Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Prevalence and patterns of traditional bullying victimization and cyber-teasing among college population in Spain

Authors: Francisco Caravaca Sánchez, María Falcón Romero, Javier Navarro-Zaragoza, Aurelio Luna Ruiz-Cabello, Oriali Rodriges Frantzisko, Aurelio Luna Maldonado

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Traditional bullying victimization and the growing number of cyber-teasing victims during the last decade is a major public health concern. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between students’ experiences of traditional bullying victimization and cyber-teasing and the sociodemographic characteristics of a sample composed of college students in Spain.

Methods

In the fall of 2014, 543 sixth-grade students from southeast Spain completed an anonymous survey on their experience of both kinds of to ascertain any relationship with sociodemographic characteristics, including gender, nationality, economic problems, family conflicts and alcohol and cannabis use.

Results

A total of 62.2 % of the students reported to having suffered traditional bullying victimization and 52.7 % reported that they had been subject to cyber-teasing. 40.7 % of participants had been victims of traditional bullying victimization and cyber-teasing in the past 12 months. Most (65.7 %) of the victims were at the same time cyber-teasing victims; 77.6 % of cyber-teasing victims were also victimized in a different manner. Traditional bullying victimization was higher among boys than among girls, while female students were more likely to have been subjected to cyber-teasing than male students. The characteristics that most heavily influenced suffering traditional bullying victimization were economic problems, family conflicts and cannabis use.

