Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Research article

Prospective verification of sonographic fetal weight estimators among term parturients in Uganda

Authors: Senai Goitom Sereke, Richard Okello Omara, Felix Bongomin, Sarah Nakubulwa, Harriet Nalubega Kisembo

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Accuracy of fetal weight estimation by ultrasound is essential in making decisions on the time and mode of delivery. There are many proposed formulas for fetal weight estimation such as Hadlock 1, Hadlock 2, Hadlock 3, Hadlock 4 and Shepard. What best applies to the Ugandan population is not known since no verification of any of the formulas has been done before. The primary aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of sonographic estimation of fetal weight using five most commonly used formulas, and analyze formula variations for different weight ranges.

Methods

This was a hospital based prospective cohort study at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda. A total of 356 pregnant women who consented and were within 3 days of birth were enrolled. Prenatal ultrasound fetal weight determined by measuring the biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femoral length, and then was compared with actual birth weight.

Results

The overall accuracy of Hadlock 1, Hadlock 2, Hadlock 3, Hadlock 4 and Shepard formula were 66.9, 73.3, 77.3, 78.4 and 69.7% respectively. All Hadlocks showed significant mean difference between weight estimates and actual birth weight (p < 0.01) whereas Shepard formula did not [p - 0.2], when no stratification of fetal weights was done. However, all Hadlocks showed a none significant (p-values > 0.05) mean difference between weight estimates and actual birth weight when the actual birth weight was ≥4000.0 g. Shepard weight estimates showed a none significant mean difference when actual birth weight was < 4000 g. Bland-Altman graphs also showed a better agreement of weight estimated by Shepard formula and actual birth weights.

