Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 6/2017

Open Access 01-06-2017 | Original Article

Proctors exploit three-dimensional ghost tools during clinical-like training scenarios: a preliminary study

Authors: Anthony M. Jarc, Andrew A. Stanley, Thomas Clifford, Inderbir S. Gill, Andrew J. Hung

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In this study, we examine three-dimensional (3D) proctoring tools (i.e., semitransparent ghost tools overlaid on the surgeon’s field of view) on realistic surgical tasks. Additionally, we develop novel, quantitative measures of whether proctors exploit the additional capabilities offered by ghost tools.

Methods

Seven proctor–trainee pairs completed realistic surgical tasks such as tissue dissection and suturing in a live porcine model using 3D ghost tools on the da Vinci Xi Surgical System. The usability and effectiveness of 3D ghost tools were evaluated using objective measures of proctor performance based on proctor hand movements and button presses, as well as post-study questionnaires.

Results

Proctors exploited the capabilities of ghost tools, such as 3D hand movement (p < 0.001), wristedness (p < 0.001), finger pinch gestures (p < 0.001), and bimanual hand motions (p < 0.001). The median ghost tool excursion distances across proctors in the x-, y-, and z-directions were 57.6, 31.9, and 50.7, respectively. Proctors and trainees consistently evaluated the ghost tools as effective across multiple categories of mentoring. Trainees found ghost tools more helpful than proctors across all categories (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Proctors exploit the augmented capabilities of 3D ghost tools during clinical-like training scenarios. Additionally, both proctors and trainees evaluated ghost tools as effective mentoring tools, thereby confirming previous studies on simple, inanimate tasks. Based on this preliminary work, advanced mentoring technologies, such as 3D ghost tools, stand to improve current telementoring and training technologies in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Sundaram CP, McDougall EM (2011) Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. J Urol 185(4):1191–1197CrossRefPubMed Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Sundaram CP, McDougall EM (2011) Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. J Urol 185(4):1191–1197CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonté F, Morel P (2013) Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art. World J Surg 37(12):2812–2819CrossRefPubMed Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonté F, Morel P (2013) Learning tools and simulation in robotic surgery: state of the art. World J Surg 37(12):2812–2819CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bogen EM, Augestad KM, Patel HR, Lindsetmo R-O (2014) Telementoring in education of laparoscopic surgeons: an emerging technology. World J Gastrointest Endosc 6(5):148CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bogen EM, Augestad KM, Patel HR, Lindsetmo R-O (2014) Telementoring in education of laparoscopic surgeons: an emerging technology. World J Gastrointest Endosc 6(5):148CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Mobasheri MH, Johnston M, Syed UM, King D, Darzi A (2015) The uses of smartphones and tablet devices in surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery 158(5):1352–1371CrossRefPubMed Mobasheri MH, Johnston M, Syed UM, King D, Darzi A (2015) The uses of smartphones and tablet devices in surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery 158(5):1352–1371CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Santomauro M, Reina GA, Stroup SP, James O (2013) Telementoring in robotic surgery. Curr Opin Urol 23(2):141–145PubMed Santomauro M, Reina GA, Stroup SP, James O (2013) Telementoring in robotic surgery. Curr Opin Urol 23(2):141–145PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hanly EJ, Miller BE, Kumar R, Hasser CJ, Coste-Maniere E, Talamini MA, Aurora AA, Schenkman NS, Marohn MR (2006) Mentoring console improves collaboration and teaching in surgical robotics. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 16(5):445–451CrossRef Hanly EJ, Miller BE, Kumar R, Hasser CJ, Coste-Maniere E, Talamini MA, Aurora AA, Schenkman NS, Marohn MR (2006) Mentoring console improves collaboration and teaching in surgical robotics. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 16(5):445–451CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Marengo F, Larraín D, Babilonti L, Spinillo A (2012) Learning experience using the double-console da Vinci surgical system in gynecology: a prospective cohort study in a university hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(2):441–445CrossRefPubMed Marengo F, Larraín D, Babilonti L, Spinillo A (2012) Learning experience using the double-console da Vinci surgical system in gynecology: a prospective cohort study in a university hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285(2):441–445CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Shin DH, Dalag L, Azhar RA, Santomauro M, Satkunasivam R, Metcalfe C, Dunn M, Berger A, Djaladat H, Nguyen M, Desai MM, Aron M, Gill IS, Hung AJ (2015) A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery. BJU Int 116(2):302–308. doi:10.1111/bju.12985 CrossRefPubMed Shin DH, Dalag L, Azhar RA, Santomauro M, Satkunasivam R, Metcalfe C, Dunn M, Berger A, Djaladat H, Nguyen M, Desai MM, Aron M, Gill IS, Hung AJ (2015) A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery. BJU Int 116(2):302–308. doi:10.