Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 1/2018

01-02-2018 | Original Article

Prognostic factors for disease-free and overall survival of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma

Authors: Yavuz Emre Şükür, Salih Taşkın, Bulut Varlı, Can Ateş, Mete Güngör, Fırat Ortaç

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) is a relatively rare and very aggressive tumor. The predictors of survival for patients with UCS have not been determined clearly yet. The aim of the present study was to investigate the possible predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with UCS.

Methods and materials

All patients with UCS who were treated surgically at a university-based Gynecology Oncology Clinic between January 2008 and December 2014 were recruited into this retrospective cohort study. Data regarding clinical, pathologic and treatment information were obtained retrospectively from hospital records. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate DFS and OS, and Cox regression analysis was performed to define the effects of risk factors on survival.

Results

A total of 88 UCS patients with a median age of 64.5 years were included in the study. Forty-seven (53.4%) patients were diagnosed with stage III disease and seven (7.9%) with stage IV disease. The median follow-up time was 16 months. Among all patients, 60 (68.1%) underwent lymphadenectomy. Optimal cytoreductive surgery was achieved in 67 (76.1%) patients. Stepwise variable selection Cox regression analysis showed that lymph node metastasis was associated with poor DFS (hazard ratio 6.524; 95% CI 2.625–16.211; P < 0.001) and OS (hazard ratio 6.993; 95% CI 2.631–18.587; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis in both early and advanced-stage diseases revealed no significant impact of risk factors on survival.

