Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Virchows Archiv 1/2022

Open Access 21-04-2022 | Prostate Cancer | Original Article

Detection of perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsies with deep neural networks

Authors: Kimmo Kartasalo, Peter Ström, Pekka Ruusuvuori, Hemamali Samaratunga, Brett Delahunt, Toyonori Tsuzuki, Martin Eklund, Lars Egevad

Published in: Virchows Archiv | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

The presence of perineural invasion (PNI) by carcinoma in prostate biopsies has been shown to be associated with poor prognosis. The assessment and quantification of PNI are, however, labor intensive. To aid pathologists in this task, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm based on deep neural networks. We collected, digitized, and pixel-wise annotated the PNI findings in each of the approximately 80,000 biopsy cores from the 7406 men who underwent biopsy in a screening trial between 2012 and 2014. In total, 485 biopsy cores showed PNI. We also digitized more than 10% (n = 8318) of the PNI negative biopsy cores. Digitized biopsies from a random selection of 80% of the men were used to build the AI algorithm, while 20% were used to evaluate its performance. For detecting PNI in prostate biopsy cores, the AI had an estimated area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97–0.99) based on 106 PNI positive cores and 1652 PNI negative cores in the independent test set. For a pre-specified operating point, this translates to sensitivity of 0.87 and specificity of 0.97. The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 0.67 and 0.99, respectively. The concordance of the AI with pathologists, measured by mean pairwise Cohen’s kappa (0.74), was comparable to inter-pathologist concordance (0.68 to 0.75). The proposed algorithm detects PNI in prostate biopsies with acceptable performance. This could aid pathologists by reducing the number of biopsies that need to be assessed for PNI and by highlighting regions of diagnostic interest.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strom P, Nordstrom T, Delahunt B, Samaratunga H, Gronberg H, Egevad L, Eklund M (2020) Prognostic value of perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsies: a population-based study of patients treated by radical prostatectomy. J Clin Pathol 73:630–635CrossRef Strom P, Nordstrom T, Delahunt B, Samaratunga H, Gronberg H, Egevad L, Eklund M (2020) Prognostic value of perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsies: a population-based study of patients treated by radical prostatectomy. J Clin Pathol 73:630–635CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Wu S, Lin X, Lin SX, Lu M, Deng T, Wang Z, Olumi AF, Dahl DM, Wang D, Blute ML, Wu CL (2019) Impact of biopsy perineural invasion on the outcomes of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Urol 53:287–294CrossRef Wu S, Lin X, Lin SX, Lu M, Deng T, Wang Z, Olumi AF, Dahl DM, Wang D, Blute ML, Wu CL (2019) Impact of biopsy perineural invasion on the outcomes of patients who underwent radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Urol 53:287–294CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Grignon DJ (2018) Prostate cancer reporting and staging: needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Mod Pathol 31:S96–S109CrossRef Grignon DJ (2018) Prostate cancer reporting and staging: needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Mod Pathol 31:S96–S109CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L et al (2021) EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 79:243–262CrossRef Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L et al (2021) EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer-2020 update. