Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 6/2007

01-11-2007 | Clinical Investigation

Prospective Study of Elective Bilateral Versus Unilateral Femoral Arterial Puncture for Uterine Artery Embolization

Authors: M. J. Bratby, N. Ramachandran, N. Sheppard, J. Kyriou, G. M. Munneke, A.-M. Belli

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 6/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of elective bilateral femoral arterial punctures for uterine artery embolization (UAE) of symptomatic fibroids on fluoroscopy and procedural time, patient dose, and ease of procedure. We conducted a prospective study of UAE with either the intention to catheterize both uterine arteries using a single femoral puncture (n = 12) or elective bilateral arterial punctures from the outset (n = 12). The same two operators undertook each case. Main outcome measures were total procedure time, fluoroscopy time, dose-area product (DAP), and total skin dose. A simulation was then performed on an anthropomorphic phantom using the mean in vivo fluoroscopy parameters to estimate the ovarian dose. Bilateral UAE was achieved in all patients. None of the patients with initial unilateral arterial puncture required further contralateral arterial puncture. The mean fluoroscopy time in the group with elective bilateral punctures was 12.8 min, compared with a mean of 16.6 min in patients with unilateral puncture (p = 0.046). There was no significant difference in overall procedure time (p = 0.68). No puncture-site complications were found. Additional catheters were required only following unilateral puncture. The simulated dose was 25% higher with unilateral puncture. Although there was no significant difference in measured in vivo patient dose between the two groups (DAP, p = 0.32), this is likely to reflect the wide variation in other patient characteristics. Allowing for the small study size, our results show that the use of elective bilateral arterial punctures reduces fluoroscopy time, requires less catheter manipulation, and, according to the simulation model, has the potential to reduce patient dose. The overall procedure time, however, is not significantly reduced.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2007) NICE guidelines on heavy menstrual bleeding. NICE, London National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2007) NICE guidelines on heavy menstrual bleeding. NICE, London
2.
go back to reference Walker WJ, Pelage JP (2002) Uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: clinical results in 400 women with imaging follow up. BJOG 109:1262–1272PubMedCrossRef Walker WJ, Pelage JP (2002) Uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: clinical results in 400 women with imaging follow up. BJOG 109:1262–1272PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goodwin SC, McLucas B, Lee M, et al. (1999) Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata: mid-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:1159–11165PubMedCrossRef Goodwin SC, McLucas B, Lee M, et al. (1999) Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata: mid-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:1159–11165PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Spies JB, Ascher SA, Roth AR, Kim J, Levy EB, Gomez-Jorge J (2001) Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 98:29–34PubMedCrossRef Spies JB, Ascher SA, Roth AR, Kim J, Levy EB, Gomez-Jorge J (2001) Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 98:29–34PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pron G, Bennett J, Common A, Wall J, Asch J, Sniderman K (2003) The Ontario uterine fibroid embolization trial: uterine fibroid reduction and symptom relief after uterine artery embolization for fibroids. Fertil Steril 79:120–127PubMedCrossRef Pron G, Bennett J, Common A, Wall J, Asch J, Sniderman K (2003) The Ontario uterine fibroid embolization trial: uterine fibroid reduction and symptom relief after uterine artery embolization for fibroids. Fertil Steril 79:120–127PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pelage J-P, Soyer P, Le Dref O, Dahan H, Coumbaras J, Kardache M, Rymer R (1999) Uterine arteries: bilateral catheterization with a single femoral approach and a single 5-F catheter—technical note. Radiology 210(2):573–575PubMed Pelage J-P, Soyer P, Le Dref O, Dahan H, Coumbaras J, Kardache M, Rymer R (1999) Uterine arteries: bilateral catheterization with a single femoral approach and a single 5-F catheter—technical note. Radiology 210(2):573–575PubMed
7.
go back to reference Rosen MP, Brophy D (1999) Simmons reverse curve. Radiology 213(2):619–620PubMed Rosen MP, Brophy D (1999) Simmons reverse curve. Radiology 213(2):619–620PubMed
8.
