Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 12/2016

01-12-2016 | Correspondence

Prone position and VAP incidence in the PROSEVA trial: attention to the causal question when interpreting competing risk analysis—response to comments by Ranzani et al.

Authors: Muriel Rabilloud, Claude Guérin

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 12/2016

Login to get access

Excerpt

Dear Editor, …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ranzani OT, Li Bassi G, Torres A (2016) Prone position and VAP incidence in the PROSEVA trial: attention to the causal question when interpreting competing risk analysis. Intensive Care Med. doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4469-2 PubMed Ranzani OT, Li Bassi G, Torres A (2016) Prone position and VAP incidence in the PROSEVA trial: attention to the causal question when interpreting competing risk analysis. Intensive Care Med. doi:10.​1007/​s00134-016-4469-2 PubMed
2.
go back to reference Ayzac L, Girard R, Baboi L, Beuret P, Rabilloud M, Richard JC, Guérin C (2016) Ventilator-associated pneumonia in ARDS patients: the impact of prone positioning. A secondary analysis of the PROSEVA trial. Intensive Care Med 42:871–878. doi:10.1007/s00134-015-4167-5 CrossRefPubMed Ayzac L, Girard R, Baboi L, Beuret P, Rabilloud M, Richard JC, Guérin C (2016) Ventilator-associated pneumonia in ARDS patients: the impact of prone positioning. A secondary analysis of the PROSEVA trial. Intensive Care Med 42:871–878. doi:10.​1007/​s00134-015-4167-5 CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Latouche A, Allignol A, Beyersmann J, Labopin L, Fine JP (2013) A competing risks analysis should report results on all cause-specific hazards and cumulative incidence functions. J Clin Epidemiol 66:648–653CrossRefPubMed Latouche A, Allignol A, Beyersmann J, Labopin L, Fine JP (2013) A competing risks analysis should report results on all cause-specific hazards and cumulative incidence functions. J Clin Epidemiol 66:648–653CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Beyersmann J, Schumacher M, Allignol A (2012) Competing risks and multistate models with R. Springer, New York, pp 89–153CrossRef Beyersmann J, Schumacher M, Allignol A (2012) Competing risks and multistate models with R. Springer, New York, pp 89–153CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prone position and VAP incidence in the PROSEVA trial: attention to the causal question when interpreting competing risk analysis—response to comments by Ranzani et al.
Authors
Muriel Rabilloud
Claude Guérin
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 12/2016
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4548-4

Other articles of this Issue 12/2016

Intensive Care Medicine 12/2016 Go to the issue