Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 11/2015

01-11-2015 | Otology

Prognostic factors for long-term hearing preservation after canal-tympanoplasty for congenital aural atresia

Authors: Takashi Sakamoto, Shu Kikuta, Yayoi S. Kikkawa, Makoto Kinoshita, Yuki Saito, Kenya Kobayashi, Akinobu Kakigi, Mitsuya Suzuki, Tatsuya Yamasoba

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 11/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine favorable prognostic factors for long-term postoperative hearing outcome after canal-tympanoplasty for congenital aural atresia (CAA). We retrospectively reviewed pre and postoperative hearing results and image findings of 51 ears with CAA performed by canal-tympanoplasty for primary repair. Averages of the postoperative air and bone-conduction thresholds, and the air–bone gap (ABG) were calculated from the last pure-tone audiometry. Follow-up duration ranged from 16 to 139 months. A successful hearing result was defined as a postoperative ABG of ≤15 dB, or a postoperative pure-tone average of ≤30 dB. The influence of the following factors on the success of surgery was assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis: total Jahrsdoerfer grading system score, age at surgery, and dimensions of middle ear including incudostapedial joint angulation, mesotympanic height, mesotympanic width, mesotympanic depth, mesotympanic area, mesotympanic volume, reconstructable external auditory canal (EAC) diameter, and reconstructable EAC height. Successful hearing outcomes were achieved in 24 of 51 ears (47.1 %). A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that an EAC area >72.3 mm2 was the most significant favorable predictive factor (P = 0.006), followed by mesotympanic depth >5.5 mm (P = 0.013), mesotympanic height >4.6 mm (P = 0.016), and EAC diameter >9.5 mm (P = 0.029). In conclusion, the size of the reconstructable EAC and mesotympanum is important for predicting long-term favorable hearing outcome following canal-tympanoplasty for CAA.
Literature
1.
go back to reference De la Cruz A, Teufert KB (2003) Congenital aural atresia surgery: long-term results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129(1):121–127CrossRefPubMed De la Cruz A, Teufert KB (2003) Congenital aural atresia surgery: long-term results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129(1):121–127CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Ishimoto S et al (2007) Hearing levels in patients with microtia: correlation with temporal bone malformation. Laryngoscope 117(3):461–465CrossRefPubMed Ishimoto S et al (2007) Hearing levels in patients with microtia: correlation with temporal bone malformation. Laryngoscope 117(3):461–465CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Dedhia K et al (2012) Anatomic variants on computed tomography in congenital aural atresia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147(2):323–328CrossRefPubMed Dedhia K et al (2012) Anatomic variants on computed tomography in congenital aural atresia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 147(2):323–328CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ishimoto S et al (2004) The role of the external auditory canal in the development of the malleal manubrium in humans. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(8):913–916CrossRefPubMed Ishimoto S et al (2004) The role of the external auditory canal in the development of the malleal manubrium in humans. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(8):913–916CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ishimoto S et al (2005) Correlation between microtia and temporal bone malformation evaluated using grading systems. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(4):326–329CrossRefPubMed Ishimoto S et al (2005) Correlation between microtia and temporal bone malformation evaluated using grading systems. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(4):326–329CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yeakley JW, Jahrsdoerfer RA (1996) CT evaluation of congenital aural atresia: what the radiologist and surgeon need to know. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20(5):724–731CrossRefPubMed Yeakley JW, Jahrsdoerfer RA (1996) CT evaluation of congenital aural atresia: what the radiologist and surgeon need to know. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20(5):724–731CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Yellon RF, Branstetter BF (2010) Prospective blinded study of computed tomography in congenital aural atresia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74(11):1286–1291CrossRefPubMed Yellon RF, Branstetter BF (2010) Prospective blinded study of computed tomography in congenital aural atresia. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 74(11):1286–1291CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yu Z et al (2008) Facial nerve course in congenital aural atresia––identified by preoperative CT scanning and surgical findings. Acta Otolaryngol 128(12):1375–1380CrossRefPubMed Yu Z et al (2008) Facial nerve course in congenital aural atresia––identified by preoperative CT scanning and surgical findings. Acta Otolaryngol 128(12):1375–1380CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chandrasekhar SS, De la Cruz A, Garrido E (1995) Surgery of congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol 16(6):713–717PubMed Chandrasekhar SS, De la Cruz A, Garrido E (1995) Surgery of congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol 16(6):713–717PubMed
