Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2021

01-12-2021 | Research article

Primary stability of the Activ L® intervertebral disc prosthesis in cadaver bone and comparison of the keel and spike anchoring concept

Authors: Christoph von Schulze Pellengahr, Wolfram Teske, Saurabh Kapoor, Alexander Klein, Bernd Wegener, Andreas Büttner, Matthias Lahner

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

High primary stability is the key prerequisite for safe osseointegration of cementless intervertebral disc prostheses. The aim of our study was to determine the primary stability of intervertebral disc prostheses with two different anchoring concepts – keel and spike anchoring.

Methods

Ten ActivL intervertebral disc prostheses (5 x keel anchoring, 5 x spike anchoring) implanted in human cadaver lumbar spine specimens were tested in a spine movement simulator. Axial load flexion, extension, left and right bending and axial rotation motions were applied on the lumbar spine specimens through a defined three-dimensional movement program following ISO 2631 and ISO/CD 18192-1.3 standards. Tri-dimensional micromotions of the implants were measured for both anchor types and compared using Student’s T-test for significance after calculating 95 % confidence intervals.

Results

In the transverse axis, the keel anchoring concept showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) lower mean values of micromotions compared to the spike anchoring concept. The highest micromotion values for both types were observed in the longitudinal axis. In no case the threshold of 200 micrometers was exceeded.

Conclusions

Both fixation systems fulfill the required criteria of primary stability. Independent of the selected anchorage type an immediate postoperative active mobilization doesn’t compromise the stability of the prostheses.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jasty M, Bragdon C, Burke D, O’Connor D, Lowenstein J, Harris WH. In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(5):707–14.CrossRefPubMed Jasty M, Bragdon C, Burke D, O’Connor D, Lowenstein J, Harris WH. In vivo skeletal responses to porous-surfaced implants subjected to small induced motions. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(5):707–14.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Pitto RP, Bohner J, Hofmeister V. Factors affecting the stability of acetabular components. An in vitro study. Biomed Tech (Berl). 1997;42:363–8.CrossRef Pitto RP, Bohner J, Hofmeister V. Factors affecting the stability of acetabular components. An in vitro study. Biomed Tech (Berl). 1997;42:363–8.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Panjabi MM. Dreidimensionale Testung der Stabilität von Wirbelsäulenimplantaten. Orthopäde. 1991;20(2):106–11.PubMed Panjabi MM. Dreidimensionale Testung der Stabilität von Wirbelsäulenimplantaten. Orthopäde. 1991;20(2):106–11.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Wilke HJ, Wenger K, Claes L. Testing criteria for spinal implants recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability tasting of spinal implants. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(2):148–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilke HJ, Wenger K, Claes L. Testing criteria for spinal implants recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability tasting of spinal implants. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(2):148–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Schmoelz W, Huber J-F, Nydegger T, Claes L, Wilke H-J. Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments - an invitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16(4):418–23.CrossRefPubMed Schmoelz W, Huber J-F, Nydegger T, Claes L, Wilke H-J. Dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments - an invitro experiment. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16(4):418–23.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Panjabi MM, Krag MH, Goel VK. A technique for measurement and description of three- dimensional six degree-of-freedom motion of a body joint with application to the human spine. J Biomech. 1981;14(7):447–60.CrossRefPubMed Panjabi MM, Krag MH, Goel VK. A technique for measurement and description of three- dimensional six degree-of-freedom motion of a body joint with application to the human spine. J Biomech. 1981;14(7):447–60.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cunningham BW, Gordon M, Dmitriev A, Hu N, McAfee PC. Biomechanical Evaluation of Total Disc Replacement Arthroplasty: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model. Spine. 2003;28(20):110–7.CrossRef Cunningham BW, Gordon M, Dmitriev A, Hu N, McAfee PC. Biomechanical Evaluation of Total Disc Replacement Arthroplasty: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Model. Spine. 2003;28(20):110–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference DIN/ISO 2631SO. 2631-1:1997-05. Mechanical vibration and shock - Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration - Part 1: General requirements. 1997-05. DIN/ISO 2631SO. 2631-1:1997-05. Mechanical vibration and shock - Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration - Part 1: General requirements. 1997-05.
9.
go back to reference ISO/CD 18192-1.3. Implants for surgery-Wear of total intervertebral spinal disc prothesis. Part 3: Impingement wear testing and corresponding environmental conditions for test of lumbar prothesis under adverse conditions. 2017-4. ISO/CD 18192-1.3. Implants for surgery-Wear of total intervertebral spinal disc prothesis. Part 3: Impingement wear testing and corresponding environmental conditions for test of lumbar prothesis under adverse conditions. 2017-4.
10.
go back to reference Keller TS, Spengler DM, Hansson TH. Mechanical Behavior of the Human Lumbar Spine. I. Creep Analysis During Static Compressive Loading. J Orthop Res. 1987;9:467–78.CrossRef Keller TS, Spengler DM, Hansson TH. Mechanical Behavior of the Human Lumbar Spine. I. Creep Analysis During Static Compressive Loading. J Orthop Res. 1987;9:467–78.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference McAfee PC. The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement. Spine J. 2004;4:177–81.CrossRef McAfee PC. The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement. Spine J. 2004;4:177–81.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2014. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2014.
15.
go back to reference Rosenthall L. Hip and knee prostheses: evaluation of the natural history of periprosthetic bone changes. Semin Nucl Med. 1997;27(4):346–54.CrossRefPubMed Rosenthall L. Hip and knee prostheses: evaluation of the natural history of periprosthetic bone changes. Semin Nucl Med. 1997;27(4):346–54.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Metadata
Title
Primary stability of the Activ L® intervertebral disc prosthesis in cadaver bone and comparison of the keel and spike anchoring concept
Authors
Christoph von Schulze Pellengahr
Wolfram Teske
Saurabh Kapoor
Alexander Klein
Bernd Wegener
Andreas Büttner
Matthias Lahner
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04544-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2021 Go to the issue