Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2008

01-05-2008

Prospective validation study of an algorithm for triage to MRCP or ERCP for investigation of suspected pancreatico-biliary disease

Authors: C. N. Parnaby, J. T. Jenkins, J. C. Ferguson, B. W. A. Williamson

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In patients with suspected pancreatico-biliary disease, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) should be reserved for those requiring therapeutic intervention. However, difficulty arises in identifying patients likely to require therapy in the early phase of diagnostic work-up.
An algorithm has been developed by the authors based upon prospective assessment of ERCP patients for triage of patients to magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or ERCP with suspected pancreatico-biliary disease. We aimed to validate this algorithm in an independent group of patients using a different group of endoscopists blinded to the algorithm.

Methods

Patients were stratified into different categories by clinical, ultrasound and liver function test findings. The algorithm stratified patients by the likelihood of therapeutic intervention. The accuracy of the algorithm for a therapeutic outcome was assessed by receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

Hundred and twenty-five consecutive patients (Oct 2005 to July 2006) were prospectively assessed by MRCP or ERCP according to the algorithm, and the outcomes recorded. Fifty-seven patients were triaged to MRCP and 63 patients were triaged to ERCP. A category was not assessable in five patients. Three patients from the MRCP group required subsequent therapeutic ERCP. Diagnostic ERCP was performed in three patients in the ERCP group. ERCP-related complications occurred in four patients. The algorithm performed well in predicting the requirement for intervention as determined by the area under the ROC curve [0.84 (95%CI 0.76–0.92)].

