Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 6/2016

01-06-2016 | Miscellaneous

Properties of new diffusion filters for treatment of amblyopia with accurate occlusive effects

Authors: Makoto Sasaki, Tsuneto Iwasaki, Hiroyuki Kondo, Akihiko Tawara

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 6/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Our purpose is to present the characteristics of newly developed diffusion filters that can reduce the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of the non-amblyopic eye to a specified value and that can be used to treat amblyopia.

Methods

Silica sol is a colorless and transparent colloidal gel of different particle sizes. The silica was added to an emulsion adhesive, thoroughly mixed, and coated evenly on polyethylene terephthalate films. Twelve filters with 12 different concentrations of silica were constructed. The density of the silica particles on the films was determined by scanning electron microscopy, and the haze values and light transmittance were measured with a goniophotometer. The reduction of the BCVA by the filters was determined in 16 healthy young women (mean age, 22.0 ± 2.3 years) by attaching the filters to spectacles.

Results

Scanning electron microscopy showed a monolayer of evenly spaced silica particles. The haze values of the 12 filters were related to the concentration of silica. The total light transmittance of the 12 filters was not significantly correlated to the concentration of silica. The BCVAs measured with the 12 filters were significantly and inversely correlated with the concentration of silica for both eyes (right eye, y = 0.174x - 0.197, R2 = 0.951; left eye, y = 0.173x - 0.212, R2 = 0.983).

Conclusions

These findings indicate that these diffusion filters can reduce the BCVA with no reduction of light transmittance. We conclude that they can be used to degrade the image of the dominant eye by known amounts in patients with amblyopia without affecting the overall light levels to the eye, i.e., form deprivation without light deprivation.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Chen Z, Li J, Thompson B, Deng D, Yuan J, Chan L, Hess RF, Yu M (2015) The effect of Bangerter filters on binocular function in observers with amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:139–149. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-15224 CrossRef Chen Z, Li J, Thompson B, Deng D, Yuan J, Chan L, Hess RF, Yu M (2015) The effect of Bangerter filters on binocular function in observers with amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:139–149. doi:10.​1167/​iovs.​14-15224 CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, Fielder AR (2004) Treatment dose–response in amblyopia therapy: the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3048–3054. doi:10.1167/iovs.04-0250 CrossRefPubMed Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, Fielder AR (2004) Treatment dose–response in amblyopia therapy: the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:3048–3054. doi:10.​1167/​iovs.​04-0250 CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wallace MP, Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, Fielder AR, Monitored Occlusion Treatment Amblyopia Study C, Randomized Occlusion Treatment Amblyopia Study C (2013) Compliance with occlusion therapy for childhood amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:6158–6166. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-11861 CrossRefPubMed Wallace MP, Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, Fielder AR, Monitored Occlusion Treatment Amblyopia Study C, Randomized Occlusion Treatment Amblyopia Study C (2013) Compliance with occlusion therapy for childhood amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 54:6158–6166. doi:10.​1167/​iovs.​13-11861 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group Writing C, Rutstein RP, Quinn GE, Lazar EL, Beck RW, Bonsall DJ, Cotter SA, Crouch ER, Holmes JM, Hoover DL, Leske DA, Lorenzana IJ, Repka MX, Suh DW (2010) A randomized trial comparing Bangerter filters and patching for the treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 117:998–1004. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.10.014, e1006 CrossRef Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group Writing C, Rutstein RP, Quinn GE, Lazar EL, Beck RW, Bonsall DJ, Cotter SA, Crouch ER, Holmes JM, Hoover DL, Leske DA, Lorenzana IJ, Repka MX, Suh DW (2010) A randomized trial comparing Bangerter filters and patching for the treatment of moderate amblyopia in children. Ophthalmology 117:998–1004. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ophtha.​2009.​10.​014, e1006 CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Odell NV, Leske DA, Hatt SR, Adams WE, Holmes JM (2008) The effect of Bangerter filters on optotype acuity, Vernier acuity, and contrast sensitivity. J AAPOS Off Publ Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 12:555–559. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.04.012 CrossRef Odell NV, Leske DA, Hatt SR, Adams WE, Holmes JM (2008) The effect of Bangerter filters on optotype acuity, Vernier acuity, and contrast sensitivity. J AAPOS Off Publ Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus Am Assoc Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 12:555–559. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jaapos.​2008.​04.​012 CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hess RF, Mansouri B, Thompson B (2010) A new binocular approach to the treatment of amblyopia in adults well beyond the critical period of visual development. Restor Neurol Neurosci 28:793–802. doi:10.3233/RNN-2010-0550 PubMed Hess RF, Mansouri B, Thompson B (2010) A new binocular approach to the treatment of amblyopia in adults well beyond the critical period of visual development. Restor Neurol Neurosci 28:793–802. doi:10.​3233/​RNN-2010-0550 PubMed
Metadata
Title
Properties of new diffusion filters for treatment of amblyopia with accurate occlusive effects
Authors
Makoto Sasaki
Tsuneto Iwasaki
Hiroyuki Kondo
Akihiko Tawara
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-016-3334-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2016

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 6/2016 Go to the issue