Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 12/2014

01-12-2014

Preliminary Report of Major Surgery in Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving m-TOR Inhibitors without Therapeutic Discontinuation

Authors: Lilian Schwarz, François Cauchy, Filomena Conti, Ailton Sepulveda, Fabiano Perdigao, Denis Bernard, Yvon Calmus, Olivier Soubrane, Olivier Scatton

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Mammalian target rapamycin inhibitors (m-TORi) are increasingly used in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT). Yet, there is rising concern that they also could impair wound healing and favor the development of several surgical complications. This report was designed to evaluate both feasibility and safety of major surgery in liver transplant recipients receiving m-TORi–based immunosuppression without therapeutic discontinuation.

Methods

From 2007 to 2012, six liver transplant recipients underwent nine major abdominal or thoracic surgical procedures without m-TORi discontinuation or specific dosage adjustment. Their characteristics and postoperative outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Indications for m-TORi were de novo or recurrent malignant disease in five patients and calcineurin inhibitors related neurologic toxicity in one patient. Abdominal procedures, thoracic procedures, and combined thoracic and abdominal procedures were performed in six, two, and one cases respectively. Emergency surgery was performed in one case and elective procedures were performed in eight cases, including five for malignant disease and three for late surgical complications following LT. No patient died postoperatively. One major complication was observed, but no patient required reoperation. No evisceration, incisional surgical site infection, or lymphocele occurred.

