Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 8/2019

01-07-2019 | Original Article

Prevalence of metaphyseal injury and its mimickers in otherwise healthy children under two years of age

Authors: Pernille Eide, Åsmund Djuve, Ramona Myklebust, Kjersti Foros Forseth, Andreas Nøttveit, Christina Brudvik, Karen Rosendahl

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 8/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Metaphyseal lesions in infants and toddlers are believed to have a high specificity for inflicted injury.

Objectives

To examine the prevalence of metaphyseal injury and its mimickers in otherwise healthy children younger than 2 years of age.

Materials and methods

During 2010–2015, all children 2 years old and younger seen at the Accident and Emergency (A&E) Department due to an injury who had radiographs taken were included. Information on mechanism and clinical findings were drawn from the medical notes. All radiographs were reviewed by two of five researchers together with an experienced paediatric radiologist, registering fracture site and type, and metaphyseal appearances.

Results

Four hundred and eight children (212 boys) (mean age: 17.7 months, range: 3–24 months) were included, of whom 149 (77 boys) had a total of 162 fractures (incidence of 5.4 per 1,000 children). Only one metaphyseal lesion, without a history of trauma, was seen. Of the 860 metaphyses analysed, 140 (16.3%) were defined as either irregular (74/860, 8.6%) or as having a metaphyseal collar (66/860, 7.7%). Sixty-four of the 66 collars (97.0%) and 54/104 irregularities (60.8%) were located around the wrist and the ankle, while 25/74 irregularities (33.8%) were found around the knee joint.