​1111/​bju.​12985 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Clifford TG, Dajani D, Khooshabeh P, Hwang E, Desai MM, Gill IS, Hung AJ (2016) MP23-18 inter-hospital telementoring for robotic surgery. J Urol 195(4):e268–e269CrossRef Clifford TG, Dajani D, Khooshabeh P, Hwang E, Desai MM, Gill IS, Hung AJ (2016) MP23-18 inter-hospital telementoring for robotic surgery. J Urol 195(4):e268–e269CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jarc AM, Shah SH, Adebar T, Hwang E, Aron M, Gill IS, Hung AJ (2016) Beyond 2D telestration: an evaluation of novel proctoring tools for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. J Robot Surg 10(2):103–109CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jarc AM, Shah SH, Adebar T, Hwang E, Aron M, Gill IS, Hung AJ (2016) Beyond 2D telestration: an evaluation of novel proctoring tools for robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. J Robot Surg 10(2):103–109CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ (2012) Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 187(1):247–252CrossRefPubMed Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Miles BJ, Dunkin BJ (2012) Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol 187(1):247–252CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shin DH, Dalag L, Azhar RA, Santomauro M, Satkunasivam R, Metcalfe C, Dunn M, Berger A, Djaladat H, Nguyen M (2014) A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery. BJU Int 116(2):302–308CrossRef Shin DH, Dalag L, Azhar RA, Santomauro M, Satkunasivam R, Metcalfe C, Dunn M, Berger A, Djaladat H, Nguyen M (2014) A novel interface for the telementoring of robotic surgery. BJU Int 116(2):302–308CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ahmed K, Khan R, Mottrie A, Lovegrove C, Abaza R, Ahlawat R, Ahlering T, Ahlgren G, Artibani W, Barret E (2015) Development of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts. BJU Int 116(1):93–101CrossRefPubMed Ahmed K, Khan R, Mottrie A, Lovegrove C, Abaza R, Ahlawat R, Ahlering T, Ahlgren G, Artibani W, Barret E (2015) Development of a standardised training curriculum for robotic surgery: a consensus statement from an international multidisciplinary group of experts. BJU Int 116(1):93–101CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Vetter MH, Green I, Martino M, Fowler J, Salani R (2015) Incorporating resident/fellow training into a robotic surgery program. J Surg Oncol 112(7):684–689CrossRefPubMed Vetter MH, Green I, Martino M, Fowler J, Salani R (2015) Incorporating resident/fellow training into a robotic surgery program. J Surg Oncol 112(7):684–689CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Fisher RA, Dasgupta P, Mottrie A, Volpe A, Khan MS, Challacombe B, Ahmed K (2015) An over-view of robot assisted surgery curricula and the status of their validation. Int J Surg 13:115–123CrossRefPubMed Fisher RA, Dasgupta P, Mottrie A, Volpe A, Khan MS, Challacombe B, Ahmed K (2015) An over-view of robot assisted surgery curricula and the status of their validation. Int J Surg 13:115–123CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Smith AL, Scott EM, Krivak TC, Olawaiye AB, Chu T, Richard SD (2013) Dual-console robotic surgery: a new teaching paradigm. J Robot Surg 7(2):113–118CrossRefPubMed Smith AL, Scott EM, Krivak TC, Olawaiye AB, Chu T, Richard SD (2013) Dual-console robotic surgery: a new teaching paradigm. J Robot Surg 7(2):113–118CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Budrionis A, Augestad KM, Patel HR, Bellika JG (2013) An evaluation framework for defining the contributions of telestration in surgical telementoring. Interact J Med Res 2(2):e14CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Budrionis A, Augestad KM, Patel HR, Bellika JG (2013) An evaluation framework for defining the contributions of telestration in surgical telementoring. Interact J Med Res 2(2):e14CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Gambadauro P, Torrejón R (2013) The “tele” factor in surgery today and tomorrow: implications for surgical training and education. Surg Today 43(2):115–122CrossRefPubMed Gambadauro P, Torrejón R (2013) The “tele” factor in surgery today and tomorrow: implications for surgical training and education. Surg Today 43(2):115–122CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lenihan J Jr, Brower M (2012) Web-connected surgery: using the internet for teaching and proctoring of live robotic surgeries. J Robot Surg 6(1):47–52CrossRefPubMed Lenihan J Jr, Brower M (2012) Web-connected surgery: using the internet for teaching and proctoring of live robotic surgeries. J Robot Surg 6(1):47–52CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Proctors exploit three-dimensional ghost tools during clinical-like training scenarios: a preliminary study
Authors
Anthony M. Jarc
Andrew A. Stanley
Thomas Clifford
Inderbir S. Gill
Andrew J. Hung
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-016-1944-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

World Journal of Urology 6/2017 Go to the issue