Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2009

01-01-2009 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Prognostic Significance of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes: Is UICC/TNM Node Classification Perfectly Suitable for Early Gastric Cancer?

Authors: Baojun Huang, Xinyu Zheng, Zhenning Wang, Meixian Wang, Yulan Dong, Bo Zhao, Huimian Xu

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Metastatic lymph node (MLN) is less frequently involved in early gastric cancer (EGC) and barely exceeds six in number. The prognostic value of the 5th edition of the UICC tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) node classification appears to be less accurate when applied to patients with EGC and needs to be further stratified. Three hundred twenty-three EGC patients were enrolled into this study. Prognoses of these patients were first assessed based on the 5th edition UICC TNM classification, followed by a reevaluation in which the prognoses of patients were further stratified according to the number of MLNs involved with an increment of one node at a time. A new node classification was proposed based on the correlation between prognoses and the number of positive nodes. According to the prognostic value, a new node classification was categorized as new N0 (0 MLN), new N1 (1–3 MLNs), new N2 (4–6 MLNs), and new N3 (>6 MLNs). While the survival of N0 and N1 groups based on the 5th edition UICC TNM classification appeared to be homogeneous (p = 0.0947), significant difference was unmasked between the new N2 and new N0/N1 groups (p < 0.001). In addition, differentiation status, vessel involvement, and new node classification were identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariate analysis for EGC. We conclude that subsets exist in patients with EGC at stage IB by UICC classification; patients with ≥4 MLNs are at higher risk of recurrence and surgical outcome in this population is relatively poor.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gotoda T, Sasako M, Ono H, et al. Evaluation of the necessity for gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for patients with submucosal invasive gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2001;88:444–9.CrossRefPubMed Gotoda T, Sasako M, Ono H, et al. Evaluation of the necessity for gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for patients with submucosal invasive gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2001;88:444–9.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, et al. Comparison of surgical results of D2 versus D3 gastrectomy (para-aortic lymph node dissection) for advanced gastric carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:659–67.CrossRefPubMed Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, et al. Comparison of surgical results of D2 versus D3 gastrectomy (para-aortic lymph node dissection) for advanced gastric carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:659–67.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Saito H, Fukumoto Y, Osaki T, et al. Prognostic significance of level and number of lymph node metastases in patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1688–93.CrossRefPubMed Saito H, Fukumoto Y, Osaki T, et al. Prognostic significance of level and number of lymph node metastases in patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1688–93.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Degiuli M, Calvo F. Survival of early gastric cancer in a specialized European center. Which lymphadenectomy is necessary? World J Surg. 2006;30:2193–203.CrossRefPubMed Degiuli M, Calvo F. Survival of early gastric cancer in a specialized European center. Which lymphadenectomy is necessary? World J Surg. 2006;30:2193–203.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, et al. Significance of long-term follow-up of early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:363–9.CrossRefPubMed Kunisaki C, Akiyama H, Nomura M, et al. Significance of long-term follow-up of early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13:363–9.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Wittekind CH, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumors (5th ed). International Union Against Cancer (UICC). New York: Wiley; 1997. p. 59–62. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH, editors. TNM classification of malignant tumors (5th ed). International Union Against Cancer (UICC). New York: Wiley; 1997. p. 59–62.
7.
go back to reference Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al., editors. In: American Joint Committee on Cancer, Cancer staging manual. Philadelphia: Lippincott–Raven; 1997. p. 71–6. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al., editors. In: American Joint Committee on Cancer, Cancer staging manual. Philadelphia: Lippincott–Raven; 1997. p. 71–6.
8.
go back to reference Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al., editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New york: Springer; 2002. p. 99–106. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al., editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 6th ed. New york: Springer; 2002. p. 99–106.
9.
go back to reference Yoo CH, Noh SH, Kim YI, et al. Comparison of prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4th edition) and new (5th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. International Union Against Cancer. World J Surg. 1999;23:492–8.CrossRefPubMed Yoo CH, Noh SH, Kim YI, et al. Comparison of prognostic significance of nodal staging between old (4th edition) and new (5th edition) UICC TNM classification for gastric carcinoma. International Union Against Cancer. World J Surg. 1999;23:492–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Katai H, Yoshimura K, Maruyama K, et al. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:1796–800.CrossRefPubMed Katai H, Yoshimura K, Maruyama K, et al. Evaluation of the New International Union Against Cancer TNM staging for gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:1796–800.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Celen O, Yildirim E, Gülben K, et al. Prediction of survival in gastric carcinoma related to lymph node grading by the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International Contre le Cancer System or the Japanese system. Eur J Surg Suppl. 