Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Premature Rupture of Membranes | Research article

Maternal age at first cesarean delivery related to adverse pregnancy outcomes in a second cesarean delivery: a multicenter, historical, cross-sectional cohort study

Authors: Shilei Bi, Lizi Zhang, Jingsi Chen, Minshan Huang, Lijun Huang, Shanshan Zeng, Yulian Li, Yingyu Liang, Jinping Jia, Suiwen Wen, Yinli Cao, Shaoshuai Wang, Xiaoyan Xu, Ling Feng, Xianlan Zhao, Yangyu Zhao, Qiying Zhu, Hongbo Qi, Lanzhen Zhang, Hongtian Li, Zhijian Wang, Lili Du, Dunjin Chen

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To determine the effects of maternal age at first cesarean on maternal complications and adverse outcomes of pregnancy with the second cesarean.

Methods

This was a multicenter, historical, cross-sectional cohort study involving singleton pregnancies ≥28 gestational weeks, with a history of 1 cesarean delivery, and who underwent a second cesarean between January and December 2017 at 11 public tertiary hospitals in 7 provinces of China. We analyzed the effects of maternal age at first cesarean on adverse outcomes of pregnancy in the second cesarean using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

The study consisted of 10,206 singleton pregnancies. Women were at first cesarean between 18 and 24, 25–29, 30–34, and ≥ 35 years of age; and numbered 2711, 5524, 1751, and 220 cases, respectively. Maternal age between 18 and 24 years at first cesarean increased the risk of placenta accreta spectrum (aOR, 1.499; 95% CI, 1.12–2.01), placenta previa (aOR, 1.349; 95% CI, 1.07–1.70), intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (aOR, 1.947; 95% CI, 1.24–3.07), postpartum hemorrhage (aOR, 1.505; 95% CI, 1.05–2.16), and blood transfusion (aOR, 1.517; 95% CI, 1.21–1.91) in the second cesarean compared with the reference group (aged 25–29 years). In addition, maternal age ≥ 35 years at first cesarean was a risk factor for premature rupture of membranes (aOR, 1.556; 95% CI, 1.08–2.24), placental abruption (aOR, 6.464, 95% CI, 1.33–31.51), uterine rupture (aOR, 7.952; 95% CI, 1.43–44.10), puerperal infection (aOR, 6.864; 95% CI, 1.95–24.22), neonatal mild asphyxia (aOR, 4.339; 95% CI, 1.53–12.32), severe asphyxia (aOR, 18.439; 95% CI, 1.54–220.95), and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (aOR, 2.825; 95% CI, 1.54–5.17) compared with the reference group (aged 25–29 years).

