Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2014

01-11-2014 | Neuro-Oncology

Preoperative Prognostic Neurologic Index for Glioblastoma Patients Receiving Tumor Resection

Authors: Hsiang-Kuang Liang, MD, Chun-Wei Wang, MD, PhD, Han-Min Tseng, MD, Chao-Yuan Huang, MD, PhD, Keng-Hsueh Lan, MD, PhD, Yu-Hsuan Chen, MD, San-Lin You, PhD, Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng, MD, PhD, Ann-Lii Cheng, MD, PhD, Sung-Hsin Kuo, MD, PhD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Neurologic status is one of the major prognostic factors in glioblastoma patients; however, no consensus exists on a clinical index for predicting patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between neurologic deficits and clinical outcomes in glioblastoma patients, and to develop a prognostic neurologic index for identifying patients with poor outcomes.

Methods

Patients receiving tumor resection with pathologically confirmed glioblastoma were retrospectively evaluated. The patients’ preoperative neurologic deficits were categorized, and patients with poor overall survival (OS) were identified. Other common prognostic factors, including age, performance, imaging findings, and extent of resection, were analyzed.

Results

We evaluated 162 glioblastoma patients receiving tumor resection between February 2000 and December 2011, of whom 54 received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) alone and 84 received concurrent chemo-RT with temozolomide. At a median follow-up of 57.6 (range 26.3–88.9) months, 26 patients had survived without loss to follow-up. We defined adverse neurologic status by using an index of combined increased intracranial pressure (IICP) and non-IICP signs. In univariate analysis, the median OS of patients with and without adverse neurologic status were 9.6 and 18.7 months, respectively (p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, adverse neurologic status remained significantly associated with poor OS (hazard ratio 2.18, 95 % confidence interval 1.54–3.10).

Conclusions

Our proposed neurologic index enables significantly identifying glioblastoma patients receiving tumor resection with poor outcomes, independent of other common prognostic factors. Using the index provides a preoperative predictor of prognosis in glioblastoma patients receiving tumor resection.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Cha S. Update on brain tumor imaging: from anatomy to physiology. Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:475–87.PubMed Cha S. Update on brain tumor imaging: from anatomy to physiology. Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;27:475–87.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Walker MD, Green SB, Byar DP, et al. Randomized comparisons of radiotherapy and nitrosoureas for the treatment of malignant glioma after surgery. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:1323–9.PubMedCrossRef Walker MD, Green SB, Byar DP, et al. Randomized comparisons of radiotherapy and nitrosoureas for the treatment of malignant glioma after surgery. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:1323–9.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Curran WJ Jr, Scott CB, Horton J, et al. Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group malignant glioma trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:704–10.PubMedCrossRef Curran WJ Jr, Scott CB, Horton J, et al. Recursive partitioning analysis of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group malignant glioma trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:704–10.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Li J, Wang M, Won M, et al. Validation and simplification of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis classification for glioblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:623–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Li J, Wang M, Won M, et al. Validation and simplification of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partitioning analysis classification for glioblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:623–30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Athanassiou H, Synodinou M, Maragoudakis E, et al. Randomized phase II study of temozolomide and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2372–7.PubMedCrossRef Athanassiou H, Synodinou M, Maragoudakis E, et al. Randomized phase II study of temozolomide and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2372–7.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stupp R, Dietrich PY, Ostermann Kraljevic S, et al. Promising survival for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme treated with concomitant radiation plus temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1375–82.PubMedCrossRef Stupp R, Dietrich PY, Ostermann Kraljevic S, et al. Promising survival for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme treated with concomitant radiation plus temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1375–82.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–96.PubMedCrossRef Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–96.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mirimanoff RO, Gorlia T, Mason W, et al. Radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis of the EORTC 26981/22981-NCIC CE3 phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2563–9.PubMedCrossRef Mirimanoff RO, Gorlia T, Mason W, et al. Radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis of the EORTC 26981/22981-NCIC CE3 phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2563–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Filippini G, Falcone C, Boiardi A, et al. Prognostic factors for survival in 676 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma. Neurooncology. 2008;10:79–87. Filippini G, Falcone C, Boiardi A, et al. Prognostic factors for survival in 676 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed primary glioblastoma. Neurooncology. 2008;10:79–87.
14.
go back to reference Shikama N, Sasaki S, Shinoda A, Koiwai K. Treatment outcome of elderly patients with glioblastoma who received combination therapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2012;35:486–9.PubMedCrossRef Shikama N, Sasaki S, Shinoda A, Koiwai K. Treatment outcome of elderly patients with glioblastoma who received combination therapy. Am J Clin Oncol. 2012;35:486–9.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Laws ER, Parney IF, Huang W, et al. Survival following surgery and prognostic factors for recently diagnosed malignant glioma: data from the Glioma Outcomes Project. J Neurosurg. 2003;99:467–73.PubMedCrossRef Laws ER, Parney IF, Huang W, et al. Survival following surgery and prognostic factors for recently diagnosed malignant glioma: data from the Glioma Outcomes Project. J Neurosurg. 2003;99:467–73.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Showalter TN, Andrel J, Andrews DW, et al. Multifocal glioblastoma multiforme: prognostic factors and patterns of progression. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:820–4.PubMedCrossRef Showalter TN, Andrel J, Andrews DW, et al. Multifocal glioblastoma multiforme: prognostic factors and patterns of progression. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:820–4.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Allahdini F, Amirjamshidi A, Reza-Zarei M, Abdollahi M. Evaluating the prognostic factors effective on the outcome of patients with glioblastoma multiformis: does maximal resection of the tumor lengthen the median survival? World Neurosurg. 2010;73:128–34.PubMedCrossRef Allahdini F, Amirjamshidi A, Reza-Zarei M, Abdollahi M. Evaluating the prognostic factors effective on the outcome of patients with glioblastoma multiformis: does maximal resection of the tumor lengthen the median survival? World Neurosurg. 2010;73:128–34.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preoperative Prognostic Neurologic Index for Glioblastoma Patients Receiving Tumor Resection
Authors
Hsiang-Kuang Liang, MD
Chun-Wei Wang, MD, PhD
Han-Min Tseng, MD
Chao-Yuan Huang, MD, PhD
Keng-Hsueh Lan, MD, PhD
Yu-Hsuan Chen, MD
San-Lin You, PhD
Jason Chia-Hsien Cheng, MD, PhD
Ann-Lii Cheng, MD, PhD
Sung-Hsin Kuo, MD, PhD
Publication date
01-11-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3793-4

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

Annals of Surgical Oncology 12/2014 Go to the issue