Conclusions

Major surgery in liver transplant recipients receiving m-TOR inhibitors appears both feasible and safe without therapeutic discontinuation or specific dosage adjustment.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ekberg H, Tedesco-Silva H, Demirbas A et al (2007) Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 357:2562–2575PubMedCrossRef Ekberg H, Tedesco-Silva H, Demirbas A et al (2007) Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 357:2562–2575PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Naesens M, Kuypers DR, Sarwal M (2009) Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:481–508PubMed Naesens M, Kuypers DR, Sarwal M (2009) Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:481–508PubMed
4.
go back to reference Chandok N, Watt KD (2012) Burden of de novo malignancy in the liver transplant recipient. Liver Transpl 18:277–1289CrossRef Chandok N, Watt KD (2012) Burden of de novo malignancy in the liver transplant recipient. Liver Transpl 18:277–1289CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fung J, Kelly D, Kadry Z et al (2005) Immunosuppression in liver transplantation: beyond calcineurin inhibitors. Liver Transpl 11:267–280PubMedCrossRef Fung J, Kelly D, Kadry Z et al (2005) Immunosuppression in liver transplantation: beyond calcineurin inhibitors. Liver Transpl 11:267–280PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kawahara T, Asthana S, Kneteman NM (2011) m-TOR inhibitors: What role in liver transplantation? J Hepatol 55:1441–1451PubMedCrossRef Kawahara T, Asthana S, Kneteman NM (2011) m-TOR inhibitors: What role in liver transplantation? J Hepatol 55:1441–1451PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sanchez Antolin G, Garcia Pajares F, Lorenzo Pelayo S et al (2011) Indications and effectiveness of the mammalian target of rapamycin in liver transplantation. Transpl Proc 43:714–717CrossRef Sanchez Antolin G, Garcia Pajares F, Lorenzo Pelayo S et al (2011) Indications and effectiveness of the mammalian target of rapamycin in liver transplantation. Transpl Proc 43:714–717CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wagner D, Kniepeiss D, Schaffellner S et al (2010) Sirolimus has a potential to influent viral recurrence in HCV positive liver transplant candidates. Int Immunopharmacol 10:990–993PubMedCrossRef Wagner D, Kniepeiss D, Schaffellner S et al (2010) Sirolimus has a potential to influent viral recurrence in HCV positive liver transplant candidates. Int Immunopharmacol 10:990–993PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Nashan B, Citterio F (2012) Wound healing complications and the use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in kidney transplantation: a critical review of the literature. Transplantation 94:547–561PubMedCrossRef Nashan B, Citterio F (2012) Wound healing complications and the use of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in kidney transplantation: a critical review of the literature. Transplantation 94:547–561PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Pengel LH, Liu LQ, Morris PJ (2011) Do wound complications or lymphoceles occur more often in solid organ transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Transpl Int 24:1216–1230PubMedCrossRef Pengel LH, Liu LQ, Morris PJ (2011) Do wound complications or lymphoceles occur more often in solid organ transplant recipients on mTOR inhibitors? A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Transpl Int 24:1216–1230PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Humar R, Kiefer FN, Berns H et al (2002) Hypoxia enhances vascular cell proliferation and angiogenesis in vitro via rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent signaling. FASEB J 16:771–780PubMedCrossRef Humar R, Kiefer FN, Berns H et al (2002) Hypoxia enhances vascular cell proliferation and angiogenesis in vitro via rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent signaling. FASEB J 16:771–780PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Willems MC, Hendriks T, De Man BM et al (2011) Everolimus-induced loss of wound strength can be prevented by a short postoperative delay in its administration. Wound Repair Regen 19:680–686PubMedCrossRef Willems MC, Hendriks T, De Man BM et al (2011) Everolimus-induced loss of wound strength can be prevented by a short postoperative delay in its administration. Wound Repair Regen 19:680–686PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Van Der Vliet JA, Willems MC, De Man BM et al (2006) Everolimus interferes with healing of experimental intestinal anastomoses. Transplantation 82:1477–1483PubMedCrossRef Van Der Vliet JA, Willems MC, De Man BM et al (2006) Everolimus interferes with healing of experimental intestinal anastomoses. Transplantation 82:1477–1483PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kuppahally S, Al-Khaldi A, Weisshaar D et al (2006) Wound healing complications with de novo sirolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil-based regimen in cardiac transplant recipients. Am J Transpl 6:986–992CrossRef Kuppahally S, Al-Khaldi A, Weisshaar D et al (2006) Wound healing complications with de novo sirolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil-based regimen in cardiac transplant recipients. Am J Transpl 6:986–992CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dean PG, Lund WJ, Larson TS et al (2004) Wound-healing complications after kidney transplantation: a prospective, randomized comparison of sirolimus and tacrolimus. Transplantation 77:1555–1561PubMedCrossRef Dean PG, Lund WJ, Larson TS et al (2004) Wound-healing complications after kidney transplantation: a prospective, randomized comparison of sirolimus and tacrolimus. Transplantation 77:1555–1561PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tondolo V, Citterio F, Massa A et al (2006) Lymphocele after renal transplantation: the influence of the immunosuppressive therapy. Transpl Proc 38:1051–1052CrossRef Tondolo V, Citterio F, Massa A et al (2006) Lymphocele after renal transplantation: the influence of the immunosuppressive therapy. Transpl Proc 38:1051–1052CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kahn D, Spearman CW, Mall A et al (2005) Effect of rapamycin on the healing of the bile duct. Transplant Proc 37:832–833PubMedCrossRef Kahn D, Spearman CW, Mall A et al (2005) Effect of rapamycin on the healing of the bile duct. Transplant Proc 37:832–833PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Deoliveira ML, Jassem W, Valente R et al (2011) Biliary complications after liver transplantation using grafts from donors after cardiac death: results from a matched control study in a single large volume center. Ann Surg 254:716–722; discussion 722–713 Deoliveira ML, Jassem W, Valente R et al (2011) Biliary complications after liver transplantation using grafts from donors after cardiac death: results from a matched control study in a single large volume center. Ann Surg 254:716–722; discussion 722–713