Conclusion

All the five formulas were accurate at estimating actual birth weights within 10% accuracy. However, this accuracy varied with the fetal birth weight. Shepard was more accurate in estimating actual birth weights < 4000 g whereas all Hadlocks were more accurate when the actual birthweight was ≥4000 g.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2017: estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
2.
go back to reference Ukah UV, Bayrampour H, Sabr Y, Razaz N, Chan W-S, Lim KI, et al. Association between gestational weight gain and severe adverse birth outcomes in Washington State, US: A population-based retrospective cohort study, 2004–2013. PLoS Med. 2019;16(12):e1003009. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003009. Ukah UV, Bayrampour H, Sabr Y, Razaz N, Chan W-S, Lim KI, et al. Association between gestational weight gain and severe adverse birth outcomes in Washington State, US: A population-based retrospective cohort study, 2004–2013. PLoS Med. 2019;16(12):e1003009. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1371/​journal.​pmed.​1003009.
3.
go back to reference MacKenzie AP, Stephenson CD, Funai EF. Prenatal sonographic assessment of fetal weight; 2018. MacKenzie AP, Stephenson CD, Funai EF. Prenatal sonographic assessment of fetal weight; 2018.
5.
go back to reference Lanowski J-S, Lanowski G, Schippert C, Drinkut K, Hillemanns P, Staboulidou I. Ultrasound versus clinical examination to estimate fetal weight at term. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017;77(3):276–83.CrossRef Lanowski J-S, Lanowski G, Schippert C, Drinkut K, Hillemanns P, Staboulidou I. Ultrasound versus clinical examination to estimate fetal weight at term. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017;77(3):276–83.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Milner J, Arezina J. The accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in comparison to birth weight: A systematic review. Ultrasound J Br Med Ultrasound Soc. 2018;26(1):32–41. Milner J, Arezina J. The accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in comparison to birth weight: A systematic review. Ultrasound J Br Med Ultrasound Soc. 2018;26(1):32–41.
7.
go back to reference Galjaard S, Ameye L, Lees CC, Pexsters A, Bourne T, Timmerman D, et al. Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population. Biol Sex Differ. 2019;10(1):48.CrossRef Galjaard S, Ameye L, Lees CC, Pexsters A, Bourne T, Timmerman D, et al. Sex differences in fetal growth and immediate birth outcomes in a low-risk Caucasian population. Biol Sex Differ. 2019;10(1):48.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Buck Louis GM, Grewal J, Albert PS, Sciscione A, Wing DA, Grobman WA, et al. Racial/Ethnic Standards for Fetal Growth, the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4):449.e1–449.e41.CrossRef Buck Louis GM, Grewal J, Albert PS, Sciscione A, Wing DA, Grobman WA, et al. Racial/Ethnic Standards for Fetal Growth, the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(4):449.e1–449.e41.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Westerway SC. Estimating fetal weight for best clinical outcome. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2012;15(1):13–7.CrossRef Westerway SC. Estimating fetal weight for best clinical outcome. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2012;15(1):13–7.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zhang J, Merialdi M, Platt LD, Kramer MS. Defining Normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;202(6):522–8.CrossRef Zhang J, Merialdi M, Platt LD, Kramer MS. Defining Normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jun;202(6):522–8.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Akinola SS, Oluwafemi K, Ernest OO, Niyi OM, Solomon OO, Oluwagbemiga OA, et al. Clinical versus Sonographic estimation of Foetal weight in Southwest Nigeria. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007;25(1):14–23. Akinola SS, Oluwafemi K, Ernest OO, Niyi OM, Solomon OO, Oluwagbemiga OA, et al. Clinical versus Sonographic estimation of Foetal weight in Southwest Nigeria. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007;25(1):14–23.
14.
go back to reference Barel O, Zvi V, Josef T, Arie H, Ron M. Assessment of the accuracy of multiple Sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:815–23.PubMed Barel O, Zvi V, Josef T, Arie H, Ron M. Assessment of the accuracy of multiple Sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32:815–23.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Melamed N, Yogev Y, Meisner I, Mashiach R, Bardin R, Ben-Haroush A. Sonographic fetal weight estimation: which model should be used? J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:617–29.CrossRef Melamed N, Yogev Y, Meisner I, Mashiach R, Bardin R, Ben-Haroush A. Sonographic fetal weight estimation: which model should be used? J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28:617–29.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hammami A, Zumaeta AM, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):35–43.CrossRef Hammami A, Zumaeta AM, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(1):35–43.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hiwale SS, Misra H, Ulman S. Ultrasonography-based fetal weight estimation: finding an appropriate model for an Indian population. J Med Ultrasound. 2017;25(1):24–32.CrossRef Hiwale SS, Misra H, Ulman S. Ultrasonography-based fetal weight estimation: finding an appropriate model for an Indian population. J Med Ultrasound. 2017;25(1):24–32.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Combs CA, Jaekle R, Rosenn B, et al. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:365–70.PubMed Combs CA, Jaekle R, Rosenn B, et al. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;82:365–70.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Sabbagha RE, Minogue J, Tamura RK, Hungerford SA. Estimation of birth weight by use of ultrasonographic formulas targeted to large-, appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:854–60.CrossRef Sabbagha RE, Minogue J, Tamura RK, Hungerford SA. Estimation of birth weight by use of ultrasonographic formulas targeted to large-, appropriate-, and small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:854–60.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Oshri B, Ron M, Zvi V, Josef T, Noam S. Sonographic fetal weight estimation – is there more to it than just fetal measurements? Prenat Diagn. 2014;34:50–5.CrossRef Oshri B, Ron M, Zvi V, Josef T, Noam S. Sonographic fetal weight estimation – is there more to it than just fetal measurements? Prenat Diagn. 2014;34:50–5.CrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Sma SB, Ilham BA-K, Rawan MQ, Zouhair OA. Accuracy of Sonographic fetal weight estimation within 14 days of delivery in a Jordanian population using Hadlock formula 1. Med Princ Pr. 2012;21:366–9.CrossRef Sma SB, Ilham BA-K, Rawan MQ, Zouhair OA. Accuracy of Sonographic fetal weight estimation within 14 days of delivery in a Jordanian population using Hadlock formula 1. Med Princ Pr. 2012;21:366–9.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cletus Uche E, Livinus Chibuzo A, Jerome N, Udo O, Olayinka O. Correlation of ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight with actual birth weight in a tertiary hospital in Lagos, Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2015;15(4):1112–22. Cletus Uche E, Livinus Chibuzo A, Jerome N, Udo O, Olayinka O. Correlation of ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight with actual birth weight in a tertiary hospital in Lagos, Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2015;15(4):1112–22.
Metadata
Title
Prospective verification of sonographic fetal weight estimators among term parturients in Uganda
Authors
Senai Goitom Sereke
Richard Okello Omara
Felix Bongomin
Sarah Nakubulwa
Harriet Nalubega Kisembo
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03645-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2021 Go to the issue