Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2022

30-10-2021 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: outcomes from 500 consecutive cases in the UK

Authors: Jonathan Noël, Neil H. Spencer, Siya Lodia, Seiver Karim, Surina Taneja, Darius Moghanchizadeh, Arvind Nayak, Ashwin Tamhankar, Seema Angra, Rajiv Swamy, Samita Agarwal, Ashish Narula, Tim Lane, Jim Adshead, Nikhil Vasdev

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 4/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose is to report the United Kingdom’s largest single-centre experience of robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies (RALP), using the neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section (NeuroSAFE) technique. We describe the utilisation and outcomes of this technique. This is a retrospective study from 2012 to 2019 on 520 patients undergoing NeuroSAFE RALP at our Institution. Our Institution’s database was analysed for false-positive frozen-section (FS) margins as confirmed on paraffin histopathological analysis: functional outcomes of potency, continence, and biochemical recurrence (BCR). The median (range) of console time was 145 (90–300) min. In our cohort, positive FS was seen in 30.7% (160/520) of patients, with a confirmatory paraffin analysis in 91.8% of our patients’ cohort (147/160). The neurovascular bundles (NVBs) that underwent secondary resection contained tumour in 26.8% (43/160) of the cases. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was 6.7% (35/520), of which FS was positive in 40% (14/35) of those cases. There were insufficient evidence of a statistical association of urinary incontinence and positive surgical margin rates according to NS or NVB resection. NeuroSAFE enables intraoperative confirmation of the oncologic safety of a NS procedure. Patients with a positive FS on NeuroSAFE can be converted to a negative surgical margin (NSM) by ipsilateral wide resection. This spared 1 in 4 men from positive margins posterolaterally in our series. Limitations are the absence of a matched contemporary cohort of NS RALP without NeuroSAFE in our centre.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Walsh PC, Donker PJ (1982) Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 128:492–497CrossRef Walsh PC, Donker PJ (1982) Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 128:492–497CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M, Members of the VIP team (2003) A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 92:205–210CrossRef Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M, Members of the VIP team (2003) A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 92:205–210CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Berryhill R Jr, Jhaveri J, Yadav R et al (2008) Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology 72(15–23):1 Berryhill R Jr, Jhaveri J, Yadav R et al (2008) Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches. Urology 72(15–23):1
5.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W et al (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55:1037–1063CrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W et al (2009) Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol 55:1037–1063CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Raina R, Agarwal A, Zippe CD (2005) Management of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Urology 66:923–929CrossRef Raina R, Agarwal A, Zippe CD (2005) Management of erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Urology 66:923–929CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schlomm T, Tennstedt P, Huxhold C et al (2012) Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) increases nerve-sparing frequency and reduces positive surgical margins in open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 11,069 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 62:333–340CrossRef Schlomm T, Tennstedt P, Huxhold C et al (2012) Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) increases nerve-sparing frequency and reduces positive surgical margins in open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience after 11,069 consecutive patients. Eur Urol 62:333–340CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Vasdev N, Agarwal S, Rai BP, Soosainathan A, Shaw G, Chang S, Prasad V, Mohan-S G, Adshead JM (2015) Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate reduces the risk of positive margin whilst ensuring nerve sparing in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy: first reported UK series. Curr Urol 9:93–103. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442860CrossRef Vasdev N, Agarwal S, Rai BP, Soosainathan A, Shaw G, Chang S, Prasad V, Mohan-S G, Adshead JM (2015) Intraoperative frozen section of the prostate reduces the risk of positive margin whilst ensuring nerve sparing in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy: first reported UK series. Curr Urol 9:93–103. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000442860CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mirmilstein G, Rai BP, Gbolahan O, Srirangam V, Narula A, Agarwal S, Lane TM, Vasdev N, Adshead J (2018) The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting—a prospective observational comparative study. BJU Int 121:854–862CrossRef Mirmilstein G, Rai BP, Gbolahan O, Srirangam V, Narula A, Agarwal S, Lane TM, Vasdev N, Adshead J (2018) The neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination (NeuroSAFE) approach to nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a British setting—a prospective observational comparative study. BJU Int 121:854–862CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pisansky TM, Thompson IM, Valicenti RK et al (2019) Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: ASTRO/AUA Guideline amendment 2018e2019. J Urol 202:533CrossRef Pisansky TM, Thompson IM, Valicenti RK et al (2019) Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy: ASTRO/AUA Guideline amendment 2018e2019. J Urol 202:533CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gandaglia G, Ploussard G, Valerio M, Marra G, Moschini M, Martini A, Briganti AV (2020) Prognostic implications of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and concomitant systematic biopsy in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy. Eur Urol. Onc. 3(6):739–747CrossRef Gandaglia G, Ploussard G, Valerio M, Marra G, Moschini M, Martini A, Briganti AV (2020) Prognostic implications of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and concomitant systematic biopsy in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients diagnosed with magnetic resonance imaging–targeted biopsy. Eur Urol. Onc. 