2003;588:33–9.PubMed Celen O, Yildirim E, Gülben K, et al. Prediction of survival in gastric carcinoma related to lymph node grading by the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union International Contre le Cancer System or the Japanese system. Eur J Surg Suppl. 2003;588:33–9.PubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Ichikura T, Tomimatsu S, Uefuji K, et al. Evaluation of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification. Cancer. 1999;86:553–8.CrossRefPubMed Ichikura T, Tomimatsu S, Uefuji K, et al. Evaluation of the new American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification. Cancer. 1999;86:553–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fujii K, Isozaki H, Okajima K, et al. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system. Br J Surg. 1999;86:685–9.CrossRefPubMed Fujii K, Isozaki H, Okajima K, et al. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system. Br J Surg. 1999;86:685–9.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hayashi H, Ochiai T, Suzuki T, et al. Superiority of a new UICC-TNM staging system for gastric cancer. Surgery. 2000;127:129–35.CrossRefPubMed Hayashi H, Ochiai T, Suzuki T, et al. Superiority of a new UICC-TNM staging system for gastric cancer. Surgery. 2000;127:129–35.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hermanek P. The superiority of the new International Union Against Cancer and American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging of gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:1763–5.CrossRefPubMed Hermanek P. The superiority of the new International Union Against Cancer and American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging of gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;88:1763–5.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma—2nd English Edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10–24.CrossRefPubMed Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma—2nd English Edition. Gastric Cancer. 1998;1:10–24.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nitti D, Marchet A, Olivieri M, et al. Ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor after D2 resection for gastric cancer: analysis of a large European monoinstitutional experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:1077–85.CrossRefPubMed Nitti D, Marchet A, Olivieri M, et al. Ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor after D2 resection for gastric cancer: analysis of a large European monoinstitutional experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:1077–85.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kunisaki C, Makino H, Akiyama H, et al. Clinical significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio in early gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:542–9.CrossRefPubMed Kunisaki C, Makino H, Akiyama H, et al. Clinical significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio in early gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:542–9.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Scartozzi M, Galizia E, Verdecchia L, et al. Lymphatic, blood vessel and perineural invasion identifies early-stage high-risk radically resected gastric cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:445–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scartozzi M, Galizia E, Verdecchia L, et al. Lymphatic, blood vessel and perineural invasion identifies early-stage high-risk radically resected gastric cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:445–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Duraker N, Sişman S, Can G. The significance of perineural invasion as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric carcinoma. Surg Today. 2003;33:95–100.CrossRefPubMed Duraker N, Sişman S, Can G. The significance of perineural invasion as a prognostic factor in patients with gastric carcinoma. Surg Today. 2003;33:95–100.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tanaka A, Watanabe T, Okuno K, et al. Perineural invasion as a predictor of recurrence of gastric cancer. Cancer. 1994;73:550–5.CrossRefPubMed Tanaka A, Watanabe T, Okuno K, et al. Perineural invasion as a predictor of recurrence of gastric cancer. Cancer. 1994;73:550–5.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Roviello F, Rossi S, Marrelli D, et al. Number of lymph node metastases and its prognostic significance in early gastric cancer: a multicenter Italian study. J Surg Oncol. 2006;94:274–80.CrossRef Roviello F, Rossi S, Marrelli D, et al. Number of lymph node metastases and its prognostic significance in early gastric cancer: a multicenter Italian study. J Surg Oncol. 2006;94:274–80.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Folli S, Morgagni P, Roviello F, et al. Risk factors for lymph node metastases and their prognostic significance in early gastric cancer (EGC) for the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (IRGGC). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2001;31:495–9.CrossRefPubMed Folli S, Morgagni P, Roviello F, et al. Risk factors for lymph node metastases and their prognostic significance in early gastric cancer (EGC) for the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer (IRGGC). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2001;31:495–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Gunji Y, Suzuki T, Hori S, et al. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes in early gastric cancer. Dig Surg. 2003;20:148–53.CrossRefPubMed Gunji Y, Suzuki T, Hori S, et al. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes in early gastric cancer. Dig Surg. 2003;20:148–53.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prognostic Significance of the Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes: Is UICC/TNM Node Classification Perfectly Suitable for Early Gastric Cancer?
Authors
Baojun Huang
Xinyu Zheng
Zhenning Wang
Meixian Wang
Yulan Dong
Bo Zhao
Huimian Xu
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer New York
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0193-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2009 Go to the issue