Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Journal of Religion and Health
Published in: Journal of Religion and Health 2/2012

01-06-2012 | Original Paper

Proportion of US Congregations that have People Living with HIV

Authors: Steven M. Frenk, Mark Chaves

Published in: Journal of Religion and Health | Issue 2/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Surveillance studies monitor the prevalence and incidence of HIV, and this information is used by policy makers to design prevention programs and facilitate care for people living with HIV (PLWHIV). Although most of these studies monitor the presence of PLWHIV in the general population or specific communities, some assess the presence of PLWHIV in organizations. One type of organization that has not been examined, yet could potentially play a large role in caring for PLWHIV, is the religious congregation. In this study, we estimate the proportion of US religious congregations that have PLWHIV and examine whether congregations that are in contact with populations with high HIV prevalence and incidence rates are more likely to have PLWHIV using data from a nationally representative sample of congregations and the 2000 Census. Over 10,000 congregations have PLWHIV, and congregations containing, open to, or located in areas with populations with high HIV prevalence and incidence rates are more likely to have them. This study offers new insight into the presence of HIV in the United States and provides information about which congregations may be amenable to serving as sites of HIV programs.
Footnotes
1
This strategy exploits the insight that the organizational affiliations of a representative sample of people constitute a representative sample of organizations (McPherson 1982). Thus, one can develop a nationally representative sample of US congregations from a nationally representative sample of Americans.
 
2
Key informant reports are widely used in organizational research as a way to obtain accurate information about the features of organizations (cf. Frenk et al. forthcoming; Marsden and Rohrer 2001; McPherson and Rotolo 1995).
 
3
The question is, “Is there anyone in your congregation who has publicly acknowledged his or her infection with the virus that causes AIDS? That is, is there anyone who is openly HIV-positive?”
 
4
Chaves and Anderson (2009) provide an example to help explain this issue, “Suppose that the universe contains only two congregations, one with 1,000 regular attenders and the other with 100 regular attenders. Suppose further that the 1,000-person congregation supports a food pantry and the 100-person congregation does not. We can express this reality in one of two ways. We can say that 91 percent of the people are in a congregation that supports a food pantry (1,000/1,100), or we can say that 50 percent of the congregations support a food pantry (1/2). Both of these are meaningful numbers. Ignoring the over-representation of larger congregations, a percentage or mean from the NCS is analogous to the 91 percent in this example. Weighted inversely proportional to congregational size, a percentage or mean is analogous to the 50 percent in this example. The first number views congregations from the perspective of the average attender, which gives greater weight to congregations with more people in them; the second number views them from the perspective of the average congregation, ignoring size differences.”
 
5
Because we collected congregations’ addresses, we were able to attach data from the 2000 Census Summary File 3 to the NCS data file. Based on previous research examining the level of measurement to use when assessing health variables, we attach block group level data (Krieger et al. 2002).
 
6
Because of the small proportion of congregations that have PLWHIV, we run a sensitivity analysis using the RELOGIT program in STATA to assess the robustness of the coefficients produced in the regression model (King and Zeng 1999a; King and Zeng 1999b; Tomz et al. 1999). The model produced by RELOGIT does not vary significantly from the model that appears in the paper.
 
