Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2006

Open Access 01-12-2006 | Research

Prevalence of visual impairment in relation to the number of ophthalmologists in a given area: a nationwide approach

Authors: Antoine J Lafuma, Antoine P Brézin, Francis L Fagnani, Mounir Mesbah, Gilles H Berdeaux

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Sociological and economic risk factors of visual impairment have never been described in France at a national level as the association between the number of ophthalmologists per inhabitant and visual impairment prevalence.

Methods

Two national surveys were pooled. First, 2075 institutions were selected at random from the French Health Ministry files. Second, a random, stratified sample of 356,208 citizens living in the community was selected. Blindness and low vision (LV) prevalence rates were estimated by age and gender. Geographical equities were estimated by logistic regression adjusted on age and occupational category. The association between ophthalmologist density and visual impairment prevalence rate was estimated per region. Interviews were completed with 14,603 (94.9%) of 15,403 randomly selected subjects in institutions, and 16,945 (77.8%) of 21,760 randomly selected subjects in the community. Three groups were defined from the interviews: low vision, blind, and control.

Results

Prevalence rates were LV 2.08% and blindness 0.12%. Both rates increased exponentially with age. No major difference was found with gender. Injury was the declared reason for both LV (12%) and blindness (12%). Large regional differences in prevalence persisted for LV after adjustment on age and occupation (ORs: 0.35 to 2.10), but not for blindness. Regions with ophthalmologists below the national per capita average were usually those with higher LV prevalence.

Conclusion

An inverse correlation was found between ophthalmologist number and LV prevalence rates for subjects of similar age and socio-professional category. This denoted possible inequity in the provision of healthcare.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Wright SE, Keefe JE, Thies LS: Direct costs of blindness in Australia. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2000, 28: 140–142. 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2000.00296.xPubMedCrossRef Wright SE, Keefe JE, Thies LS: Direct costs of blindness in Australia. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2000, 28: 140–142. 10.1046/j.1442-9071.2000.00296.xPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chiang YP, Bassi LJ, Javitt JC: Federal budgetary costs of blindness. Milbank Q 1992, 70: 319–340.PubMedCrossRef Chiang YP, Bassi LJ, Javitt JC: Federal budgetary costs of blindness. Milbank Q 1992, 70: 319–340.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference OECD: Aging in OECD countries. A critical Policy Challenge, Social Policy study N°. Paris 1997., 20: OECD: Aging in OECD countries. A critical Policy Challenge, Social Policy study N°. Paris 1997., 20:
5.
go back to reference OECD: Maintaining propriety in an Aging Society. Paris 1998. OECD: Maintaining propriety in an Aging Society. Paris 1998.
6.
go back to reference Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel G, Mariotti S: Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 2004, 82: 844–851.PubMedCentralPubMed Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel G, Mariotti S: Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 2004, 82: 844–851.PubMedCentralPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lafuma A, Brézin A, Lopatriello S, Hieke K, Hutchinson J, Mimaud V, Berdeaux G: Evaluation of non-medical costs associated with visual impairment in four European countries (France, Italy, Germany and the United Kingdom). Pharmacoeconomics 2006, 24: 193–205. 10.2165/00019053-200624020-00007PubMedCrossRef Lafuma A, Brézin A, Lopatriello S, Hieke K, Hutchinson J, Mimaud V, Berdeaux G: Evaluation of non-medical costs associated with visual impairment in four European countries (France, Italy, Germany and the United Kingdom). Pharmacoeconomics 2006, 24: 193–205. 10.2165/00019053-200624020-00007PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference OECD: Aging in OECD countries. A critical Policy Challenge. Social Policy study N° Paris 1997., 20: OECD: Aging in OECD countries. A critical Policy Challenge. Social Policy study N° Paris 1997., 20:
9.
go back to reference Robinson R, Deutsch J, Jones HS, Youngson-Reilly S, Hamlin DM, Dhurjon L, Fielder AR: Unrecognised and unregistered visual impairment. Br J Ophthalmol 1994, 78: 736–740.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Robinson R, Deutsch J, Jones HS, Youngson-Reilly S, Hamlin DM, Dhurjon L, Fielder AR: Unrecognised and unregistered visual impairment. Br J Ophthalmol 1994, 78: 736–740.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bruce IW, McKennell AC, Walker EC: Blind and partially sighted adults in Britain: the RNIB survey. London: HMSO 1991., 1: Bruce IW, McKennell AC, Walker EC: Blind and partially sighted adults in Britain: the RNIB survey. London: HMSO 1991., 1:
11.
go back to reference Walker EC, Tobin MJ, McKennell AC: Blind and partially sighted children in Britain: the RNIB survey. London HMSO 1991., 2: Walker EC, Tobin MJ, McKennell AC: Blind and partially sighted children in Britain: the RNIB survey. London HMSO 1991., 2:
13.
go back to reference Thylefors B, Négrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, Dadzie KY: Available data on blindness (update 1994). Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1995, 2: 5–39.PubMedCrossRef Thylefors B, Négrel AD, Pararajasegaram R, Dadzie KY: Available data on blindness (update 1994). Ophthalmic Epidemiol 1995, 2: 5–39.PubMedCrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. Causes and prevalence of visual Impairment among adults in the United States Arch Ophthalmol 2004, 122: 477–485. 10.1001/archopht.122.4.477 The Eye Diseases Prevalence Research Group. Causes and prevalence of visual Impairment among adults in the United States Arch Ophthalmol 2004, 122: 477–485. 10.1001/archopht.122.4.477
16.
go back to reference Herwartz H, Theilen B: The determinants of health care expenditure: testing pooling restrictions in small samples. Health Econ 2003, 12: 113–124. 10.1002/hec.700PubMedCrossRef Herwartz H, Theilen B: The determinants of health care expenditure: testing pooling restrictions in small samples. Health Econ 2003, 12: 113–124. 10.1002/hec.700PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mooney G: Economics, medicine and health care. Edited by: Hemel Hempstead England. Simon & Schuster International group; 1992. Mooney G: Economics, medicine and health care. Edited by: Hemel Hempstead England. Simon & Schuster International group; 1992.
19.
20.
go back to reference Delattre E, Dormont B: Fixed fees and physician-induced demand: a panel data study on French physicians. Health Econ 2003, 12: 741–754. 10.1002/hec.823PubMedCrossRef Delattre E, Dormont B: Fixed fees and physician-induced demand: a panel data study on French physicians. Health Econ 2003, 12: 741–754. 10.1002/hec.823PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Brézin A, Lafuma A, Fagnani F, Mesbah M, Berdeaux G: Prevalence and burden of blindness, low vision and visual impairment in the community: a nationwide survey. Arch Ophthalmol 2005, 123: 1117–1124. 10.1001/archopht.123.8.1117PubMedCrossRef Brézin A, Lafuma A, Fagnani F, Mesbah M, Berdeaux G: Prevalence and burden of blindness, low vision and visual impairment in the community: a nationwide survey. Arch Ophthalmol 2005, 123: 1117–1124. 10.1001/archopht.123.8.1117PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Brézin A, Lafuma A, Fagnani F, Mesbah M, Berdeaux G: Prevalence and burden of blindness, low vision and visual impairment in institution: a nation-wide survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005, 3: 27. 10.1186/1477-7525-3-27PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Brézin A, Lafuma A, Fagnani F, Mesbah M, Berdeaux G: Prevalence and burden of blindness, low vision and visual impairment in institution: a nation-wide survey. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005, 3: 27. 10.1186/1477-7525-3-27PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Brézin A, Lafuma A, Fagnani F, Mesbah M, Berdeaux G: Blindness, low vision and other handicaps as risk factors of institution. Br J Ophthalmol 2004, 88: 1330–1337. 10.1136/bjo.2003.039180PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Brézin A, Lafuma A, Fagnani F, Mesbah M, Berdeaux G: Blindness, low vision and other handicaps as risk factors of institution. Br J Ophthalmol 2004, 88: 1330–1337. 10.1136/bjo.2003.039180PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Statistics Division. Manual for the development of statistical information for disability programmes and policies United Nations Publication, Sales No E96.XVII.4 1996. United Nations. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Statistics Division. Manual for the development of statistical information for disability programmes and policies United Nations Publication, Sales No E96.XVII.4 1996.
26.
go back to reference Morniche P: L'enquête HID de l'INSEE – Objectifs et shéma organisationnel. Courrier des Statistiques. Ed INSEE, Paris 1998, 87: 88. Morniche P: L'enquête HID de l'INSEE – Objectifs et shéma organisationnel. Courrier des Statistiques. Ed INSEE, Paris 1998, 87: 88.
27.
go back to reference Couet C: Estimations locales dans le cadre de l'enquête HID. Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economique. Séries des documents de travail de la Direction des statistiques démographiques et sociales. N° F0207. Ed INSEE. Paris 2002. [http://www.insee.fr] Couet C: Estimations locales dans le cadre de l'enquête HID. Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economique. Séries des documents de travail de la Direction des statistiques démographiques et sociales. N° F0207. Ed INSEE. Paris 2002. [http://​www.​insee.​fr]
28.
go back to reference Sicart D: Les médecins: Estimations au 1er janvier 2002. Direction de la recherche, des études, de l'évaluation et des statistiques. Série statistiques, document de travail. n° 44 décembre 2002. Ministère des affaires sociales, du travail et de la solidarité. Ministère de la santé, de la famille et des personnes handicapées, Paris. 2002. Sicart D: Les médecins: Estimations au 1er janvier 2002. Direction de la recherche, des études, de l'évaluation et des statistiques. Série statistiques, document de travail. n° 44 décembre 2002. Ministère des affaires sociales, du travail et de la solidarité. Ministère de la santé, de la famille et des personnes handicapées, Paris. 2002.
29.
go back to reference Queguiner P, Guillaumat L, Gattef C: Epidémiologie de la cécité dans les Bouches-du-Rhone. Approche méthodologique. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr 1988, 88: 21–22. 25–26PubMed Queguiner P, Guillaumat L, Gattef C: Epidémiologie de la cécité dans les Bouches-du-Rhone. Approche méthodologique. Bull Soc Ophtalmol Fr 1988, 88: 21–22. 25–26PubMed
32.
go back to reference Culham LE, Ryan B, Jackson AJ, Hill AR, Jones B, Miles C, Young JA, Bunce C, Bird AC: Low vision services for vision rehabilitation in the United Kingdom. Br J Ophthalmol 2002, 86: 743–747. 10.1136/bjo.86.7.743PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Culham LE, Ryan B, Jackson AJ, Hill AR, Jones B, Miles C, Young JA, Bunce C, Bird AC: Low vision services for vision rehabilitation in the United Kingdom. Br J Ophthalmol 2002, 86: 743–747. 10.1136/bjo.86.7.743PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prevalence of visual impairment in relation to the number of ophthalmologists in a given area: a nationwide approach
Authors
Antoine J Lafuma
Antoine P Brézin
Francis L Fagnani
Mounir Mesbah
Gilles H Berdeaux
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2006
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-4-34

Other articles of this Issue 1/2006

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2006 Go to the issue