Conclusions

Maternal age between 18 and 24 years or advanced maternal age at first cesarean was an independent risk factor for adverse maternal outcomes with the second cesarean. Advanced maternal age at the first cesarean specifically increased adverse neonatal outcomes with the second. Therefore, decisions as to whether to perform a first cesarean at a young or advanced maternal age must be critically evaluated.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brown W, Ahmed S, Roche N, Sonneveldt E, Darmstadt GL. Impact of family planning programs in reducing high-risk births due to younger and older maternal age, short birth intervals, and high parity. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39(5):338–44.CrossRef Brown W, Ahmed S, Roche N, Sonneveldt E, Darmstadt GL. Impact of family planning programs in reducing high-risk births due to younger and older maternal age, short birth intervals, and high parity. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39(5):338–44.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Olshansky SJ. Articulating the case for the longevity dividend. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016;6(2):a025940.CrossRef Olshansky SJ. Articulating the case for the longevity dividend. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2016;6(2):a025940.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Perkins BA, Caskey CT, Brar P, Dec E, Karow DS, Kahn AM, et al. Precision medicine screening using whole-genome sequencing and advanced imaging to identify disease risk in adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(14):3686–91.CrossRef Perkins BA, Caskey CT, Brar P, Dec E, Karow DS, Kahn AM, et al. Precision medicine screening using whole-genome sequencing and advanced imaging to identify disease risk in adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(14):3686–91.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, Intarut N, et al. Advanced maternal age and pregnancy outcomes: a multicountry assessment. BJOG. 2014;121(1):49–56.CrossRef Laopaiboon M, Lumbiganon P, Intarut N, et al. Advanced maternal age and pregnancy outcomes: a multicountry assessment. BJOG. 2014;121(1):49–56.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sauer MV. Reproduction at an advanced maternal age and maternal health. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(5):1136–43.CrossRef Sauer MV. Reproduction at an advanced maternal age and maternal health. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(5):1136–43.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Benli AR, Cetin Benli N, Usta AT, Atakul T, Koroglu M. Effect of maternal age on pregnancy outcome and cesarean delivery rate. J Clin Med Res. 2015;7(2):97–102.CrossRef Benli AR, Cetin Benli N, Usta AT, Atakul T, Koroglu M. Effect of maternal age on pregnancy outcome and cesarean delivery rate. J Clin Med Res. 2015;7(2):97–102.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pinheiro RL, Areia AL, Mota Pinto A, Donato H. Advanced maternal age: adverse outcomes of pregnancy, a meta-analysis. Acta Med Port. 2019;32(3):219–26.CrossRef Pinheiro RL, Areia AL, Mota Pinto A, Donato H. Advanced maternal age: adverse outcomes of pregnancy, a meta-analysis. Acta Med Port. 2019;32(3):219–26.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Klemetti R, Gissler MA-O, Sainio S, Hemminki E. At what age does the risk for adverse maternal and infant outcomes increase? Nationwide register-based study on first births in Finland in 2005-2014. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(12):1368–75.CrossRef Klemetti R, Gissler MA-O, Sainio S, Hemminki E. At what age does the risk for adverse maternal and infant outcomes increase? Nationwide register-based study on first births in Finland in 2005-2014. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95(12):1368–75.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cohen W. Does maternal age affect pregnancy outcome? BJOG. 2014;121(3):252–4.CrossRef Cohen W. Does maternal age affect pregnancy outcome? BJOG. 2014;121(3):252–4.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Guedes M, Canavarro MC. Characteristics of primiparous women of advanced age and their partners: a homogenous or heterogenous group? Birth. 2014 Mar;41(1):46–55.CrossRef Guedes M, Canavarro MC. Characteristics of primiparous women of advanced age and their partners: a homogenous or heterogenous group? Birth. 2014 Mar;41(1):46–55.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Imterat M, Wainstock T, Sheiner E, Kapelushnik J, Fischer L, Walfisch A. Advanced maternal age during pregnancy and the risk for malignant morbidity in the childhood. Eur J Pediatr. 2018;177(6):879–86.CrossRef Imterat M, Wainstock T, Sheiner E, Kapelushnik J, Fischer L, Walfisch A. Advanced maternal age during pregnancy and the risk for malignant morbidity in the childhood. Eur J Pediatr. 2018;177(6):879–86.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Li HT, Luo S, Trasande L, Hellerstein S, Kang C, Li JX, et al. Geographic variations and temporal trends in cesarean delivery rates in China, 2008-2014. JAMA. 2017;317(1):69–76.CrossRef Li HT, Luo S, Trasande L, Hellerstein S, Kang C, Li JX, et al. Geographic variations and temporal trends in cesarean delivery rates in China, 2008-2014. JAMA. 2017;317(1):69–76.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436–7. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2(8452):436–7.
14.
go back to reference Bayrampour H, Heaman M. Advanced maternal age and the risk of cesarean birth: a systematic review. Birth. 2010;37(3):219–26.CrossRef Bayrampour H, Heaman M. Advanced maternal age and the risk of cesarean birth: a systematic review. Birth. 2010;37(3):219–26.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Candice PY, Wang WCT, Kanagalingam D, Tan HK. Why we do Caesars a comparison of the trends in caesarean section delivery. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2013;42(8):408–12. Candice PY, Wang WCT, Kanagalingam D, Tan HK. Why we do Caesars a comparison of the trends in caesarean section delivery. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2013;42(8):408–12.
16.