Literature
Bozzette, S. A., Berry, S. H., Duan, N., Frankel, M. R., Leibowitz, A. A., Lefkowitz, D., et al. (1998). The care of HIV-infected adults in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 339(26), 1897–1904.
Buehler, J. W. (2008). Surveillance. In K. J. Rothman, S. Greenland, & T. L. Lash (Eds.), Modern epidemiology (3rd ed., pp. 459–480). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
US Census Bureau (2002). Census 2000 Summary File 3—United States [Data file].
Campbell, M. K., Hudson, M. A., Resnicow, K., Blakeney, N., Paxton, A., & Baskin, M. (2007). Church-based health promotion interventions: evidence and lessons learned. Annual Review of Public Health, 28, 213–234.PubMedCrossRef
Carlin, J. B., Galati, J. C., & Royston, P. (2008). A new framework for managing and analyzing multiply imputed data in Stata. Stata Journal, 8(1), 49–67.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). HIV prevalence estimates—United States, 2006. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57(39), 1073–1076.
Chaves, M. (2004). Congregations in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Chaves, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2008). Continuity and change in American congregations: introducing the second wave of the National Congregations Study. Sociology of Religion, 69(4), 415–440.CrossRef
Chaves, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2009). National Congregations Study cumulative codebook for waves I and II (1998 and 2006–2007). Durham: Duke University, Sociology Department.
Chaves, M., & Tsitsos, W. (2001). Congregations and social services: what they do, how they do it, and with whom. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(4), 660–683.CrossRef
Davis, J. A., Smith, T. W., & Marsden, P. V. (2007). General Social Surveys, 1972–2006: cumulative codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
Dean, H. D., Lansky, A., & Fleming, P. L. (2002). HIV surveillance methods for the incarcerated population. AIDS Education and Prevention, 14(5), 65–74.PubMedCrossRef
DeHaven, M. J., Hunter, I. B., Wilder, L., Walton, J. W., & Berry, J. (2004). Health programs in faith-based organizations: are they effective? American Journal of Public Health, 94(6), 1030–1036.PubMedCrossRef
Frenk, S. M., Anderson, S. L., Chaves, M., & Martin, N. (forthcoming). Assessing the validity of key informant reports about congregants’ demographic characteristics. Sociology of Religion.
Hadaway, C. K., & Marler, P. L. (2005). How many Americans attend worship each week? An alternative approach to measurement. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(3), 307–322.CrossRef
Hall, H. I., Song, R., Rhodes, P., Prejean, J., An, Q., Lee, L. M., et al. (2008). Estimation of HIV incidence in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 300(5), 520–529.PubMedCrossRef
Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1999). AIDS stigma and contact with persons with AIDS: effects of direct and vicarious contact. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(1), 1–36.CrossRef
Hernández, E. I., Burwell, R., & Smith, J. (2007). Answering the call: how Latino churches can respond to the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame, Institute for Latino Studies.
Hicks, K. E., Allen, J. A., & Wright, E. M. (2005). Building holistic HIV/AIDS responses in African American urban faith communities: a qualitative, multiple case study analysis. Family & Community Health, 28(2), 184–205.
Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics (6th ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
King, G., & Zeng, L. (1999b). Estimating absolute, relative, and attributable risks in case-control studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Department of Government. Retrieved from http://​GKing.​Harvard.​Edu.
Krieger, N., Chen, J. T., Waterman, P. D., Soobader, M., Subramanian, S. V., & Carson, R. (2002). Geocoding and monitoring of US socioeconomic inequalities in mortality and cancer incidence: does the choice of area-based measure and geographic level matter? The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. American Journal of Epidemiology, 156(5), 471–482.PubMedCrossRef
Latkin, C. A., Tobin, K. E., & Gilbert, S. H. (2002). Shun or support: the role of religious behaviors and HIV-related health care among drug users in Baltimore, Maryland. AIDS and Behavior, 6(4), 321–329.CrossRef
Marsden, P. V., & Rohrer, L. H. (2001). Organizational and informant differences in the reliability of survey reports on organization size and age. Paper presented at the American Sociological Association meetings. Los Angeles, CA.
McBridge, D. C., McCoy, C. B., Chitwood, D. D., Inciardi, J. A., Hernandez, E. L., & Mutch, P. M. (1994). Religious institutions as sources of AIDS information for street injection drug users. Review of Religious Research, 35(4), 324–334.CrossRef
McGrew, C. A., Dick, R. W., Schniedwind, K., & Kikas, P. (1993). Survey of NCAA institutions concerning HIV/AIDS policies and universal precautions. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 25(8), 917–921.PubMed
McPherson, J. M. (1982). Hypernetwork sampling: duality and differentiation among voluntary organizations. Social Networks, 3(4), 225–249.CrossRef
McPherson, J. M., & Rotolo, T. (1995). Measuring the composition of voluntary groups—a multitrait-multimethod analysis. Social Forces, 73(3), 1097–1115.
McRoberts, O. (2003). Streets of glory: church and community in a black urban neighborhood. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Moore, R. D., & Chaisson, R. E. (1999). Natural history of HIV infection in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS, 13(14), 1933–1942.PubMedCrossRef
Palella, F. J., Delaney, K. M., Moorman, A. C., Loveless, M. O., Fuhrer, J., Satten, G. A., et al. (1998). Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(13), 853–860.PubMedCrossRef
Royston, P. (2007). Multiple imputation of missing values: further update of ice, with an emphasis on interval censoring. Stata Journal, 7(4), 445–464.
StataCorp. (2007). Stata Statistical Software: Release 10. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.
Trinitapoli, J., Ellison, C. G., & Boardman, J. D. (2009). US religious congregations and the sponsorship of health-related programs. Social Science & Medicine, 68(12), 2231–2239.CrossRef
Trubo, R. (2004). CDC initiative targets HIV research gaps in black and Hispanic communities. Journal of the American Medical Association, 292(21), 2563–2564.PubMedCrossRef
Visser, M. J., Makin, J. D., & Lehobye, K. (2006). Stigmatizing attitudes of the community towards people living with HIV/AIDS. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 16(1), 42–58.CrossRef
Winship, C., & Radbill, L. (1994). Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 23(2), 230–257.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Proportion of US Congregations that have People Living with HIV
Authors
Steven M. Frenk
Mark Chaves
Publication date
01-06-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health / Issue 2/2012
Print ISSN: 0022-4197
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6571
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-010-9379-y

Other articles of this Issue 2/2012

Journal of Religion and Health 2/2012 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Not Chosen: A Lament

Original Paper

Gerotrancscendence Through Jewish Eyes

Report

“I don’t have a home:” Helping Homeless People Through Faith, Spirituality, and Compassionate Service

Original Paper

Spiritual Well-Being Among Older African Americans in a Midwestern City

Original Paper

Examining Attachment to God and Health Risk-Taking Behaviors in College Students

Report

Teaching Council in Sri Lanka: A Post Disaster, Culturally Sensitive and Spiritual Model of Group Process