Conclusions

Our findings confirm overlapping results in the risk factors that influence suffering both traditional bullying victimization and cyber-teasing: there was a strong influence of certain sociodemographic and individual characteristics of the college population, suggesting that specific policies are necessary to improve college students’ environment in Spain.
Literature
1.
Park TW, Lee SH, Lee M, Jung YE, Leventhal B, Kim YS, et al. Cyberbullying, problematic internet use, and psychopathologic symptoms among Korean youth. Yonsei Med J. 2014;55(3):826–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
3.
Bannink R, Broeren S, van de Looij-Jansen PM, de Waart FG, Raat H. Cyber and traditional bullying victimization as a risk factor for mental health problems and suicidal ideation in adolescents. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94026.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
Shapira NA, Lessig MC, Goldsmith TD, Szabo ST, Lazoritz M, Gold MS, et al. Problematic internet use: proposed classification and diagnostic criteria. Depress Anxiety. 2003;17(4):207–16.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Suzuki K, Asaga R, Sourander A, Hoven CW, Mandell D. Cyberbullying and adolescent mental health. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2012;24(1):27–35.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Smith PK, Mahdavi J, Carvalho M, Fisher S, Russell S, Tippett N. Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2008;49(4):376–85.CrossRef
7.
Kiriakidis SP, Kavoura A. Cyberbullying: a review of the literature on harassment through the internet and other electronic means. Fam Community Heal. 2010;33(2):82–93.CrossRef
8.
Madlock PE, Westerman D. Hurtful cyber-teasing and violence who’s laughing out loud? J Interpers Violence. 2011;26(17):3542–60.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Juvonen J, Gross EF. Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. J Sch Health. 2008;78(9):496–505.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ. Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip. 2004;45(7):1308–16.CrossRef
11.
Scherer HL, Snyder JA, Fisher BS. Intimate partner victimization among college students with and without disabilities prevalence of and relationship to emotional well-being. J Interpers Violence. 2016;31(1):49–80.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Kraft E, Wang J. An exploratory study of the cyberbullying and cyberstalking experiences and factors related to victimization of students at a public liberal arts college. Int J Technoethics. 2010;1(4):74–91.CrossRef
13.
McDonald C, Roberts-Pittman B. Cyberbullying among college students: prevalence and demographic differences. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;9:2003–9.CrossRef
14.
Schenk A, Fremouw W. Prevalence, psychological impact, and coping of cyberbully victims among college students. J Sch Violence. 2012;11(1):21–37.CrossRef
15.
Wang J, Iannotti RJ, Nansel TR. School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. J Adolesc Heal. 2009;45(4):368–75.CrossRef
16.
Tokunaga RS. Following you home from school: a critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Comput Human Behav. 2010;26(3):277–87.CrossRef
17.
Olweus D. Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: long-term consequences and an effective intervention program. Mental Disorder and Crime. 1993;2:317–49.
18.
Barboza GE, Schiamberg LB, Oehmke J, Korzeniewski SJ, Post LA, Heraux CG. Individual characteristics and the multiple contexts of adolescent bullying: an ecological perspective. J Youth Adolesc. 2009;38(1):101–21.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Nansel TR, Overpeck M, Pilla RS, Ruan WJ, Simons-Morton B, Scheidt P. Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA. 2001;285(16):2094–100.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
Kim YS, Koh Y-J, Leventhal BL. Prevalence of school bullying in Korean middle school students. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(8):737–41.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Chapell MS, Hasselman SL, Kitchin T, Lomon SN, MacIver KW, Sarullo PL. Bullying in elementary school, high school, and college. Adolescence. 2006;41(164):633–48.PubMed
22.
Paul LA, Walsh K, McCauley JL, Ruggiero KJ, Resnick HS, Kilpatrick DG. College women’s experiences with rape disclosure: a national study. Violence Against Women. 2013;19(4):486–502.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Craig W, Harel-Fisch Y, Fogel-Grinvald H, Dostaler S, Hetland J, Simons-Morton B, et al. A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. Int J Public Health. 2009;54(2):216–24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
24.
Humphrey JA, White JW. Women’ s vulnerability to sexual assault from adolescence to young adulthood. J Adolesc Heal. 2000;27(6):419–24.CrossRef
25.
Schneider SK, Odonnell L, Stueve A, Coulter RW. Cyberbullying, school bullying, and psychological distress: a regional census of high school students. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(1):171–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Rospenda KM, Richman JA, Wolff JM, Burke LA. Bullying victimization among college students: negative consequences for alcohol use. J Addict Dis. 2013;32(4):325–42.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Kowalski RM, Limber SP. Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. J Adolesc Heal. 2013;53(1):13–20.CrossRef
28.
Messias E, Kindrick K, Castro J. School bullying, cyberbullying, or both: correlates of teen suicidality in the 2011 CDC youth risk behavior survey. Compr Psychiatry. 2014;55(5):1063–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
Johnston LD, O’Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE. Monitoring the Future national results on drug use, 1975–2010: Volume I, Secundary school students. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan; 2011.
30.
Berg CJ, Lowe K, Stratton E, Goodwin SB, Grimsley L, Rodd J, et al. Sociodemographic, psychosocial, and health behavior risk factors associated with sexual risk behaviors among southeastern US college students. Open J Prev Med. 2014;4(6):387–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Davis AK, Osborn LA, Leith J, Rosenberg H, Ashrafioun L, Hawley A, et al. Development and evaluation of the marijuana reduction strategies self-efficacy scale. Psychol Addict Behav. 2014;28(2):575–9.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Gebreslassie M, Feleke A, Melese T. Psychoactive substances use and associated factors among Axum University students, Axum Town, North Ethiopia. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):693.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
Wechsler H, Kuo M. College students define binge drinking and estimate its prevalence: results of a national survey. J Am Coll Health. 2000;49(2):57–64.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Smokowski PR, Kopasz KH. Bullying in school: an overview of types, effects, family characteristics, and intervention strategies. Natl Assoc Soc Work. 2005;17(2):101–10.
35.
Carlyle KE, Steinman KJ. Demographic differences in the prevalence, co-occurrence, and correlates of adolescent bullying at school. J Sch Health. 2007;77(9):623–9.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Farrington DP, Ttofi MM. Bullying as a predictor of offending, violence and later life outcomes. Crim Behav Ment Heal. 2011;21(2):90–8.CrossRef
37.
Herrenkohl TI, Maguin E, Hill KG, Hawkins JD, Abbott RD, Catalano RF. Developmental risk factors for youth violence. J Adolesc Health. 2000;26(3):176–86.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Toumbourou JW, Hemphill SA, Tresidder J, Humphreys C, Edwards J, Murray D. Mental health promotion and socio-economic disadvantage: lessons from substance abuse, violence and crime prevention and child health. Health Promot J Austr. 2007;18(3):184–90.PubMed
39.
Allan EJ, Madden M. The nature and extent of college student hazing. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2012;24(1):83–90.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Bhang SY, Yoo HK, Kim JH, Kim B, Lee YS, Ahn D, et al. Victims of bullying among Korean adolescents: prevalence and association with psychopathology evaluated using the adolescent mental health and problem behavior screening questionnaire-II standardization study data. J Korean Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012;23(1):23–30.CrossRef
41.
Brolin Låftman S, Modin B, Östberg V. Cyberbullying and subjective health: a large-scale study of students in Stockholm, Sweden. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2013;35(1):112–9.CrossRef
42.
Helweg‐Larsen K, Schütt N, Larsen HB. Predictors and protective factors for adolescent Internet victimization: results from a 2008 nationwide Danish youth survey. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(5):533–9.PubMedCrossRef
43.
Sourander A, Brunstein Klomek A, Ikonen M, Lindroos J, Luntamo T, Koskelainen M, et al. Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: a population-based study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(7):720–8.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Menesini E, Nocentini A, Palladino BE, Frisén A, Berne S, Ortega-Ruiz R, et al. Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: a comparison across six European countries. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012;15(9):455–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Gámez-Guadix M, Orue I, Smith PK, Calvete E. Longitudinal and reciprocal relations of cyberbullying with depression, substance use, and problematic internet use among adolescents. J Adolescent Health. 2013;53(4):446–52.CrossRef
46.
47.
McCabe SE, Morales M, Cranford JA, Delva J, McPherson MD, Boyd CJ. Race/ethnicity and gender differences in drug use and abuse among college students. J Ethn Subst Abuse. 2007;6(2):75–95.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
Olweus D. No The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. University of Bergen, Norway: Research Centre for Health Promotion; 2007.
49.
Ybarra ML, Diener-West M, Leaf PJ. Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: implications for school. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2007;41(6):42–50.CrossRef
50.
51.
Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Roumeliotis P, Xu H. Associations between cyberbullying and school bullying victimization and suicidal ideation, plans and attempts among Canadian schoolchildren. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102145.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
52.
Jansen PW, Verlinden M, Dommisse-van Berkel A, Mieloo C, van der Ende J, Veenstra R, et al. Prevalence of bullying and victimization among children in early elementary school: Do family and school neighbourhood socioeconomic status matter? BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):494–504.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
Gradinger P, Strohmeier D, Spiel C. Traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Psychol. 2010;217(4):205–13.
54.
Madden M, Lenhart A, Duggan M, Cortesi S, Gasser U. Teens and technology. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2013.
55.
Werner NE, Bumpus MF, Rock D. Involvement in internet aggression during early adolescence. J Youth Adolesc. 2010;39(6):607–19.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Frank E, Carrera JS, Stratton T, Bickel J, Nora LM. Experiences of belittlement and harassment and their correlates among medical students in the United States: longitudinal survey. BMJ. 2006;333(7570):682–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
Feldman SS, Gowen LK. Conflict negotiation tactics in romantic relationships in high school students. J Youth Adolesc. 1998;27(6):691–717.CrossRef
58.
Foster H, Brooks-Gunn J. Neighborhood, family and individual influences on school physical victimization. J Youth Adolesc. 2013;42(10):1596–610.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Magklara K, Skapinakis P, Gkatsa T, Bellos S, Araya R, Stylianidis S, et al. Bullying behaviour in schools, socioeconomic position and psychiatric morbidity: a cross-sectional study in late adolescents in Greece. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2012;6(8):1–13.
60.
McCabe SE, Teter CJ. Drug use related problems among nonmedical users of prescription stimulants: a web-based survey of college students from a Midwestern university. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;91(1):69–76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
61.
Gilreath TD, Astor RA, Estrada JN, Benbenishty R, Unger JB. School victimization and substance use among adolescents in California. Prev Sci. 2014;15(6):897–906.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
62.
Nowotny KM, Graves JL. Substance use and intimate partner violence victimization among White, African American, and Latina women. J Interpers Violence. 2013;28(17):3301–18.PubMedCrossRef
63.
Reijntjes A, Kamphuis JH, Prinzie P, Telch MJ. Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abus Negl. 2010;34(4):244–52.CrossRef
64.
Della Cioppa V, O’Neil A, Craig W. Learning from traditional bullying interventions: a review of research on cyberbullying and best practice. Aggress Violent Beh. 2015;23:61–8.CrossRef
65.
Kowalski RM, Giumetti GW, Schroeder AN, Lattanner MR. Bullying in the digital age: a critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(4):1073–137.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Thomas HJ, Connor JP, Scott JG. Integrating traditional bullying and cyberbullying: challenges of definition and measurement in adolescents. A review. Educ Psychol Rev. 2014;27(1):135–52.CrossRef
67.
Polanin JR, Espelage DL, Pigott TD. A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychol Rev. 2012;41(1):47–65.
68.
Slonje R, Smith PK, Frisén A. The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(1):26–32.CrossRef
69.
Casas JA, Del Rey R, Ortega-Ruiz R. Bullying and cyberbullying: convergent and divergent predictor variables. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(3):580–7.CrossRef
70.
Doane AN, Kelley ML, Pearson MR. Reducing cyberbullying: A theory of reasoned action‐based video prevention program for college students. Aggress Behav. 2015. In press.
71.
Olweus D, Limber SP. Olweus bullying prevention program. 2007.
72.
Salmivalli C, Kärnä A, Poskiparta E. Counteracting bullying in Finland: the KiVa program and its effects on different forms of being bullied. Int J Behav Dev. 2011;35(5):405–11.CrossRef
73.
American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force. Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools?: an evidentiary review and recommendations. Am Psychol. 2008;63(9):852–62.CrossRef
74.
Foody M, Samara M, Carlbring P. A review of cyberbullying and suggestions for online psychological therapy. Internet Interv. 2015;2(3):235–42.CrossRef
75.
Zalaquett CP, Chatters SJ. Cyberbullying in college: frequency, characteristics, and practical implications. SAGE Open. 2014;4(1):1–8.CrossRef
76.
Crosslin K, Golman M. “Maybe you don’t want to face it” college students’ perspectives on cyberbullying. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;41:14–20.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prevalence and patterns of traditional bullying victimization and cyber-teasing among college population in Spain
Authors
Francisco Caravaca Sánchez
María Falcón Romero
Javier Navarro-Zaragoza
Aurelio Luna Ruiz-Cabello
Oriali Rodriges Frantzisko
Aurelio Luna Maldonado
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2857-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Public Health 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research article

Does home equipment contribute to socioeconomic gradients in Australian children’s physical activity, sedentary time and screen time?

Research article

Comparing the quality of pro- and anti-vaccination online information: a content analysis of vaccination-related webpages

Research article

Clinical determinants of the severity of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS): a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research article

Searching for consensus among physicians involved in the management of sick-listed workers in the Belgian health care sector: a qualitative study among practitioners and stakeholders

Research article

Does the public receive and adhere to boil water advisory recommendations? A cross-sectional study in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Research article

Europeanisation of health systems: a qualitative study of domestic actors in a small state