Skip to main content
Top
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lynch J, Belgaumkar A. Bariatric surgery is effective and safe in patients over 55: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1507–16.PubMedCrossRef Lynch J, Belgaumkar A. Bariatric surgery is effective and safe in patients over 55: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1507–16.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Onkologie. 2000;23(6):597–602.PubMedCrossRef Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Onkologie. 2000;23(6):597–602.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Stroup DF, Berlin JA, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. Jama. 2000;283(15):2008–12.PubMedCrossRef Stroup DF, Berlin JA, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. Jama. 2000;283(15):2008–12.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Streiner D. Meta-analysis: a 12-step program. EJGI. 2003;9:23. Streiner D. Meta-analysis: a 12-step program. EJGI. 2003;9:23.
6.
go back to reference Haghdoost AA. Text book of systematic review and meta-analysis. Tehran: Teimourzadeh; 2007. Haghdoost AA. Text book of systematic review and meta-analysis. Tehran: Teimourzadeh; 2007.
7.
go back to reference Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(3):666–76.PubMedCrossRef Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(3):666–76.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rucker G, Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, et al. Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:79.PubMedCrossRef Rucker G, Schwarzer G, Carpenter JR, et al. Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:79.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Engels EA, Schmid CH, Terrin N, et al. Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses. Stat Med. 2000;19(13):1707–28.PubMedCrossRef Engels EA, Schmid CH, Terrin N, et al. Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses. Stat Med. 2000;19(13):1707–28.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mittlbock M, Heinzl H. A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses. Stat Med. 2006;25(24):4321–33.PubMedCrossRef Mittlbock M, Heinzl H. A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses. Stat Med. 2006;25(24):4321–33.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Aalaei-Andabili SH, Alavian SM. High-quality meta-analyses are required for development of evidence in medicine. J Infect Dis. 2012;205(9):1472.PubMedCrossRef Aalaei-Andabili SH, Alavian SM. High-quality meta-analyses are required for development of evidence in medicine. J Infect Dis. 2012;205(9):1472.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Principles of Meta-analysis Should be Well Understood
Authors
Seyed Hossein Aalaei-Andabili
Seyed Moayed Alavian
Publication date
01-12-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 12/2012
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-012-0789-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2012

Obesity Surgery 12/2012 Go to the issue