Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 9/2014

01-09-2014 | Original Article

Prone extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with porcine collagen perineal reconstruction (Permacol™): high primary perineal wound healing rates

Authors: R. L. Harries, A. Luhmann, D. A. Harris, J. A. Shami, B. N. Appleton

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 9/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum (elAPER) is arguably the modern surgical approach to low rectal cancer and yet results in large defects that may necessitate plastic surgical reconstruction. This study aims to evaluate the quality of prone elAPER surgery with Permacol™ repair of the perineum. The primary end point studied was the rate of primary perineal wound healing.

Methods

Data were prospectively collected for consecutive patients having prone elAPER at a single institution to assess surgical morbidity together with pathological and cancer-specific outcomes.

Results

Between 2006 and 2012, 48 patients had prone elAPER with median age of 63 (40–86). Thirty-four patients (72.3 %) received neoadjuvant treatment. Median length of stay was 9 days (6–66). With a prone approach, three patients had specimen perforation (6.4 %) and seven patients had circumferential margin involvement (14.9 %). Complete perineal wound healing was achieved in 34 patients (73.9 %) at 4 weeks. Four patients (8.3 %) were unhealed at 6 months; one patient required a perineal sinus to be laid open, and another patient required plastic surgical reconstruction. No perineal wound herniae have been identified during follow-up.

