Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Anesthesiology Reports 1/2020

01-03-2020 | Preoperative Evaluation (BJ Sweitzer, Section Editor)

Preoperative Assessment for Inpatients

Authors: Joseph McComb, Chad Talarek, Ksenia Guvakova, Gordon Morewood

Published in: Current Anesthesiology Reports | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of the Review

This chapter will highlight several important concepts that are relevant to the assessment and optimization of hospitalized patients prior to the administration of an anesthetic.

Recent Findings

Patients admitted to hospital comprise a unique population. The risk-benefit ratio of pre-procedural investigations and the economic implications of specific management strategies may be significantly different than for patients managed on an ambulatory basis. The anesthesiologist must have a thorough understanding of these factors. Preoperative workflows provide effective coordination of the necessary resources and ensure that each patient’s procedure is completed as safely and efficiently as possible.

Summary

A working knowledge of reimbursement principles, expertise in local procedural workflows, and the ability to quickly and effectively screen patients for high-risk conditions place anesthesiologists at the center of the perioperative process and the financial viability of their inpatient facility.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bernstein DN, Liu TC, Winegar AL, Jackson LW, Darnutzer JL, Wulf KM, et al. Evaluation of a preoperative optimization protocol for primary hip and knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplast. 2018;33:3642–8.CrossRef Bernstein DN, Liu TC, Winegar AL, Jackson LW, Darnutzer JL, Wulf KM, et al. Evaluation of a preoperative optimization protocol for primary hip and knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplast. 2018;33:3642–8.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Duceppe E, Parlow J, MacDonald P, Lyons K, McMullen M, Srinathan S, et al. Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines on perioperative cardiac risk assessment and Management for Patients who Undergo Noncardiac Sur- gery. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:17–32.CrossRef Duceppe E, Parlow J, MacDonald P, Lyons K, McMullen M, Srinathan S, et al. Canadian cardiovascular society guidelines on perioperative cardiac risk assessment and Management for Patients who Undergo Noncardiac Sur- gery. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33:17–32.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference •• Fleisher LA. The value of preoperative assessment before noncardiac surgery in the era of value-based care. Circ. 2017;136:1769–71 This paper discusses the shifting focus of pre-operative assessment away from comprehensive testing in all patients and towards the focused assignment of resources and support of patient-centered decision making.CrossRef •• Fleisher LA. The value of preoperative assessment before noncardiac surgery in the era of value-based care. Circ. 2017;136:1769–71 This paper discusses the shifting focus of pre-operative assessment away from comprehensive testing in all patients and towards the focused assignment of resources and support of patient-centered decision making.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference • Hall DE, Arya S, Schmid KK, Carlson MA, Lavedan P, Bailey TL, et al. Association of a frailty screening initiative with postoperative survival at 30, 180, and 365 days. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):233–40 This paper discusses the increasing importance of non-cardiopulmonary risk factors in identifying appropriate candidates for surgery and reducing perioperative morbidity and mortality. CrossRef • Hall DE, Arya S, Schmid KK, Carlson MA, Lavedan P, Bailey TL, et al. Association of a frailty screening initiative with postoperative survival at 30, 180, and 365 days. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):233–40 This paper discusses the increasing importance of non-cardiopulmonary risk factors in identifying appropriate candidates for surgery and reducing perioperative morbidity and mortality. CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Murthy S, Hepner DL, Cooper Z, Bader AM, Neuman MD. Controversies in anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery in older adults. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:ii15–25.CrossRef Murthy S, Hepner DL, Cooper Z, Bader AM, Neuman MD. Controversies in anaesthesia for noncardiac surgery in older adults. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115:ii15–25.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130:e278–333.PubMed Fleisher LA, Fleischmann KE, Auerbach AD, Barnason SA, Beckman JA, Bozkurt B, et al. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;130:e278–333.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Elnahal SM, Clancy CC, Shulkin DJ. A framework for disseminating clinical best practices in the VA health system. JAMA. 2017;317(3):255–6.CrossRef Elnahal SM, Clancy CC, Shulkin DJ. A framework for disseminating clinical best practices in the VA health system. JAMA. 2017;317(3):255–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Gupta PK, Gupta H, Sundaram A, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery. Circulation. 2011;124:381–7.CrossRef Gupta PK, Gupta H, Sundaram A, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery. Circulation. 2011;124:381–7.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wijeysundera DN, Pearse RM, Abbott TE, et al. Assessment of functional capacity before major non-cardiac surgery: an international, prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2018;391:2631–40.CrossRef Wijeysundera DN, Pearse RM, Abbott TE, et al. Assessment of functional capacity before major non-cardiac surgery: an international, prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2018;391:2631–40.