Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2019

Open Access 01-12-2019 | Research article

Projected return on investment of a corporate global health programme

Authors: Samuel Peik, Erik Schimmel, Sara Hejazi

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Health and wellbeing initiatives vary in effectiveness due to programme design and offerings. The Partnership for Prevention programme expands access to up to 40 evidence-based clinical preventive services for all employees and eligible family members as part of a unique global health initiative.

Methods

Using a published RAND Europe model developed for the company, country-level return on investment was estimated over a five-year timeframe using programme utilisation data. Regional, global, and service-level averages were estimated using population-weighted country averages. Data were collected from 2012 to 2018 and analysed in 2018.

Results

The programme is estimated to generate a global return of $4.28–$11.88 (after cost of investment), based on analysis of 57 countries and nearly 125,000 delivered services. Returns were positive for all regions, and immunisations, smoking cessation, and cardiovascular treatment generated the largest individual service returns.

Conclusions

This global health programme is projected to generate a significant return on investment by focusing on global utilisation of clinical preventive services.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Backer K, et al. Workplace wellness programs can generate savings. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(2):304–11.CrossRef Backer K, et al. Workplace wellness programs can generate savings. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(2):304–11.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Henke RM, et al. Recent experience in health promotion at Johnson & Johnson: lower health spending, strong return on investment. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(3):490–9.CrossRef Henke RM, et al. Recent experience in health promotion at Johnson & Johnson: lower health spending, strong return on investment. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011;30(3):490–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goetzel RZ, et al. The stock performance of C. Everett Koop award winners compared with the Standard & Poor’s 500 index. J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Jan;58(1):9–15.CrossRef Goetzel RZ, et al. The stock performance of C. Everett Koop award winners compared with the Standard & Poor’s 500 index. J Occup Environ Med. 2016 Jan;58(1):9–15.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mattke S, et al. Workplace wellness programs study. Final Report Rand Health Q 2013 Summer; 3(2):7. Mattke S, et al. Workplace wellness programs study. Final Report Rand Health Q 2013 Summer; 3(2):7.
6.
go back to reference Goetzel RZ, et al. Do workplace health promotion (wellness) programs work? J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(9):927–34.CrossRef Goetzel RZ, et al. Do workplace health promotion (wellness) programs work? J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(9):927–34.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Projected return on investment of a corporate global health programme
Authors
Samuel Peik
Erik Schimmel
Sara Hejazi
Publication date
01-12-2019
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2019
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7857-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

BMC Public Health 1/2019 Go to the issue