go back to reference Nikolic B, Abbara S, Levy E, Imaoka I, Lundsten ML, Jha RC, Spies JB (2000) Influence of radiographic technique and equipment on absorbed ovarian dose associated with uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11(9):1173–1178PubMedCrossRef Nikolic B, Abbara S, Levy E, Imaoka I, Lundsten ML, Jha RC, Spies JB (2000) Influence of radiographic technique and equipment on absorbed ovarian dose associated with uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 11(9):1173–1178PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Nikolic B, Spies JB, Campbell L, Walsh SM, Abbara S, Lundsten MJ (2001) Uterine artery embolization: reduced radiation with refined technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12(1):39–44PubMedCrossRef Nikolic B, Spies JB, Campbell L, Walsh SM, Abbara S, Lundsten MJ (2001) Uterine artery embolization: reduced radiation with refined technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12(1):39–44PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference IPAC (2004) Interventional procedures guidelines 94. IPAC report for NICE. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London IPAC (2004) Interventional procedures guidelines 94. IPAC report for NICE. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London
11.
go back to reference Walker WJ, McDowell ST (2006) Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: a series of 56 completed pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(5):1266–12711PubMed Walker WJ, McDowell ST (2006) Pregnancy after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: a series of 56 completed pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(5):1266–12711PubMed
12.
go back to reference Ho SS, Cowan NC (2005) Uterine artery embolisation for uterine fibroids using a 4F Rosch inferior mesenteric catheter. Eur Radiol 15(6):1168–1172PubMedCrossRef Ho SS, Cowan NC (2005) Uterine artery embolisation for uterine fibroids using a 4F Rosch inferior mesenteric catheter. Eur Radiol 15(6):1168–1172PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kroencke TJ, Kluner C, Hamm B, Gauruder-Burmester A (2007) Use of the 4F Rosch inferior mesenteric catheter in embolization procedures in the pelvis: a review of 300 cases. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30(2):268–727CrossRef Kroencke TJ, Kluner C, Hamm B, Gauruder-Burmester A (2007) Use of the 4F Rosch inferior mesenteric catheter in embolization procedures in the pelvis: a review of 300 cases. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30(2):268–727CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vetter S, Schultz FW, Strecker EP, Zoetelief J (2004) Patient radiation exposure in uterine artery embolization of leiomyomata: calculation of organ doses a and effective dose. Eur Radiol 14(5):842–848PubMedCrossRef Vetter S, Schultz FW, Strecker EP, Zoetelief J (2004) Patient radiation exposure in uterine artery embolization of leiomyomata: calculation of organ doses a and effective dose. Eur Radiol 14(5):842–848PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vetter S, Schultz FW, Strecker EP, Zoetelief J (2005) Optimisation strategies and justification: an example in uterine artery embolisation for fibroids. Radiat Proc Dosimetry 117(1–3):50–53 Vetter S, Schultz FW, Strecker EP, Zoetelief J (2005) Optimisation strategies and justification: an example in uterine artery embolisation for fibroids. Radiat Proc Dosimetry 117(1–3):50–53
16.
go back to reference Kroncke TJ, Gauruder-Burmester A, Gronewold M, et al. (2004) Technical success rate, peri-interventional complications and radiation exposure of the transarterial embolization for leiomyomas of the uterus. Rofo 176(4):580–589PubMed Kroncke TJ, Gauruder-Burmester A, Gronewold M, et al. (2004) Technical success rate, peri-interventional complications and radiation exposure of the transarterial embolization for leiomyomas of the uterus. Rofo 176(4):580–589PubMed
17.
go back to reference Chrisman HB, Liu DM, Bui JT, Resnick SA, Sato K, Chen R, Vogelzang RL, Omary RA (2005) The safety and efficacy of a percutaneous closure device in patients undergoing uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(3):347–350PubMed Chrisman HB, Liu DM, Bui JT, Resnick SA, Sato K, Chen R, Vogelzang RL, Omary RA (2005) The safety and efficacy of a percutaneous closure device in patients undergoing uterine artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16(3):347–350PubMed
18.
go back to reference Ratnam LA, Raja J, Munneke GJ, Morgan RA, Belli A-M (2007) Prospective nonrandomized trial of manual compression and Angio-Seal and Starclose arterial closure devices in common femoral punctures. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30:182–188CrossRef Ratnam LA, Raja J, Munneke GJ, Morgan RA, Belli A-M (2007) Prospective nonrandomized trial of manual compression and Angio-Seal and Starclose arterial closure devices in common femoral punctures. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30:182–188CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prospective Study of Elective Bilateral Versus Unilateral Femoral Arterial Puncture for Uterine Artery Embolization
Authors
M. J. Bratby
N. Ramachandran
N. Sheppard
J. Kyriou
G. M. Munneke
A.-M. Belli
Publication date
01-11-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 6/2007
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9136-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2007

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 6/2007 Go to the issue