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). 2014 ESC/ESA guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31:517–73.CrossRef The Joint Task Force on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA). 2014 ESC/ESA guidelines on non-cardiac surgery: cardiovascular assessment and management. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2014;31:517–73.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1082–115.CrossRef Levine GN, Bates ER, Bittl JA, Brindis RG, Fihn SD, Fleisher LA, et al. 2016 ACC/AHA guideline focused update on duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1082–115.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2019;140:e125–51.CrossRef January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2019;140:e125–51.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Fleisher LA, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Circulation. 2017;135:e1159–95.CrossRef Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP, Fleisher LA, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease. Circulation. 2017;135:e1159–95.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke activity status index). Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:651–4.CrossRef Hlatky MA, Boineau RE, Higginbotham MB, Lee KL, Mark DB, Califf RM, et al. A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke activity status index). Am J Cardiol. 1989;64:651–4.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lee T, Marcantonio E, Mangione C, Thomas E, Polanczyk C, Cook E, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:1043–9.CrossRef Lee T, Marcantonio E, Mangione C, Thomas E, Polanczyk C, Cook E, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:1043–9.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gupta H, Gupta PK, Fang X, Miller WJ, Cemaj S, Forse A, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator predicting postoperative respiratory failure. Chest. 2011;140:1207–15.CrossRef Gupta H, Gupta PK, Fang X, Miller WJ, Cemaj S, Forse A, et al. Development and validation of a risk calculator predicting postoperative respiratory failure. Chest. 2011;140:1207–15.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245–51.CrossRef Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:1245–51.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nicholls J, Gaskin PS, Ward J, Areti YK. Guidelines for preoperative investigations for elective surgery at Queen Elizabeth Hospital: effects on practices, outcomes, and costs. J Clin Anesth. 2016;35:176–89.CrossRef Nicholls J, Gaskin PS, Ward J, Areti YK. Guidelines for preoperative investigations for elective surgery at Queen Elizabeth Hospital: effects on practices, outcomes, and costs. J Clin Anesth. 2016;35:176–89.CrossRef
20.
22.
go back to reference Nguyen-Van-Tam SE, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Myint S, et al. Risk factors for hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in a large English teaching hospital: a case-control study. Infection. 1999;27:12–7.CrossRef Nguyen-Van-Tam SE, Nguyen-Van-Tam JS, Myint S, et al. Risk factors for hospital-acquired urinary tract infection in a large English teaching hospital: a case-control study. Infection. 1999;27:12–7.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference McConnell K. John et al. ambulance diversion and lost hospital revenues. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:702–10.CrossRef McConnell K. John et al. ambulance diversion and lost hospital revenues. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;48:702–10.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference • Artenstein AW, Rathlev NK, Neal D, et al. Decreasing Emergency Department Walkout Rate and Boarding Hours by Improving Inpatient Length of Stay. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(6):982–92 This paper highlights the financial implications which result from inefficient overall hospital patient throughput.CrossRef • Artenstein AW, Rathlev NK, Neal D, et al. Decreasing Emergency Department Walkout Rate and Boarding Hours by Improving Inpatient Length of Stay. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(6):982–92 This paper highlights the financial implications which result from inefficient overall hospital patient throughput.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference • Gaieski DF, Agarwal AK, Mikkelsen ME, et al. The impact of ED crowding on early interventions and mortality in patients with severe sepsis. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(7):953–60 This paper highlights the implications for medical care which result from inefficient overall hospital patient throughput.CrossRef • Gaieski DF, Agarwal AK, Mikkelsen ME, et al. The impact of ED crowding on early interventions and mortality in patients with severe sepsis. Am J Emerg Med. 2017;35(7):953–60 This paper highlights the implications for medical care which result from inefficient overall hospital patient throughput.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Phruetthiphat OA, Gao Y, Anthony CA, Pugely AJ, Warth LC, Callaghan JJ. Incidence of and preoperative risk factors for surgical delay in primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(11):2432–6.CrossRef Phruetthiphat OA, Gao Y, Anthony CA, Pugely AJ, Warth LC, Callaghan JJ. Incidence of and preoperative risk factors for surgical delay in primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(11):2432–6.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Barnett SR. Preoperative assessment of older adults. Anesthesiol Clin. 2019;37:423–36.CrossRef Barnett SR. Preoperative assessment of older adults. Anesthesiol Clin. 2019;37:423–36.