic change. Acad Radiol. 2001;8:149–57.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A, et al. Can clinically significant prostate Cancer be detected with Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2015;68:1045–53.CrossRefPubMed Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, Emberton M, Giannarini G, Kirkham A, et al. Can clinically significant prostate Cancer be detected with Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging? A systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2015;68:1045–53.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hattori S, Kosaka T, Mizuno R, Kanao K, Miyajima A, Yasumizu Y, Kim JY, Kim SH, Kim YH, Lee HJ, Kim MJ, Choi MS et al. Low- risk prostate cancer: the accuracy of multiparametric MR imaging for detection. Radiology. 2014;271:435 – 44. Hattori S, Kosaka T, Mizuno R, Kanao K, Miyajima A, Yasumizu Y, Kim JY, Kim SH, Kim YH, Lee HJ, Kim MJ, Choi MS et al. Low- risk prostate cancer: the accuracy of multiparametric MR imaging for detection. Radiology. 2014;271:435 – 44.
13.
go back to reference Rosenkrantz AB, Verma S, Choyke P, et al. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging targeted Biopsy in patients with a prior negative biopsy: a Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR. J Urol. 2020;203(4):749–60. Rosenkrantz AB, Verma S, Choyke P, et al. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging targeted Biopsy in patients with a prior negative biopsy: a Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR. J Urol. 2020;203(4):749–60.
14.
go back to reference de Rooij M, Hamoen EHJ, Fütterer JJ, et al. Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(2):343–51.CrossRefPubMed de Rooij M, Hamoen EHJ, Fütterer JJ, et al. Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(2):343–51.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference “Male Genital Pathology”. The Internet Pathology Laboratory for Medical Education. The University of Utah, Eccles Health Sciences Library. Retrieved 2009-05-13. “Male Genital Pathology”. The Internet Pathology Laboratory for Medical Education. The University of Utah, Eccles Health Sciences Library. Retrieved 2009-05-13.
16.
go back to reference Drost FJH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, et al. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4:CD012663.PubMed Drost FJH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, et al. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4:CD012663.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Sathianatthen NJ, Omer A, Harriss E, Hamdy FC, Ahmed HU, Lamb AD. Negative predicttive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in the prostate imaging reporting and data system era: a systematic review and meta-analysi. Eur Urol Sept. 2020;743:402–14.CrossRef Sathianatthen NJ, Omer A, Harriss E, Hamdy FC, Ahmed HU, Lamb AD. Negative predicttive value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in the prostate imaging reporting and data system era: a systematic review and meta-analysi. Eur Urol Sept. 2020;743:402–14.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cornud F, Roumiguie M, Barry Delongchamps N, Beuvon F, Portalez D, Peyronnet B et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: Combination of T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging.BJU Int. 2017 Jan;119(1):56–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13556. Epub 2016 Jun 28. PMID: 27353291. Cornud F, Roumiguie M, Barry Delongchamps N, Beuvon F, Portalez D, Peyronnet B et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: Combination of T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging.BJU Int. 2017 Jan;119(1):56–65. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​bju.​13556. Epub 2016 Jun 28. PMID: 27353291.
20.
go back to reference Muller, B. G., Shih, J. H., Sankineni, S., Marko, J., Rais-Bahrami, S., George, A.K., … Choyke, P. L. (2015). Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology, 277(3), 741–750. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2015142692 Muller, B. G., Shih, J. H., Sankineni, S., Marko, J., Rais-Bahrami, S., George, A.K., … Choyke, P. L. (2015). Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised prostate imaging reporting and data system at multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology, 277(3), 741–750. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1148/​radiol.​2015142692
23.
go back to reference Jung BC. The clinical usefulness of the prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen density, digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasonography in the screening for prostate cancer. Korean J Urol. 2010 Nov;51(11):729–34. PMID: 21179229; PMCID: PMC2996729. Jung BC. The clinical usefulness of the prostate-specific antigen, prostate-specific antigen density, digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasonography in the screening for prostate cancer. Korean J Urol. 2010 Nov;51(11):729–34. PMID: 21179229; PMCID: PMC2996729.
24.
go back to reference Yusim I, Konety BR, Luo Y, Presti JC Jr, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Aronson WJ, Freedland SJ. The use of prostate specific antigen density to predict clinically significant prostate cancer. J Urol. 2011 Jul;186(1):201–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.015. Epub 2011 May 15. PMID: 21571335; PMCID: PMC3129497. Yusim I, Konety BR, Luo Y, Presti JC Jr, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Amling CL, Aronson WJ, Freedland SJ. The use of prostate specific antigen density to predict clinically significant prostate cancer. J Urol. 2011 Jul;186(1):201–5. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​juro.​2011.​03.​015. Epub 2011 May 15. PMID: 21571335; PMCID: PMC3129497.
25.
go back to reference Stefanova V, Buckley R, Flax S, spevack L, Hajek D, Tunis A, Lai E, Loblaw A. Transperineal prostate biopsies using local anaesthesia: experience with 1278 patients. Prostate cancer detection rate, complications and patient tolerability. Jun. 2019;201:6. Stefanova V, Buckley R, Flax S, spevack L, Hajek D, Tunis A, Lai E, Loblaw A. Transperineal prostate biopsies using local anaesthesia: experience with 1278 patients. Prostate cancer detection rate, complications and patient tolerability. Jun. 2019;201:6.
28.
go back to reference Roza GDQ, Saad LS, Melo H, Gabrielle HAA. Impact of PI-RADS v2 on indication of prostate biopsy Roza GDQ, Saad LS, Melo H, Gabrielle HAA. Impact of PI-RADS v2 on indication of prostate biopsy
29.
go back to reference Venderink W, van Luijtelaar A, van der Leest M, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and follow-up to avoid prostate biopsy in 4259 men. BJU Int. 2019;124(5):775e84.CrossRef Venderink W, van Luijtelaar A, van der Leest M, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and follow-up to avoid prostate biopsy in 4259 men. BJU Int. 2019;124(5):775e84.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Reliability of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1 for excluding clinically significant prostate cancer using a 1.5 tesla scanner
Authors
Abdallah Sharqawi
Naomi Drye
Abdul Shugaba
Alison O’reilly
Ahmed M. Kadry
A I El-Sakka
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Urology / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2490
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01241-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Urology 1/2023 Go to the issue