Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Prevention Science 1/2019

01-01-2019

Preventive Effect Heterogeneity: Causal Inference in Personalized Prevention

Author: George W. Howe

Published in: Prevention Science | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

This paper employs a causal inference framework to explore two logically distinct forms of preventive effect heterogeneity relevant for studying variation in preventive effect as a basis for developing more personalized interventions. Following VanderWeele (2015), I begin with a discussion of causal interaction involving manipulable moderators that combine to yield more complex nonadditive effects. This is contrasted with effect heterogeneity, which involves variation in causal structure indexed by stable characteristics of populations or contexts. The paper then discusses one particularly promising approach, the baseline target moderated mediation (BTMM) design, which uses theoretically informed baseline target moderators to strengthen causal inference, suggesting methods for using BTMM designs to develop targeting strategies for personalized prevention. It presents examples of recent intervention trials that apply these different forms of moderation, and discusses causal inference and the problem of moderation confounding, reviewing methods for minimizing its impact, including recent advances in the use of propensity score matching.
Footnotes
1
The causal status of factors that cannot change within individuals, but can vary across individuals, has been the source of some controversy, as witnessed by a recent exchange on race and gender (Glymour and Glymour 2014; Kaufman 2014; VanderWeele and Robinson 2014a, b). Variables such as race can clearly be causes in models where we define them as stimulus conditions for the behavior of others. In that case, they are in fact changeable, since we could vary those conditions and assess the impact of those different conditions. And if the behavior of others in turn has an impact on those who are the “stimuli,” then personal characteristics could have an indirect impact on the person who has that characteristic, mediated through the behavior of others. In this case, variation in race across individuals would provide some index, albeit indirect, of rates of exposure to discrimination by others.
 
2
Baseline targets are usually effect moderators rather than part of a causal interaction. The status of a target variable at baseline is historical, that is, when the intervention occurs, that baseline value is in the past, and is unchangeable. The future status of that variable can change as a result of the intervention, and therefore can be considered causal of later changes in more distal outcomes, but the baseline value of that target is immutable when the intervention commences. More complex effects are also possible, although infrequently hypothesized. For example, a target may change dynamically in the period prior to intervention, and prior rates of change (rather than status at baseline) could in principle moderate intervention impact on subsequent rates of change in the target. An intervention might exacerbate that rate of change, or dampen it, and do so in different ways depending on the rate of change at the time the intervention begins. This would reflect a causal interaction, although preintervention rates of change in the target would usually be observed rather than induced.
 
3
A reviewer raised concerns as to whether BTMM effects could simply reflect regression to the mean. Values on target variables observed over two or more occasions may change for many reasons, including regression to the mean due to unreliability of measurement, decay of unobserved causes that led to initial increase, or exposure to other unobserved causes that shape change in the target. Unless there is reason to believe that measurement reliability differs for intervention and control groups, leading to differential regression to the mean for a target variable, regression artifacts are unlikely to account for findings of baseline target moderation of intervention impact on change in the target.
 
4
A reviewer noted that promotive interventions often seek to build on existing strengths as a way of promoting well-being, suggesting that this is antithetical to the notion that those with baseline deficits will improve the most. This raises some interesting issues. Can a strength be a “latent” protective factor, in that it is present but inactive when risk mechanisms are in operation, and must be activated to become protective? Can strengths in one life arena be activated through intervention to reduce risks in another arena where they are not currently being employed? Both seem plausible, and could easily be incorporated into the BTMM framework. Activation level of a strength could be a reasonable baseline moderator (when the strengths are already activated and are functioning to protect from risk, interventions to activate them will be less necessary and have less impact).
 