Conclusions

Acceptable oncological outcomes are achieved with the prone extralevator approach. The technique achieves high rates of primary healing, making it an attractive option in centres without access to plastic reconstructive expertise.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wibe A, Syse A, Andreson E, Tretli S, Myrvold H, Søreide O, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group (2004) Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47(1):48–58PubMedCrossRef Wibe A, Syse A, Andreson E, Tretli S, Myrvold H, Søreide O, Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group (2004) Oncological outcomes after total mesorectal excision for cure for cancer of the lower rectum: anterior vs. abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47(1):48–58PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Brown G, Daniels IR (2005) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: the MERCURY research project. Recent Results Cancer Res 165:58–74PubMedCrossRef Brown G, Daniels IR (2005) Preoperative staging of rectal cancer: the MERCURY research project. Recent Results Cancer Res 165:58–74PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons WJ, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP, Sebag-Montefiore D, Scott N, Johnston D, Sagar P, Finan P, Quirke P (2005) The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 242(1):74–82PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons WJ, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP, Sebag-Montefiore D, Scott N, Johnston D, Sagar P, Finan P, Quirke P (2005) The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 242(1):74–82PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, van de Velde CJ, van Krieken JH, Pathology Review Committee, Cooperative Clinical Investigators (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimetre but two millimetres is the limit. Am J Surg Path 26(3):350–357PubMedCrossRef Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, van de Velde CJ, van Krieken JH, Pathology Review Committee, Cooperative Clinical Investigators (2002) Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimetre but two millimetres is the limit. Am J Surg Path 26(3):350–357PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tilney HS, Rasheed S, Northover JM, Tekkis PP (2009) The influence of circumferential resection margins on long-term outcomes following rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 52(10):1723–1729PubMedCrossRef Tilney HS, Rasheed S, Northover JM, Tekkis PP (2009) The influence of circumferential resection margins on long-term outcomes following rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 52(10):1723–1729PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Miles WE (1908) A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 2:1812–1813CrossRef Miles WE (1908) A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 2:1812–1813CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Holm T, Ljung A, Häggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J (2007) Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94(2):232–238PubMedCrossRef Holm T, Ljung A, Häggmark T, Jurell G, Lagergren J (2007) Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 94(2):232–238PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Nisar JP, Scott HJ (2009) Myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the pelvis after abdominoperineal excision. Colorectal Dis 11(8):806–816PubMedCrossRef Nisar JP, Scott HJ (2009) Myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the pelvis after abdominoperineal excision. Colorectal Dis 11(8):806–816PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wille-Jørgensen P, Pilsgaard B, Möller P (2009) Reconstruction of the pelvic floor with a biological mesh after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(3):323–325PubMedCrossRef Wille-Jørgensen P, Pilsgaard B, Möller P (2009) Reconstruction of the pelvic floor with a biological mesh after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 24(3):323–325PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Abhinav K, Shaaban M, Raymond T, Oke T, Gullan R, Montgomery AC (2009) Primary reconstruction of the pelvic floor defects following sacrectomy using Permacol graft. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(4):439–443PubMedCrossRef Abhinav K, Shaaban M, Raymond T, Oke T, Gullan R, Montgomery AC (2009) Primary reconstruction of the pelvic floor defects following sacrectomy using Permacol graft. Eur J Surg Oncol 35(4):439–443PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tilney HS, Heriot AG, Purkayastha S, Antoniou A, Aylin P, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP (2008) A national perspective on the decline of abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 247(1):77–84PubMedCrossRef Tilney HS, Heriot AG, Purkayastha S, Antoniou A, Aylin P, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP (2008) A national perspective on the decline of abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 247(1):77–84PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Morris E, Quirke P, Thomas JD, Fairley L, Cottier B, Forman D (2008) Unacceptable variation in abdominoperineal excision rates for rectal cancer: time to intervene? Gut 57(12):1690–1697PubMedCrossRef Morris E, Quirke P, Thomas JD, Fairley L, Cottier B, Forman D (2008) Unacceptable variation in abdominoperineal excision rates for rectal cancer: time to intervene? Gut 57(12):1690–1697PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Syse A, Haffner J, Wiig JN, on behalf of the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group and the Norwegian Gastrointestinal Cancer Group (2004) Inadvertent perforation during cancer resection in Norway. Br J Surg 91:210–216PubMedCrossRef Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Syse A, Haffner J, Wiig JN, on behalf of the Norwegian Rectal Cancer Group and the Norwegian Gastrointestinal Cancer Group (2004) Inadvertent perforation during cancer resection in Norway. Br J Surg 91:210–216PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rothenberger DA, Wong WD (1992) Abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum. World J Surg 16(3):478–485PubMedCrossRef Rothenberger DA, Wong WD (1992) Abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the low rectum. World J Surg 16(3):478–485PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group, Pathology Review Committee (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23(36):9257–9264PubMedCrossRef Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P, Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group, Pathology Review Committee (2005) Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol 23(36):9257–9264PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, Holm T, Quirke P, European Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision Study Group (2010) Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(4):588–599PubMedCrossRef West NP, Anderin C, Smith KJ, Holm T, Quirke P, European Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision Study Group (2010) Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 97(4):588–599PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Foster JD, Pathak S, Smart NJ, Branagan G, Longman RJ, Thomas MG, Francis N (2012) Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 14(9):1052–1059PubMedCrossRef Foster JD, Pathak S, Smart NJ, Branagan G, Longman RJ, Thomas MG, Francis N (2012) Reconstruction of the perineum following extralevator abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the lower rectum: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 14(9):1052–1059PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Jensen KK, Rashid L, Pilsgaard B, Møller P, Wille-Jørgensen P (2014) Pelvic floor reconstruction with a biological mesh after extralevator abdominoperineal excision leads to few perineal hernias and acceptable wound complication rates with minor movement limitations: single centre experience including clinical examination and interview. Colorectal Dis 16(3):192–197PubMedCrossRef Jensen KK, Rashid L, Pilsgaard B, Møller P, Wille-Jørgensen P (2014) Pelvic floor reconstruction with a biological mesh after extralevator abdominoperineal excision leads to few perineal hernias and acceptable wound complication rates with minor movement limitations: single centre experience including clinical examination and interview. Colorectal Dis 16(3):192–197PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Porter GA, O’Keefe GE, Yakimets WW (1996) Inadvertant perforation of the rectum during abdominoperineal resection. Am J Surg 172(4):324–327PubMedCrossRef Porter GA, O’Keefe GE, Yakimets WW (1996) Inadvertant perforation of the rectum during abdominoperineal resection. Am J Surg 172(4):324–327PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Davies M, Harris D, Hirst G, Beynon R, Morgan AR, Carr ND, Beynon J (2009) Local recurrence after abdomino-perineal resection. Colorectal Dis 11(1):39–43PubMedCrossRef Davies M, Harris D, Hirst G, Beynon R, Morgan AR, Carr ND, Beynon J (2009) Local recurrence after abdomino-perineal resection. Colorectal Dis 11(1):39–43PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Harris DA, Davies M, Lucas MG, Drew P, Carr ND, Beynon J, on behalf of the Swansea Pelvic Oncology Group (2011) Multivisceral resection for the primary locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 98(4):582–588PubMedCrossRef Harris DA, Davies M, Lucas MG, Drew P, Carr ND, Beynon J, on behalf of the Swansea Pelvic Oncology Group (2011) Multivisceral resection for the primary locally advanced rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 98(4):582–588PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prone extralevator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum with porcine collagen perineal reconstruction (Permacol™): high primary perineal wound healing rates
Authors
R. L. Harries
A. Luhmann
D. A. Harris
J. A. Shami
B. N. Appleton
Publication date
01-09-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 9/2014
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1963-2

Other articles of this Issue 9/2014

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 9/2014 Go to the issue