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 79:243–262CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Delahunt B, Murray JD, Steigler A, Atkinson C, Christie D, Duchesne G, Egevad L, Joseph D, Matthews J, Oldmeadow C, Samaratunga H, Spry NA, Srigley JR, Hondermarck H, Denham JW (2020) Perineural invasion by prostate adenocarcinoma in needle biopsies predicts bone metastasis: ten year data from the TROG 03.04 RADAR Trial. Histopathology 77:284–292CrossRef Delahunt B, Murray JD, Steigler A, Atkinson C, Christie D, Duchesne G, Egevad L, Joseph D, Matthews J, Oldmeadow C, Samaratunga H, Spry NA, Srigley JR, Hondermarck H, Denham JW (2020) Perineural invasion by prostate adenocarcinoma in needle biopsies predicts bone metastasis: ten year data from the TROG 03.04 RADAR Trial. Histopathology 77:284–292CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Metter DM, Colgan TJ, Leung ST, Timmons CF, Park JY (2019) Trends in the US and Canadian pathologist workforces from 2007 to 2017. JAMA Netw Open 2:e194337CrossRef Metter DM, Colgan TJ, Leung ST, Timmons CF, Park JY (2019) Trends in the US and Canadian pathologist workforces from 2007 to 2017. JAMA Netw Open 2:e194337CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Egevad L, Strom P, Kartasalo K, Olsson H, Samaratunga H, Delahunt B, Eklund M (2020) The utility of artificial intelligence in the assessment of prostate pathology. Histopathology 76:790–792CrossRef Egevad L, Strom P, Kartasalo K, Olsson H, Samaratunga H, Delahunt B, Eklund M (2020) The utility of artificial intelligence in the assessment of prostate pathology. Histopathology 76:790–792CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bulten W, Pinckaers H, van Boven H, Vink R, de Bel T, van Ginneken B, van der Laak J, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Litjens G (2020) Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 21:233–241CrossRef Bulten W, Pinckaers H, van Boven H, Vink R, de Bel T, van Ginneken B, van der Laak J, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C, Litjens G (2020) Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 21:233–241CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Strom P, Kartasalo K, Olsson H, Solorzano L, Delahunt B, Berney DM, Bostwick DG, Evans AJ, Grignon DJ, Humphrey PA, Iczkowski KA, Kench JG, Kristiansen G, van der Kwast TH, Leite KRM, McKenney JK, Oxley J, Pan CC, Samaratunga H et al (2020) Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 21:222–232CrossRef Strom P, Kartasalo K, Olsson H, Solorzano L, Delahunt B, Berney DM, Bostwick DG, Evans AJ, Grignon DJ, Humphrey PA, Iczkowski KA, Kench JG, Kristiansen G, van der Kwast TH, Leite KRM, McKenney JK, Oxley J, Pan CC, Samaratunga H et al (2020) Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 21:222–232CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Gronberg H, Adolfsson J, Aly M, Nordstrom T, Wiklund P, Brandberg Y, Thompson J, Wiklund F, Lindberg J, Clements M, Egevad L, Eklund M (2015) Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 16:1667–1676CrossRef Gronberg H, Adolfsson J, Aly M, Nordstrom T, Wiklund P, Brandberg Y, Thompson J, Wiklund F, Lindberg J, Clements M, Egevad L, Eklund M (2015) Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol 16:1667–1676CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Strom P, Nordstrom T, Aly M, Egevad L, Gronberg H, Eklund M (2018) The Stockholm-3 model for prostate cancer detection: algorithm update, biomarker contribution, and reflex test potential. Eur Urol 74:204–210CrossRef Strom P, Nordstrom T, Aly M, Egevad L, Gronberg H, Eklund M (2018) The Stockholm-3 model for prostate cancer detection: algorithm update, biomarker contribution, and reflex test potential. Eur Urol 74:204–210CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bankhead P, Loughrey MB, Fernandez JA, Dombrowski Y, McArt DG, Dunne PD, McQuaid S, Gray RT, Murray LJ, Coleman HG, James JA, Salto-Tellez M, Hamilton PW (2017) QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep 7:16878CrossRef Bankhead P, Loughrey MB, Fernandez JA, Dombrowski Y, McArt DG, Dunne PD, McQuaid S, Gray RT, Murray LJ, Coleman HG, James JA, Salto-Tellez M, Hamilton PW (2017) QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep 7:16878CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rubens U, Hoyoux R, Vanosmael L, Ouras M, Tasset M, Hamilton C, Longuespee R, Maree R (2019) Cytomine: toward an open and collaborative software platform for digital pathology bridged to molecular investigations. Proteomics Clin Appl 13:e1800057CrossRef Rubens U, Hoyoux R, Vanosmael L, Ouras M, Tasset M, Hamilton C, Longuespee R, Maree R (2019) Cytomine: toward an open and collaborative software platform for digital pathology bridged to molecular investigations. Proteomics Clin Appl 13:e1800057CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Egevad L, Delahunt B, Samaratunga H, Tsuzuki T, Olsson H, Strom P, Lindskog C, Hakkinen T, Kartasalo