go back to reference Zeng Y, Hesketh T. The effects of China's universal two-child policy. Lancet. 2016;388(10054):1930–8.CrossRef Zeng Y, Hesketh T. The effects of China's universal two-child policy. Lancet. 2016;388(10054):1930–8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Goisis A, Remes H, Barclay K, Martikainen P, Myrskylä M. Advanced maternal age and the risk of low birth weight and preterm delivery: a within-family analysis using Finnish population registers. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186(11):1219–26.CrossRef Goisis A, Remes H, Barclay K, Martikainen P, Myrskylä M. Advanced maternal age and the risk of low birth weight and preterm delivery: a within-family analysis using Finnish population registers. Am J Epidemiol. 2017;186(11):1219–26.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kenny LC, Lavender T, McNamee R, O'Neill SM, Mills T, Khashan AS. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: evidence from a large contemporary cohort. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56583.CrossRef Kenny LC, Lavender T, McNamee R, O'Neill SM, Mills T, Khashan AS. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: evidence from a large contemporary cohort. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56583.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ihongbe TO, Wallenborn JT, Rozario S, Masho SW. Short interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes in women of advanced age: a population-based study. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28(9):605–11.CrossRef Ihongbe TO, Wallenborn JT, Rozario S, Masho SW. Short interpregnancy interval and adverse birth outcomes in women of advanced age: a population-based study. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28(9):605–11.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes of late- and postterm pregnancies in advanced maternal age: a national cohort study. 2020; 99(8):1022–30. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes of late- and postterm pregnancies in advanced maternal age: a national cohort study. 2020; 99(8):1022–30.
21.
go back to reference Kornides ML, Kitsantas P, Lindley LL, Wu H. Factors associated with young adults' pregnancy likelihood. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(2):158–68.CrossRef Kornides ML, Kitsantas P, Lindley LL, Wu H. Factors associated with young adults' pregnancy likelihood. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2015;60(2):158–68.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Norton M, Chandra-Mouli V, Lane C. Interventions for preventing unintended, rapid repeat pregnancy among adolescents: a review of the evidence and lessons from high-quality evaluations. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017;5(4):547–70.CrossRef Norton M, Chandra-Mouli V, Lane C. Interventions for preventing unintended, rapid repeat pregnancy among adolescents: a review of the evidence and lessons from high-quality evaluations. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017;5(4):547–70.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Jauniaux E, Chantraine F, Siilver RM. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: epidemiology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140(3):265–73.CrossRef Jauniaux E, Chantraine F, Siilver RM. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: epidemiology. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140(3):265–73.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sentilhes L, Kayem G, Chandraharan E, et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: conservative management. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140(3):291–8.CrossRef Sentilhes L, Kayem G, Chandraharan E, et al. FIGO consensus guidelines on placenta accreta spectrum disorders: conservative management. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;140(3):291–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bicocca MJ, Sperling JD, Chauhan SP. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: review of six national and regional guidelines. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;231:180–7.CrossRef Bicocca MJ, Sperling JD, Chauhan SP. Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: review of six national and regional guidelines. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018;231:180–7.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Oppong SA, Torto M, Beyuo T. Risk factors and pregnancy outcome in women aged over 40 years at Korle-Bu teaching Hospital in Accra, Ghana. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;149(1):56–60.CrossRef Oppong SA, Torto M, Beyuo T. Risk factors and pregnancy outcome in women aged over 40 years at Korle-Bu teaching Hospital in Accra, Ghana. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020;149(1):56–60.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Joseph KS, Allen ACF, Dodds L, et al. The perinatal effects of delayed childbearing. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(6):1410–8.CrossRef Joseph KS, Allen ACF, Dodds L, et al. The perinatal effects of delayed childbearing. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(6):1410–8.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Aliyu MH, Salihu HMF, Wilson RE, et al. The risk of intrapartum stillbirth among smokers of advanced maternal age. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(1):39–45.CrossRef Aliyu MH, Salihu HMF, Wilson RE, et al. The risk of intrapartum stillbirth among smokers of advanced maternal age. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(1):39–45.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Waldenstrom U, Cnattingius S, Vixner L, Norman M. Advanced maternal age increases the risk of very preterm birth, irrespective of parity: a population-based register study. BJOG. 2017;124(8):1235–44.CrossRef Waldenstrom U, Cnattingius S, Vixner L, Norman M. Advanced maternal age increases the risk of very preterm birth, irrespective of parity: a population-based register study. BJOG. 2017;124(8):1235–44.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Flenady V, Koopmans LF, Middleton P, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1331–40.CrossRef Flenady V, Koopmans LF, Middleton P, et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1331–40.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Lipschuetz M, Guedalia J, Rottenstreich A, Novoselsky Persky M, Cohen SM, Kabiri D, et al. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveries using machine learning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(6):613.e1–613.e12. Lipschuetz M, Guedalia J, Rottenstreich A, Novoselsky Persky M, Cohen SM, Kabiri D, et al. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveries using machine learning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(6):613.e1–613.e12.
32.
go back to reference Haumonte JB, Raylet M, Christophe M, Mauviel F, Bertrand A, Desbriere R, et al. French validation and adaptation of the Grobman nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(3):127–31.CrossRef Haumonte JB, Raylet M, Christophe M, Mauviel F, Bertrand A, Desbriere R, et al. French validation and adaptation of the Grobman nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(3):127–31.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Maternal age at first cesarean delivery related to adverse pregnancy outcomes in a second cesarean delivery: a multicenter, historical, cross-sectional cohort study
Authors
Shilei Bi
Lizi Zhang
Jingsi Chen
Minshan Huang
Lijun Huang
Shanshan Zeng
Yulian Li
Yingyu Liang
Jinping Jia
Suiwen Wen
Yinli Cao
Shaoshuai Wang
Xiaoyan Xu
Ling Feng
Xianlan Zhao
Yangyu Zhao
Qiying Zhu
Hongbo Qi
Lanzhen Zhang
Hongtian Li
Zhijian Wang
Lili Du
Dunjin Chen
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03608-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2021 Go to the issue