22.
go back to reference Blachar A, Federle MP (2001) Bowel obstruction following liver transplantation: clinical and ct findings in 48 cases with emphasis on internal hernia. Radiology 218:384–388PubMedCrossRef Blachar A, Federle MP (2001) Bowel obstruction following liver transplantation: clinical and ct findings in 48 cases with emphasis on internal hernia. Radiology 218:384–388PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Vardanian AJ, Farmer DG, Ghobrial RM et al (2006) Incisional hernia after liver transplantation. J Am Coll Surg 203:421–425PubMedCrossRef Vardanian AJ, Farmer DG, Ghobrial RM et al (2006) Incisional hernia after liver transplantation. J Am Coll Surg 203:421–425PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM, Miceli R et al (2009) Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol 10:35–43PubMedCrossRef Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM, Miceli R et al (2009) Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol 10:35–43PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hall EC, Pfeiffer RM, Segev DL et al (2013) Cumulative incidence of cancer after solid organ transplantation. Cancer 119:2300–2308PubMedCrossRef Hall EC, Pfeiffer RM, Segev DL et al (2013) Cumulative incidence of cancer after solid organ transplantation. Cancer 119:2300–2308PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Elfadawy N, Flechner SM, Liu X et al (2013) The impact of surveillance and rapid reduction in immunosuppression to control BK virus-related graft injury in kidney transplantation. Transpl Int 26:822–832PubMedCrossRef Elfadawy N, Flechner SM, Liu X et al (2013) The impact of surveillance and rapid reduction in immunosuppression to control BK virus-related graft injury in kidney transplantation. Transpl Int 26:822–832PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ciancio G, Burke GW, Gaynor JJ et al (2004) A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year. Transplantation 77:244–251PubMedCrossRef Ciancio G, Burke GW, Gaynor JJ et al (2004) A randomized long-term trial of tacrolimus and sirolimus versus tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine (NEORAL) and sirolimus in renal transplantation. I. Drug interactions and rejection at one year. Transplantation 77:244–251PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kandaswamy R, Melancon JK, Dunn T et al (2005) A prospective randomized trial of steroid-free maintenance regimens in kidney transplant recipients—an interim analysis. Am J Transpl 5:1529–1536CrossRef Kandaswamy R, Melancon JK, Dunn T et al (2005) A prospective randomized trial of steroid-free maintenance regimens in kidney transplant recipients—an interim analysis. Am J Transpl 5:1529–1536CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Buchler M, Caillard S, Barbier S et al (2007) Sirolimus versus cyclosporine in kidney recipients receiving thymoglobulin, mycophenolate mofetil and a 6-month course of steroids. Am J Transpl 7:2522–2531CrossRef Buchler M, Caillard S, Barbier S et al (2007) Sirolimus versus cyclosporine in kidney recipients receiving thymoglobulin, mycophenolate mofetil and a 6-month course of steroids. Am J Transpl 7:2522–2531CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kirchner GI, Meier-Wiedenbach I, Manns MP (2004) Clinical pharmacokinetics of everolimus. Clin Pharmacokinet 43:83–95PubMedCrossRef Kirchner GI, Meier-Wiedenbach I, Manns MP (2004) Clinical pharmacokinetics of everolimus. Clin Pharmacokinet 43:83–95PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Valente JF, Hricik D, Weigel K et al (2003) Comparison of sirolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil on surgical complications and wound healing in adult kidney transplantation. Am J Transpl 3:1128–1134CrossRef Valente JF, Hricik D, Weigel K et al (2003) Comparison of sirolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil on surgical complications and wound healing in adult kidney transplantation. Am J Transpl 3:1128–1134CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Fikatas P, Schoening W, Lee JE et al (2013) Incidence, risk factors and management of incisional hernia in a high volume liver transplant center. Ann Transpl 18:223–230CrossRef Fikatas P, Schoening W, Lee JE et al (2013) Incidence, risk factors and management of incisional hernia in a high volume liver transplant center. Ann Transpl 18:223–230CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Dunkelberg JC, Trotter JF, Wachs M et al (2003) Sirolimus as primary immunosuppression in liver transplantation is not associated with hepatic artery or wound complications. Liver Transpl 9:463–468PubMedCrossRef Dunkelberg JC, Trotter JF, Wachs M et al (2003) Sirolimus as primary immunosuppression in liver transplantation is not associated with hepatic artery or wound complications. Liver Transpl 9:463–468PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preliminary Report of Major Surgery in Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving m-TOR Inhibitors without Therapeutic Discontinuation
Authors
Lilian Schwarz
François Cauchy
Filomena Conti
Ailton Sepulveda
Fabiano Perdigao
Denis Bernard
Yvon Calmus
Olivier Soubrane
Olivier Scatton
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2693-x

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

World Journal of Surgery 12/2014 Go to the issue