Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery 6/2018

01-12-2018 | Original Article

Prophylactic Retention Sutures in Midline Laparotomy in High-Risk Patients for Wound Dehiscence: a Randomised Prospective Case Control Study

Authors: Ajay Maganlal Rajyaguru, Milap Jignesh Shah, Bhavesh V. Vaishnani, Jignesh P. Dave, Jatin G. Bhatt

Published in: Indian Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Abdominal wound dehiscence (AWD) is one of the most notorious complication after laparotomy and associated with high morbidity and mortality. The retention suture is used in the re-operated cases of wound dehiscence to reduce the disruption of fascia. To study the effect of prophylactic retention sutures in patients with high risk for wound dehiscence who underwent midline laparotomy. Random selection of 200 midline laparotomy cases was done divided into two groups. In the one group (Cases- group A) Conventional mass closure of midline fascial wound closure with incorporation of prophylactic retention sutures. In other group (Control group - group B) midline line fascial closure by conventional mass closure without incorporation of prophylactic retention sutures. Comparison of both the techniques regarding preoperative status and postoperative complication such as incisional hernia, wound dehiscence and chronic wound pain was done according to clinical examination and recorded in the pro forma prepared. Incorporation of prophylactic retention sutures reduce the occurrence of WD following midline laparotomy in high-risk patients with multiple risk factors for impaired wound healing without imposing remarkable post-operative complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Riou JP, Cohen JR, Johnson H Sr (1992) Factors influencing wound dehiscence. Am J Surg 16(3):324–328CrossRef Riou JP, Cohen JR, Johnson H Sr (1992) Factors influencing wound dehiscence. Am J Surg 16(3):324–328CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Zhamak et al (2012) Prophylactic retention sutures in midline laparotomy in high risk cases of wound dehiscence: a randomized controlled trial. Assoc Acad Surg 178(11):110–115 Zhamak et al (2012) Prophylactic retention sutures in midline laparotomy in high risk cases of wound dehiscence: a randomized controlled trial. Assoc Acad Surg 178(11):110–115
3.
go back to reference Armstrong CP, Dixon JM, Duffy SW et al (1984) Wound healing in obstructive jaundice. Br J Surg 71(6):267CrossRefPubMed Armstrong CP, Dixon JM, Duffy SW et al (1984) Wound healing in obstructive jaundice. Br J Surg 71(6):267CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gialson H, Gronbech JE (1995) Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations and comparison of closure techniques. Br J Surg 51(4):154–159 Gialson H, Gronbech JE (1995) Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations and comparison of closure techniques. Br J Surg 51(4):154–159
5.
go back to reference Macdougal BA (1995) Locking a continuous running suture. J Am Coll Surg 18(1):563 Macdougal BA (1995) Locking a continuous running suture. J Am Coll Surg 18(1):563
6.
go back to reference Medical Dictionary for the Health Professions and Nursing © Farlex 2012 Medical Dictionary for the Health Professions and Nursing © Farlex 2012
8.
go back to reference O’Dwyer PJ, Courtrey CA (2003) Educational review: Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surgeon 1(1):17–22 O’Dwyer PJ, Courtrey CA (2003) Educational review: Factors involved in abdominal wall closure and subsequent incisional hernia. Surgeon 1(1):17–22
9.
go back to reference Adams G, Richter RM (1973) A safe method of closure with retention sutures. Ann Surg 13(6):98–100 Adams G, Richter RM (1973) A safe method of closure with retention sutures. Ann Surg 13(6):98–100
10.
go back to reference Banerjee SR, Daoud, Russeell JC et al (1983) Abdominal wound evisceration. Ann Surg 40(3):432–436 Banerjee SR, Daoud, Russeell JC et al (1983) Abdominal wound evisceration. Ann Surg 40(3):432–436
11.
go back to reference Miles RM, Nash JP et al (1967) Value of retention sutures in the prevention of experimental abdominal wound disruption. Am J Surg 33(12):898–905 Miles RM, Nash JP et al (1967) Value of retention sutures in the prevention of experimental abdominal wound disruption. Am J Surg 33(12):898–905
12.
go back to reference Mohanad et al (2013) Effect of retention sutures in prevention of abdominal wound dehiscence. Assoc Acad Surg 152(1):223–229 Mohanad et al (2013) Effect of retention sutures in prevention of abdominal wound dehiscence. Assoc Acad Surg 152(1):223–229
13.
go back to reference Pennickx et al (1979) Abdominal wound dehiscence in gastroenterological surgery. Ann Surg 189:345CrossRef Pennickx et al (1979) Abdominal wound dehiscence in gastroenterological surgery. Ann Surg 189:345CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hubbard, Rever et al (1982) Determinants of wound dehiscence in abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 26(10):698–705 Hubbard, Rever et al (1982) Determinants of wound dehiscence in abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 26(10):698–705
15.
go back to reference Rink AD, Goldschmidt D, Dietrich J et al (2000) Negative side effects of retention sutures for abdominal wound closure. A prospective randomised study. Eur J Surg 166:932–937 Rink AD, Goldschmidt D, Dietrich J et al (2000) Negative side effects of retention sutures for abdominal wound closure. A prospective randomised study. Eur J Surg 166:932–937
Metadata
Title
Prophylactic Retention Sutures in Midline Laparotomy in High-Risk Patients for Wound Dehiscence: a Randomised Prospective Case Control Study
Authors
Ajay Maganlal Rajyaguru
Milap Jignesh Shah
Bhavesh V. Vaishnani
Jignesh P. Dave
Jatin G. Bhatt
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0972-2068
Electronic ISSN: 0973-9793
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-017-1684-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Indian Journal of Surgery 6/2018 Go to the issue