3(6):739–747CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Beyer B, Schlomm T, Tennstedt P et al (2014) A feasible and time-efficient adaptation of NeuroSAFE for da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 66:138–144CrossRef Beyer B, Schlomm T, Tennstedt P et al (2014) A feasible and time-efficient adaptation of NeuroSAFE for da Vinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 66:138–144CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dinneen E, Haider A, Freeman A, Oxley J, Briggs T, Nathan S, Kelly J, Grierson J, Allen C, Persad R, Aning J, Oakley N, Ahmad I, Dutto L, Shaw G (2020) NeuroSAFE PROOF randomised controlled feasibility study: brief report of perioperative outcomes, histological concordance, and feasibility. Eur Urol 78(3):476–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.052 (Epub 2020 Apr 25)CrossRefPubMed Dinneen E, Haider A, Freeman A, Oxley J, Briggs T, Nathan S, Kelly J, Grierson J, Allen C, Persad R, Aning J, Oakley N, Ahmad I, Dutto L, Shaw G (2020) NeuroSAFE PROOF randomised controlled feasibility study: brief report of perioperative outcomes, histological concordance, and feasibility. Eur Urol 78(3):476–478. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2020.​03.​052 (Epub 2020 Apr 25)CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Covas Moschovas M, Bhat S, Onol F, Rogers T, Roof S, Mazzone E, Mottrie A, Patel V (2020) Modified apical dissection and lateral prostatic fascia preservation improves early postoperative functional recovery in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur Urol 78(6):875–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.041 (Epub 2020 Jun 24)CrossRefPubMed Covas Moschovas M, Bhat S, Onol F, Rogers T, Roof S, Mazzone E, Mottrie A, Patel V (2020) Modified apical dissection and lateral prostatic fascia preservation improves early postoperative functional recovery in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: results from a propensity score-matched analysis. Eur Urol 78(6):875–884. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2020.​05.​041 (Epub 2020 Jun 24)CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Covas Moschovas M, Bhat S, Rogers T, Onol T, Roof S, Mazzone E, Mottrie A, Patel V (2020) Technical Modifications Necessary to Implement the da Vinci Single-port Robotic System. Eur Urol 78(3):415–423CrossRef Covas Moschovas M, Bhat S, Rogers T, Onol T, Roof S, Mazzone E, Mottrie A, Patel V (2020) Technical Modifications Necessary to Implement the da Vinci Single-port Robotic System. Eur Urol 78(3):415–423CrossRef
20.
21.
go back to reference Sooriakumaran P, Ploumidis A (2015) Nyberg T et al The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. BJU Int 115:106–113CrossRef Sooriakumaran P, Ploumidis A (2015) Nyberg T et al The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. BJU Int 115:106–113CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Dev HS, Wiklund P, Patel V et al (2015) Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 33:109 e7-109 e13CrossRef Dev HS, Wiklund P, Patel V et al (2015) Surgical margin length and location affect recurrence rates after robotic prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 33:109 e7-109 e13CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Cuzick J, Swanson GP, Fisher G, Brothman AR, Berney DM, Reid JE, Mesher D, Speights VO, Stankiewicz E, Foster CS, Møller H, Scardino P, Warren JD, Park J, Younus A, Flake DD 2nd, Wagner S, Gutin A, Lanchbury JS, Stone S, Transatlantic Prostate Group (2011) Prognostic value of an RNA expression signature derived from cell cycle proliferation genes in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 12(3):245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70295-3 (PMID: 21310658)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cuzick J, Swanson GP, Fisher G, Brothman AR, Berney DM, Reid JE, Mesher D, Speights VO, Stankiewicz E, Foster CS, Møller H, Scardino P, Warren JD, Park J, Younus A, Flake DD 2nd, Wagner S, Gutin A, Lanchbury JS, Stone S, Transatlantic Prostate Group (2011) Prognostic value of an RNA expression signature derived from cell cycle proliferation genes in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 12(3):245–255. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​S1470-2045(10)70295-3 (PMID: 21310658)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Bellangino M, Verrill C, Leslie T, Bell RW, Hamdy FC, Lamb AD (2017) Systematic review of studies reporting positive surgical margins after bladder neck sparing radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol Rep 18(12):99CrossRef Bellangino M, Verrill C, Leslie T, Bell RW, Hamdy FC, Lamb AD (2017) Systematic review of studies reporting positive surgical margins after bladder neck sparing radical prostatectomy. Curr Urol Rep 18(12):99CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Morgan MS, Shakir NA, Garcia-Gil M, Ozayar A, Gahan JC, Friedlander JI, Roehrborn CG, Cadeddu JA (2015) Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution. World J Urol 33(6):781–786CrossRef Morgan MS, Shakir NA, Garcia-Gil M, Ozayar A, Gahan JC, Friedlander JI, Roehrborn CG, Cadeddu JA (2015) Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution. World J Urol 33(6):781–786CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rocco B, Sighinolfi MC, Bertoni L, Spandri V, Puliatti S, Eissa A, Reggiani Bonetti L, Azzoni P, Sandri M, De Carne C, Turri F, Cimadamore A, Montironi R, Maiorana A, Micali S, Bianchi G, Pellacani G (2020) Real-time assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy: a novel approach that uses fluorescence confocal microscopy for the evaluation of peri-prostatic soft tissue. BJU Int 125(4):487–489CrossRef Rocco B, Sighinolfi MC, Bertoni L, Spandri V, Puliatti S, Eissa A, Reggiani Bonetti L, Azzoni P, Sandri M, De Carne C, Turri F, Cimadamore A, Montironi R, Maiorana A, Micali S, Bianchi G, Pellacani G (2020) Real-time assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy: a novel approach that uses fluorescence confocal microscopy for the evaluation of peri-prostatic soft tissue. BJU Int 125(4):487–489CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section examination robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: outcomes from 500 consecutive cases in the UK
Authors
Jonathan Noël
Neil H. Spencer
Siya Lodia
Seiver Karim
Surina Taneja
Darius Moghanchizadeh
Arvind Nayak
Ashwin Tamhankar
Seema Angra
Rajiv Swamy
Samita Agarwal
Ashish Narula
Tim Lane
Jim Adshead
Nikhil Vasdev
Publication date
30-10-2021
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01324-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Journal of Robotic Surgery 4/2022 Go to the issue