Conclusions

Lymph node metastasis is the most significant prognostic factor associated with poor DFS and OS in UCS patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cantrell LA, Blank SV, Duska LR (2015) Uterine carcinosarcoma: a review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 137:581–588CrossRefPubMed Cantrell LA, Blank SV, Duska LR (2015) Uterine carcinosarcoma: a review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 137:581–588CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jonson AL, Bliss RL, Truskinovsky A et al (2006) Clinical features and outcomes of uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 100:561–564CrossRefPubMed Jonson AL, Bliss RL, Truskinovsky A et al (2006) Clinical features and outcomes of uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 100:561–564CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bansal N, Herzog TJ, Seshan VE et al (2008) Uterine carcinosarcomas and grade 3 endometrioid cancers: evidence for distinct tumor behaviour. Obstet Gynecol 112:64–70CrossRefPubMed Bansal N, Herzog TJ, Seshan VE et al (2008) Uterine carcinosarcomas and grade 3 endometrioid cancers: evidence for distinct tumor behaviour. Obstet Gynecol 112:64–70CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Temkin SM, Hellmann M, Lee YC et al (2007) Early-stage carcinosarcoma of the uterus: the significance of lymph node count. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17:215–219CrossRefPubMed Temkin SM, Hellmann M, Lee YC et al (2007) Early-stage carcinosarcoma of the uterus: the significance of lymph node count. Int J Gynecol Cancer 17:215–219CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hoellen F, Waldmann A, Benthin S et al (2014) The role of lympadenectomy in uterine sarcoma: a clinical practical approach based on retrospective analysis. Anticancer Res 34:985–993PubMed Hoellen F, Waldmann A, Benthin S et al (2014) The role of lympadenectomy in uterine sarcoma: a clinical practical approach based on retrospective analysis. Anticancer Res 34:985–993PubMed
6.
go back to reference Nemani D, Mitra N, Guo M et al (2008) Assessing the effects of lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a SEER analysis. Gynecol Oncol 111:82–88CrossRefPubMed Nemani D, Mitra N, Guo M et al (2008) Assessing the effects of lymphadenectomy and radiation therapy in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a SEER analysis. Gynecol Oncol 111:82–88CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sorbe B, Paulsson G, Andersson S et al (2013) A population-based series of uterine carcinosarcomas with long-term follow-up. Acta Oncol 52:759–766CrossRefPubMed Sorbe B, Paulsson G, Andersson S et al (2013) A population-based series of uterine carcinosarcomas with long-term follow-up. Acta Oncol 52:759–766CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Alagkiozidis I, Grossman A, Tang NZ et al (2015) Survival impact of cytoreduction to microscoic disease for advanced stage cancer of the uterine corpus: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 4:61–66CrossRef Alagkiozidis I, Grossman A, Tang NZ et al (2015) Survival impact of cytoreduction to microscoic disease for advanced stage cancer of the uterine corpus: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 4:61–66CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tanner EJ, Leitao MM Jr, Garg K et al (2011) The role of cytoreductive surgery for newly diagnosed advanced stage uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 123:548–552CrossRefPubMed Tanner EJ, Leitao MM Jr, Garg K et al (2011) The role of cytoreductive surgery for newly diagnosed advanced stage uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 123:548–552CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Harano K, Hirakawa A, Yunokawa M et al (2016) Optimal cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced uterine carcinosarcoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study from the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 141:447–453CrossRefPubMed Harano K, Hirakawa A, Yunokawa M et al (2016) Optimal cytoreductive surgery in patients with advanced uterine carcinosarcoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study from the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 141:447–453CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Harano K, Hirakawa A, Yunokawa M et al (2016) Prognostic factors in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study from the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group. Int J Clin Oncol 21:168–176CrossRefPubMed Harano K, Hirakawa A, Yunokawa M et al (2016) Prognostic factors in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study from the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group. Int J Clin Oncol 21:168–176CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Thomas MB, Mariani A (2007) Role of cytoreduction in stage III and IV uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 107:190–193CrossRefPubMed Thomas MB, Mariani A (2007) Role of cytoreduction in stage III and IV uterine papillary serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 107:190–193CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Major FJ, Blessing JA, Silverberg SG et al (1993) Prognostic factors in early‐stage uterine sarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 71:1702–1709CrossRefPubMed Major FJ, Blessing JA, Silverberg SG et al (1993) Prognostic factors in early‐stage uterine sarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 71:1702–1709CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Obermair A et al (2001) Prognostic parameters in carcinosarcomas of the uterus: a clinico-pathologic study. Anticancer Res 21:3069–3074PubMed Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Obermair A et al (2001) Prognostic parameters in carcinosarcomas of the uterus: a clinico-pathologic study. Anticancer Res 21:3069–3074PubMed
15.
go back to reference Galaal K, Kew FM, Tam KF et al (2009) Evaluation of prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in uterine carcinosarcoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 143:88–92CrossRefPubMed Galaal K, Kew FM, Tam KF et al (2009) Evaluation of prognostic factors and treatment outcomes in uterine carcinosarcoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 143:88–92CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH et al (2010) The role of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in surgical management of apparently early carcinosarcoa of uterus. Ann Surg Oncol 17:861–868CrossRefPubMed Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH et al (2010) The role of pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in surgical management of apparently early carcinosarcoa of uterus. Ann Surg Oncol 17:861–868CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Matsuo K, Omatsu K, Ross MS et al (2017) Impact of adjuvant therapy on recurrence patterns in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 145:78–87CrossRefPubMed Matsuo K, Omatsu K, Ross MS et al (2017) Impact of adjuvant therapy on recurrence patterns in stage I uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 145:78–87CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Powell MA, Filiaci PG, Rose PG et al (2010) Phase II evaluation of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 28:2727–2731CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Powell MA, Filiaci PG, Rose PG et al (2010) Phase II evaluation of paclitaxel and carboplatin in the treatment of carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 28:2727–2731CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Otsuki A, Watanabe Y, Nomura H et al (2015) Paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with completely or optimally resected carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a phase II trial by the Japanese Uterine Sarcoma Group and Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25:92–97CrossRefPubMed Otsuki A, Watanabe Y, Nomura H et al (2015) Paclitaxel and carboplatin in patients with completely or optimally resected carcinosarcoma of the uterus: a phase II trial by the Japanese Uterine Sarcoma Group and Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit. Int J Gynecol Cancer 25:92–97CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Takano T, Otsuki T, Tokunaga H et al (2014) Paclitaxel-carboplatin for advanced or recurrent carcinosarcoma of the uterus: the Japan Uterine Sarcoma Group and Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit Study. Int J Clin Oncol 19:1052–1058CrossRefPubMed Takano T, Otsuki T, Tokunaga H et al (2014) Paclitaxel-carboplatin for advanced or recurrent carcinosarcoma of the uterus: the Japan Uterine Sarcoma Group and Tohoku Gynecologic Cancer Unit Study. Int J Clin Oncol 19:1052–1058CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Callister M, Ramondetta LM, Jhingran A et al (2004) Malignant mixed Mullerian tumors of the uterus: analysis of patterns of failure, prognostic factors, and treatment outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:786–796CrossRefPubMed Callister M, Ramondetta LM, Jhingran A et al (2004) Malignant mixed Mullerian tumors of the uterus: analysis of patterns of failure, prognostic factors, and treatment outcome. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 58:786–796CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Wolfson AH, Brady MF, Rocereto T et al (2007) A gynecologic oncology group randomized phase III trial of whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. cisplatin-ifosfamide and mesna (CIM) as post-surgical therapy in stage I–IV carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus. Gynecol Oncol 107:177–185CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wolfson AH, Brady MF, Rocereto T et al (2007) A gynecologic oncology group randomized phase III trial of whole abdominal irradiation (WAI) vs. cisplatin-ifosfamide and mesna (CIM) as post-surgical therapy in stage I–IV carcinosarcoma (CS) of the uterus. Gynecol Oncol 107:177–185CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Reed NS, Mangioni C, Malmström H et al (2008) Phase III randomised study to evaluate the role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine sarcomas stages I and II: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group Study (protocol 55874). Eur J Cancer 44:808–818CrossRefPubMed Reed NS, Mangioni C, Malmström H et al (2008) Phase III randomised study to evaluate the role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine sarcomas stages I and II: a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group Study (protocol 55874). Eur J Cancer 44:808–818CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Zwahlen DR, Schick U, Bolukbasi Y et al (2016) Outcome and predictive factors in uterine carcinosarcoma using postoperative radiotherapy: a RARE Cancer Network Study. Rare Tumors 8:6052CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zwahlen DR, Schick U, Bolukbasi Y et al (2016) Outcome and predictive factors in uterine carcinosarcoma using postoperative radiotherapy: a RARE Cancer Network Study. Rare Tumors 8:6052CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Prognostic factors for disease-free and overall survival of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma
Authors
Yavuz Emre Şükür
Salih Taşkın
Bulut Varlı
Can Ateş
Mete Güngör
Fırat Ortaç
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1181-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 1/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine