Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Presbyopia | Cataract

Comparison of objective accommodation in phakic and pseudophakic eyes between age groups

Authors: Byunghoon Chung, Seonghee Choi, Yong Woo Ji, Eung Kweon Kim, Kyoung Yul Seo, Tae-im Kim

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare objective accommodation of phakic and pseudophakic eyes between two different age groups.

Methods

Eighty-three eyes (83 participants aged ≥ 40 years) with a visual acuity of 20/25 or better, and refractive error < spherical − 1.0 diopters (D) and cylindrical 1.0 D, were included. Forty-four patients had undergone phacoemulsification and monofocal intraocular lens implantation and were examined 6 months post-surgery. Participants were divided into groups 1 (pseudophakic, age < 60 years), 2 (pseudophakic, ≥ 60 years), 3 (phakic, < 60 years), and 4 (phakic, ≥ 60 years). Objective accommodation and pupil diameter to 2.0- and 3.0-D stimuli were measured with a binocular open-field autorefractor.

Results

The mean objective accommodation was 0.29 ± 0.47 D, 0.01 ± 0.21 D, 1.00 ± 0.88 D, and 0.01 ± 0.13 to a 2.0-D stimulus, and 0.26 ± 0.51 D, − 0.06 ± 0.21 D, 1.42 ± 1.21 D, and − 0.06 ± 0.21 to a 3.0-D stimulus in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. For both stimuli, the values in group 1 exceeded those in groups 2 and 4, and were smaller than those in group 3, while the values in group 3 exceeded those in groups 2 and 4. The mean pupillary diameter was − 0.5 ± 0.8 mm, − 0.3 ± 0.8 mm, − 0.6 ± 0.5 mm, and − 0.6 ± 0.9 mm to a 2.0-D stimulus, and − 0.6 ± 0.8 mm, − 0.6 ± 0.8 mm, − 0.9 ± 0.5 mm, and − 1.0 ± 1.1 mm to a 3.0-D stimulus in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. There was significant correlation between objective accommodation and changes of pupil size for both stimuli.