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Coffman J, Tran T, Quast T, Berlowitz MS, Chae SH. Cost conscious care: preoperative evaluation by a cardiologist prior to low-risk procedures. BMJ Open Qual. 2019;8(2):e000481.CrossRef Coffman J, Tran T, Quast T, Berlowitz MS, Chae SH. Cost conscious care: preoperative evaluation by a cardiologist prior to low-risk procedures. BMJ Open Qual. 2019;8(2):e000481.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Bock M, Fritsch G, Hepner DL. Preoperative laboratory testing. Anesthesiol Clin. 2016;34:43–58.CrossRef Bock M, Fritsch G, Hepner DL. Preoperative laboratory testing. Anesthesiol Clin. 2016;34:43–58.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Manji F, McCarty K, Kurzweil V, Mark E, Rathmell JP, Agarwala AV. Measuring and improving the quality of preprocedural assessments. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(6):1846–54.CrossRef Manji F, McCarty K, Kurzweil V, Mark E, Rathmell JP, Agarwala AV. Measuring and improving the quality of preprocedural assessments. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(6):1846–54.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Weile J, Brix J, Moellekaer AB. Is point-of-care ultrasound disruptive innovation? Formulating why POCUS is different from conventional comprehensive ultrasound. Crit Ultrasound J. 2018;10:25.CrossRef Weile J, Brix J, Moellekaer AB. Is point-of-care ultrasound disruptive innovation? Formulating why POCUS is different from conventional comprehensive ultrasound. Crit Ultrasound J. 2018;10:25.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Klein AA, Snell A, Nashef SA, Hall RM, Kneeshaw JD, Arrowsmith JE. The impact of intra-operative transoesophageal echocardiography on cardiac surgical practice. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:947–52.CrossRef Klein AA, Snell A, Nashef SA, Hall RM, Kneeshaw JD, Arrowsmith JE. The impact of intra-operative transoesophageal echocardiography on cardiac surgical practice. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:947–52.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Canty DJ, Royse CF, Kilpatrick D, Bowman L, Royse AG. The impact of focused transthoracic echocardiography in the pre-operative clinic. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:618–25.CrossRef Canty DJ, Royse CF, Kilpatrick D, Bowman L, Royse AG. The impact of focused transthoracic echocardiography in the pre-operative clinic. Anaesthesia. 2012;67:618–25.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Haji DL, Royse A, Royse CF. Non-cardiologist-performed transthoracic echocardiography. Emerg Med Australas. 2013;25:4–12.CrossRef Haji DL, Royse A, Royse CF. Non-cardiologist-performed transthoracic echocardiography. Emerg Med Australas. 2013;25:4–12.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Cowie B, Kluger R. Evaluation of systolic murmurs using transthoracic echocardiography by anaesthetic trainees. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:785–90.CrossRef Cowie B, Kluger R. Evaluation of systolic murmurs using transthoracic echocardiography by anaesthetic trainees. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:785–90.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Tanzola RC, Walsh S, Hopman WM, Sydor D, Arellano R, Allard RV. Brief report: focused transthoracic echocardiography training in a cohort of Canadian anesthesiology residents: a pilot study. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:32–7.CrossRef Tanzola RC, Walsh S, Hopman WM, Sydor D, Arellano R, Allard RV. Brief report: focused transthoracic echocardiography training in a cohort of Canadian anesthesiology residents: a pilot study. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:32–7.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Royse CF, Haji DL, Faris JG, et al. Evaluation of the interpretative skills of participants of a limited transthoracic echocardiography training course (H.a.R.T. scan course). Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40:498–504.CrossRef Royse CF, Haji DL, Faris JG, et al. Evaluation of the interpretative skills of participants of a limited transthoracic echocardiography training course (H.a.R.T. scan course). Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40:498–504.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Adler AC, Greeley WJ, Conlin F, Feldman JM. Perioperative anesthesiology UltraSonographic evaluation (PAUSE): a guided approach to perioperative bedside ultrasound. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30(2):521–9.CrossRef Adler AC, Greeley WJ, Conlin F, Feldman JM. Perioperative anesthesiology UltraSonographic evaluation (PAUSE): a guided approach to perioperative bedside ultrasound. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016;30(2):521–9.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Pronovost PJ, Marsteller JA. A physician management infrastructure. J Am Med Assoc. 2011;305(5):500–1.CrossRef Pronovost PJ, Marsteller JA. A physician management infrastructure. J Am Med Assoc. 2011;305(5):500–1.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preoperative Assessment for Inpatients
Authors
Joseph McComb
Chad Talarek
Ksenia Guvakova
Gordon Morewood
Publication date
01-03-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Anesthesiology Reports / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 2167-6275
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40140-020-00371-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

Current Anesthesiology Reports 1/2020 Go to the issue

Preoperative Evaluation (BJ Sweitzer, Section Editor)

Preoperative Airway Evaluation

Preoperative Evaluation (BJ Sweitzer, Section Editor)

Preprocedural Assessment for Patients Anticipating Sedation

Preoperative Evaluation (BJ Sweitzer, Section Editor)

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery