Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 10/2003

01-10-2003 | Original Article

Prevalence of osteoporosis using bone mineral measurements at the calcaneus by dual X-ray and laser (DXL)

Authors: R. Kullenberg, J. A. Falch

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 10/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Using manufacturers reference data the prevalence of osteoporosis using a T-score threshold of −2.5 for heel measurements by DXL technology was compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements at the femoral neck, spine and forearm. The prevalence of osteoporosis for women aged 50 years or older was 28% for DXL measurements of the heel bone and 30, 22 and 32% for DXA measurements of the lumbar spine, femoral neck and forearm respectively. Bone mineral density (BMD) was also measured by DXL in the heel bone and by DXA in spine and femoral neck in 251 women (mean age 62±14.5 years) when attending an osteoporosis clinic. The sensitivity and specificity for osteoporosis and osteopenia for the DXL measurements were calculated assuming a low T-score at the spine or femoral neck as the criterion for a correct diagnosis. The sensitivity was found to be 80% for osteoporosis and 82% for osteopenia and the specificity was 82% for osteoporosis and 89% for osteopenia. We conclude that DXL measurement at the heel bone, using a T-score threshold of −2.5 for classification of osteoporosis, is in concordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) definition of osteoporosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bolotin HH, Sievänen H (2001) Inaccuracies inherent in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in vivo bone mineral density can seriously mislead diagnostic/prognostic interpretations of patient-specific bone fragility. J Bone Miner Res 16:799–805PubMed Bolotin HH, Sievänen H (2001) Inaccuracies inherent in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in vivo bone mineral density can seriously mislead diagnostic/prognostic interpretations of patient-specific bone fragility. J Bone Miner Res 16:799–805PubMed
2.
go back to reference Jonson R (1993) Mass attenuation coefficients, quantities and units for use in bone mineral determinations. Osteoporos Int 3:103–106PubMed Jonson R (1993) Mass attenuation coefficients, quantities and units for use in bone mineral determinations. Osteoporos Int 3:103–106PubMed
3.
go back to reference Lochmueller EM, Miller P, Burklein D, Wehr U, Rambeck W, Eckstein F (2000) In situ femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry related to ash weight, bone size and density, and its relationship with mechanical failure loads of the proximal femur. Osteoporos Int 11:361–367CrossRefPubMed Lochmueller EM, Miller P, Burklein D, Wehr U, Rambeck W, Eckstein F (2000) In situ femoral dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry related to ash weight, bone size and density, and its relationship with mechanical failure loads of the proximal femur. Osteoporos Int 11:361–367CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kupier JW, van Kuijk C, Grashuis JL, Ederveen AGH, Schutte HE (1996) Accuracy and the influence of marrow fat on quantitative CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the femoral neck in vitro. Osteoporos Int 6:25–30PubMed Kupier JW, van Kuijk C, Grashuis JL, Ederveen AGH, Schutte HE (1996) Accuracy and the influence of marrow fat on quantitative CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of the femoral neck in vitro. Osteoporos Int 6:25–30PubMed
5.
go back to reference Meunier P., Aaron J., Edouard C., Vignon G (1971) Osteoporosis and the replacement of cell populations of the marrow by adipose tissue. Clin Orthop 80:147–154PubMed Meunier P., Aaron J., Edouard C., Vignon G (1971) Osteoporosis and the replacement of cell populations of the marrow by adipose tissue. Clin Orthop 80:147–154PubMed
6.
go back to reference Swanpalmer J, Kullenberg RA (2000) new measuring device for quantifying the amount of mineral in the heel bone. Ann N Y Acad Sci 904:115–117PubMed Swanpalmer J, Kullenberg RA (2000) new measuring device for quantifying the amount of mineral in the heel bone. Ann N Y Acad Sci 904:115–117PubMed
7.
go back to reference The WHO Study Group (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report 843, World Health Organisation, Geneva The WHO Study Group (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report 843, World Health Organisation, Geneva
8.
go back to reference Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG et al. (2001) Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. JAMA 286:2815–2822PubMed Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG et al. (2001) Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. JAMA 286:2815–2822PubMed
9.
go back to reference Black DM, Cummings SR, Genant HK et al. (1992) Axial and appendicular bone density predict fractures in older women. J Bone Miner Res 7:633–638PubMed Black DM, Cummings SR, Genant HK et al. (1992) Axial and appendicular bone density predict fractures in older women. J Bone Miner Res 7:633–638PubMed
10.
go back to reference Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254–1259PubMed Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254–1259PubMed
11.
go back to reference Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al. (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489CrossRefPubMed Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al. (1998) Updated data on proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 8:468–489CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (1997) Bone density measurement—a systematic review. J Int Med 241, Supplement 739:1–60 Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (1997) Bone density measurement—a systematic review. J Int Med 241, Supplement 739:1–60
13.
go back to reference Blake GM, Fogelman I (2001) Peripheral or central densitometry: does it matter which technique we use? J Clin Densitom 4:83–96 Blake GM, Fogelman I (2001) Peripheral or central densitometry: does it matter which technique we use? J Clin Densitom 4:83–96
14.
go back to reference Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC et al. (1993) Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 341:72–75PubMed Cummings SR, Black DM, Nevitt MC et al. (1993) Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. Lancet 341:72–75PubMed
15.
go back to reference Wasnich RD, Ross PD, Heilbrum LK, Vogel JM (1987) Selection of the optimal site for fracture risk prediction. Clin Orthop 216:262–268PubMed Wasnich RD, Ross PD, Heilbrum LK, Vogel JM (1987) Selection of the optimal site for fracture risk prediction. Clin Orthop 216:262–268PubMed
16.
go back to reference Vogel JM, Wasnich RD, Ross PD (1988) The clinical relevance of calcaneus bone mineral measurements: a review. Bone Miner 5:35–58PubMed Vogel JM, Wasnich RD, Ross PD (1988) The clinical relevance of calcaneus bone mineral measurements: a review. Bone Miner 5:35–58PubMed
17.
go back to reference Smith RW, Walker RR (1964) Femoral expansion in aging women: implications for osteoporosis and fractures. Science 145:156–157 Smith RW, Walker RR (1964) Femoral expansion in aging women: implications for osteoporosis and fractures. Science 145:156–157
18.
go back to reference Faulkner KG, von Stetten E, Miller P (1999) Discordance in patient classification using T-scores. J Clin Densitom 3:343–350 Faulkner KG, von Stetten E, Miller P (1999) Discordance in patient classification using T-scores. J Clin Densitom 3:343–350
Metadata
Title
Prevalence of osteoporosis using bone mineral measurements at the calcaneus by dual X-ray and laser (DXL)
Authors
R. Kullenberg
J. A. Falch
Publication date
01-10-2003
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 10/2003
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1442-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2003

Osteoporosis International 10/2003 Go to the issue