Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2019

Open Access 01-04-2019 | Pancreatic Tumors

Prognostic Nomogram for Disease-Specific Survival in Patients with Non-metastatic Ampullary Carcinoma After Surgery

Authors: Huang-bao Li, MM, Feng-qing Zhao, MM, Jun Zhou, MM

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to establish and validate an individualized nomogram for predicting disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with non-metastatic ampullary carcinoma after surgery.

Methods

The nomogram was prepared using retrospective data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, and included 2022 patients (training dataset: 1276; validation dataset: 746 patients) with non-metastatic ampullary carcinoma who were surgically treated between 2004 and 2014. Cox multivariate regression was performed to identify independent risk factors. The predictive accuracy was determined using the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves. Results were validated internally using bootstrap resampling, and externally against the validation dataset.

Results

The median follow-up for the training dataset was 25.5 months (range 1–143), the median survival time was 52 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 41.67–62.33], and the postoperative 1-, 3-, and 5-year DSS rates were 86.7%, 57.3%, and 47.2%, respectively. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that age, grade, tumor size, lymph node ratio, extension range, and histology were independent risk factors for DSS. The C-index of the internal validation dataset for predicting DSS was 0.70 (95% CI 0.68–0.72), which was superior to that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, i.e. 0.64 (95% CI 0.62–0.66; p < 0.001). The 5-year DSS and median DSS time for the low-risk group were significantly greater than those for the high-risk group (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our nomogram reliably and accurately predicted DSS in patients with non-metastatic ampullary carcinoma after surgery. This model may help clinicians in their decision making.
Literature
1.
go back to reference O’Connell JB, Maggard MA, Manunga J Jr, et al. Survival after resection of ampullary carcinoma: a national population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(7):1820–1827.CrossRefPubMed O’Connell JB, Maggard MA, Manunga J Jr, et al. Survival after resection of ampullary carcinoma: a national population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(7):1820–1827.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gonzalez RS, Bagci P, Basturk O, et al. Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma: Analysis, staging considerations, and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol. 2016;29(11):1358–1369.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Gonzalez RS, Bagci P, Basturk O, et al. Intrapancreatic distal common bile duct carcinoma: Analysis, staging considerations, and comparison with pancreatic ductal and ampullary adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol. 2016;29(11):1358–1369.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Chandrasegaram MD, Gill AJ, Samra J, et al. Ampullary cancer of intestinal origin and duodenal cancer—a logical clinical and therapeutic subgroup in periampullary cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017;9(10):407–415.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Chandrasegaram MD, Gill AJ, Samra J, et al. Ampullary cancer of intestinal origin and duodenal cancer—a logical clinical and therapeutic subgroup in periampullary cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017;9(10):407–415.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
4.
go back to reference American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. Chicago, IL: Springer; 2017. American Joint Committee on Cancer. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. Chicago, IL: Springer; 2017.
5.
go back to reference Iasonos A, Schrag D, Raj GV, Panageas KS. How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(8):1364–1370.CrossRefPubMed Iasonos A, Schrag D, Raj GV, Panageas KS. How to build and interpret a nomogram for cancer prognosis. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(8):1364–1370.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Young KA, Efiong E, Dove JT, et al. External validation of a survival nomogram for non-small cell lung cancer using the national cancer database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(6):1459–1464.CrossRefPubMed Young KA, Efiong E, Dove JT, et al. External validation of a survival nomogram for non-small cell lung cancer using the national cancer database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(6):1459–1464.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Demey K, Wolthuis A, de Buck van Overstraeten A, et al. External validation of the prognostic nomogram (COMPASS) for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(12):3604–3608.CrossRefPubMed Demey K, Wolthuis A, de Buck van Overstraeten A, et al. External validation of the prognostic nomogram (COMPASS) for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24(12):3604–3608.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Zheng ZF, Lu J, Wang W, et al. Development and external validation of a simplified nomogram predicting individual survival after R0 resection for gastric cancer: an international, multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(8):2383–2390.CrossRefPubMed Zheng ZF, Lu J, Wang W, et al. Development and external validation of a simplified nomogram predicting individual survival after R0 resection for gastric cancer: an international, multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(8):2383–2390.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Li HB, Zhou J, Zhao FQ. A prognostic nomogram for disease-specific survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:6313–6321.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Li HB, Zhou J, Zhao FQ. A prognostic nomogram for disease-specific survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas following pancreaticoduodenectomy. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:6313–6321.