Conclusions

Our study confirms that an algorithm-based approach can reproducibly predict those patients requiring therapeutic biliary intervention.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Garden OJ. Gallstones. In: Garden OJ (ed) Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, 2nd edition. pp 213–237 Garden OJ. Gallstones. In: Garden OJ (ed) Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, 2nd edition. pp 213–237
2.
go back to reference Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F et al (1998) Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48:1–10PubMedCrossRef Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G, Chilovi F, Costan F, De Berardinis F et al (1998) Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 48:1–10PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, Rondeau Y, Rocher L, Fritsch J et al (1999) Use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 44:118–122PubMedCrossRef Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen O, Rondeau Y, Rocher L, Fritsch J et al (1999) Use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut 44:118–122PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Adamek HE, Albert J, Breer H, Weitz M, Schilling D, Riemann JF (1998) A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction. Gut 43:680–683PubMedCrossRef Adamek HE, Albert J, Breer H, Weitz M, Schilling D, Riemann JF (1998) A prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected bile duct obstruction. Gut 43:680–683PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne DH, Lee MJ (2000) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 55:25–35PubMedCrossRef Varghese JC, Liddell RP, Farrell MA, Murray FE, Osborne DH, Lee MJ (2000) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. Clin Radiol 55:25–35PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN (2003) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med 139:547–557PubMedCrossRef Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN (2003) Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med 139:547–557PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron M et al (1995) Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 42:225–231PubMedCrossRef Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron M et al (1995) Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 42:225–231PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal P et al (1996) Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct lithiasis. Lancet 347:75–79PubMedCrossRef Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal P et al (1996) Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct lithiasis. Lancet 347:75–79PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Jenkins JT, Williamson BWA (2006) Prospective study to develop an algorithm for investigation by MRCP or ERCP. ANZ J Surg 76:1–4CrossRef Jenkins JT, Williamson BWA (2006) Prospective study to develop an algorithm for investigation by MRCP or ERCP. ANZ J Surg 76:1–4CrossRef
10.
go back to reference The management of pancreatico-duodenal tumours: a regional protocol for the West of Scotland Cancer Network (WoSCAN)—Produced and approved by the WoSCAN upper GI cancer managed clinical network advisory board, March 2007 The management of pancreatico-duodenal tumours: a regional protocol for the West of Scotland Cancer Network (WoSCAN)—Produced and approved by the WoSCAN upper GI cancer managed clinical network advisory board, March 2007
11.
go back to reference Duensing RA, Williams RA, Collins JC, Wilson SE (1995) Managing choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 170:619–623PubMedCrossRef Duensing RA, Williams RA, Collins JC, Wilson SE (1995) Managing choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 170:619–623PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Cotton PB (1993) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165:474–478PubMedCrossRef Cotton PB (1993) Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 165:474–478PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Koo KP, Traverso LW (1996) Do preoperative indicators predict the presence of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 171:495–499PubMedCrossRef Koo KP, Traverso LW (1996) Do preoperative indicators predict the presence of common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 171:495–499PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Menezes N, Marson LP, deBeaux AC, Muir IM, Auld CD (2000) Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg 87:1176–1181PubMedCrossRef Menezes N, Marson LP, deBeaux AC, Muir IM, Auld CD (2000) Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg 87:1176–1181PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Prat F, Meduri B, Ducot B, Chiche R, Salimbeni-Bartolini R, Pelletier G (1999) Prediction of common bile duct stones by non-invasive tests. Ann Surg 229:362–368PubMedCrossRef Prat F, Meduri B, Ducot B, Chiche R, Salimbeni-Bartolini R, Pelletier G (1999) Prediction of common bile duct stones by non-invasive tests. Ann Surg 229:362–368PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Abboud PAC, Malet PF, Berlin JA, Staroscik R, Cabana MD, Clarke JR et al (1996) Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 44:450–459PubMedCrossRef Abboud PAC, Malet PF, Berlin JA, Staroscik R, Cabana MD, Clarke JR et al (1996) Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 44:450–459PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Luman W, Chan ESY (2003) Mathematical model for predicting biliary therapeutic endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP). Dig Liver Dis 35:486–492PubMedCrossRef Luman W, Chan ESY (2003) Mathematical model for predicting biliary therapeutic endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERCP). Dig Liver Dis 35:486–492PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. National Institutes of Health State of the Science conference statement 14–16 Jan 2002, final statement, pp 4–6 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. National Institutes of Health State of the Science conference statement 14–16 Jan 2002, final statement, pp 4–6
19.
go back to reference Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M et al (1999) E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13:952–957PubMedCrossRef Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M et al (1999) E.A.E.S. multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi. Surg Endosc 13:952–957PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol 2 Martin DJ, Vernon DR, Toouli J (2006) Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol 2
21.
go back to reference Davidson BR, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL (1988) Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ considered unfit for surgery. Gut 29:114–120PubMedCrossRef Davidson BR, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL (1988) Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients with gallbladder in situ considered unfit for surgery. Gut 29:114–120PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Welbourn CR, Beckly DE, Eyre-Brook IA (1995) Endoscopic sphincterotomy without cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis. Gut 37:119–120PubMedCrossRef Welbourn CR, Beckly DE, Eyre-Brook IA (1995) Endoscopic sphincterotomy without cholecystectomy for gallstone pancreatitis. Gut 37:119–120PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Uhl W, Warshaw A, Imrie C, Bassi C, McKay C, Lankisch P et al (2002) IAP Guidelines for the surgical management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2:565–573PubMedCrossRef Uhl W, Warshaw A, Imrie C, Bassi C, McKay C, Lankisch P et al (2002) IAP Guidelines for the surgical management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2:565–573PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Romagnuolo J, Currie G et al (2005) Noninvasive versus selective invasive biliary imaging for acute biliary pancreatitis: an economic evaluation by using decision tree analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 61:86–97PubMedCrossRef Romagnuolo J, Currie G et al (2005) Noninvasive versus selective invasive biliary imaging for acute biliary pancreatitis: an economic evaluation by using decision tree analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 61:86–97PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Toh SK, Phillips S, Johnson CD (2000) A prospective audit against national standards of the presentation and management of acute pancreatitis in the South of England. Gut 46:239–243PubMedCrossRef Toh SK, Phillips S, Johnson CD (2000) A prospective audit against national standards of the presentation and management of acute pancreatitis in the South of England. Gut 46:239–243PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference de Ledinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, Gense V, Amouretti M, Drouillard J et al (1999) Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 49:26–31PubMedCrossRef de Ledinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, Gense V, Amouretti M, Drouillard J et al (1999) Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 49:26–31PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prospective validation study of an algorithm for triage to MRCP or ERCP for investigation of suspected pancreatico-biliary disease
Authors
C. N. Parnaby
J. T. Jenkins
J. C. Ferguson
B. W. A. Williamson
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9775-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2008

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2008 Go to the issue