Literature
go back to reference Bierman, K. L., Domitrovich, C. E., Nix, R. L., Welsh, J. A., & Gest, S. D. (2014). Integrating evidence-based preschool programs to support social-emotional and cognitive development. In M. Boivin, K. L. Bierman, M. Boivin, & K. L. Bierman (Eds.), Promoting school readiness and early learning: Implications of developmental research for practice (pp. 231–252). New York: Guilford Press. Bierman, K. L., Domitrovich, C. E., Nix, R. L., Welsh, J. A., & Gest, S. D. (2014). Integrating evidence-based preschool programs to support social-emotional and cognitive development. In M. Boivin, K. L. Bierman, M. Boivin, & K. L. Bierman (Eds.), Promoting school readiness and early learning: Implications of developmental research for practice (pp. 231–252). New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Brand, J. E., & Thomas, J. S. (2013). Causal effect heterogeneity. In S. L. Morgan (Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (pp. 189–214). New York: Springer.CrossRef Brand, J. E., & Thomas, J. S. (2013). Causal effect heterogeneity. In S. L. Morgan (Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (pp. 189–214). New York: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Brody, G. H., Chen, Y.-f., Beach, S. R. H., Kogan, S. M., Yu, T., DiClemente, R. J., et al. (2014). Differential sensitivity to prevention programming: A dopaminergic polymorphism-enhanced prevention effect on protective parenting and adolescent substance use. Health Psychology, 33, 182–191. doi:10.1037/a0031253.CrossRefPubMed Brody, G. H., Chen, Y.-f., Beach, S. R. H., Kogan, S. M., Yu, T., DiClemente, R. J., et al. (2014). Differential sensitivity to prevention programming: A dopaminergic polymorphism-enhanced prevention effect on protective parenting and adolescent substance use. Health Psychology, 33, 182–191. doi:10.​1037/​a0031253.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cho, J., Kogan, S. M., & Brody, G. H. (2016). Genetic moderation of transactional relations between parenting practices and child self-regulation. Journal of Family Psychology. doi:10.1037/fam0000228. Cho, J., Kogan, S. M., & Brody, G. H. (2016). Genetic moderation of transactional relations between parenting practices and child self-regulation. Journal of Family Psychology. doi:10.​1037/​fam0000228.
go back to reference Clarke, G. N., Hornbrook, M., Lynch, F., Polen, M., Gale, J., Beardslee, W., et al. (2001). A randomized trial of a group cognitive intervention for preventing depression in adolescent offspring of depressed parents. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 1127.CrossRefPubMed Clarke, G. N., Hornbrook, M., Lynch, F., Polen, M., Gale, J., Beardslee, W., et al. (2001). A randomized trial of a group cognitive intervention for preventing depression in adolescent offspring of depressed parents. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 1127.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Collins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., & Bierman, K. L. (2004). A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prevention Science: The Official Journal Of The Society For Prevention Research, 5, 185–196.CrossRef Collins, L. M., Murphy, S. A., & Bierman, K. L. (2004). A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prevention Science: The Official Journal Of The Society For Prevention Research, 5, 185–196.CrossRef
go back to reference Falloon, I. R. H., Shanahan, W., & Laporta, M. (1992). Prevention of major depressive episodes: Early intervention with family-based stress management. Journal of Mental Health, 1, 53–60. doi:10.3109/09638239209034511.CrossRef Falloon, I. R. H., Shanahan, W., & Laporta, M. (1992). Prevention of major depressive episodes: Early intervention with family-based stress management. Journal of Mental Health, 1, 53–60. doi:10.​3109/​0963823920903451​1.CrossRef
go back to reference Ghitza, U. E. (2015). A commentary on ‘A new initiative on precision medicine’. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6. Ghitza, U. E. (2015). A commentary on ‘A new initiative on precision medicine’. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6.
go back to reference Gonzales, N. A., Dumka, L. E., Millsap, R. E., Gottschall, A., McClain, D. B., Wong, J. J., et al. (2012). Randomized trial of a broad preventive intervention for Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 1–16. doi:10.1037/a0026063.CrossRefPubMed Gonzales, N. A., Dumka, L. E., Millsap, R. E., Gottschall, A., McClain, D. B., Wong, J. J., et al. (2012). Randomized trial of a broad preventive intervention for Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 80, 1–16. doi:10.​1037/​a0026063.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gunasekara, F. I., Carter, K., & Blakely, T. (2011). Change in income and change in self-rated health: Systematic review of studies using repeated measures to control for confounding bias. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 72, 193–201. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.10.029.CrossRef Gunasekara, F. I., Carter, K., & Blakely, T. (2011). Change in income and change in self-rated health: Systematic review of studies using repeated measures to control for confounding bias. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 72, 193–201. doi:10.​1016/​j.​socscimed.​2010.​10.​029.CrossRef
go back to reference Harder, V. S., Stuart, E. A., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 15, 234–249. doi:10.1037/a0019623.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harder, V. S., Stuart, E. A., & Anthony, J. C. (2010). Propensity score techniques and the assessment of measured covariate balance to test causal associations in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 15, 234–249. doi:10.​1037/​a0019623.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Howe, G. W., Beach, S. R. H., Brody, G. H., & Wyman, P. A. (2016). Translating genetic research into preventive intervention: The baseline target moderated mediator design. Frontiers In Psychology, 1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01911. Howe, G. W., Beach, S. R. H., Brody, G. H., & Wyman, P. A. (2016). Translating genetic research into preventive intervention: The baseline target moderated mediator design. Frontiers In Psychology, 1–9. doi:10.​3389/​fpsyg.​2015.​01911.