K, Eklund M, Ruusuvuori P (2021) Interobserver reproducibility of perineural invasion of prostatic adenocarcinoma in needle biopsies. Virchows Arch 478:1109–1116CrossRef Egevad L, Delahunt B, Samaratunga H, Tsuzuki T, Olsson H, Strom P, Lindskog C, Hakkinen T, Kartasalo K, Eklund M, Ruusuvuori P (2021) Interobserver reproducibility of perineural invasion of prostatic adenocarcinoma in needle biopsies. Virchows Arch 478:1109–1116CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells W, Frangi A (eds) Lecture notes in computer science pp. 234–241 Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells W, Frangi A (eds) Lecture notes in computer science pp. 234–241
18.
go back to reference Lin TY, Goyal P, Girshick R, He K, Dollar P (2020) Focal loss for dense object detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 42:318–327CrossRef Lin TY, Goyal P, Girshick R, He K, Dollar P (2020) Focal loss for dense object detection. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 42:318–327CrossRef
19.
go back to reference DeLancey JO, Wood DP Jr, He C, Montgomery JS, Weizer AZ, Miller DC, Jacobs BL, Montie JE, Hollenbeck BK, Skolarus TA (2013) Evidence of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy specimen and survival after radical prostatectomy. Urology 81:354–357CrossRef DeLancey JO, Wood DP Jr, He C, Montgomery JS, Weizer AZ, Miller DC, Jacobs BL, Montie JE, Hollenbeck BK, Skolarus TA (2013) Evidence of perineural invasion on prostate biopsy specimen and survival after radical prostatectomy. Urology 81:354–357CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Tollefson MK, Karnes RJ, Kwon ED, Lohse CM, Rangel LJ, Mynderse LA, Cheville JC, Sebo TJ (2014) Prostate cancer Ki-67 (MIB-1) expression, perineural invasion, and Gleason score as biopsy-based predictors of prostate cancer mortality: the Mayo model. Mayo Clin Proc 89:308–318CrossRef Tollefson MK, Karnes RJ, Kwon ED, Lohse CM, Rangel LJ, Mynderse LA, Cheville JC, Sebo TJ (2014) Prostate cancer Ki-67 (MIB-1) expression, perineural invasion, and Gleason score as biopsy-based predictors of prostate cancer mortality: the Mayo model. Mayo Clin Proc 89:308–318CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Egevad L, Judge M, Delahunt B, Humphrey PA, Kristiansen G, Oxley J, Rasiah K, Takahashi H, Trpkov K, Varma M, Wheeler TM, Zhou M, Srigley JR, Kench JG (2019) Dataset for the reporting of prostate carcinoma in core needle biopsy and transurethral resection and enucleation specimens: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Pathology 51:11–20CrossRef Egevad L, Judge M, Delahunt B, Humphrey PA, Kristiansen G, Oxley J, Rasiah K, Takahashi H, Trpkov K, Varma M, Wheeler TM, Zhou M, Srigley JR, Kench JG (2019) Dataset for the reporting of prostate carcinoma in core needle biopsy and transurethral resection and enucleation specimens: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Pathology 51:11–20CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Maru N, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Scardino PT, Wheeler TM (2001) Prognostic significance of the diameter of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens. Hum Pathol 32:828–833CrossRef Maru N, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Scardino PT, Wheeler TM (2001) Prognostic significance of the diameter of perineural invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens. Hum Pathol 32:828–833CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lubig S, Thiesler T, Muller S, Vorreuther R, Leipner N, Kristiansen G (2018) Quantitative perineural invasion is a prognostic marker in prostate cancer. Pathology 50:298–304CrossRef Lubig S, Thiesler T, Muller S, Vorreuther R, Leipner N, Kristiansen G (2018) Quantitative perineural invasion is a prognostic marker in prostate cancer. Pathology 50:298–304CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Detection of perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsies with deep neural networks
Authors
Kimmo Kartasalo
Peter Ström
Pekka Ruusuvuori
Hemamali Samaratunga
Brett Delahunt
Toyonori Tsuzuki
Martin Eklund
Lars Egevad
Publication date
21-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Virchows Archiv / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03326-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Virchows Archiv 1/2022 Go to the issue