Conclusion

Age seems to play a role in objective accommodation among relatively young pseudophakic patients.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Koretz JF, Cook CA, Kaufman PL (1997) Accommodation and presbyopia in the human eye. Changes in the anterior segment and crystalline lens with focus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:569–578PubMed Koretz JF, Cook CA, Kaufman PL (1997) Accommodation and presbyopia in the human eye. Changes in the anterior segment and crystalline lens with focus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 38:569–578PubMed
3.
go back to reference Hayashi K, Hayashi H (2006) Comparison of amplitude of apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes with that of normal accommodation in phakic eyes in various age groups. Eye (Lond) 20:290–296CrossRef Hayashi K, Hayashi H (2006) Comparison of amplitude of apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes with that of normal accommodation in phakic eyes in various age groups. Eye (Lond) 20:290–296CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F (2003) Aging changes in apparent accommodation in eyes with a monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 135:432–436CrossRefPubMed Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F (2003) Aging changes in apparent accommodation in eyes with a monofocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 135:432–436CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Win-Hall DM, Glasser A (2009) Objective accommodation measurements in pseudophakic subjects using an autorefractor and an aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:282–290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Win-Hall DM, Glasser A (2009) Objective accommodation measurements in pseudophakic subjects using an autorefractor and an aberrometer. J Cataract Refract Surg 35:282–290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Win-Hall DM, Ostrin LA, Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A (2007) Objective accommodation measurement with the grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer. Optom Vis Sci 84:879–887CrossRefPubMed Win-Hall DM, Ostrin LA, Kasthurirangan S, Glasser A (2007) Objective accommodation measurement with the grand Seiko and Hartinger coincidence refractometer. Optom Vis Sci 84:879–887CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wold JE, Hu A, Chen S, Glasser A (2003) Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1878–1888CrossRefPubMed Wold JE, Hu A, Chen S, Glasser A (2003) Subjective and objective measurement of human accommodative amplitude. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:1878–1888CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Sawusch MR, Guyton DL (1991) Optimal astigmatism to enhance depth of focus after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 98:1025–1029CrossRefPubMed Sawusch MR, Guyton DL (1991) Optimal astigmatism to enhance depth of focus after cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 98:1025–1029CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fukuyama M, Oshika T, Amano S, Yoshitomi F (1999) Relationship between apparent accommodation and corneal multifocality in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology 106:1178–1181CrossRefPubMed Fukuyama M, Oshika T, Amano S, Yoshitomi F (1999) Relationship between apparent accommodation and corneal multifocality in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology 106:1178–1181CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nemeth G, Lipecz A, Szalai E, Berta A, Modis L Jr (2013) Accommodation in phakic and pseudophakic eyes measured with subjective and objective methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:1534–1542CrossRefPubMed Nemeth G, Lipecz A, Szalai E, Berta A, Modis L Jr (2013) Accommodation in phakic and pseudophakic eyes measured with subjective and objective methods. J Cataract Refract Surg 39:1534–1542CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Nakazawa M, Ohtsuki K (1983) Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 96:435–438CrossRefPubMed Nakazawa M, Ohtsuki K (1983) Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 96:435–438CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nakazawa M, Ohtsuki K (1984) Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses: optical analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25:1458–1460PubMed Nakazawa M, Ohtsuki K (1984) Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses: optical analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 25:1458–1460PubMed
13.
go back to reference Ravalico G, Baccara F (1990) Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 68:604–606CrossRef Ravalico G, Baccara F (1990) Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 68:604–606CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lara F, Bernal-Molina P, Fernandez-Sanchez V, Lopez-Gil N (2014) Changes in the objective amplitude of accommodation with pupil size. Optom Vis Sci 91:1215–1220CrossRefPubMed Lara F, Bernal-Molina P, Fernandez-Sanchez V, Lopez-Gil N (2014) Changes in the objective amplitude of accommodation with pupil size. Optom Vis Sci 91:1215–1220CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lopez-Gil N, Fernandez-Sanchez V (2010) The change of spherical aberration during accommodation and its effect on the accommodation response. J Vis 10:12CrossRefPubMed Lopez-Gil N, Fernandez-Sanchez V (2010) The change of spherical aberration during accommodation and its effect on the accommodation response. J Vis 10:12CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Manabe S, Hayashi H (2010) Comparison of visual function between phakic eyes and pseudophakic eyes with a monofocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:20–27CrossRefPubMed Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Manabe S, Hayashi H (2010) Comparison of visual function between phakic eyes and pseudophakic eyes with a monofocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 36:20–27CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Tsorbatzoglou A, Nemeth G, Math J, Berta A (2006) Pseudophakic accommodation and pseudoaccommodation under physiological conditions measured with partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:1345–1350CrossRefPubMed Tsorbatzoglou A, Nemeth G, Math J, Berta A (2006) Pseudophakic accommodation and pseudoaccommodation under physiological conditions measured with partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 32:1345–1350CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Atchison DA, Capper EJ, McCabe KL (1994) Critical subjective measurement of amplitude of accommodation. Optom Vis Sci 71:699–706CrossRefPubMed Atchison DA, Capper EJ, McCabe KL (1994) Critical subjective measurement of amplitude of accommodation. Optom Vis Sci 71:699–706CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Langenbucher A, Huber S, Nguyen NX, Seitz B, Gusek-Schneider GC, Kuchle M (2003) Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:677–685CrossRefPubMed Langenbucher A, Huber S, Nguyen NX, Seitz B, Gusek-Schneider GC, Kuchle M (2003) Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 29:677–685CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lopez-Gil N, Fernandez-Sanchez V, Legras R, Montes-Mico R, Lara F, Nguyen-Khoa JL (2008) Accommodation-related changes in monochromatic aberrations of the human eye as a function of age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:1736–1743CrossRefPubMed Lopez-Gil N, Fernandez-Sanchez V, Legras R, Montes-Mico R, Lara F, Nguyen-Khoa JL (2008) Accommodation-related changes in monochromatic aberrations of the human eye as a function of age. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:1736–1743CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pugh JR, Winn B (1988) Modification of the canon auto ref R1 for use as a continuously recording infra-red optometer. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 8:460–464CrossRefPubMed Pugh JR, Winn B (1988) Modification of the canon auto ref R1 for use as a continuously recording infra-red optometer. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 8:460–464CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tsuneyoshi Y, Negishi K, Tsubota K (2017) Importance of accommodation and eye dominance for measuring objective refractions. Am J Ophthalmol 177:69–76CrossRefPubMed Tsuneyoshi Y, Negishi K, Tsubota K (2017) Importance of accommodation and eye dominance for measuring objective refractions. Am J Ophthalmol 177:69–76CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sheppard AL, Davies LN (2010) Clinical evaluation of the grand Seiko auto ref/keratometer WAM-5500. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 30:143–151CrossRefPubMed Sheppard AL, Davies LN (2010) Clinical evaluation of the grand Seiko auto ref/keratometer WAM-5500. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 30:143–151CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Win-Hall DM, Houser J, Glasser A (2010) Static and dynamic accommodation measured using the WAM-5500 autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci 87:873–882CrossRefPubMed Win-Hall DM, Houser J, Glasser A (2010) Static and dynamic accommodation measured using the WAM-5500 autorefractor. Optom Vis Sci 87:873–882CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Findl O (2005) Intraocular lenses for restoring accommodation: hope and reality. J Refract Surg 21:321–323PubMed Findl O (2005) Intraocular lenses for restoring accommodation: hope and reality. J Refract Surg 21:321–323PubMed
26.
go back to reference Kriechbaum K, Findl O, Koeppl C, Menapace R, Drexler W (2005) Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology 112:453–459CrossRefPubMed Kriechbaum K, Findl O, Koeppl C, Menapace R, Drexler W (2005) Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology 112:453–459CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Wang B, Ciuffreda KJ (2006) Depth-of-focus of the human eye: theory and clinical implications. Surv Ophthalmol 51:75–85CrossRefPubMed Wang B, Ciuffreda KJ (2006) Depth-of-focus of the human eye: theory and clinical implications. Surv Ophthalmol 51:75–85CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of objective accommodation in phakic and pseudophakic eyes between age groups
Authors
Byunghoon Chung
Seonghee Choi
Yong Woo Ji
Eung Kweon Kim
Kyoung Yul Seo
Tae-im Kim
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keyword
Presbyopia
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-019-04249-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 3/2019 Go to the issue