Skip to main content
Top

02-05-2024 | Preimplantation Genetic Diagnostics | Commentary

Stringent criteria needed for germline genome editing of human IVF embryos

Authors: Alexis Heng Boon Chin, Jean-Didier Bosenge Nguma, Mohd Faizal Ahmad

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Login to get access

Abstract

Germline genome editing of IVF embryos is controversial because it is not directly health or lifesaving but is intended to prevent genetic diseases in yet-unborn future offspring. The following criteria are thus proposed for future clinical trials: (i) Due to medical risks, there should be cautious and judicious application while avoiding any non-essential usage, with rigorous patient counseling. (ii) Genome editing should only be performed on the entire batch of IVF embryos without initial PGT screening if all of them are expected to be affected by genetic disease. (iii) When there is a fair chance that some IVF embryos will not be affected by genetic diseases, initial PGT screening must be performed to identify unaffected embryos for transfer. (iv) IVF embryos with carrier status should not undergo germline genome editing. (v) If patients fail to conceive after the transfer of unaffected embryos, they should undergo another fresh IVF cycle rather than opt for genome editing of their remaining affected embryos. (vi) Only if the patient is unable to produce any more unaffected embryos in a fresh IVF cycle due to advanced maternal age or diminished ovarian reserves, can the genome editing of remaining affected embryos be permitted as a last resort.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Zischewski J, Fischer R, Bortesi L. Detection of on-target and off-target mutations generated by CRISPR/Cas9 and other sequence-specific nucleases. Biotechnol Adv. 2017;35(1):95–104.CrossRefPubMed Zischewski J, Fischer R, Bortesi L. Detection of on-target and off-target mutations generated by CRISPR/Cas9 and other sequence-specific nucleases. Biotechnol Adv. 2017;35(1):95–104.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mehravar M, Shirazi A, Nazari M, Banan M. Mosaicism in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing. Dev Biol. 2019;445(2):156–62.CrossRefPubMed Mehravar M, Shirazi A, Nazari M, Banan M. Mosaicism in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing. Dev Biol. 2019;445(2):156–62.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Geng K, Merino LG, Veiga RG, Sommerauer C, Epperlein J, Brinkman EK, Kutter C. Intrinsic deletion at 10q23.31, including the PTEN gene locus, is aggravated upon CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome engineering in HAP1 cells mimicking cancer profiles. Life Sci Alliance. 2023;7(2):e202302128.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Geng K, Merino LG, Veiga RG, Sommerauer C, Epperlein J, Brinkman EK, Kutter C. Intrinsic deletion at 10q23.31, including the PTEN gene locus, is aggravated upon CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome engineering in HAP1 cells mimicking cancer profiles. Life Sci Alliance. 2023;7(2):e202302128.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Papathanasiou S, Markoulaki S, Blaine LJ, Leibowitz ML, Zhang CZ, Jaenisch R, Pellman D. Whole chromosome loss and genomic instability in mouse embryos after CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):5855.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Papathanasiou S, Markoulaki S, Blaine LJ, Leibowitz ML, Zhang CZ, Jaenisch R, Pellman D. Whole chromosome loss and genomic instability in mouse embryos after CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):5855.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Tao J, Wang Q, Mendez-Dorantes C, Burns KH, Chiarle R. Frequency and mechanisms of LINE-1 retrotransposon insertions at CRISPR/Cas9 sites. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):3685.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tao J, Wang Q, Mendez-Dorantes C, Burns KH, Chiarle R. Frequency and mechanisms of LINE-1 retrotransposon insertions at CRISPR/Cas9 sites. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):3685.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Khan MAZ, Konje JC. Ethical and religious dilemmas of modern reproductive choices and the Islamic perspective. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;232:5–9.CrossRefPubMed Khan MAZ, Konje JC. Ethical and religious dilemmas of modern reproductive choices and the Islamic perspective. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;232:5–9.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Schires SM, Buchanan NT, Lee RM, McGue M, Iacono WG, Burt SA. Discrimination and ethnic-racial socialization among youth adopted from South Korea into White American families. Child Dev. 2020;91(1):e42–58.CrossRefPubMed Schires SM, Buchanan NT, Lee RM, McGue M, Iacono WG, Burt SA. Discrimination and ethnic-racial socialization among youth adopted from South Korea into White American families. Child Dev. 2020;91(1):e42–58.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Zhang X, Pinderhughes EE. Depth in cultural socialization in families with children adopted from China. Fam Process. 2019;58(1):114–28.CrossRefPubMed Zhang X, Pinderhughes EE. Depth in cultural socialization in families with children adopted from China. Fam Process. 2019;58(1):114–28.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Madero JI, Manotas MC, García-Acero M, López Cáceres A, López JC. Preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproduction. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2023;75(3):260–72.CrossRefPubMed Madero JI, Manotas MC, García-Acero M, López Cáceres A, López JC. Preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproduction. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2023;75(3):260–72.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mattar CNZ, Labude MK, Lee TN, Lai PS. Ethical considerations of preconception and prenatal gene modification in the embryo and fetus. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(12):3018–27.CrossRefPubMed Mattar CNZ, Labude MK, Lee TN, Lai PS. Ethical considerations of preconception and prenatal gene modification in the embryo and fetus. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(12):3018–27.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Pilkington B, Paleoudis EG. Don’t ask too much: non-maleficence as the guiding principle in IRB decision-making. Am J Bioeth. 2023;23(6):124–6.CrossRefPubMed Pilkington B, Paleoudis EG. Don’t ask too much: non-maleficence as the guiding principle in IRB decision-making. Am J Bioeth. 2023;23(6):124–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sood A, Gupta J. Patient counselling and consent. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;46:43–7.CrossRefPubMed Sood A, Gupta J. Patient counselling and consent. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;46:43–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Birney E. A society-wide conversation is needed about germline genome editing using CRISPR. Nat Med. 2024;30(1):30–2.CrossRefPubMed Birney E. A society-wide conversation is needed about germline genome editing using CRISPR. Nat Med. 2024;30(1):30–2.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Smith K. Time to start intervening in the human germline? A utilitarian perspective. Bioethics. 2020;34(1):90–104.CrossRefPubMed Smith K. Time to start intervening in the human germline? A utilitarian perspective. Bioethics. 2020;34(1):90–104.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Stringent criteria needed for germline genome editing of human IVF embryos
Authors
Alexis Heng Boon Chin
Jean-Didier Bosenge Nguma
Mohd Faizal Ahmad
Publication date
02-05-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-024-03125-6