go back to reference Josephy, H., Vansteelandt, S., Vanderhasselt, M.-A., & Loeys, T. (2015). Within-subject mediation analysis in AB/BA crossover designs. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 11, 1–22. doi:10.1515/ijb-2014-0057.CrossRefPubMed Josephy, H., Vansteelandt, S., Vanderhasselt, M.-A., & Loeys, T. (2015). Within-subject mediation analysis in AB/BA crossover designs. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 11, 1–22. doi:10.​1515/​ijb-2014-0057.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kidd, K. K. (1993). Associations of disease with genetic markers: Déjà vu all over again. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 48, 71–73.CrossRefPubMed Kidd, K. K. (1993). Associations of disease with genetic markers: Déjà vu all over again. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 48, 71–73.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2001). Gender differences in depression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 173.CrossRef Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2001). Gender differences in depression. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 173.CrossRef
go back to reference Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Pelham, W. E., Fabiano, G. A., Waxmonsky, J. G., Greiner, A. R., Gnagy, E. M., Coxe, S., et al. (2016). Treatment sequencing for childhood ADHD: A multiple-randomization study of adaptive medication and behavioral interventions. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 45, 396–415. doi:10.1080/15374416.2015.1105138.CrossRef Pelham, W. E., Fabiano, G. A., Waxmonsky, J. G., Greiner, A. R., Gnagy, E. M., Coxe, S., et al. (2016). Treatment sequencing for childhood ADHD: A multiple-randomization study of adaptive medication and behavioral interventions. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 45, 396–415. doi:10.​1080/​15374416.​2015.​1105138.CrossRef
go back to reference Perrino, T., Brincks, A., Howe, G., Brown, C. H., Prado, G., & Pantin, H. (2016). Reducing internalizing symptoms among high-risk, Hispanic adolescents: Mediators of a preventive family intervention. Prevention Science: The Official Journal Of The Society For Prevention Research, 17, 595–605. doi:10.1007/s11121-016-0655-2.CrossRef Perrino, T., Brincks, A., Howe, G., Brown, C. H., Prado, G., & Pantin, H. (2016). Reducing internalizing symptoms among high-risk, Hispanic adolescents: Mediators of a preventive family intervention. Prevention Science: The Official Journal Of The Society For Prevention Research, 17, 595–605. doi:10.​1007/​s11121-016-0655-2.CrossRef
go back to reference Rassen, J. A., Shelat, A. A., Franklin, J. M., Glynn, R. J., Solomon, D. H., & Schneeweiss, S. (2013). Matching by propensity score in cohort studies with three treatment groups. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 24, 401–409. doi:10.1097/EDE.0b013e318289dedf.CrossRef Rassen, J. A., Shelat, A. A., Franklin, J. M., Glynn, R. J., Solomon, D. H., & Schneeweiss, S. (2013). Matching by propensity score in cohort studies with three treatment groups. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 24, 401–409. doi:10.​1097/​EDE.​0b013e318289dedf​.CrossRef
go back to reference Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701. doi:10.1037/h0037350.CrossRef Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701. doi:10.​1037/​h0037350.CrossRef
go back to reference Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co..
go back to reference Teisl, M., Wyman, P. A., Cross, W., West, J., & Sworts, L. (2012). Adaptive intervention to address the needs of children with language delays and behavior problems: Proximal impact on emotion-regulation skill knowledge. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Washington, DC. Teisl, M., Wyman, P. A., Cross, W., West, J., & Sworts, L. (2012). Adaptive intervention to address the needs of children with language delays and behavior problems: Proximal impact on emotion-regulation skill knowledge. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Washington, DC.
go back to reference VanderWeele, T. J. (2015). Explanation in causal inference. Methods for mediation and interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. VanderWeele, T. J. (2015). Explanation in causal inference. Methods for mediation and interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference VanderWeele, T. J., & Robins, J. M. (2007). Four types of effect modification: A classification based on directed acyclic graphs. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 18, 561–568.CrossRef VanderWeele, T. J., & Robins, J. M. (2007). Four types of effect modification: A classification based on directed acyclic graphs. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 18, 561–568.CrossRef
go back to reference VanderWeele, T. J., & Robins, J. M. (2008). Empirical and counterfactual conditions for sufficient cause interactions. Biometrika, 95, 49–49.CrossRef VanderWeele, T. J., & Robins, J. M. (2008). Empirical and counterfactual conditions for sufficient cause interactions. Biometrika, 95, 49–49.CrossRef
go back to reference Yang, S., Imbens, G. W., Cui, Z., Faries, D. E., & Kadziola, Z. (2016). Propensity score matching and subclassification in observational studies with multi-level treatments. Biometrics, 72, 1055–1065.CrossRefPubMed Yang, S., Imbens, G. W., Cui, Z., Faries, D. E., & Kadziola, Z. (2016). Propensity score matching and subclassification in observational studies with multi-level treatments. Biometrics, 72, 1055–1065.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Preventive Effect Heterogeneity: Causal Inference in Personalized Prevention
Author
George W. Howe
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Prevention Science / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1389-4986
Electronic ISSN: 1573-6695
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0826-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Prevention Science 1/2019 Go to the issue