10.
go back to reference Chang SO et al (2002) Prevention of postoperative meatal stenosis with anteriorly and inferiorly based periosteal flaps in congenital aural atresia surgery. Otol Neurotol 23(1):25–28CrossRefPubMed Chang SO et al (2002) Prevention of postoperative meatal stenosis with anteriorly and inferiorly based periosteal flaps in congenital aural atresia surgery. Otol Neurotol 23(1):25–28CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Digoy GP, Cueva RA (2007) Congenital aural atresia: review of short- and long-term surgical results. Otol Neurotol 28(1):54–60CrossRefPubMed Digoy GP, Cueva RA (2007) Congenital aural atresia: review of short- and long-term surgical results. Otol Neurotol 28(1):54–60CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference El-Hoshy Z, Abdel-Aziz M, Shabana M (2008) Congenital aural atresia: transmastoid approach; an old technique with good results. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72(7):1047–1052CrossRefPubMed El-Hoshy Z, Abdel-Aziz M, Shabana M (2008) Congenital aural atresia: transmastoid approach; an old technique with good results. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 72(7):1047–1052CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lambert PR (1998) Congenital aural atresia: stability of surgical results. Laryngoscope 108(12):1801–1805CrossRefPubMed Lambert PR (1998) Congenital aural atresia: stability of surgical results. Laryngoscope 108(12):1801–1805CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nishizaki K, Masuda Y, Karita K (1999) Surgical management and its post-operative complications in congenital aural atresia. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 540:42–44CrossRefPubMed Nishizaki K, Masuda Y, Karita K (1999) Surgical management and its post-operative complications in congenital aural atresia. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 540:42–44CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Teufert KB, De la Cruz A (2004) Advances in congenital aural atresia surgery: effects on outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(3):263–270CrossRefPubMed Teufert KB, De la Cruz A (2004) Advances in congenital aural atresia surgery: effects on outcome. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 131(3):263–270CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Chang SO, Choi BY, Hur DG (2006) Analysis of the long-term hearing results after the surgical repair of aural atresia. Laryngoscope 116(10):1835–1841CrossRefPubMed Chang SO, Choi BY, Hur DG (2006) Analysis of the long-term hearing results after the surgical repair of aural atresia. Laryngoscope 116(10):1835–1841CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Oliver ER et al (2010) Middle ear dimensions in congenital aural atresia and hearing outcomes after atresiaplasty. Otol Neurotol 31(6):946–953CrossRefPubMed Oliver ER et al (2010) Middle ear dimensions in congenital aural atresia and hearing outcomes after atresiaplasty. Otol Neurotol 31(6):946–953CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kim DW et al (2011) Continuity of the incudostapedial joint: a novel prognostic factor in postoperative hearing outcomes in congenital aural atresia. Acta Otolaryngol 131(7):701–707CrossRefPubMed Kim DW et al (2011) Continuity of the incudostapedial joint: a novel prognostic factor in postoperative hearing outcomes in congenital aural atresia. Acta Otolaryngol 131(7):701–707CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Mishiro Y et al (2009) Prognostic factors for short-term outcomes after ossiculoplasty using multivariate analysis with logistic regression. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135(8):738–741CrossRefPubMed Mishiro Y et al (2009) Prognostic factors for short-term outcomes after ossiculoplasty using multivariate analysis with logistic regression. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135(8):738–741CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Mishiro Y et al (2010) Prognostic factors of long-term outcomes after ossiculoplasty using multivariate analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267(6):861–865CrossRefPubMed Mishiro Y et al (2010) Prognostic factors of long-term outcomes after ossiculoplasty using multivariate analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 267(6):861–865CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Yeakley JW et al (1992) Grading system for the selection of patients with congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol 13(1):6–12PubMed Yeakley JW et al (1992) Grading system for the selection of patients with congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol 13(1):6–12PubMed
Metadata
Title
Prognostic factors for long-term hearing preservation after canal-tympanoplasty for congenital aural atresia
Authors
Takashi Sakamoto
Shu Kikuta
Yayoi S. Kikkawa
Makoto Kinoshita
Yuki Saito
Kenya Kobayashi
Akinobu Kakigi
Mitsuya Suzuki
Tatsuya Yamasoba
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3164-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2015

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 11/2015 Go to the issue