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Doepker MP, Thompson ZJ, Centeno BA, Kim RD, Wong J, Hodul PJ. Clinicopathologic and survival analysis of resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(2):170–175.CrossRefPubMed Doepker MP, Thompson ZJ, Centeno BA, Kim RD, Wong J, Hodul PJ. Clinicopathologic and survival analysis of resected ampullary adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2016;114(2):170–175.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Reid MD, Balci S, Ohike N, et al. Ampullary carcinoma is often of mixed or hybrid histologic type: an analysis of reproducibility and clinical relevance of classification as pancreatobiliary versus intestinal in 232 cases. Mod Pathol. 2016;29(12):1575–1585.CrossRefPubMed Reid MD, Balci S, Ohike N, et al. Ampullary carcinoma is often of mixed or hybrid histologic type: an analysis of reproducibility and clinical relevance of classification as pancreatobiliary versus intestinal in 232 cases. Mod Pathol. 2016;29(12):1575–1585.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(21):7252–7259.CrossRef Camp RL, Dolled-Filhart M, Rimm DL. X-tile: a new bio-informatics tool for biomarker assessment and outcome-based cut-point optimization. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10(21):7252–7259.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Harrell FE Jr, Califf RM, Pryor DB, Lee KL, Rosati RA. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA. 1982;247(18):2543–2546.CrossRefPubMed Harrell FE Jr, Califf RM, Pryor DB, Lee KL, Rosati RA. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA. 1982;247(18):2543–2546.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference He C, Mao Y, Wang J, Duan F, Lin X, Li S. Nomograms predict long-term survival for patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma after pancreatoduodenectomy. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):327.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed He C, Mao Y, Wang J, Duan F, Lin X, Li S. Nomograms predict long-term survival for patients with periampullary adenocarcinoma after pancreatoduodenectomy. BMC Cancer. 2018;18(1):327.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tol JA, Brosens LA, van Dieren S, et al. Impact of lymph node ratio on survival in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer. Br J Surg. 2015;102(3):237–245.CrossRefPubMed Tol JA, Brosens LA, van Dieren S, et al. Impact of lymph node ratio on survival in patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer. Br J Surg. 2015;102(3):237–245.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kwon J, Kim K, Chie EK, et al. Prognostic relevance of lymph node status for patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma after radical resection followed by adjuvant treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(9):1690–1696.CrossRefPubMed Kwon J, Kim K, Chie EK, et al. Prognostic relevance of lymph node status for patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma after radical resection followed by adjuvant treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(9):1690–1696.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Chen SC, Shyr YM, Chou SC, Wang SE. The role of lymph nodes in predicting the prognosis of ampullary carcinoma after curative resection. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:224.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Chen SC, Shyr YM, Chou SC, Wang SE. The role of lymph nodes in predicting the prognosis of ampullary carcinoma after curative resection. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:224.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference Partelli S, Crippa S, Capelli P, et al. Adequacy of lymph node retrieval for ampullary cancer and its association with improved staging and survival. World J Surg. 2013;37(6):1397–1404.CrossRefPubMed Partelli S, Crippa S, Capelli P, et al. Adequacy of lymph node retrieval for ampullary cancer and its association with improved staging and survival. World J Surg. 2013;37(6):1397–1404.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Okano K, Oshima M, Yachida S, et al. Factors predicting survival and pathological subtype in patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(2):156–162.CrossRefPubMed Okano K, Oshima M, Yachida S, et al. Factors predicting survival and pathological subtype in patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(2):156–162.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wen X, Wu W, Wang B, Yao H, Teng X. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: Immunophenotype and differentiation. Oncol Lett. 2014;8(4):1687–1692.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Wen X, Wu W, Wang B, Yao H, Teng X. Signet ring cell carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: Immunophenotype and differentiation. Oncol Lett. 2014;8(4):1687–1692.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
22.
go back to reference Jin Z, Hartgers ML, Sanhueza CT, et al. Prognostic factors and benefits of adjuvant therapy after pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma: Mayo Clinic experience. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(5):677–683.CrossRefPubMed Jin Z, Hartgers ML, Sanhueza CT, et al. Prognostic factors and benefits of adjuvant therapy after pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma: Mayo Clinic experience. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(5):677–683.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Stiles ZE, Behrman SW, Deneve JL, et al. Ampullary adenocarcinoma: defining predictors of survival and the impact of adjuvant therapy following surgical resection for stage I disease. J Surg Oncol. 2018;117(7):1500–1508.CrossRefPubMed Stiles ZE, Behrman SW, Deneve JL, et al. Ampullary adenocarcinoma: defining predictors of survival and the impact of adjuvant therapy following surgical resection for stage I disease. J Surg Oncol. 2018;117(7):1500–1508.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prognostic Nomogram for Disease-Specific Survival in Patients with Non-metastatic Ampullary Carcinoma After Surgery
Authors
Huang-bao Li, MM
Feng-qing Zhao, MM
Jun Zhou, MM
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-07115-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2019 Go to the issue