Conclusion

Metaphyseal lesions with a history of trauma did not occur in otherwise healthy neonates and infants younger than 2 years of age, indicating that this type of fracture has a particular trauma mechanism. Metaphyseal irregularities/collars are frequently seen and should not be mistaken for a classic metaphyseal lesion.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Clarke NM, Shelton FR, Taylor CC et al (2012) The incidence of fractures in children under the age of 24 months--in relation to non-accidental injury. Injury 43:762–765CrossRefPubMed Clarke NM, Shelton FR, Taylor CC et al (2012) The incidence of fractures in children under the age of 24 months--in relation to non-accidental injury. Injury 43:762–765CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Brudvik C (2006) Child injuries in Bergen, Norway: identifying high-risk groups and activity specific injuries. Thesis, University of Bergen Brudvik C (2006) Child injuries in Bergen, Norway: identifying high-risk groups and activity specific injuries. Thesis, University of Bergen
4.
go back to reference Lyons RA, Delahunty AM, Kraus D et al (1999) Children's fractures: a population based study. Inj Prev 5(2):129–132 Lyons RA, Delahunty AM, Kraus D et al (1999) Children's fractures: a population based study. Inj Prev 5(2):129–132
5.
go back to reference Kocher MS, Kasser JR (2009) Orthopaedic aspects of child abuse. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 8:10–20 Kocher MS, Kasser JR (2009) Orthopaedic aspects of child abuse. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 8:10–20
7.
go back to reference Pandya NK, Baldwin KD, Wolfgruber H et al (2010) Humerus fractures in the pediatric population: an algorithm to identify abuse. J Pediatr Orthop B 19:535–541CrossRefPubMed Pandya NK, Baldwin KD, Wolfgruber H et al (2010) Humerus fractures in the pediatric population: an algorithm to identify abuse. J Pediatr Orthop B 19:535–541CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Baldwin K, Pandya NK, Wolfgruber H et al (2011) Femur fractures in the pediatric population: abuse or accidental trauma? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:798–804 Baldwin K, Pandya NK, Wolfgruber H et al (2011) Femur fractures in the pediatric population: abuse or accidental trauma? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:798–804
9.
go back to reference Leventhal JM, Martin KD, Asnes AG (2010) Fractures and traumatic brain injuries: abuse versus accidents in a US database of hospitalized children. Pediatrics 126:e104–e115CrossRefPubMed Leventhal JM, Martin KD, Asnes AG (2010) Fractures and traumatic brain injuries: abuse versus accidents in a US database of hospitalized children. Pediatrics 126:e104–e115CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Barber I, Kleinman PK (2014) Imaging of skeletal injuries associated with abusive head trauma. Pediatr Radiol 44:S613–S620 Barber I, Kleinman PK (2014) Imaging of skeletal injuries associated with abusive head trauma. Pediatr Radiol 44:S613–S620
11.
go back to reference Kleinman PK, Perez-Rossello JM, Newton AW (2011) Prevalence of the classic metaphyseal lesion in infants at low versus high risk for abuse. AJR AmJ Roentgenol 197:1005–1008CrossRef Kleinman PK, Perez-Rossello JM, Newton AW (2011) Prevalence of the classic metaphyseal lesion in infants at low versus high risk for abuse. AJR AmJ Roentgenol 197:1005–1008CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Thackeray JD, Wannemacher J, Adler BH, Lindberg DM (2016) The classic metaphyseal lesion and traumatic injury. Pediatr Radiol 46:1128–1133CrossRefPubMed Thackeray JD, Wannemacher J, Adler BH, Lindberg DM (2016) The classic metaphyseal lesion and traumatic injury. Pediatr Radiol 46:1128–1133CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tsai A, Coats B, Kleinman PK (2017) Biomechanics of the classic metaphyseal lesion: finite element analysis. Pediatr Radiol 47:1622–1630CrossRefPubMed Tsai A, Coats B, Kleinman PK (2017) Biomechanics of the classic metaphyseal lesion: finite element analysis. Pediatr Radiol 47:1622–1630CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tsai A, Johnston PR, Perez-Rossello JM et al (2018) The distal tibial classic metaphyseal lesion: medial versus lateral cortical injury. Pediatr Radiol 48:973–978 Tsai A, Johnston PR, Perez-Rossello JM et al (2018) The distal tibial classic metaphyseal lesion: medial versus lateral cortical injury. Pediatr Radiol 48:973–978
15.
go back to reference Tsai A, McDonald AG, Rosenberg AE et al (2014) High-resolution CT with histopathological correlates of the classic metaphyseal lesion of infant abuse. Pediatr Radiol 44:124–140CrossRefPubMed Tsai A, McDonald AG, Rosenberg AE et al (2014) High-resolution CT with histopathological correlates of the classic metaphyseal lesion of infant abuse. Pediatr Radiol 44:124–140CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Quigley AJ, Stafrace S (2014) Skeletal survey normal variants, artefacts and commonly misinterpreted findings not to be confused with non-accidental injury. Pediatr Radiol 44:82–93CrossRefPubMed Quigley AJ, Stafrace S (2014) Skeletal survey normal variants, artefacts and commonly misinterpreted findings not to be confused with non-accidental injury. Pediatr Radiol 44:82–93CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kleinman PK (2015) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press Kleinman PK (2015) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press
18.
go back to reference Oestreich AE (2008) Growth of the pediatric skeleton. Springer, Berlin Oestreich AE (2008) Growth of the pediatric skeleton. Springer, Berlin
19.
go back to reference Laval-Jeantet M, Balmain N, Juster M, Bernard J (1968) Relations of the perichondral ring to the cartilage in normal and pathologic growth. Ann Radiol (Paris) 11:327–335 Laval-Jeantet M, Balmain N, Juster M, Bernard J (1968) Relations of the perichondral ring to the cartilage in normal and pathologic growth. Ann Radiol (Paris) 11:327–335
20.
go back to reference Servaes S, Brown SD, Choudhary AK et al (2016) The etiology and significance of fractures in infants and young children: a critical multidisciplinary review. Pediatr Radiol 46:591–600 Servaes S, Brown SD, Choudhary AK et al (2016) The etiology and significance of fractures in infants and young children: a critical multidisciplinary review. Pediatr Radiol 46:591–600
21.
go back to reference Flaherty EG, Perez-Rossello JM, Levine MA et al (2014) Evaluating children with fractures for child physical abuse. Pediatrics 133:e477–e489CrossRefPubMed Flaherty EG, Perez-Rossello JM, Levine MA et al (2014) Evaluating children with fractures for child physical abuse. Pediatrics 133:e477–e489CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ayoub DM, Hyman C, Cohen M, Miller M (2014) A critical review of the classic metaphyseal lesion: traumatic or metabolic? AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:185–196CrossRefPubMed Ayoub DM, Hyman C, Cohen M, Miller M (2014) A critical review of the classic metaphyseal lesion: traumatic or metabolic? AJR Am J Roentgenol 202:185–196CrossRefPubMed
23.
24.
go back to reference Burrell T, Opfer E, Berglund L et al (2015) A witnessed case of a classic metaphyseal fracture caused during IV line placement in a child: insight into mechanism of injury. J Forensic Legal Med 35:51–53CrossRef Burrell T, Opfer E, Berglund L et al (2015) A witnessed case of a classic metaphyseal fracture caused during IV line placement in a child: insight into mechanism of injury. J Forensic Legal Med 35:51–53CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kleinman PK, Belanger PL, Karellas A, Spevak MR (1991) Normal metaphyseal radiologic variants not to be confused with findings of infant abuse. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:781–783CrossRefPubMed Kleinman PK, Belanger PL, Karellas A, Spevak MR (1991) Normal metaphyseal radiologic variants not to be confused with findings of infant abuse. AJR Am J Roentgenol 156:781–783CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prevalence of metaphyseal injury and its mimickers in otherwise healthy children under two years of age
Authors
Pernille Eide
Åsmund Djuve
Ramona Myklebust
Kjersti Foros Forseth
Andreas Nøttveit
Christina Brudvik
Karen Rosendahl
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04413-5

Other articles of this Issue 8/2019

Pediatric Radiology 8/2019 Go to the issue

Hermes

Hermes

Exposure

Exposure